'Why don't you like us?' American woman is flooded with brutal responses after posing 'sad' question to Australians

Australians have a general reputation for being friendly, laidback, affable and easy-going people.
But a recent Reddit thread shared by an American woman questioned why a country that prides itself on values like mateship appears to have an apparent 'dislike' of Americans and the United States.
Earlier this week, the woman wrote: 'I've seen lots of polling lately showing that Australians really don't like Americans very much.
'It makes me super sad as an American who has visited Australia multiple times (I am actually in WA right now) and is obsessed with your country.'
The research the original post referred to was a Pew Research Center report published on June 11 titled, 'Views of the United States'.
The paper identified the countries that viewed the US most and least favourably. Among the western nations, Australia came in at second behind Sweden in the list of countries that had the 'least positive assessment' of the US.
The Reddit user wrote that she was 'genuinely curious' to understand whether Australians' 'dislike' for Americans was as a result of recent 'politics' – or if it stemmed 'farther back'.
'What is it about Americans that really turns you guys off?' she asked.
'I have some guesses, like maybe we take ourselves too seriously or are way into work culture, or maybe we see ourselves as the centre of the universe too often?'
Within a matter of days, the post attracted over 1800 comments, many from Aussies offering detailed explanations and even bullet point lists of reasons.
The comment with the most up-votes surmised that the disdain many Australians felt stemmed from a misalignment of cultural 'values'.
'I don't think Australians dislike Americans in general. It's rather about some of the values America is currently exporting that turns people away,' one Aussie suggested.
They continued by citing specific examples, such as 'tipping culture, removing social safety nets, the gigantic trucks and the polarised politics'.
Replies to that post also singled out other issues Aussies perceived about American society, such as 'gun culture', 'rubbish healthcare system', and 'views about reproductive rights'.
Many Aussie commenters were at pains to specify that most Americans are 'lovely on an individual level'.
But the broader issue was around some of the values the US represents. One reply explained: '[A]s others have said it's not individuals but rather the collective values of the USA arose to be; greed, violence, dishonesty and selfishness.'
The American tourist's Reddit post has yielded over 1800 responses, which detailed a range of perceived cultural issues that complicate the perception Aussies have of the US
Another suggested reason was that 'American exceptionalism', evident in common sentiments like 'USA NUMBER 1!' goes 'directly against Aussies anti tall poppy ethos'.
Past Australian history with the US - particularly during wartime - was also raised as an explanation for the complexity of Australia's feelings towards the US.
But there were also multiple comments laying blame at the feet of the current state of American politics following the recent re-election of President Donald Trump.
It wasn't just Aussies chiming in, with one New Zealander confirming that the US was disliked by kiwis for similar reasons to those expressed in the comments.
Another person based in Europe added that locals viewed American tourists as 'loud', 'rude' and 'entitled'.
A separate comment said: 'Unfortunately there's an extremely prevalent stereotype of ignorance and arrogance [about American people], and you'll find this stereotype exists all around the world, not just amongst Australians. These kinds of folks are the minority of Americans of course, but unfortunately the loudest.'
The avalanche of comments served as wake-up call for the original poster, who said they 'appreciated' people sharing their honest thoughts.
'We can't fix our blind spots without being aware of them and some of the things said definitely apply to me, so thank you. Just trying to gain some perspective and humility,' she admitted.
To the woman's credit, they also replied to multiple comments throughout the thread, humbly agreeing with many reasons.
For instance, in reply to a comment about Australia's Vietnam War conscript involvement, she said that she 'had no idea'.
She also conceded that Australia's willingness to overhaul its gun laws in the immediate aftermath of the 1996 Port Arthur massacre demonstrated 'a deep moral divide between Australia and the US'.
She even agreed that American tipping culture had gotten 'out of hand'.
The American woman also noted that certain attitudes she thought were the norm are actually more specific to American culture.
As an example, she said 'a lot of Americans can't take a joke or any other kind of perceived insult' - admitting even she still tends to take herself 'too seriously'.
The original poster also touched on the 'American Exceptionalism' point and offered an explanation for it.
'My generation... was brought up with a very strong message of "USA #1", which is part of that American Exceptionalism you speak of. It pervades everything, even if it's not explicit, it's implicit.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Scottish Sun

3 hours ago

• Scottish Sun

Iranians BURN US & Israel flags and chant ‘we want to DIE for Ayatollah' as thousands join ‘death to the West' protests

