
Britain's ‘Ryanair of the rails' may not be glamorous, but it could teach rivals a thing or two
The British train operator which has garnered a reputation as the 'Ryanair of the Rails' does indeed have, it seems, a lot in common with the budget airline that so many passengers love to hate.
Lumo, which just under four years ago launched its inaugural service between London and Edinburgh, does indeed have consistently lower fares than the main operator on the route, LNER.
It has ambitious plans for growth, too. Having increased services to Edinburgh from two trains a day to five, it recently announced the intention to introduce a new direct link between London and the Scottish city of Stirling, with a further expansion of routes down the line.
And like the Dublin-based low-cost airline, its no nonsense one-size-fits-all approach has its detractors, with reviews on platforms such as TrustPilot frequently highlighting issues with cleanliness, punctuality, inadequate provision of refreshment and staff whose brusque manner seems to have come straight from the Michael O'Leary's customer relations playbook.
Much of this is hardly surprising. When Lumo began services between London and Edinburgh in October 2021, it unashamedly proclaimed its intention to undercut rivals on the route and to provide real competition to the budget airlines – namely Ryanair and easyJet – which operated between the two cities.
In addition to low prices (many of its introductory fares are less than £20 one-way), it gave travellers seeking to reduce their carbon footprint a more environmentally friendly option, with a fleet of all-electric Hitachi trains offering high speeds and low emissions.
Potential game changer
Mark Smith, the rail guru behind the Man in Seat 61 website, hailed the arrival of Lumo – which was given permission to run the London-Edinburgh route as an 'open access' operator – as a potential game changer.
'For years the high cost of rail travel has been cited by those turning to the cheaper options offered by airlines, but the arrival of Lumo could change all that,' he said.
'Finally a London-Edinburgh train will take on the likes of easyJet and Ryanair at their own game. It is a pioneering move and, if successful, it could encourage others to set up low-cost rail routes and put pressure on the government-backed train operators to reduce fares.'
So has Lumo lived up to its early promise? And what's it like to travel on?
Reading the TrustPilot reviews, I feared the worst when I boarded the train for a journey to Edinburgh with my wife – a decision taken because, yes, I wanted to test Lumo out but, crucially, because it was considerably cheaper than LNER.
The train was certainly busy, with all seats taken and every available space for luggage used to the full.
The seats themselves, an attractive deep blue, may not have allowed long leg stretches, but were comfortable enough – and not dissimilar space-wise to those found on more mainstream operators.
The drop-down table and individualised lighting were perfectly functional; there was WiFi too, but as with many trains, it was intermittent.
We did not feel the train was dirty, though others have pointed to mess on the floor and stained seats. Nor did we experience the rudeness for which Lumo staff have frequently been criticised (in fact, we even managed a joke with the ticket inspector).
And of course the views along the way – particularly the later stretches, taking in the Angel of the North, Durham Cathedral and the beautiful stretch of Northumberland coastline on the approach to Scotland – were, of course, every bit as splendid as they would have been on a more expensive train.
We arrived in Edinburgh bang on time. No complaints.
Unacceptably dirty
Maybe we were lucky. Rory Boland, the editor of Which? Travel, also recently travelled with Lumo and had more grounds for complaint. On his trip to Edinburgh, he found the train unacceptably dirty, announcements bordering on the hostile, staff manhandling bags placed in the wrong places and, most egregiously, a failure in the tea service, usually available via an on-board trolley.
He did acknowledge, however, that Lumo's fares, while not as low as originally indicated, were less than those quoted by LNER. The cheapest fare he found was £91 return – a good £44 less than the lowest offered by LNER for the same period. With very few stops (Morpeth, Newcastle and, on some journeys, Stevenage), the trains are also faster: the best completing the journey to Edinburgh in just 4 hours 16 minutes.
And the Ryanair parallels continue: though passengers love to complain about Lumo, they nevertheless continue to use the service in their droves.
So much so, in fact, that the operator – which is owned by FirstGroup – announced earlier this month that it plans to launch a new direct service between London and Stirling, commencing next year. Furthermore, in what will be a significant challenge to an increasingly nationalised rail network, it has applications to run trains from London to Rochdale, Carmarthen and Paignton. The aim is to triple passenger numbers to 10 million a year.
According to Simon Hodge, managing director of specialist operator Tailor Made Rail, this is all for the good, as it might help to create some 'healthy competition' on the proposed routes – as operators Italo and Iryo have in Italy and Spain respectively – which would likely reduce fares and benefit passengers.
In fact, even Boland had a positive take, concluding that though 'the boarding experience with so many people and luggage being thrown around is chaotic, and dirty seats and no tea made our trip feel budget', Lumo is nevertheless 'fast, far better for the environment than flying and, perhaps crucially, by far the cheapest option.'
So, lower fares and, soon, a direct service from London to one of Scotland's finest cities?
