GCDA may become first local body to serve as appropriate authority for land pooling for a major project
Greater Cochin Development Authority (GCDA) will be the first local body to act as an appropriate authority to make available land for a major project in the State under the land pooling rules, if and when it goes ahead with land pooling for the third phase expansion of the Infopark Kochi.
The State Government order dated October 18, 2024, designated the GCDA as the appropriate authority for the proposed land pooling under Section 56 of the Kerala Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, into which land pooling rules were incorporated through an extraordinary government gazette dated March 16, 2024.
'Though we have undertaken projects like Kaloor-Kadavanthra Road, which can be construed as executed through land pooling, this is the first time a local body is being designated as the appropriate authority under the land pooling rules,' said GCDA sources.
Out of the 300 acres which the GCDA proposes to make available, 100 acres would be made available to Infopark Kochi, while the remaining 200 acres would be enhanced in value through infrastructure, and a portion of it would be returned to landowners, which is at the heart of the concept of land pooling.
According to the Kerala Land Pooling Rules, 30% of the land would be used for commercial, industrial, and housing purposes, and the remaining land would be returned to landowners. The municipal corporation, municipal council, town panchayat, or village panchayat may, through a resolution, decide to prepare a land pooling scheme in respect of any part of the area within its jurisdiction.
Once not less than 75% of landowners of the proposed land pooling scheme area give their consent, the appropriate authority may issue the final notification for the drafting of the scheme. However, it is mandatory that the landowners who decline to give their consent should also be included in the scheme. Even if the consent is not forthcoming, the appropriate authority may, with the approval of the government, take an appropriate decision with regard to the scheme.
Landowners with plots not less than five hectares in municipal corporations, seven hectares in municipalities, and 10 hectares in panchayats can apply to the appropriate authority for inclusion of their plots in a land pooling scheme in their areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
MahaRERA orders Lodha Developers to refund booking amount of NRI homebuyers after home loan rejection for Mumbai project
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has directed Lodha Developers (formerly Macrotech) to refund the booking amount to NRI homebuyers who cancelled their reservation after being unable to secure a home loan for a ₹ 2.27 crore apartment in their Lodha Mulund project in Mumbai. The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has directed Lodha Developers (formerly Macrotech) to refund the booking amount to NRI homebuyers who cancelled their reservation after being unable to secure a home loan. (Picture for representational purposes only)(Pexels) The couple had paid ₹ 7 lakh upfront, 'relying' on the developer's oral assurance that the amount would be fully refunded if their loan application failed. After informing Lodha of their loan rejection and requesting cancellation, they were allegedly denied the refund, prompting them to approach MahaRERA, which has now ruled in their favour. The two homebuyers, Vaibhav Kishor Ambukar and his wife Seema Ambukar, had booked a flat in 'Lodha Mulund Project Tower 1' by paying a booking amount of ₹ 7 lakh in two instalments in September and October 2021. The couple, residing abroad (Russia at the time of booking), made it clear at the time of booking that their ability to buy the flat was contingent upon securing a home loan. According to the homebuyers, Lodha's representatives had orally assured them that in case of loan rejection or a financial emergency, the booking amount would be refunded without deductions. However, after the loan application was rejected in November 2021, due to documentation challenges and the complainant's contractual employment abroad, Lodha allegedly refused to cancel the booking or process a refund. Developer's defence The developer- Lodha Group contended that the booking was governed by an application form signed on November 18, 2021, which included a clause (Clause 3.5) allowing the forfeiture of booking amounts — up to 10% of the total consideration — in case of cancellation. The developer maintained that the complainants had signed the application form after fully understanding the terms. Also Read: Maharashtra Tribunal backs homebuyers, orders Lodha Group to register portion of New Cuffe Parade Project with MahaRERA MahaRERA's order The MahaRERA, in its order dated June 10, 2025, stated that no formal agreement for sale had been executed between the parties. The Authority found the forfeiture clause to be 'one-sided, unconscionable, and unenforceable' and held that the refund denial violated the spirit of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. 