From slow lane to fast track: Why auto dealers adopting AI are growing faster

Having spent years in the auto retail space, I've seen firsthand how quickly the landscape has changed. What used to be a face-to-face, handshake-driven industry has shifted almost overnight into a digital-first, expectation-driven marketplace. And there's one force accelerating those changes faster than any other: artificial intelligence (AI).
AI isn't just some passing fad—it's a strategic lever. For forward-looking auto dealerships, it's becoming the engine behind growth, efficiency, and smarter customer engagement.
TODAY'S BUYER IS FAST, FRICTIONLESS, AND PERSONALIZED
Today's consumers aren't walking into a showroom as their first step when making a purchase. They're clicking, scrolling, comparing, and making decisions long before they ever decide to talk to a human. In fact, McKinsey reports that 71% of consumers expect personalized interactions, and 76% note that they feel frustrated when that isn't a reality. Ultimately, this tells us everything we need to know about why AI is so important right now.
AI allows dealerships to deliver these high-touch experiences at scale, without putting stress on staff or compromising speed.
Let's walk through the practical value AI delivers based on what I've witnessed and implemented in real dealership settings.
Instant, Personalized Engagement
AI platforms track how leads behave online—what cars they browse, which features they highlight, how long they spend on a page—and use that data to generate custom messages harmonized to their interests.
Instead of sending a generic 'Are you still looking?' email, the system might follow up with 'We noticed you're interested in the 2024 Ford Explorer with a towing package—let's talk.' These hyper-personalized messages often land within seconds, helping dealerships stay top of mind in a highly competitive market.
Scalability Sans The Stress
AI adapts in real time. If your marketing efforts bring in a flood of new leads, the system doesn't need to cover overtime expenses or increase staff headcount to respond. It just works harder, allowing you to scale customer outreach without scrambling to hire and train.
Profit-Boosting Tactics
One technology and AI provider for auto dealers reports that adopting their AI chatbot technology has helped their auto dealers to a whopping 32% surge in lead conversion rate, reduced costs in business development center (BDC), and a noticeable $200 increase gross profit per vehicle sold.
Lower Loan Default Rates
For dealerships offering internal financing, AI can assess creditworthiness more accurately by analyzing thousands of data points in seconds. That kind of insight has helped some dealers reduce loan default risk by 10%–15%, according to data shared by Fitch Ratings.
Real Operational Efficiency
When AI handles routine tasks—appointment confirmations, first contact messages, lead follow-ups—your team is free to focus on activities that actually close deals. I've seen sales teams cut their admin time drastically, and that alone can create massive performance lifts.
HOW TO INTEGRATE AI AT YOUR DEALERSHIP—THE RIGHT WAY
As much as I believe in AI, I also know it's not plug-and-play. You have to align technology with your people and processes. Here are the best practices I've followed when bringing AI into dealership operations:
Train Your Team—And Earn Their Buy-In
One of the biggest (and primary) roadblocks I've seen with AI is resistance from sales teams who fear being replaced. The key is to reframe the conversation.
Demonstrate how AI leads differ from traditional walk-ins. Walk them through the data insights they now have access to. Reinforce the idea that AI doesn't replace salespeople—it makes them more effective.
Set Smart KPIs
Don't just hope AI will work—track it. Metrics such as response time, appointment show rates, and lead conversion percentages are excellent benchmarks for evaluating whether the tool is delivering a return on investment.
Pilot With Purpose
Start small. For example, roll out an AI-powered chatbot on your website and monitor the impact before deploying full-scale lead-nurturing automation. These controlled pilots give your team a chance to build comfort and your leadership team time to fine-tune.
GROWTH COMES FROM SMART TECH PLUS SMART PEOPLE
AI isn't a silver bullet, and you shouldn't view it as such. Rather, it's a powerful amplifier.
When you combine cutting-edge AI tools with skilled, customer-focused staff, the results are undeniable. Increased sales, lower overhead, happier customers, and a dealership that's built not just to compete, but to lead. True AI noise can at times be overwhelming, but not if you approach it methodically.
For me, the takeaway is simple: Auto dealerships adopting AI are growing faster because they're adapting smarter. The real question isn't whether AI belongs in your dealership—it's whether you're ready to use it to your full advantage.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News24

