Punjab Police Constable Recruitment 2025: Objection window closes tomorrow at punjabpolice.gov.in, link here

Punjab Police will be closing the window to file objections against the provisional answer key for constable recruitment examination 2025 on Monday, June 23, 2025. Candidates who wish to challenge the answer key can do so on the official website of Punjab Police at punjabpolice.gov.in. Punjab Police Constable Recruitment 2025: Objection window closes on June 23 at punjabpolice.gov.in. Candidates can click on the direct link given here,
Candidates should note that the link to challenge the answer key will be active till 7 PM.
The Punjab Police Constable Recruitment CBT - 1 Computer-Based Test) Examination 2025 was conducted on May 4 to June 8, 2025.
As per the schedule, the answer key was released and objection window was opened on June 21, 2025.
Also read: DU calls 'Muslim' as language a clerical error after outrage over Urdu omission
It may be mentioned here that the selection process for the recruitment of Punjab Police constables includes three stages:
Stage 1 consists of two common Computer Based Test (CBT), multiple Choice Question (MCQ) type Paper, namely Paper-I and Paper-II, of which Paper-II shall be qualifying in nature.
Also read: JoSAA Counselling 2025: Seat acceptance, fee payment for Round 1 ends today at josaa.nic.in, direct link here
Whereas Stage 2 includes Physical Screening Test (PST) and Physical Measurement Test (PMT). Both Physical Screening Test and Physical Measurement Test will be qualifying in nature.
Stage 3 consists of Document Scrutiny.
Also read: TS ICET Answer Key 2025: Objection window opens today at icet.tgche.ac.in, here's how to challenge answer key
Through this recruitment exam, Punjab Police aims to fill tentatively 1,746 vacancies are to be filled through this recruitment drive. Of this, 1,261 vacancies are for District Police Cadre and 485 are for Armed Police Cadre. Punjab Police Recruitment 2025: How to submit objections
Candidates can follow the steps mentioned below to submit objections against the answer key: Visit the official website at punjabpolice.gov.in. On the home page, click on the Recruitment tab. Click on the link for Punjab Police Recruitment 2025. Enter your credentials to log in, and submit. Check the answer key and click on the option to submit objections, as required. Submit your objection supported by valid proof. Download your confirmation page and keep a printout of the same for future reference.
For more details, candidates are advised to visit the official website of Punjab Police.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

Punjab Police Constable Recruitment 2025: Applied for 1,746 vacancies? Answer key released, objection window open, here's how to challenge errors

The Punjab Police has released the answer key for the Computer-Based Test ( CBT ) conducted to recruit constables in the District and Armed Police Cadres. Candidates who appeared for the exam can now check their responses and raise objections, if any, on the official website, until 7 PM on June 23, 2025. What was the exam for? This recruitment drive is to fill 1,746 constable vacancies. Online applications were accepted from 21 February to 13 March, and the CBT took place in phases from 4 May to 8 June. Admit cards were released according to the exam dates. The recruitment process includes four steps: Computer-Based Test (CBT) Physical Screening Test (PST) Physical Measurement Test (PMT) Document Verification Answer Key and Objection Window The answer key has been published for all exam phases, including the last round of exams held between 31 May and 8 June. Candidates are advised to review their recorded answers and check for any mistakes. If they spot any errors, they can raise objections through the online portal on the Punjab Police website. The objection window is open from 7 PM on 21 June to 7 PM on 23 June. Live Events The CBT was held in both English and Punjabi to make it easier for all candidates. Who is eligible? To apply, candidates must: Be Indian citizens Be aged between 18 and 28 Have passed 10+2 (or equivalent) Have passed Matriculation with Punjabi as a subject Both male and female candidates can apply. The minimum height requirement is: 5 feet 7 inches (170.2 cm) for men 5 feet 2 inches (157.5 cm) for women Postings could be anywhere in Punjab or even outside the country in some cases. Application Fees General category: Rs 1,200 SC/ST and EWS: Rs 700 Ex-servicemen and their family members: Rs 500 How to check the answer key and raise objections Go to Click on the 'Constable 2025 – District and Armed Police Cadres' recruitment section Select the link to view the CBT answer key Log in using your registration details To raise objections, click on 'Raise Objection', upload any supporting documents, and submit before the deadline Make sure you submit accurate details. Once the deadline passes, the police will not accept any further objections. What happens next? After the answer key is finalised and results are declared, shortlisted candidates will be called for the PST and PMT (physical tests). These are only qualifying in nature. Then comes the document verification before the final selection. Candidates should only follow updates from the official Punjab Police website to avoid any confusion or fake news.

