United Utilities banned from awarding bonuses to executives under new Ofwat rules
Water supplier United Utilities has been barred from awarding bonuses to its most senior executives after the introduction of new regulations aimed at holding water companies accountable for their performance.
The new rules, which came into force on Friday 6 June under the Water (Special Measures) Act, mean United Utilities cannot offer financial bonuses to its chief executive or chief financial officer.
The measures apply to companies that fail to meet environmental or consumer standards, fall short on financial resilience, or are convicted of a criminal offence.
Regulator Ofwat has been given new powers to recover any bonus payments made in breach of the ban.
The restrictions are not permanent, and United Utilities may be able to resume performance-related rewards in 2025/26, provided it complies with the new conditions.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has revealed that over the past decade, more than £112 million in bonuses and incentives have been paid out by UK water companies. Ministers say this is no longer acceptable where companies have failed to meet key standards.
Commenting on the new measures, Environment Secretary Steve Reed said: ' Water company bosses, like anyone else, should only get bonuses if they've performed well, certainly not if they've failed to tackle water pollution.
'Undeserved bonuses will now be banned as part of the Government's plan to clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good.'
Campaign group River Action has welcomed the ban, but warned against companies attempting to bypass it by increasing base pay.
Chief executive James Wallace said: 'We won't end pollution for profit until water companies are refinanced and governed for public benefit. Any attempt to inflate base pay as a workaround must be stamped out.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
18 hours ago
- BBC News
Thames Water nationalisation prep 'stepped up', says government
The government has "stepped up" preparations for the potential temporary nationalisation of Thames Water, the environment secretary has in Parliament on Thursday, Steve Reed said the government "stand ready for all eventualities" - including placing the embattled water company under its control "if that were to become necessary".Earlier this month, Thames Water faced a major blow in its attempt to secure its future after US private equity giant KKR pulled out of a £4bn rescue deal for the Dubois, from the water company, said it was "working hard to get the company on a much firmer financial footing". Answering a question from the Labour MP for Monmouthshire, Catherine Fookes, Reed said Thames Water "remains financially stable" and that the government had "stepped up" its preparations for potential nationalisation."The government will always act in the national interest on these issues," he added. 'Business as usual' Thames Water serves about a quarter of the UK's population, mostly across parts of southern England and London, and employs 8,000 it has huge debts and is struggling to fix leaks, stop sewage spills, and modernise outdated May, the water company's chief told MPs that its survival depended on the industry regulator Ofwat being lenient over fines and penalties for its environmental BBC understands that KKR pulled out of its deal to invest in the firm in part due to the political and regulatory risk surrounding the speaking on Thursday, Mr Reed said: "Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to its customers and to the environment—it is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company."When asked about the firm being placed into government-supervised administration, Ms Dubois said: "We're getting on with the business of serving customers with water and treating their sewage, so it's business as usual for us.""We're working hard to get the company on a much firmer financial footing and we're just getting on with the day job," she a statement, Thames Water added: "Our focus remains on a holistic and fundamental recapitalisation, delivering a market-led solution which includes targeting investment grade credit ratings."Regardless of who owns Thames Water, its water services will continue as Water is effectively owned by its lenders and a consortium of them has prepared a plan to raise equity which sources say is ready to go and fully funded. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Times
2 days ago
- Times
Thames Water given special administration warning by minister
The government has given the strongest indication yet that it is preparing to put Thames Water into administration. Answering questions in the Commons, Steve Reed the environment secretary, was asked to comment on backbench unease that a consortium plotting a takeover of Thames Water is lobbying Ofwat, the regulator, to ease up on the fines and penalties it is levying against the company for past misdemeanours and ongoing poor performance. In response Reed told MPs: 'Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to their customers and to the environment. It is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company.' He continued: 'The company remains financially stable but we've stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, as I've said before, including [a] special administration regime if that were to become necessary.' A special administration regime is the option of last resort for the troubled company and would involve the appointment of professional accountants and be likely to wipe out all creditors in an attempt to refinance the business. A consortium of creditors of Thames Water