2 hours ago

• News24

Emile Ormond: South Africa unready for AI-era job disruption

Emerging economies like South Africa may be partially shielded from the initial waves of AI automation, but when it inevitably arrives, the country could be especially vulnerable due to its large, predominantly young labour force, writes Emile Ormond. As artificial intelligence (AI) grows more sophisticated and pervasive, its potential to disrupt labour markets demands urgent attention. Will AI displace workers? Could it trigger unprecedented unemployment? There has been an influx of news articles, predictions, and expert claims that AI will be highly disruptive to the workforce. For instance, McKinsey estimates 400-800 million people globally may need new jobs by 2030, while a BCG survey found 42% of workers fear their roles may vanish within a decade. For South Africa, with an unemployment rate of 32.9% and 46.5% for youth, these predictions are dire. The country simply cannot afford large-scale job losses without jeopardising fragile social stability, deepening poverty and inequality, increasing crime, and threatening fiscal sustainability. As the government of national unity prioritises 'inclusive growth and job creation,' understanding AI's impact on jobs is not just critical - it's urgent. Impact yet to materialise Despite these warnings, evidence of current AI-driven job losses remains limited. In advanced economies like the US and EU, unemployment is near historic lows. Research has found that, for now, AI's impact on employment is minimal, often boosting productivity instead. In South Africa, high unemployment predates AI, rooted in structural economic challenges. So far, AI has not significantly shrunk job markets globally or locally. Historical, technological leaps, like the Industrial Revolutions, sparked similar fears of mass labour market disruption but ultimately resulted in substantially higher employment and productivity. For instance, more than two-thirds of the world's population lived in extreme poverty before the Industrial Revolution – today, it is less than 10%. This precedent, combined with AI's limited impact to date, may have bred complacency among South Africans, especially policymakers, that AI's impact will be manageable and a net positive. However, this view is shortsighted and lacks nuance. Rapidly increasing advances in areas such as multi-modal and agentic AI are poised to transform workplaces. The vast majority of organisations are planning on introducing or expanding their use of AI. This will see workers requiring new skills, creating new roles, and eliminating others. While the balance of these changes is debated, massive labour market disruption is almost certain. This time is different AI's unique traits, distinct from past technologies, will amplify its impact on jobs. These features include: Cognitive capabilities: Unlike earlier automation that targeted manual tasks, AI can handle complex cognitive work, such as analysis and decision-making. General-purpose technology: Like electricity or the internet, AI's application spans all sectors, driving broad economic impact and broadly fuelling productivity at an unrivalled pace. Self-improvement: AI can help enhance future iterations of itself, unlike previous technologies. For instance, the most advanced nuclear reactor cannot design new reactors, but AI can make better AI. Democratised access: Many AI tools are freely or cheaply available, unlike costly previous industrial technologies that were often limited to large, wealthy organisations. Rapid adoption: Generative AI, for example, surged from obscurity to global prominence in just three years. Now, South African workers use generative AI more than those in the US and UK. These characteristics illustrate why AI will disrupt labour markets at an unprecedented pace and scale, but not all countries and groups are equally vulnerable. SA has breathing room High-income countries, with more white-collar jobs, face earlier AI-driven disruption. For instance, 34% of European Union jobs are exposed to AI automation, compared to 19% in the African Union, according to the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Ageing populations and high labour costs may also accelerate AI adoption in developed markets. Young workers, often in entry-level roles, are particularly at risk. The ILO notes that youth hold jobs most susceptible to automation, potentially blocking their entry into the labour force. This is particularly pressing for Africa, with 350 million young Africans expected to reach working age by 2050. In other words, emerging economies like South Africa may be partially shielded from the initial waves of AI automation, but when it inevitably arrives, the country could be especially vulnerable due to its large, predominantly young labour force. In conjunction with this, AI will likely also drive massive productivity gains and create new, currently unforeseen jobs, but the transition period could be long and hard. Moreover, it could ultimately further entrench South Africa's world-leading inequality. Charting a path forward South Africa has a narrow window, as short as two to three years, to harness AI's productivity gains while mitigating its fallout. Key actions stakeholders can take include: Policy development: Political leaders must move beyond vague rhetoric and adopt nuanced, thoughtful policy positions on AI. The government should finalise a national AI strategy, released for comment in mid-2024, to address labour market impacts. Digital infrastructure: Expand reliable, high-speed internet nationwide, resolving disputes over providers like Starlink to ensure equitable AI access. Reskilling programmes: Invest in large-scale training to equip workers with AI-relevant skills and update school and tertiary education curricula for emerging roles. Responsible AI governance: Regulators and organisations should integrate AI oversight into corporate governance, aligning innovation with national development goals. Moreover, AI needs to be a cross-cutting responsibility in government. Social protections: Plans for displaced workers need to be considered now – there are nearly 19 million grant recipients, compared to a tax base of 7 million. Growth measures and/or new revenue sources will need to be found if the if the South Africa stands at the edge of an epoch-defining labour shift. The question is whether we act proactively or react in a crisis. - Dr Emile Ormond has an interest in policy analysis and risk managment.

