Vivek Agnihotri slams John Abraham for ‘mediocre acting' in Dhan Dhana Dhan Goal: He couldn't say 5 lines of dialogue

Bollywood filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri once again talked about the problems he faced while making the 2007 film Dhan Dhana Dhan Goal. In an interview with Dainik Bhaskar, the filmmaker recalled how John Abraham came on board due to Anurag Kashyap and took a dig at his acting skills, calling it "mediocre". (Also Read: Vivek Agnihotri says Bollywood is in shambles: 'There's a mad rush to release old films') Vivek Agnihotri takes a dig at John Abraham's acting skills.
Vivek Agnihotri recently spoke about the behind-the-scenes events during the making of the film Dhan Dhana Dhan Goal. He revealed that when he was working on the film, the production house UTV didn't consider him a capable writer. According to him, UTV was fascinated by the idea of working with Anurag Kashyap, even though the film's subject did not align with him. Citing industry chatter, Vivek dismissed Anurag's claim that he wasn't even taken along for the film's London schedule, stating that John had come on board primarily because of Anurag.
Vivek said that Goal was still a good film for its time, with the film's songs becoming chartbusters. He added, "But there were many problems during that time. In the middle of it all, Bipasha Basu and John Abraham broke up during the making of the film. When you're in love, you have to deal with one set of issues, and after a breakup, a whole new set of problems arises. So, it became very difficult for me to manage everything. Even though I was the director of the film, the entire system was functioning based on the intelligence of a very mediocre actor." Vivek criticises John Abraham, praises Anurag Kashyap
Vivek criticised John for his "mediocre acting" and said, "Everyone was like, 'Let's take John, he is a footballer. That's how he became a part of the film. But you tell me, if it's a film about football, what should an actor do? We called a premium league coach to train Arshad Warsi, Raj Joshi, and they all put their soul in preparing, but in all of John's scenes, we had to shoot his face and feet separately. And Arshad had given his all for that film. He questioned me on things, he didn't tell me, 'reduce my dialogues' Why? Because you can't say them at once? You can't say five lines of dialogues in rhythm at once. This is your problem. Then why should these actor be given so much money?" About Dhan Dhana Dhan Goal
Dhan Dhana Dhan Goal is a 2007 Indian sports drama film directed by Vivek Agnihotri. Set in the UK, the film revolves around a struggling South Asian football club, Southall United, and their journey to regain lost glory. Featuring an ensemble cast including John Abraham, Arshad Warsi, and Bipasha Basu, the story explores themes of identity, racism, and community spirit through the lens of football.
Meanwhile, Vivek is now awaiting the release of his upcoming directorial, titled The Bengal Files: Right to Life. It is believed that Vivek's film will delve into the politics of 1940s in Bengal. The film stars Mithun Chakraborty, Anupam Kher, Pallavi Joshi, and Govind Namdev, among others, in key roles and is scheduled to release in theatres on 5 September 2025.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

12 minutes ago

• Time of India

Are filmmakers being silenced by Arbitrary Censorship?

In a democratic nation where freedom of speech and artistic expression are considered fundamental rights, a string of recent incidents involving the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has stirred fresh debate around censorship and creative liberty in Indian cinema. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The two most prominent cases—Janaki V/S State of Kerala and Sitaare Zameen Par—highlight a concerning trend: creators are being forced to make politically and religiously motivated changes, often with little or no formal communication, just to get their films cleared for release. A Name That Sparked Controversy The Malayalam courtroom drama Janaki V/S State of Kerala starring and Union Minister was denied censor clearance at the last minute despite being scheduled for release on June 27. The issue? The protagonist's name—Janaki. According to the CBFC, the name, which is another widely accepted form of Goddess Sita, was deemed inappropriate for a female character portrayed as a victim of assault. This sudden decision, lacking any formal written notice or show-cause, drew immediate criticism. FEFKA (Film Employees Federation of Kerala) general secretary B Unnikrishnan during his conversation with The Times Of India asked . 'Many Hindu names are derived from deities—will they all face censorship?' Unnikrishnan, noting that his own telefilm with a character named Janaki had previously passed CBFC approval. This isn't the first time such censorship over character names has occurred. Director M B Padmakumar faced similar pushback over a character named Janaki in his film Token Number. In that case, the CBFC had suggested replacing the name with 'Jayanti' or 'Krishnan'—names that lacked the supposed divine association and only when the name was changed to Jayanti was the film approved for screening. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now CBFC's Micro-Management of Creative Choices If Janaki V/S State of Kerala presents a case of religious sensitivity gone awry, the CBFC's treatment of Sitaare Zameen Par, starring and , showcases an even broader issue—political influence creeping into creative decisions. Bollywood Hungama in its report stated that after being unhappy with the cuts suggested by CBFC's Examining Committee the film was eventually reviewed by the Revising Committee, headed by Vaman Kendre. Their suggestions involved the following changes Replace "Businesswoman" with the gender-neutral "Businessperson." Replace 'Michael Jackson' with the generic term 'Lovebirds.' Remove a visual element tied to the word 'Kamal' (interpreted as a reference to the lotus, the BJP party symbol). Most notably, include a quote by Prime Minister Narendra Modi after the opening disclaimer These demands raise an uncomfortable question: since when did CBFC's role extend to prescribing political messages in fictional narratives? Adding a quote from a sitting prime minister turns it into an ideological imposition. Despite these interventions, Sitaare Zameen Par was eventually granted a U/A 13+ certificate, and the film released on June 20. But at what cost to artistic autonomy? Are Certain Narratives Being Silenced? With growing examples of this kind of interference, one must ask: will upcoming films that delve into sensitive mythological or historical subjects also face similar scrutiny? A case in point is Nitesh Tiwari's Ramayana, starring as Lord Ram and Sai Pallavi as Goddess Sita. The story of Ramayana is inherently complex and filled with emotionally intense sequences—Sita's abduction by Ravana, her Agnipariksha (trial by fire), and her eventual abandonment by Ram despite being pregnant with Luv and Kush. These episodes are not only central to the plot but also deeply embedded in Indian cultural memory. Will the CBFC now raise objections to how Sita's trials are depicted? Will they argue that showing her as a victim undermines her divinity? If using a name like Janaki is already contentious, what of a film that retells her entire journey, including the injustices she faced? This isn't just hypothetical—it's a very real concern in today's political and social climate, where identity, religion, and ideology intersect more than ever before. In the words of the late Satyajit Ray, 'Cinema's job is not to provide answers, but to ask the right questions.' It's time the CBFC remembered that.

