‘High proportion' of APP scam victims getting their money back under new rules

A 'high proportion' of scam victims are getting their money back since new mandatory fraud reimbursement rules were launched last October, according to the regulator overseeing the policy.
The rules, overseen by the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR), require banks to give people their money back when they have been tricked into transferring it to criminals.
An authorised push payment (APP) reimbursement limit of £85,000 has been applied under the rules, although banks can choose to go further than this and repay higher amounts.
Posting a 'snapshot' of what the regulator has seen so far, its managing director David Geale said on the PSR's website: 'We are pleased with what we've seen in the data and heard from stakeholders in the first few months, which demonstrates that the policy has been successfully implemented – and more consumers have been protected.
'This is testament to the efforts of industry to deliver the best outcomes for victims of APP scams and work with us to resolve any issues.'
Under the new code, reimbursement costs are split between the sending and receiving banks – giving the receiving firm an added incentive to stop the scam happening in the first place.
Mr Geale said: 'A high proportion of APP scam victims are being reimbursed consistently across a larger number of PSPs (payment service providers).
'And while it is too early to draw firm conclusions based on the period covered by this data, we have not seen evidence of spikes in claim volumes that some had feared would occur under the policy.
'Additionally, now that both parties in the payment journey (the sending PSP and the receiving PSP) share the cost of reimbursing victims, there is a much stronger incentive for all PSPs to prevent APP scams from occurring in the first place.
'We are pleased to see PSPs starting to collaborate more in the effort to fight this fraud.'
Looking at compliance data reported by payment service providers, the regulator said that in the first three months of the initiative, 86% of money lost to APP scams was returned to victims, totalling around £27 million.
The regulator said it is not possible to make direct comparisons with data from before its policy due to methodology changes, however 'we note that reimbursement for consumers in 2023 was 68% (by value), as per UK Finance's annual fraud report 2024 data'.
Before the mandatory rules came into force, many banks had signed up to a voluntary reimbursement agreement. However, consumer campaigners raised concerns about banks not applying this consistently.
The PSR said that before the policy went live, some organisations were concerned that there would be a sharp rise in the number of APP scam claims.
But, on its website, it said: 'We have seen no evidence of any increase to date.'
However, claim volumes 'have steadily increased each month and we expect this to continue in the short to medium term as victims become more aware of the policy,' according to the PSR.
Firms can opt to apply an excess of up to £100 when reimbursing customers, but this cannot be applied to vulnerable customers. Some firms have waived the excess.
Some APP fraud victims may also be refused reimbursement if they are deemed to have been 'grossly negligent'.
The PSR's website said: 'Just 2% of total claims were rejected because the consumer standard of caution has not been met. We also heard from industry stakeholders that they did not see a significant shift in customer behaviour as a result of the policy.
'However, we are seeing differences in how frequently firms are applying the exemptions. This is backed up in the data we are seeing: only 23% of firms that received a claim in the period used this exception as a reason for rejecting reimbursement.
'We're working with firms and other stakeholders, including the Financial Ombudsman Service, and will keep under review whether more clarity is needed on when this exception should be applied.'
Rocio Concha, Which? director of policy and advocacy, said: 'Which? campaigned for years to make reimbursement mandatory, so it's encouraging to see that the new rules appear to be having a positive impact, with more APP scam victims getting their money back and a more consistent approach from banks and payment providers.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

America's queen of jams savages Meghan Markle's latest 'As Ever' fruit spread: 'There's no excuse for this'

The Duchess of Sussex may have set the tills ringing with the latest 'As Ever' merchandise, but her new apricot spread has been savaged by critics – within hours of going on sale. Champion jam-maker Donna Collins said: 'It's a real disappointment that Meghan is selling a fruit spread, which is what you make when your jam fails. In the jam industry a spread is what we call something that didn't work. 'It can have the best ingredients, but if I had a jam that was too runny, I'd slap a label on it and call it a spread. There's no excuse for this. It should be perfect.' Ms Collins, who owns Jelly Queens jam company and has won more than 40 world championship honours in jam-making competitions, also queried the ingredients in Meghan's spread. The jars, sold in keepsake packaging for £10 or plain for £7, list conventionally grown apricots, dried organic apricots, organic pure cane sugar and fruit pectin. 'Why should she include conventionally grown apricots, which will have used pesticides?' said Ms Collins. 'And why is she using pectin, which is a gelling agent, unless it's because her spread was too runny? Most spreads don't use pectin.' Meghan launched her 'As Ever' brand in April with a raspberry spread, which critics attacked for being ill-suited for spreading on bread or toast. Many fans who jumped online the moment Meghan's 'As Ever' products went up for sale on Friday were disappointed to learn the apricot spread had sold out. Ms Collins added: 'Her apricot spread sold out in minutes, just like her earlier raspberry spread, which may mean they only made a small batch. 'I don't know who's making her spread, but we all know it's not Meghan. It sounds like they really don't know what they are doing.' Maureen Foley, owner of Red Hen Cannery near Montecito, said she suspected Meghan wanted to make a spread to take advantage of marketing opportunities. 'She may be smart trying to fill a niche,' said Ms Foley. 'Spreads can be sweet or savoury, and used on dishes for all meals, so perhaps it's just clever marketing.'