Yahoo

4 hours ago

• Yahoo

So, has anything actually gotten more expensive because of Trump's tariffs?

Predictions from mainstream economists were dire after President Donald Trump launched his tariff campaign just a couple weeks after he began his second term in office: Prices would rise — sharply — they said, reigniting an inflation crisis that tens of millions of Americans had elected him to solve. But that massive, tariff-induced inflation spike hasn't materialized. Not even close. Not yet, anyway. Consumer prices rose just 2.4%, annually, last month, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That was less than economists had expected, and only slightly higher than the 2.3% rate in April, which was the US economy's lowest inflation since February 2021. According to the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index most closely followed by the Federal Reserve, core inflation — which strips out volatile items like food and gas prices — fell to 2.5% in April. That was the lowest reading since March 2021. That's a far cry from what economists and consumers have predicted. Month after month, inflation has fallen short of Wall Street's expectations, as American businesses said they would be forced to hike prices as a result of historically high tariffs. America's effective tariff rate is now 14.1%, according to Fitch Ratings, up from 2.3% last year. That means Trump raised taxes on imported goods by nearly 12 percentage points in 2025. Economists expected substantial inflation increases as a result. Goldman Sachs analysts last month said core goods inflation could hit 6.3% this year and consumer prices would surge 3.7% by early 2026. JPMorgan economists said core inflation would nearly double by the end of this year. And American consumers in May expected prices to rise an alarming 6.6% this year, according to sentiment surveys from the University of Michigan. That prediction fell in June, but consumers still expect inflation to hit 5.1% in 2025. So what happened? Are economists just really bad at their jobs? Not quite. Their predictions may yet come true — and economists are largely cleaving to their bets. America's economy is enormous and complex, and predicting when prices will rise and fall can be an extremely tricky business — particularly when factoring in the on-again, off-again nature of Trump's tariff regime. Still, tariffs through mid-June haven't caused inflation to spike. Love tariffs or hate them, there's no denying inflation is lower now than when Trump took office. Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said just a few items are growing in price as a result of tariffs, including electronics that come from China. He said PCs and A/V equipment have become more expensive because of Trump's trade war. But the price increases aren't widespread yet, Powell noted, because stores are still working through the inventory that came in to their warehouses before Trump put tariffs in place. 'Goods being sold at retailers today may have been imported several months ago, before tariffs were imposed,' Powell said. Research firm Telsey Advisory Group, which has been tracking the prices of 80 select consumer items across a wide variety of retail categories, reported this week that just 19 products it has tracked have gained in price since mid-April — and 16 items' prices fell. Similarly, the New York Times' Wirecutter, which recommends consumer products, tracked the prices for 40 of its top picks over the course of two months and found this week that the vast majority didn't change price at all: 10 gained in price and only half of those gained more than 7%. 'There haven't been many significant upticks in prices as of yet given that many retailers are still selling through their lower-cost inventory,' Dana Telsey, CEO and chief research officer of Telsey Advisory Group told CNN. Even autos, many of which are subject to a 25% tariff, plus a tariff of up to 25% on some imported auto parts, haven't gained in price — they've fallen. New car prices fell 0.2% in May, according to car-buying research site Edmunds, and they rose only 2.5% compared to the pre-tariff period in March. Both new and used car prices fell in May, according to the BLS' Consumer Price Index. That's because dealers are still working through their supply of pre-tariff cars, according to Ivan Drury, director of insights at Edmunds. With prices remaining in check so far, the Trump administration has declared victory. 'They've all been discredited,' said the White House's top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, in an interview last month with CNN, referring to tariffs' detractors. 'What we got in the first term [of Trump's presidency] was not recession or inflation, we got price stability, robust economic growth and rising wages, just as we thought we would.' Navarro has frequently pointed to the low overall inflation during Trump's first term, despite his tariffs. And he's right: CPI peaked at 2.9% in mid-2018 before falling below 2% throughout most of 2019. But Navarro's assertion about the impact of tariffs on the US economy comes with a couple of significant caveats: First, Trump during his current term has already placed tariffs of at least 10% on $2.3 trillion of imported goods, comprising 71% of all US goods imports, according to the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. In his first term, Trump placed tariffs on just $380 billion worth of foreign goods. And second, the pandemic severely disrupted the global economy soon after Trump's tariffs took effect, preventing economists from getting a decent picture of how significantly prices rose. But some data shows prices gained in the specific sectors Trump targeted with his first-term tariffs. For example, after imposing some steel tariffs in 2018, US production expanded modestly, but it sent costs rising for cars, tools and machines; and shrank those industries' output by more than $3 billion in 2021, the International Trade Commission found in a 2023 analysis. Nevertheless, Joseph Lavorgna, a former Wall Street economist turned Treasury Department official, took a victory lap because inflation hasn't risen since Trump imposed tariffs during his second term. 