Hans India

14 minutes ago

• Hans India

CBFC Religious Objection Halts Suresh Gopi's Malayalam Film Release For Janaki' In title

The upcoming Malayalam film 'Janaki vs State of Kerala', featuring Union Minister and actor Suresh Gopi alongside Anupama Parameswaran, faces an unexpected roadblock as the Central Board of Film Certification has raised objections to its title on religious grounds. The controversy emerged when the CBFC demanded that filmmakers alter the movie's title, specifically objecting to the use of 'Janaki' due to its religious significance as another name for the Hindu goddess Sita. This directive has effectively put the film's scheduled June 27 release date in jeopardy, creating uncertainty for distributors and audiences alike. The film's narrative centers around a woman who becomes a survivor of sexual assault and subsequently engages in a determined legal battle against the state system. This powerful storyline addressing women's rights and judicial accountability was set to reach theaters this week before the censorship intervention. According to the production team, an interesting jurisdictional conflict has emerged within the CBFC itself. While the Thiruvananthapuram regional office cleared the film for release without any title modifications, the Mumbai headquarters has insisted on the name change, creating administrative confusion and delaying the certification process. This development has triggered strong reactions from Kerala's film industry, with various filmmaker associations and industry bodies expressing their displeasure over what they perceive as unnecessary interference. Several prominent figures in Malayalam cinema have criticized the decision and warned of potential protest actions if the demand is not reconsidered. The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between creative expression and religious sensitivities in Indian cinema. Filmmakers argue that 'Janaki' is a common name used across Indian culture and literature, not exclusively reserved for religious contexts. They contend that the character in question represents an ordinary woman fighting for justice, making the title appropriate for the narrative. Industry observers note that this incident reflects broader challenges facing Indian cinema regarding censorship policies and their implementation across different regional offices. The inconsistency between local and central CBFC decisions has raised questions about standardized guidelines and the need for clearer protocols. The film's producers are now caught between maintaining their artistic vision and meeting commercial release deadlines. Any significant delay could impact the movie's box office prospects and distribution arrangements that have already been finalized with theater chains across Kerala and other states. As the standoff continues, the Malayalam film industry watches closely, viewing this as a test case for creative freedom and the extent of censorship powers. The resolution of this dispute may set important precedents for future films dealing with sensitive themes or utilizing names with cultural significance.

Hindustan Times

17 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Prada's 'Kolhapuri chappals' make their runway debut; but this is just another Scandi scarf controversy in the making

The Kolhapuri chappal is now global. Prada's 'Kolhapuri chappals' make their runway debut — but people aren't the least bit happy(Photos: X, Korakari) But that's where the irony lies — for something so deeply desi, and hence expansive, to be considered 'global', contingent on (and only) an unassumingly entitled nod from a luxury stronghold. Prada showcased its Men's Spring Summer 2026 collection yesterday at the Deposito of the Fondazione Prada, Milan. Introduced by Miuccia Prada and Raf Simons, the Italian luxury house's lineup was whimsical, softly futuristic and as it goes, not for the mango crowd. But that's the whole point. The rhetoric and debate over this however, took a back seat in the face of the detail that became the inevitable showstopper — Prada's very own Kolhapuri chappals (although we're pretty sure they won't be calling it that). The slim build, the ring-ed toe and the skeletal frame — referring to these pairs of tan exoticism (sadly), as anything but Kolhapuri chappals, would make for yet another chapter in the growing volume of rooted Indian fashion, being colonised sans a sliver of acknowledgement. did it again There's inspiration, and then there's unacknowledged duplication. There's a third strain to this too — a continued and problematic denial of there having been any appropriation. From the looks of it, Prada was absolutely anticipating the Kolhapuri chappals to land as chic-ly as they did. Each show invite was literally packed with a "leather ring" as a token takeaway for all the attendees. Now need we remind you that the Kolhapuri's USP sits with that toe ring. Magnifying this to broader global narratives, the disapproving reception of Prada's Kolhapuri chappals feels like a Scandi scarf scandal 3.0. We say 3.0, in acknowledgement of the infuriating back-and-forth when it came to asserting the true inspiration behind the viral-for-the-summer 'Ibiza' aesthetic as desi applique work and embroidery. What is the Scandinavian scarf but a dupatta? What are the Ibiza-core minis and skirts but saturated texture on western silhouettes? And what are the earthy Prada 'sandals' but literally Kolhapuri chappals? Wake up babe, we're literally living through fashion.