EAM Jaishankar in Netherlands: Pakistan must face consequences if terror continues
The Hague [Netherlands], May 22 (ANI): External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, during his official visit to the Netherlands, said Pakistan must face consequences if cross-border terror attacks continue.
In an interview with Dutch daily de Volkskrant, EAM Jaishankar referred to the April 22 attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, and stated that the Pakistani military leadership holds extreme religious views.
'We want a definitive end to terrorism. Our message is therefore: yes, the ceasefire has put an end to military actions against each other for now, but if the terrorist attacks from Pakistan continue, there will be consequences. The Pakistanis must understand that very well.'
EAM Jaishankar was in the Netherlands in place of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who cancelled his planned state visit due to the recent military exchange between India and Pakistan. The visit focused on economic cooperation and counterterrorism, as well as preparatory discussions for PM Modi's rescheduled visit later this year.
Bilateral issues discussed included Dutch arms supplies to Pakistan, which were previously raised by Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh in Delhi with Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans in March.
When asked whether he was implying that Pakistan supports terrorism, EAM Jaishankar responded: 'I am not suggesting that, I am stating that. Suppose that there were large military centres in the middle of a city like Amsterdam where tens of thousands of people gathered for military training, would you say that your government knows nothing about that? Of course not.'
'We should not go along with the narrative that Pakistan does not know what is going on. The most notorious terrorists on the United Nations (UN) sanctions list are all in Pakistan. They operate in the big cities, in broad daylight. Their addresses are known. Their activities are known. Their mutual contacts are known. So let's not pretend that Pakistan is not involved. The state is involved. The army is up to its neck in it.'
On whether terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir is linked to the broader Kashmir dispute, EAM Jaishankar said: 'No, for us terrorism is an independent, completely unacceptable international crime that should not be condoned or justified.'
He added: 'The terrorists targeted the vibrant tourism industry in Jammu and Kashmir with their attack. So they are prepared to destroy things in Kashmir for their own, very limited, selfish purposes. They also deliberately gave the attack a very religious tint (Hindu versus Muslim, ed.). The world should not accept such practices.'
On Kashmir's political status, EAM Jaishankar said: 'As for Jammu and Kashmir, it is a historical fact that it joined India when India and Pakistan separated in 1947. Our position is that the illegal occupiers should return their illegally occupied parts to the rightful owner. And that is us.'
Asked whether the international community could mediate in the Kashmir dispute, EAM Jaishankar said: 'No, it is a bilateral issue between the countries involved.'
When asked about mediation offers such as that from US President Donald Trump, he replied: 'As I said, this is something we will do together with Pakistan.'
EAM Jaishankar also held discussions on enhancing economic and technological cooperation between India and the Netherlands. In addition to traditional sectors such as hydraulic engineering, agriculture, and pharmaceuticals, EAM Jaishankar said India is focused on new areas including semiconductors and sustainable energy, particularly green hydrogen.
He also sought Dutch support for accelerating negotiations on the India-European Union free trade agreement, which India hopes to conclude by the end of 2025.
'After Germany, you are India's largest trading partner within the European Union and the fourth largest investor in India worldwide,' EAM Jaishankar said. He added that he has been visiting the Netherlands for more than thirty years due to family ties.
Responding to concerns about India's agricultural market protections, EAM Jaishankar said: 'Europe is also shielding its own markets, even more than we are. I am not making sweeping statements about things that are still under negotiation. But to reach a trade agreement, you have to understand the realities of each other's societies. We are a country of small farmers with small plots of land. People have at most a few cattle. We do not have a history of subsidized agriculture, like you do. If small farmers from India had to compete with large, commercial, subsidized European farmers, that would be unfair.'
On India's ambition in global manufacturing, he said: 'Our hope is indeed that the manufacturing of products in India will grow and that we will be more integrated into global production chains. New technology can be an entry point. So our interests in market access cover a much broader spectrum of modern products, such as electronic hardware, chemicals or all kinds of pharmaceuticals.'