Lumo might feel budget, but if the rise of the budget airline has proved anything, it's that – for most of us – cost and convenience will always trump comfort. A bit of healthy competition never hurts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Metro's biggest shareholder open to selling stake, sources say
LONDON, June 20 (Reuters) - Colombian billionaire Jaime Gilinski Bacal is open to selling his majority stake in British lender Metro Bank and has received interest from investors, two people with knowledge of the matter said. Gilinski, who sits on Metro's board as a non-executive director and who owns a 52.87% stake via his Spaldy Investments vehicle, has been considering options for his stake including a sale, after a rebound in the bank's share price, the people said. He became the majority shareholder after playing a critical role in its 325 million pound ($436 million) equity recapitalisation in 2023.


The Sun
11 minutes ago
- The Sun
EV drivers can get 5,000 miles of FREE charging this summer – and you can apply now
THE UK's biggest energy supplier is launching its first electric vehicle home charger and you can get your hands on it for free. Octopus Energy has designed and built its own EV charger which will provide charging for as little as 2p per mile and new users will get heaps of free charging. 2 Named Octopus Charge and launching in August, new customers who sign up will get a 5,000 free miles bonus. The offer is only available to the first 100 people, so EV drivers will have to be quick to snap up the offer. Combined with Octopus' Drive Pack tariff, customers can get unlimited charging for just £30 a month. The saving don't just end there, because those with Octopus solar panels can power their EVs with any surplus solar electricity. The new EV charger has built-in 4G and a uniquely designed charging cable holster so it can fit snugly in tight spaces. 'Charging at home is already better than queueing up at the petrol station – and now we've made it even simpler," said Rebecca Dibb-Simkin, chief product officer at Octopus Energy. 'Octopus Energy was the first energy company to launch a smart tariff, an EV tariff, an export tariff, and our very own heat pump." She added: "We're delighted to add Octopus Charge to our stable, initially designed to work seamlessly with Intelligent Octopus Go, and with other features to follow shortly.' Octopus Charge will first be exclusively available for customers of Octopus' EV leasing business, Octopus Electric Vehicles, before being launched to all Octopus Energy customers in August. Those interested can register their interest at the Octopus Energy website. New Nissan Leaf tested - it's bigger, better and goes further It's been a big week of announcements from Octopus Energy, who only days ago said it was bringing back its popular Saving Sessions for households. The scheme is a way for customers to earn rewards by reducing their electricity consumption during specific times when the national grid is under pressure. Over the summer, households have a chance to use their washing machine and charge their devices for free if they shift their usage from peak times. Octopus said the free electricity will be available during one-hour slots that will usually be held in the early afternoon. To be eligible for the scheme, you must be an Octoplus member, which is a free rewards program for the smart meter customers. 2


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Glasgow given go-ahead to introduce a tourist tax
Tourists in Glasgow will start paying extra for their accommodation after the city gave the green light to introduce a tourist tax by 2027. In a bid to generate £16m a year for the Scottish city, visitors heading to Glasgow will be charged five per cent of their accommodation bill extra, which will work out to £4.83 per night on average. Under national legislation, the council has to undergo an 18-month implementation phase, so the levy will not be rolled out until January 2027 at the earliest. The decision was made in a city administration committee on Thursday, with 1.5 per cent of each levy being retained by accommodation providers, while the rest will be invested in Glasgow's infrastructure projects and events. The funding will also be used for public services, such as street sweeping, maintenance of city landmarks and improvements to parks, which will benefit both residents and visitors. A council spokesperson said there was support from all parties on the committee, including the SNP, Labour, Greens and Conservatives. The move to introduce the levy came following a public consultation that started in January between local trade bodies and accommodation businesses. Deputy Council Leader Richard Bell told The Independent: 'Many Glaswegians will be familiar with visitor levies, which are relatively common abroad. 'The levy means that some of the people who enjoy what Glasgow has to offer, but do not pay local taxes, will be asked to make a small contribution to the city. 'In turn, that money will be invested in making Glasgow a better place for citizens and visitors alike – which will benefit our tourist trade.' Green Cllr Blair Anderson, whose motion started the process, said: 'The tourist tax is going to be a game-changer for Glasgow, delivering more money to tidy up our city and make it even more attractive for visitors and residents alike. 'A small contribution from tourists will mean we can invest millions more in street sweeping, bin collections, and getting Glasgow looking good again. 'I'm glad that Greens in Holyrood got this law passed, and I'm grateful to all councillors who have worked with me over recent months to get this tax in place as soon as possible.' The levy will apply to all hotels, hostels, guest houses, bed & breakfasts and self-catering accommodation. Glasgow currently averages around 2.9 million overnight stays each year, which generates an expenditure of £250m. The Visitor Levy Act became law in September 2024. This allows councils in Scotland to tax overnight accommodation if they wish to do so. This devolved power has been met with mixed responses, with Edinburgh becoming the first to vote in January to add a five per cent surcharge on visitors' overnight stays by 2026. Meanwhile, South Ayrshire council is set to abandon its plans for a visitor levy in light of residents' and businesses' concerns that the area does not warrant one for the number of visitors it receives.