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Gloom grows in UK boardrooms as bosses lament 'hostile' economy

Pessimism is deepening in boardrooms across the UK as bosses prepare for economic conditions at home and globally to worsen, a new report suggests. Around 70 per cent of boardroom leaders expect worldwide economic conditions to worsen in the year ahead, while just 5.4 per cent believe they will improve, according to a survey by The Chartered Governance Institute UK & Ireland. By contrast, only 22.2 per cent in 2024 anticipated a deterioration in global economic conditions, and exactly double that percentage forecast them getting better. Nearly two-thirds of respondents also think the UK's economic circumstances will weaken further, compared to just a quarter asked the same question last year. CGI said executives are concerned UK competitiveness would not improve in the months ahead, due to factors like US trade tariffs and UK Government policy. President Donald Trump has slapped a 10 per cent baseline tariff on most US imports, as well as a 25 per cent import tax on car parts and a 50 per cent levy on foreign steel and aluminium. The tariffs have heightened anxieties about economic growth slowing, both in the UK and internationally, and inflationary pressures for consumers and businesses magnifying. Meanwhile, the proportion of boardroom leaders who said their firms plan on cutting capital expenditure over the next year rose to over a quarter, while none are forecasting a 'considerable' increase. 'The results remind us that boardroom decision-making has rarely been more challenging,' said the report. 'Organisations of every type are operating in a fluid, and often, hostile environment that (this year particularly) offers few certainties and elevated risk,' it added. The biggest concern for most boards is cybersecurity, with 71 per cent of governance professionals predicting cyber risks will grow this year. However, a smaller proportion of boards - 66 per cent - intend to raise spending on IT security, against 80 per cent in 2024/25. Among significant worry is regulation; most quoted governance professionals believe rules are 'slightly excessive'. Peter Swabey, policy and research director at CGI UK & Ireland, said: 'Governance professionals, always in tune with board sentiments, reveal a boardroom mood of caution and recalibration. 'While AI and cyber resilience are climbing the agenda, confidence in the UK's economic outlook and regulatory environment remains fragile. 'The Government's industrial strategy will need to address these concerns if it is to unlock long-term investment.' Having originally set to be announced this spring, Britain's industrial strategy is now set to be published in the last week of June. Defence, digital infrastructure, clean energy and advanced manufacturing comprised the top four priorities for the industrial strategy among the CGI survey's interviewees. The strategy is also set to include details on the creative, financial services, life sciences, and professional and business services sectors. CGI's survey was based on the full responses of 96 participants from organisations either based in or operating in the UK. Governance professionals in private businesses and members of quoted firms each comprised 35 per cent of the responses. The remaining 30 per cent were from representatives of the public sector, charities and other ownership structures.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

A future master of the universe? Wes Streeting sips champagne with elite at 'world's secret government'

It is the shadowy gathering of the global elite which has been described as 'the world's secret Government' – and this year Wes Streeting joined for the first time. The Health Secretary's appearance at the Bilderberg Meeting in Sweden, sipping champagne in the company of billionaires, bankers and power brokers, is likely to spark fresh speculation about his ambitions to succeed Sir Keir Starmer. Both his political mentors Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson have attended the event. The group, which has been the subject of numerous conspiracy theories since it first met in 1954, was established to foster dialogue between Europe and North America and prevent another world war. However, it is now defined as 'bolstering a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe' – not something that is likely to endear Mr Streeting, who is tipped by some as a future Labour leader, to the Left of his party. The 42-year-old was spotted chatting to Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary and Goldman Sachs chairman José Manuel Barroso on a boat taking them to a lavish banquet at a palace on the Stockholm archipelago, owned by the hugely wealthy Wallenberg family. He also met major CEOs, including Pfizer's Albert Bourla and Microsoft's Satya Nadella, in addition to Borge Brende, the president of the World Economic Forum; Sir John Sawers, the former head of MI6; Mark Rutte, the new head of Nato; the Greek Prime Minister; and four EU Commissioners. After the Saturday dinner, the group returned to the five-star Grand Hotel at around 11pm in a convoy of coaches flanked by a motorcade. Streeting mingling with power brokers at the shadowy gathering of the global elite which has been described as 'the world's secret Government' Mr Streeting left after lunch the next day. A Labour source said: 'Bilderberg regards itself as a spotter of rising talent – Wes would certainly include himself in that category.' A spokesman for Mr Streeting said: 'The Government sends a representative to Bilderberg each year and this year Wes was the Government's representative.'