Hindustan Times

6 hours ago

• Hindustan Times

Bengal child rights commission sends notice to BJP's Amit Malviya

Kolkata: The West Bengal Commission for Protection of Child Rights has served a show cause letter to Amit Malviya, head of the national information technology cell of the Bharatiya Janata Party, for posting a photograph of a minor girl after her unnatural death in Bengal's South 24 Parganas district on June 16, a commission official said. BJP leader Amit Malviya. (File Photo) Targeting chief minister Mamata Banerjee, Malviya alleged in a social media post on June 19 that the girl was gangraped and murdered. He attached a photo in which the minor's face was digitally blurred. 'The commission took suo motu cognizance of Malviya's post because the minor could be easily identified despite an effort to digitally blur her face. This is a violation of the Juvenile Justice Act,' a commission official said requesting anonymity. Malviya, a BJP national executive member and co-incharge of the party's West Bengal unit, also alleged in his post that the incident had a communal angle. He wrote: '...Mamata Banerjee's governance has been an unmitigated disaster for women's safety. Worse still, the administration is suppressing the incident, citing 'communal sensitivity' — because the victim is Hindu and the accused are Muslim. This is not secularism. This is state-sponsored injustice...' The West Bengal police issued a rebuttal on X on June 20, calling Malviya's allegation a lie and stating that post mortem examination had revealed that the minor died after consuming poison and there was no evidence of sexual assault whatsoever. 'Lies Again! Efforts are being made from certain quarters to spread misinformation about the death of a minor girl four days back. Facts are, an unnatural death of a minor girl happened. The body was recovered from her house in observance of all formalities. Inquest and post mortem, under proper videography, was done to ascertain the cause of death. Based on the complaint by the mother of the deceased, FIR in Jibantala PS was also registered,' the state police said. 'The post mortem report reveals that there was no sexual assault whatsoever and the death was caused by consumption of unknown poison. Investigation is in progress. A criminal case is being started against the person who shared the photograph of the deceased minor girl on social media in violation of the Hon'ble Apex Court guidelines and also attempted to fuel communal disharmony,' the post added. Malviya did not comment on his post and the commission's show cause letter till Sunday afternoon. Bengal BJP unit's chief spokesperson Samik Bhattacharya said: 'Answers to all questions raised will be given in due time.'