'Tariffs have just not shown up at all in any of the data,' Lavorgna, counselor to the Treasury secretary, told CNN this week. 'The forecasting community has been completely wrong.' Lavorgna, a former SMBC Nikko Securities chief economist who also served in the White House during Trump's first term, said a broad range of inflation metrics suggests foreign producers are absorbing tariffs and that the trade war won't be inflationary. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed that message Thursday during a briefing, saying: 'America is quickly returning to the successful formula of the first Trump administration: low inflation and rising wages.' Many mainstream economists argue that the low inflation of the spring represents a calm before the summer storm, when they expect prices to rise. 'It's a question of when, not if,' Stephanie Roth, chief economist at Wolfe Research, told CNN. Walmart, Target, Lululemon, Home Depot and Costco among others have said in recent weeks that they will raise some prices because of tariff pressures. Although some of the big box retailers said they would work to keep most prices low, they acknowledged that they operate low-margin businesses, and in the cases when American-made alternatives are unavailable or more expensive, they expect that they'll have to pass some of that additional cost to their customers. Consumers won't be alone in their struggles with tariffs in the coming months, said said Sid Malladi, CEO of Nuvo, a company that manages businesses' trade partnerships. Price hikes will weigh on businesses, too, many of whom will take on some of the hit to keep prices as low as possible for as long as possible. But that could mean difficult conversations in the boardroom later this year about potential layoffs and other cost cutting. 'This is early innings. No one wants to be first out of the gate,' said Malladi. 'You don't want to risk reputational damage to your brand, because raising prices in this environment might cause customers to turn away from you. Many may eat their margin for a few months.' 'It's hard to overstate the level of anxiety businesses have,' Malladi added. Small businesses, without the supply chain mastery of larger companies, have struggled in particular to afford higher tariff costs and have said they are reducing supply or raising prices. Many have complained that American alternatives for some foreign imports may be unavailable or are too expensive. 'While larger retailers may have the scale, capital and pricing power to absorb or strategically offset these pressures, small and mid-sized players remain significantly more vulnerable, with limited flexibility to manage rising input costs or supply disruptions,' Telsey said in TAG's latest Product Pricing Analysis report. Telsey noted that prices, when they eventually start to rise, won't all gain equally or across the board. Only select goods will start to gain in price to start, likely beginning in late August or September. 'Inventory is ordered typically anywhere from six months to one year in advance, and it is expected that the select pricing pieces will begin to show up in late summer,' she said. Fed Chair Powell on Wednesday agreed that the tipping point for broad consumer price increases could come this summer as inventories of pre-tariff warehoused goods dry up. 'We do expect to see more of that over the course of the summer,' Powell said. 'It takes some time for tariffs to work their way through the chain of distribution to the end consumer.' Normally, retailers hold about 1 to 2 months' worth of inventory on items, noted Kristy Akullian, head of iShares Investment Strategy, Americas, so prices could begin to rise in the coming weeks. Another indication that prices could start to spike: In April's Institute for Supply Management services report, prices paid by businesses increased the most since November 2022, and business inventories contracted. 'Low inventories make it harder for companies to keep prices steady, so going forward, we expect the inflation impacts from tariffs to become more apparent,' Akullian said. Powell agreed with that timeline, noting companies that report on their business sentiment to the Fed have said they expect to pass those tariff costs on down the supply chain. 'Many, many companies do expect to put all or — some of the effect of tariffs through to the next person in the chain, and ultimately, to the consumer,' Powell said. 'So we're beginning to see some effects. We expect to see more.' Despite initial success at maintaining low prices, Treasury's Lavorgna conceded inflation could begin to rise down the road because of tariffs. 'I'm not saying there can't be a tariff effect on the numbers at some point,' he said. CNN's Phil Mattingly, Matt Egan and Chris Isidore contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Motor 1