who are already propping up the £19.25 billion in-debt London and Thames Valley supplier, have proposed a £5 billion refinancing over and above £3 billion of bridging loans that are currently keeping the company in business. However, those creditors have made it plain that their proposals can work only if Ofwat is prepared to offer a 'recalibration' of Thames Water's five-year funding settlement and performance targets. As the settlement currently stands, which demands reductions in environmentally-damaging pollution incidents and wasteful mains leakage plus other metrics, Thames could face up to £1 billion of fines and penalties for not hitting the targets in the coming years. The creditors plotting the takeover include major UK institutions such as Aberdeen, Invesco and M&G, large international finance houses such as BlackRock and Apollo, as well as distressed-debt dealers such as Elliott and Silver Point Capital. They have stepped in after the infrastructure investment arm of KKR, the American private equity house, walked away last month from a £4 billion recapitalisation plan. A spokesman for the creditors backing the takeover said: 'Broad regulatory support is needed to unlock a market-led solution for Thames Water that will secure billions of pounds in fresh investment for its ageing network. 'This investor group is committed to working with the government and regulators to agree a pragmatic plan that recognises what Thames Water can realistically deliver and they expect to be held accountable for an ambitious trajectory for the company's return to compliance. 'More than £10 billion would be written-off to get the company back to investment grade, expected to be the largest financial loss on an infrastructure asset in British history.'
The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Government will not be lenient with Thames Water creditors, suggests Reed
Environment Secretary Steve Reed has suggested that the Government will reject calls from Thames Water creditors for leniency from fines and penalties. Taking questions in the Commons on Tuesday, Mr Reed said the Government had 'stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities', amid Thames Water's search for a rescue plan. The troubled utility company's lenders put forward proposals to pump cash into it. But they have also demanded leniency from regulators over performance targets and fines for environmental failings. The creditors argue that without regulatory leniency, the utility's 'pollutions, asset health deterioration, and customer service levels are likely to worsen'. Labour MP for Monmouthshire, Catherine Fookes, told the Commons: 'I am really concerned by reports of Thames Water seeking regulatory easements. 'Can the Secretary of State assure me that this Government will continue to crack down on water pollution from all sources, including in the Wye and the Thames and all across the UK?' Mr Reed replied: 'The Government will always act in the national interest on these issues. 'Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to their customers and to the environment. 'It is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company. 'The company remains financially stable, but we've stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, as I've said before, including a special administration regime if that were to become necessary.' It comes after US private equity giant KKR recently pulled out of a rescue deal to inject much-needed cash into Britain's biggest water supplier, which has 16 million customers and is sinking under £19 billion of debt. The move threw the future of Thames Water into doubt once more and raised the threat of temporary nationalisation by the Government if a deal cannot be agreed. A Thames Water spokesperson said: 'Thames Water is committed to improving outcomes for the environment and its customers. 'We are investing billions of pounds in our network and any recapitalisation of the business will need to ensure that is maintained for the benefit of all our stakeholders. 'Our focus remains on a holistic and fundamental recapitalisation, delivering a market-led solution which includes targeting investment grade, credit ratings.' The creditors are the bondholders who now effectively own Thames Water after the High Court, earlier this year, approved a financial restructuring through a loan of up to £3 billion to ensure it can keep running until the summer of 2026. As part of their plans, the creditors would commit to spending £20.5 billion over the next five years, as agreed under the current five-year plan with Ofwat. But they are calling for a 'pragmatic approach' to regulation – including 're-basing incentives and performance targets' – and 'realistic levels of compliance'. It is understood they have been holding intensive talks with regulator Ofwat in the hope of securing approval for their deal in early July. A spokesman for the creditors said: 'Broad regulatory support is needed to unlock a market-led solution for Thames Water that will secure billions of pounds in fresh investment for its aging network, allowing a world class leadership team to start the intensive turnaround and deliver better outcomes for customers and the environment. 'This investor group is committed to working with the Government and regulators to agree a pragmatic plan that recognises what Thames Water can realistically deliver and they expect to be held accountable for an ambitious trajectory for the company's return to compliance. 'More than £10 billion would be written off to get the company back to investment grade, expected to be the largest financial loss on an infrastructure asset in British history.'