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SEETHING Iranians burned US and Israeli flags and swore their allegiance to the regime in mass protests across the country. Thousands flooded the capital's streets after weekly prayers, chanting for the death of the west and pledging their lives to the Supreme Leader. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 9 Protesters gathered in Tehran's main square to express their fury with Israel Credit: Getty 9 US and Israeli flags are burned Credit: AP 9 Strong support for the Supreme Leader was evident among the crowds Credit: Getty Israel has urged the people of Iran to rise up against the regime, but there are still pockets of support for the Islamic government. But alongside their loyalty to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the crowds aimed vitriolic hate at Israel and the West. Photos show Israeli and US flag deliberately set on fire and trampled on. A sea of Iranian and Hezbollah flags and photos of Khamenei were paraded through the roads. Footage also shows demonstrators brandishing pictures of commanders killed over the past week by Israel's missiles. One banner read: "I will sacrifice my life for my leader." Iranian state TV said: "This is the Friday of the Iranian nation's solidarity and resistance across the country." The broadcaster said that protests also took place in other cities - particularly Tabriz in northwestern Iran and Shiraz in the south. And there are reports of smaller scale gatherings in towns around the country. While these crowds back the regime, there are plenty in Iran who want to see it toppled and the people finally freed from its tyranny. Moment Israel DOWNS Iranian drone over Syria Thousands have drained from Tehran and even left the country. Friday's protests were by far the largest since Israel and Iran began trading missiles. People took to the streets despite the ongoing threat of Israeli bombs. In Isfahan, home to one of the nuclear facilities Israel has hit, thousands joined in the funeral of an Iranian killed in an Israeli attack. Several men were seen carrying a coffin draped with Iranian flags and with a photo of a uniformed soldier. Behind them, men, women and children followed, chanting: 'Death to Israel, death to America." 9 Crowds took to the streets following Friday prayers Credit: Getty 9 People turned out despite the threat posed by Israel's ongoing bombardment of Iran Credit: AP 9 Protesters believe that the US and Israel want to exploit the conflict to gain power over the Middle East Credit: EPA Protester Abu Hussein, a 54-year-old taxi driver, told Arab News: 'It is an unjust war… Israel has no right. 'Israel is not in it for the (Iranian) nuclear (program). "What Israel and the Americans want is to dominate the Middle East." The protests came on a day that efforts to find a diplomatic solution got gathered momentum. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi travelled to Geneva to meet European foreign minsters - including those from the UK, Germany and France. Earlier in the day, he attended a special meeting of the UN's Human Rights Council. Meanwhile, the UN's Security Council met in New York upon Iran's request. 9 The protests broke out at cities around the country Credit: EPA 9 They were attended by men, women and children Credit: AP

Daily Mirror

4 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

Russia issues 'catastrophic' nuclear warning to US as Trump ponders Iran strikes

United States president Donald Trump has not yet ruled out whether to use American nuclear weapons to attack the underground Fordow enrichment site in Iran Russia has sent a stark warning to the USA as it considers whether to use tactical nuclear weapons in Iran. The Kremlin believes that even if the Americans were to use their weapons carefully the consequences would be "catastrophic". Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the Russian TASS news agency there "have been a lot of speculation". ‌ Asked about media reports that Donald Trump was still deciding about what to do, and had not yet ruled out whether to use nuclear weapons to attack the underground Fordow enrichment site in Iran, Mr Peskov said: "This would be a catastrophic development. But there are so many speculations that in fact, it's impossible to comment on them." ‌ The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Iran's capital Tehran. It remains the most heavily defended known enrichment site in Iran, buried some 80 to 90 metres underground. Israel is believed to lack the capability to destroy the site on its own and would need the help of American bombers. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordow was part of that plan. ‌ Russia has presented itself as a possible mediating force between US-backed Israel and Iran, although Donald Trump has publicly been reluctant to accept the offer. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene rejected US calls to surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them'. US officials said this week that Trump had rejected an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei, later adding that there were no plans to kill him 'at least not for now'.

The Guardian

4 hours ago

• The Guardian

Labor eyes ambitious tax reform but it must be ready for vicious backlash from vested interests

There was a hint of frustration in Anthony Albanese's voice when he spoke to the Canberra press gallery for the first time after Labor's thumping election victory on 3 May. In the prime minister's courtyard at Parliament House, he was asked if he planned to use his soaring political capital for major reforms of the tax or superannuation systems. Badly needed, and often talked about in the abstract, this kind of action had waited for a long time for the necessary political ambition. Albanese said he wouldn't get ahead of himself in the opening weeks of his second term in power. He insisted Labor had already been bold, delivering on its promises in the first three years. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Fast forward to Wednesday, while the PM was pressing the diplomatic flesh at the G7 summit in Canada, the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, showed the first signs of that reform ambition. In a speech to the National Press Club in Canberra, Chalmers signalled Labor was willing to consider changes to the tax system at the looming productivity summit in August, recognition that fixing longstanding problems was needed to right the budget's structural deficit. The speech was an implicit recognition that Labor's tax changes in the first term barely touched the edges of deeper structural problems in Australia's tax system. Chalmers, a student of economic reformer Paul Keating, said any progress on productivity or budget sustainability would be impossible without proper consideration of tax reform, a challenge he conceded would be 'hard and contested' with benefits that were not always immediate. Even someone with a passing interest in federal politics should know the scale of the problem is vast: some $1tn in government debt and soaring spending, held up by a system overly reliant on income tax from an ageing population – a problem that will only get worse due to the ageing population. For years Chalmers has been eager to point out the five main pressures on the budget are not going to get any easier without proper attention. Spending on health, aged care, the national disability insurance scheme, defence and interest from government debt will keep treasurers and finance ministers up at night for years to come. The government's revenue base is being eroded from declining fuel and tobacco excises, and in the long term will take a hit from lower tax receipts from fossil fuel extraction. The early stages of Labor's plans seem to include lower income taxes, but no changes to the 25-year-old GST. Chalmers is upfront, saying tax overall needs to rise. Whether it is indeed possible to meaningfully lower income taxes without broadening or raising the GST is unclear. Economists argue taxing consumption through mechanisms such as the GST is efficient, while taxing incomes isn't. Parliamentary Budget Office figures show the GST causes about 8 cents in economic loss for each dollar gained, compared with 24 cents for income tax or 40 cents for corporate tax. Two major pieces of work should be the starting point, acknowledging that any change which makes it into law will inevitably create some winners and some losers. Chalmers was working for then treasurer Wayne Swan when Ken Henry handed his landmark tax review to the Rudd government in late 2009. Both men marked up copies of the document over the course of the summer, leaving them to 'disgorge' sand from the beach by the time they made it back to Canberra. Many of the review's 138 recommendations never saw the light of day. Today, the former Treasury secretary says, the system is in even worse shape. Henry has called for wholesale reform, including increasing the GST to pay for company and personal income tax cuts, as well as comprehensive road user charging, replacing stamp duties, increasing taxes on super profits from the mining sector, an economy-wide price on carbon and changes to fringe benefits and superannuation taxes. Henry's review is best remembered for recommending the mining tax, an idea which prompted a furious campaign of resistance against the government. Chalmers has acknowledged the politics of the review were mishandled, that it was kept secret too long before ultimately crashing into Labor's leadership wars. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The second substantive report with proposals ready to go is the white paper released by teal independent Allegra Spender in the last term of parliament. In a different political reality, Spender would be part of the Liberal party's economic team, and her significant work comes with buy-in from Henry and other leading tax voices including Robert Breunig from the Australian National University's Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, and Robert Carling from the Centre for Independent Studies. Chalmers assigned a staffer to monitor the white paper process, at a time when Spender was one of the few MPs actually prepared to talk about meaningful tax reform. The Wentworth MP wants the coming reform push to look at business investment and corporate taxes, the under-performing petroleum resource rent tax, road user charging, indexation of income brackets, unhelpful state taxes and the GST. Spender has more guts than either of the major parties in one specific area as well. She has called for a review of Western Australia's insanely generous GST deal, which respected economist Saul Eslake calls the worst public policy decision of the 21st century. WA's state Labor government handed down a budget with a $2.5bn surplus this week, but taxpayers from every other state are paying $54bn to the state due to perceived unfairness in the grants commission process. This special treatment agreed by then treasurer Scott Morrison and locked in by Anthony Albanese to maintain Labor's political stocks in the West will see the nation's richest state receive an extra $21.1bn from federal taxpayers over the next four years alone. Family trusts, the legal tax structures used by millions of Australians to lower their tax liabilities, also look likely to come under increased scrutiny as part of the latest reform push. Chalmers and Albanese will convene their productivity summit in the cabinet room on 19 August. If they want their record to be considered alongside the Hawke-Keating and Howard-Costello governments, the political conditions could hardly be better. Labor must prepare itself for the predictable backlash from vested interests unwilling to countenance changes to cushy arrangements and handy loopholes. Only a serious government prepared to expend political capital will be able to make the system fairer and fit for a 21st century country facing major demographic and economic challenges. If Labor really has the ambition Anthony Albanese insists it does, meaningful tax reform might become the make-or-break test of the government's second term.