'The complainants' reason for withdrawal stemmed from a genuine financial crisis, not mala fide intent. The application form itself appeared partially filled and unsigned by Lodha's sales representatives. Moreover, it was signed just nine days before the refund request was made,' the order said. Following this, the MahaRERA ordered Lodha to refund ₹ 6.65 lakh to the homebuyers by July 15, 2025. The order said that if the timeline is not adhered to, the refund will attract interest at 2% above the State Bank of India (SBI)'s highest marginal cost of lending rate. Also Read: Over 29,000 complaints filed by homebuyers against 5,500 real estate projects in Maharashtra: MahaRERA data Additionally, the MahaRERA directed the developer to compensate homebuyers with ₹ 20,000 towards the cost of the complaint. Meanwhile, an email query sent to Lodha Developers did not receive a response. If a response is received, the story will be updated. Homebuyers should not rely on oral assurances According to legal experts, homebuyers should not rely on any oral submissions or assurances by the developer or its representative. "Homebuyers must exercise extreme caution and avoid relying on verbal promises or assurances from developers or their representatives when booking a flat, as such oral agreements lack legal enforceability under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) and the Indian Contract Act, 1872," said Sonam Chandwani, Managing Partner KS Legal & Associates. "A clear, written contract detailing refund policies, contingencies, and obligations is essential to safeguard against developers' potentially unfair practices," Chandwani said. Also Read: MahaRERA update: Maharashtra regulator surpasses 50,000 project registrations in 8 years Sanjay Chaturvedi, a Mumbai-based lawyer whose firm represented the homebuyers in MahaRERA, said, "The delivery of the home is always with the developer, and he can sell it either to the first buyer or any successive buyer. Then why deduct or forfeit any token amount? Such practices discourage honest homebuyers and are bad for the industry. This is a very well-adjudged order." Chaturvedi said his client was working in Russia at the time of booking and currently works in Dubai.
India.com
34 minutes ago
- India.com
Complaint Filed Against Vijay Deverakonda For Derogatory Remarks Against Tribals
Mumbai: Tollywood heartthrob Vijay Deverakonda has landed in a legal soup after a complaint was filed against him under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by the Raidurgam police. VD allegedly made derogatory remarks against the tribal communities during a pre-release event of Suriya starrer "Retro" last month. Talking about the unfortunate Pahalgham attack, Vijay was heard saying during the event, 'The solution to what is happening in Kashmir is also to educate them (terrorists) and ensure they don't get brainwashed. What will they achieve? Kashmir belongs to India, and Kashmiris are ours. India doesn't even need to attack Pakistan because Pakistanis themselves are fed up with their government and will attack them if this continues. Asalu 500 years back tribals kokkutunnatu, veelu buddi lekunda, minimum common sense lekunda chese panulu.' (They behave like tribals did 500 years ago, fighting without common sense). These remarks were considered to be derogatory towards tribals by the tribal organizations. A section of the FIR read, "Film Actor Shri Vijay Deverakonda, who participated in the pre-release event of the movie 'Retro' starring Hero Surya, made comments that hurt the sentiments of the tribals and seriously insulted them. He insulted their tribal community by saying that they had beaten them 500 years ago without any intelligence and without minimum common sense. Moreover, he made comments comparing them to Pakistani terrorists. These comments, perceived as racially offensive, were broadcast across multiple media platforms. The statement went viral through the Sithara Entertainment YouTube Channel, which has 8.63 lakh subscribers and over 99,000 video views for the specific video [YouTube link: 'https/ si-8q-bRrdnr995bkjF' It further said "The remarks were viewed as a serious insult to the self-respect and dignity of the tribal community. Therefore, the complainant requested to take necessary action against Shri Vijay Devarakonda as per law." Vijay is yet to react to the complaint.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
What two deaths say about ‘peninsular' India's insular view of the North East
In June, North East India witnessed two related deaths: Raja Raghuvanshi from Indore was murdered in Meghalaya and Roshmita Hojai, a woman from Assam's Dimasa tribe, drowned in Rishikesh in Uttarakhand. The North East link was common to both incidents but most media outlets in peninsular India had widely contrasting reactions. Racist stereotypes emerged first. A national daily declared Meghalaya as a region of ' crime-prone ' hills with no mention of how many murders or other crimes had been committed in an area where tourism is central to the local economy. One crime was all it took for mainstream and social media to condemn Meghalaya's residents as 'criminals', without bothering to mention that the villagers around Sohra, where Raghuvanshi was murdered by the wife he had recently married and her accomplices, held a candlelight vigil to mourn the killing of a complete stranger. This piece of yellow journalism is what the ToI is reduced to? Armchair reportage at its worst.. Disgusting and slanderous.. — patricia mukhim (@meipat) May 29, 2025 On the other hand, newspapers devoted a two-inch column to Hojai, who was aspiring to be a civil servant, and added that two men accompanying her were detained for questioning. There was a complete absence of journalism on how the life of a young woman was nipped in the bud. These contrasting