Asked whether India sees itself in a global leadership role, EAM Jaishankar said: 'Certainly, but our geopolitical tradition, as a post-colonial society in Asia, is different from that of the West. We have positions and we propagate them, but we also want to respect other people's sensitivities and sovereignty. That is different from the Western tradition, in which you impose your positions on other countries.'
He said India supports reform of global institutions and seeks a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council. 'That permanent seat on the Security Council is indeed one of our goals. We believe that if the much-needed reform of the UN and the Security Council finally comes about, we will receive a lot of support for our claim.'
'Many international initiatives have come from India in recent years. We understand what our position entails. We are now the fourth largest economy in the world, we have just overtaken Japan. And we know that that comes with responsibilities. We are ready.'
On the question of India mediating in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, EAM Jaishankar said: 'India has a position that many countries in the Global South probably share. We strive for a peaceful solution to this conflict. If we can do something about it, we are open to it. But of course this depends on the parties involved.'
Asked why India has not imposed sanctions on Russia, he said: 'That sanction culture is a very Western way of maintaining international relations. We do not do national sanctions.'
When asked why India does not take public international stances similar to other post-colonial states such as South Africa, EAM Jaishankar said: 'I conduct a foreign policy that suits our national character and our national interests. Following your logic, I can also say: why doesn't Europe behave more like us? That would be a good idea.'
India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 as a decisive military response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed. Indian Armed Forces targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, leading to the death of over 100 terrorists affiliated with terror outfits like the Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba and Hizbul Mujahideen.
After the attack, Pakistan retaliated with cross-border shelling across the Line of Control and Jammu and Kashmir as well as attempted drone attacks along the border regions, following which India launched a coordinated attack and damaged radar infrastructure, communication centres and airfields across 11 airbases in Pakistan.
After this, on May 10, an understanding of the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan was announced. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's oil supply chain safe from Hormuz closure: Puri
NEW DELHI: India's oil supply chain remains stable as a result of diversification in the last few years, oil minister Hardeep Puri said on Sunday as Iran's Parliament passed a motion calling for blocking the Strait of Hormuz, the critical choke point accounting for a fifth of global seaborne oil and a third of LNG shipments. 'We have been closely monitoring the evolving geopolitical situation in the Middle East since the past two weeks. Under the leadership of PM @narendramodi Ji, we have diversified our supplies in the past few years and a large volume of our supplies do not come through the Strait of Hormuz now,' he said in a post on microblogging site X. Indeed, latest data from analytics firm Kpler showed Indian refiners pivoting away from the Middle-East since the outbreak of hostilities between Israel and Iran stoked fears of Hormuz closure. In June, for example, oil imports from Russia and the US outpaced combined volumes of from traditional Middle East suppliers such as Iraq and Saudi Arabia. India currently imports oil from 13 countries. India does not buy any oil from Iran. But Hormuz is still crucial for India as 40% of its oil imports still passes through this narrow waterway between Iran and Oman. Puri, however, assured citizens on supplies. 'Our Oil Marketing Companies have supplies of several weeks and continue to receive energy supplies from several routes. We will take all necessary steps to ensure stability of supplies of fuel to our citizens,' he said. India currently imports oil from 13 countries. India does not buy any oil from Iran. But Hormuz is still crucial for India as 40% of its oil imports still passes through this narrow waterway between Iran and Oman. The last word depends on Iran's Supreme Council, which has to approve the Parliament motion. Closure of Hormuz could lead to an upheaval in global oil trade and spike in crude prices since the alternative routes for evacuation of Middle-East oil is limited to about 2-3% of daily global supplies. The strait last effectively closed during the Iran-Iraq 'Tanker War' in 1984.