Mint

7 hours ago

• Mint

Britain's Labour Party Needs to Listen to Its Social Conscience

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Progressives on both sides of the English-speaking Atlantic have focused much of their energy and attention on championing minority rights and indulging in identity politics. Standing up for groups who've suffered historic discrimination is laudable; removing barriers to Black employment and giving gay people the right to marry are hard-fought achievements. Transgender people deserve protections too, with trade-offs necessary given the clashes of biological sex and gender ideology. But whether by preference or distracted by such concerns, social evils which used to fire up the liberal-left conscience — class inequality, lack of economic opportunity and cohesive societies — have been in danger of being overlooked or even downgraded. In the UK, a horrific, decades-long scandal of grooming and rape gangs of mainly Pakistani Muslim men who preyed on young white women has revealed the pitfalls of this lopsided approach. The story is distressing enough in itself, but it has wider resonance for Britain's governing Labour Party, which prides itself on caring for the less fortunate in society but has failed them — both under Tony Blair's administration when the crimes first became apparent, and due to a sluggish response under Keir Starmer. This doesn't absolve the previous Conservative governments from carrying a large share of the blame. As the cross-party peer Baroness Louise Casey pointed out in an audit published this week, one of the main reasons for ducking the issue was oversensitivity about ethnic and religious groups from a Muslim background. Starmer, an alumnus of London's top human rights legal chambers, is an exemplar of the progressive mindset. He also successfully prosecuted grooming gangs in his former role as head of the crown prosecution service. So the appalling detail isn't unknown to him. And yet, in January, the prime minister accused opposition figures calling for a national inquiry into gangs who preyed on underage girls of 'jumping on the bandwagon of the far right,' Elon Musk had wrongly tweeted that millions of young women were being targeted by Asian gangs; in the social media echo chamber, the populists of Reform UK were taking up the cry. But that didn't invalidate the fact that the matter had been buried too quickly and with insufficient attention to the causes. The PM's words have returned to haunt him – but the underlying omission is far more important. Across the country and in the areas where the gangs operated for years with impunity under the noses of Labour councils and indolent police forces, men of Pakistani descent have been vastly overrepresented among the gangs. This mix undoubtedly requires sensitive handling — but not downright evasion. On Monday, however, the PM was forced to give way after Casey found that the authorities had 'shied away' from investigating the horrific crimes and avoided its ethnic and cultural character. The government finally agreed that a national inquiry was urgently required. The trouble is, it was urgently required a very long time ago. Even Starmer's U-turn was couched in flat, emotionless language; he would 'accept' Casey's recommendation. His Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was more forthcoming: These rapes were 'a stain on our society' and she would initiate a new round of criminal investigations. But, in truth, none of this would have happened if it wasn't for pressure from those on the right of the political spectrum — and in some case the far-right — on a center-left government. Many of the most notorious gangs operated in Labour-held areas, and the councils who 'shied away' were Labour too. Alarmed by the potential threat to a fragile social peace in areas where large groups of incomers are often living lives wholly separate to the White communities around them, Labour had another reason to downplay the matter — concern about the reaction of a substantial Muslim voting bloc. Local councils urged the police to play down the systematic nature of the abuse. Overindulging group rights has also cornered the PM in the fierce debate over the rights of trans people and protections for women's spaces. When the Supreme Court ruled this year that 'sex' in Britain's Equality Act unequivocally meant 'biological sex,' Starmer's bloodless response was to welcome 'the clarity' of the judgment. We are none the wiser about what he really thinks about the issue. I have firsthand experience as a journalist of this reluctance of a liberal mindset to face inconvenient truths. At the Sunday Times, we published a magazine article in 2007 by a feminist writer Julie Bindel, exclusively detailing the abuse of girls by groups of Pakistani-origin men in the northern counties of Lancashire and Yorkshire. The article had been offered first to the liberal-leaning Guardian newspaper, which turned it down. Andrew Norfolk, a journalist on our sister paper the Times, was also subsequently accused of racism when he investigated the ethnic gang phenomenon. A few brave Labour MPs, mostly women, also tried to bring the problem to the attention of a wider audience but initially found little support from male colleagues in Parliament and local parties. And while a degree of discipline is necessary in politics, lack of curiosity about opposing or challenging views leads to problems getting parked and evils left to fester. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington more than 60 years ago, Martin Luther King spoke of his dream that his children would 'one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.' There's an enduring lesson here for all: The implication of the declaration is that wise progressives should not be blind to good and evil among Whites, Blacks and Asians, and steadfast in their willingness to confront the consequences. The price of ignoring wrongdoing, whoever the culprit, is much higher — and more painful for all concerned. More from Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Martin Ivens is the editor of the Times Literary Supplement. Previously, he was editor of the Sunday Times of London and its chief political commentator. More stories like this are available on