reactions are not exceptions. Stereotypes abound in peninsular India about the people of the North East as 'terrorists', 'secessionists' and immoral women. Every few months, there are reports of women from the northeastern states were molested in Delhi. After one attack, a message was circulated in one of the universities that the women were assaulted because they do not dress like Indians. In December 2021, when security forces gunned down six young men returning home from daily wage work in Mon in Nagaland, social media groups were filled with messages that the men were secessionists who deserved to die. For over six decades, much of the North East has been under the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, which gives extraordinary powers to the security forces. It grants the forces the impunity to gun down innocent people, as they did in Nagaland, if they claim to have done it in good faith on the line of duty. I have heard a few who call themselves human rights activists and oppose the murder of civilians in the rest of India saying that the stringent law is needed in the North East because of secessionism. This assertion is rarely backed by an effort to find out how many 'secessionists' there are or why there are conflicts in the region. The 'conflict zone' itself is an exaggerated stereotype. The more than 45 million people of the North East live with the disadvantage of distance with peninsular India, which they call the 'mainland' because of its insular view of their region. This distance and relative isolation are physical as well as psychological and political. For the British colonial regime, the North East was used as an isolated buffer zone between the rest of India and China and Burma. That isolation has continued after Independence. Decades after three wars were fought in the region in the 1960s – against China in 1962, Pakistan in 1965 and following the creation of Bangladesh in 1971 – the North East continues to be a buffer zone for national security. Most North Easterners feel that peninsular India, which views itself as the 'mainstream' centered on the Gangetic Valley Hindu dominant-caste male culture, does not understand them and that 'mainstream' India stops at Kolkata. To most 'mainstream' Indians, the North East is a vague territory between Kolkata and Myanmar about which they know little. One murder case involving both victim and perpetrators from a different state. Case worked out swiftly. And still Meghalaya is continuously trying to bolster confidence about state being a safe tourist destination. — Piyush Rai (@Benarasiyaa) June 18, 2025 During the last decade, this 'distant land of conflicts' has become 'the land of injustice' for the lakhs of immigrants excluded from the National Register of Citizens – like in Assam. But for that the North East rarely enters mainstream Indian thinking. Even the national anthem exalts 'Vindhya, Himachala, Yamuna, Ganga' and ignores the Brahmaputra, which is longer than the Ganga, is the fifth largest river in the world and confers an identity on the North East. But it is not an all-India sacred river. Efforts are being made of late to confer some sacredness on it but by connecting it to the Ganga, not in its own right. Another verse of the national anthem includes 'Punjab, Sindh, Gujarat, Maratha, Dravida, Utkala, Vanga', in other words, an Aryan-Dravidian India in which the people of the North East do not exist. Lakhs of people from the region are forced to go to 'mainland' India because of the high unemployment and poor education infrastructure of the North East. Because of their Mongoloid features, they are often referred to as 'chinki', a pejorative and racist term for the 'enemy' Chinese. Women among them often face sexual harassment because of their looks and their being perceived as open to sexual advances. These stereotypes have had disastrous consequences in times of crisis. In 2020, after the Covid-19 pandemic broke out in China and later spread globally, there were reports of North East people in peninsular India being harassed, evicted from housing or denied entry because of their 'Chinese' features. A group of Naga students was refused entry to a mall in Mysuru, as were two Manipuri students in Hyderabad. A nurse in Bengaluru reported that a child ran away from her screaming 'coronavirus'. Alana Golmei, who hails from Manipur and lives in Delhi, said that on three different occasions when she and a companion from Meghalaya entered the National Council of Educational Research and Training campus, staff taunted them with 'coronavirus'. The pandemic of racism endures even after the real one subsided. For 'mainstream' India, with its insular outlook and geographical distance from the North East, most conflicts in the region appear to 'secessionist'. Instead, it must recognise that the people of the region are searching for an identity of their own, within the Indian nation and not by joining the 'mainstream' that equates national unity with uniformity. They demand unity in diversity that respects their specificity. They want national security to mean the security of their people while belonging to a pluralist India that respects the ethnic specificity, culture, religion, language and worldview in which they find their identity. That is the pluralistic India mandated by the Constitution and it is time that the North East experiences it as well. The two deaths are an opportunity for peninsular India to look at North East India afresh.