News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
Did America Use India's Airspace For 'Op Midnight Hammer' To Hit Iran? Here's What Govt Said
Dismissing widespread social media claims, the Press Information Bureau confirmed that Indian airspace was never granted to the US for conducting its 'Operation Midnight Hammer.' Amid circulating reports that the US used India's airspace to launch aircraft against Iran, the Indian government on Sunday dismissed the claims as 'fake." Dismissing widespread social media claims, the Press Information Bureau (PIB) confirmed that Indian airspace was never granted to the US for conducting its 'Operation Midnight Hammer.' 'Several social media accounts have claimed that Indian Airspace was used by the United States to launch aircraft against Iran during Operation #MidnightHammer. #PIBFactCheck This claim is FAKE. Indian Airspace was NOT used by the US during Operation #MidnightHammer." The statement added that during an official press briefing, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, had clearly explained the actual flight route used by US aircraft during the operation, confirming that it did not involve Indian airspace. The US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—were carried out under the codename Operation Midnight Hammer and involved more than 125 aircraft, according to General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. At a press briefing on Sunday, Caine said the operation included seven B-2 Spirit bombers that dropped over a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on the Fordow and Natanz facilities. Tomahawk missiles were also launched at Isfahan. To maintain tactical surprise, a part of the aircraft package flew toward the Pacific as a decoy. The strikes began at 6:40 p.m. ET, and the bombers exited Iranian airspace by 7:05 p.m. ET. Caine said the aircraft flew from a base in Missouri, and this marked the longest B-2 flight since 2001. In total, the operation used 14 bunker-buster bombs, over two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and involved refuelling and escort aircraft. First Published: June 22, 2025, 23:04 IST
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Large volume of our supplies don't come through Hormuz': Hardeep Puri assures fuel stability amid Middle East tensions
As tensions continue to rise in the Middle East, raising the likelihood of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz, India is closely monitoring global oil trends. Around one-fifth of the world's oil consumption passes through the Strait of Hormuz, which is situated between Iran and Oman. (Reuters) Union minister for petroleum and natural gas, Hardeep Singh Puri, has reiterated that India has adequate oil supplies to meet its needs. 'We have been closely monitoring the evolving geopolitical situation in the Middle East since the past two weeks,' Puri said in a post X. The Union minister noted that India has 'diversified our supplies in the past few years and a large volume of our supplies do not come through the Strait of Hormuz now.' Puri said that the nation's oil marketing companies have several weeks' worth of supply, adding that they 'continue to receive energy supplies from several routes.' The Union minister assured that all necessary steps will be taken to ensure the stability of supplies of fuel to Indian citizens. ALSO READ | Iran hints at Strait of Hormuz closure. How will it impact Indian crude imports? Last week, following the Israeli strikes on Iran, Puri asserted that India has enough energy supplies for the coming months. 'India's energy strategy is shaped by successfully navigating the trilemma of energy availability, affordability and sustainability,' he said, adding that, 'We have adequate energy supplies for the coming months.' The brewing tensions over the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have led countries to think about the possible repercussions on oil prices. NDTV reported, citing sources, that the central government might considering reviewing the excise duty cuts on fuel if the crude oil price goes above $105 per barrel. Impact on India if Strait of Hormuz is closed India, the world's third-largest oil importer and fourth biggest gas buyer, imports over 85 per cent of its crude oil needs and roughly half its natural gas requirement, a news agency PTI report said. Of these, over 40 per cent of the oil imports and half of the gas imports come from the Middle East. However, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which is the passage of around one-fifth of the world's oil consumption, might impact India's energy sector and global oil prices. ALSO READ | Strait of Hormuz: Why the narrow waterway is at stake as Israel-Iran tensions rise About 2 million barrels per day of crude oil out of India's total import of 5.5 million barrels per day transit through the Strait of Hormuz. However, industry officials and analysts have reportedly said that India is not likely to lose sleep even if the Strait were shut down. This is because it has alternative sources, from Russia to the US to Brazil, already readily available to fill any void. India's principal supplier of gas, Qatar, does not use the Strait of Hormuz for supplies to the nation, PTI reported. And other sources of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in Australia, Russia, and the US would also remain untouched by the narrow waterway's closure. While India imports around 90 per cent of its crude oil, more than 40 per cent of those imports originate from Middle Eastern countries, such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait, whose exports pass through the Strait of Hormuz. However, in recent years, Russia has become India's largest supplier of crude oil, which is refined into fuels like petrol and diesel. In June, Indian refiners imported around 2 to 2.2 million barrels per day of Russian crude oil, the highest in the last two years.