a day ago

• Motor 1

'Respectfully, Maserati Is Not for Sale:' Stellantis Denies Another Rumor About the Brand's Possible Sale

Maserati isn't doing well. Sales for the Italian brand collapsed in 2024 , and they saw a 48 percent decline through the first three months of 2025. That's bleak. The poor sales have led to rumors that Stellantis might sell the Italian brand, but the automotive conglomerate continues to deny any such allegations . Stellantis did so again this week when Reuters asked the automaker if it had plans to sell Maserati amid a new rumor. A spokesperson rebuffed the allegation and told the publication, 'Respectfully, Maserati is not for sale,' reconfirming its commitment to the brand. Photo by: Maserati However, Reuters 's two sources allege McKinsey, the consultant Stellantis hired in April to navigate President Donald Trump's new import tariffs , could recommend that the automaker divest in Maserati in some way. It's supposedly one of the options McKinsey is exploring for the automaker. According to one source, Stellantis has told the consultancy to consider all possibilities for the ailing brand. However, McKinsey is allegedly still in the early phases of its work, so any definitive decision about Maserati's future is unlikely to arrive anytime soon. Another source told Reuters there is disagreement among the board about what to do with the Italian company. Some supposedly believe the brand has value to the automaker as its only luxury marque. However, others think Stellantis doesn't have the resources to support Maserati as it struggles to revamp its lineup. Maserati's Lacking Lineup Maserati has discontinued the Ghibli and the Levante, two of its best-selling models, but their replacements won't arrive until 2028 and 2027, respectively. That leaves the $80,000 Grecale (pictured below) as its only SUV in an industry where consumers continue to flock to such vehicles. It also sells the Gran Turismo , a coupe, and the MC20 supercar. Neither of those cars has broad appeal, and neither are enough to keep a brand afloat. Last year, former Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares admitted that Maserati was ' in the red .' Replacing the Levante and Ghibli could help turn around the brand's sales and financial outlook, but the luxury market is highly competitive. Alfa Romeo, another of Stellantis's Italian companies, is revamping its lineup, and it can't have products that interfere with Maserati's and vice versa. That leaves little room for either. Stellantis: Trump's Tariffs Could Force Stellantis to Sell Alfa Romeo and Maserati Maserati's Problems Go Deeper Than Marketing Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Reuters Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )