Top courts in ‘slow mode' with heads' tenures ending soon, say sources
Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Court of Appeal President Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and Justice Nallini Pathmanathan are waiting to hear if their tenures will be extended.
PETALING JAYA : The pace of administrative functions in the Federal Court and Court of Appeal appears to have slowed down as speculation intensifies about whether the tenures of the nation's two top judges will be extended, sources said.
Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat will go on mandatory retirement on July 1, while Court of Appeal President Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, leaves office a day earlier, as both reach the mandatory retirement age of 66.
Sources said that, except in respect of the hearing and disposal of cases, the uncertainty has hampered Tengku Maimun and Abang Iskandar in the performance of their duties.
As head of their respective courts, they are tasked with empanelling judges to hear appeals, leave and other applications, which are done in advance. They are also required to respond to correspondence.
'Now it appears to be done on an urgent need-to-do basis as it is anyone's guess whether the two judges will get the six-month extension,' one source added.
Former Malaysian Bar president Salim Bashir said even the Judicial Appointments Commission's monthly meetings could come to a grinding halt as the chief justice is its chairman, while the Court of Appeal president acts in her absence.
'Any vacuum and uncertainty surrounding the extensions of these two critical judicial positions will impede the commission from executing legally mandated duties,' he said.
On May 20, Tengku Maimun told the media the judiciary was still awaiting formal confirmation as to whether the her tenure as well as that of Abang Iskandar and senior Federal Court judge Nallini Pathmanathan would be extended.
Nallini will go on mandatory retirement on Aug 22.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had said the government is mulling extending their tenures after the National Human Rights Society of Malaysia (Hakam) expressed concern over the delay.
On Thursday, Malaysian Bar vice-president B Anand Raj said it was also troubled by the current state of affairs, claiming it was unusual for the chief justice, the Court of Appeal president and senior Federal Court judges not to be granted the extension.
Article 125 of the Federal Constitution states that superior court judges shall hold office until age 66, but their tenure can be extended for up to six months by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
Earlier this year, the king granted extensions to five judges of the apex court, including Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim and Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Abdul Rahman Sebli.
A retired apex court judge, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said there was no fixed time frame for when judges would be informed about whether their tenures would be extended, but said it usually takes place two months before their mandatory retirement date.
Lawyer Syed Iskandar Syed Jaafar said the overall workings of the constitutional scheme points to the prime minister who advises the king on appointments, promotions and extensions.
'Granting extensions does not come as part of the constitutional monarch's discretion like appointing the prime minister or withholding consent or request for the dissolution of Parliament,' he said.
Syed Iskandar expressed hope that the top judges would be given extensions or that the positions would be filled expeditiously.
'The position of the Chief Judge of Malaya was left vacant for nine months last year, with the Court of Appeal president performing the duties and functions of the role on an interim basis. There should not be a repeat for the top two positions,' he said.
Lawyer A Srimurugan said Tengku Maimun, the first woman to be appointed as chief justice, had toiled hard to put the Malaysian judiciary on a positive note, especially in delivering groundbreaking and progressive judgments over the last six years.
'The government must ensure the public perception of judicial integrity and competence of judges is not compromised,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Rafizi takes a swipe at education ministry, defends early resignation
Rafizi Ramli said he felt it was better to resign than be a 'lame duck' minister after his party election loss, as he had lost the support of the prime minister. PETALING JAYA : Former economy minister Rafizi Ramli has taken a swipe at the education ministry after coming under criticism for his early resignation from the Cabinet, saying he refused to become a 'lame duck' minister or a 'yes man' after being defeated as PKR deputy president. He said he had resigned because it was clear he had lost the prime minister's confidence, making it impossible to carry out reforms effectively. In the debut episode of his Yang Berhenti Menteri podcast, Rafizi defended his work as a minister, saying 'about 80% of what I planned was approved by the Cabinet. These are all done'. Referring to criticism of his resignation, he said: 'I get annoyed sometimes. The economy ministry gets all the questions. Go ask the education ministry — it's been two and a half years. Where's the major policy framework? Nothing. 'But they're busy talking about someone who resigned.' Rafizi said he had completed most of his key initiatives during his tenure, including the 13th Malaysia Plan, energy transition, labour market reforms, progressive wage policy, fiscal reforms, targeted subsidies, and digital government initiatives. Better to resign than be ineffective Rafizi, who lost to Nurul Izzah Anwar for the deputy PKR president's post last month, said it was better to resign than become a 'lame duck' minister. Rafizi said he stepped down not because he was throwing a fit, but because it was clear he had lost the prime minister's confidence, making it impossible to carry out reforms effectively. He said staying on would have meant either becoming a powerless figurehead or facing constant rejection of his policies. 'When Nurul Izzah contested against me, it was clear she had Anwar's blessing. That sends a signal to the civil service that I no longer have the prime minister's support,' he said. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is the PKR president and Nurul Izzah's father. 'If the prime minister no longer believes in your leadership, it's better to step down. If I had stayed on, I would have been a lame duck minister. If I tried to continue working effectively, I would have dragged the ministry down.' 'Unless I was willing to just clock in and out every day, but that's not who I am.' Rafizi said politics was about the responsible distribution of resources and values, and doing it efficiently and ethically. 'I get the most satisfaction from making real change, not from holding office without the ability to act.' Not a team player? Responding to criticism that he wasn't a team player during his time in the Cabinet, Rafizi pointed to his track record in Petronas and his work in leading thousands of volunteers to help PKR win over 40 seats in the 2018 general election He argued that being a team player doesn't mean saying 'yes' to everything. 'A good leader surrounds themselves with people who have the courage to disagree and who work based on competence and integrity — not just 'yes men'.' Rafizi also dismissed speculation that he plans to start a new political party, stating that it would only lead to instability within the country. However, he acknowledged that many long-time PKR supporters were disillusioned, adding that he plans to work closely with them. 'We don't need new drama. We need to focus on what matters,' he said.
Free Malaysia Today
8 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
6 judges honoured with rare elevation ceremony in Penang
The six judges with presiding senior Justice Rozana Ali Yusoff after the elevation ceremony at the High Court in George Town. GEORGE TOWN : Six High Court judges were honoured at a rare judicial elevation ceremony here today, reviving a long-standing tradition with roots dating back over two centuries. Today's ceremony presided over by senior judge Justice Rozana Ali Yusoff was the first to honour six judges at once. They were: Quay Chew Soon, Anand Ponnudurai, Azizan Arshad, Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James, Fathiyah Idris and Rofiah Mohamad. Penang Bar chair Gowri Subbaiyah said the elevation ceremony usually takes place only when judicial commissioners are confirmed as High Court judges, 'which usually takes two to three years'. However, some among the six judges had been confirmed over the past three years but had not been formally recognised. 'Since they are still serving here, we felt it was only right to include them,' she said. It is understood that the elevation ceremony was last held in 2017, when Justice Lim Chong Fong, now a judge at the Court of Appeal, was elevated to the High Court. After today's ceremony, Justice St James described his confirmation as both humbling and liberating. 'I'm beholden to no one now. Only to God, my oath, the Constitution, and the rule of law,' he said. Justice Quay said his time in Penang had been both challenging and rewarding. 'I've enjoyed the cases, especially the complex ones, as they test the mind. And I've enjoyed the food and the people even more,' he said, adding that Penang was 'the best station a judge could hope for'. Justice Fathiyah paid tribute to the senior lawyers who helped her grow when she was a sessions court judge in Ipoh. Justice Anand, best known for his work in employment law, said the variety of cases in Penang had pushed him to grow. 'I've had to learn Acts of Parliament I never knew existed. And it's been worth it,' he said. 'My guiding rule is simple. I must be honest with myself. If I sign a judgment, it's because I believe it's the right decision.' The elevation ceremony is believed to have its beginnings in 1808 when the colonial settlement received its charter of justice, which led to the founding of the first formal court. Elevation ceremonies used to include a procession where judges would walk in full regalia from St George's Church to the court building. Although public processions are no longer held, the 'ceremonial spirit lives on', according to lawyer T Tharumarajah, who said the ceremony is aimed at introducing new judges to the public. It also serves as a bridge between the bar and the bench. He said: 'Judges and lawyers are meant to engage (with one another), not keep apart. But after the scandals that rocked the judiciary in the early 2000s, that bond weakened. It shouldn't be that way.'
Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Abang Jo to ‘table something' at special Sarawak assembly sitting
Sarawak premier Abang Johari Openg is expected to table a bill at a special one-day sitting of the state assembly. PETALING JAYA : The Sarawak legislative assembly will convene on July 7 for a special one-day sitting, with state premier Abang Johari Openg expected to table a bill. The Borneo Post reported that a letter on the special sitting, which starts at 9am, has been sent to assemblymen, although the purpose was not disclosed. Sarawak deputy premier Dr Sim Kui Hian was also reticent about the agenda of the meeting when asked by reporters, saying simply that Abang Johari would be 'tabling something' on the day without elaborating further.
