Macron's outburst on environmental issues
For four days, President Emmanuel Macron sought to restore his environmental credentials, launching a full-scale counteroffensive on diplomatic, media and political fronts. ON Tuesday, June 10, he vigorously defended the United Nations Ocean Conference, which France co-chaired in Nice with Costa Rica. On Saturday, in an interview with the regional daily press, he publicly rebuked both the government and Parliament, slamming the "enormous mistake" of those seeking to undermine "the priority given to climate in public debate," as key measures of the environmental transition are under attack.
Since François Bayrou's appointment as prime minister, the president's tone had never been so forceful. It is in proportion to the possibility that Macron's initial ambitions might be reduced to almost nothing. Amid the many difficulties he faced toward the end of his term, Macron's predecessor, Socialist François Hollande, could at least point to the success of the 2015 Paris Climate Conference (COP21).
By contrast, what we are witnessing today is the dismantling of the 2021 Climate and Resilience Law, with the rollback of the zero net land artificialization target, the elimination of low-emission zones and the loosening of environmental standards. Similarly, the temporary reintroduction of a neonicotinoid pesticide banned since 2020 and the early June announcement of the provisional suspension of one of the government's main programs to support household energy renovation (MaPrimeRénov') on the grounds that it allegedly attracted too much fraud, have fueled the impression of a major step backward.
Avoiding a criminal waste of time
Macron's determination to defend a path that runs counter to the climate skepticism of the far right and at odds with the anti-growth movement that is flourishing among some on the left is unmistakable. Neither accusations of never doing enough, nor the strong public backlash against the proposed carbon tax at the start of his first term (which led to the Yellow Vest protests), nor the current setbacks, seemed to have deterred him from pursuing what he called, in September 2023, "Ecologie à la française" or French-style ecology: science-driven, compatible with economic growth, innovative, competitive, able to boost the country's energy sovereignty and leaving no one behind.
The sense of failure is no less real, however, as the promise, induced by environmental planning, to bring about a genuine change in lifestyles over the long term and with minimal social upheaval has not been kept. Budget reversals, the loss of an absolute majority in the Assemblée Nationale after his reelection in 2022 and the rise of the far right across France and Europe, amid farmers' protests and backlash against regulations, have derailed the ambitions set at the start of Macron's second five-year term (he can't run a third time).
The president's outburst was not just an attempt to salvage his record two years before the end of his term. It is also a warning for the future. The many would-be successors – both on the right and among Macronists – who are unraveling his policies or letting them slide must pull themselves together, as threats to food, health, biodiversity, water, and the climate are accelerating and multiplying. Assuming they do wake up, the main challenge will not be to announce their intentions, but to build a consensus around a method to avoid backtracking and wasting time, which would be criminal. At this point, this is wishful thinking, given how divided and short-sighted France's political landscape appears to be.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
8 hours ago
- LeMonde
Historian Vincent Duclert: 'Focusing on whether genocide is taking place in Gaza is counterproductive'
As a genocide specialist, I am often asked whether genocide is taking place in Gaza. Faced with the same question during his interview on French network TF1 on Tuesday, May 13, President Emmanuel Macron said it was for historians to say, and mentioned my work on the Armenian genocide and my report from the commission that investigated France's role in the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda. Why is such precedence given to historians on an issue that is, first and foremost, a matter of law? The dual identification of genocide and the crime it defines was the work of Polish law expert Raphael Lemkin, a former prosecutor in Warsaw whose family was exterminated by the Nazis. He narrowly escaped the Holocaust and managed to take refuge in the United States. There, in 1943, he completed the book that defines the crime of genocide through the study of the fate of Jews in Axis-occupied Europe. He also drew on knowledge of the extermination of Armenians by the Unionist Young Turks in the Ottoman Empire. To reach this definition that matched the scale of genocidal enterprise, Lemkin worked as a historian. The concept of genocide as defined by international justice in 1945 thus established a link with the earlier history of the Armenian genocide. There is a mutual and often decisive contribution between historians and law experts. Several historians, including Israelis, and law experts have concluded that a genocide has been committed by the State of Israel. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) warned on January 26, 2024, of a "real and imminent risk of irreparable harm" under the charge of genocide. The International Criminal Court (ICC), meanwhile, has since November 21, 2024, been prosecuting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his former defense minister Yoav Gallant and Hamas commander Mohammed Deif (now dead) for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Local France
18 hours ago
- Local France
France's Macron says Europeans to 'accelerate negotiations' with Iran
On Friday, British, French, German and EU top diplomats held talks in Geneva with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi a week after Israel started its bombardment. They urged Iran to revive diplomatic efforts with the United States to find a solution in the standoff over its nuclear programme, but Tehran warned it could only consider diplomacy once Israel halted its bombardment. On Saturday, Macron said talks will be stepped up in an effort to avoid greater conflict. "I am convinced that a path exists to end war and avoid even greater dangers," Macron said in English on X after holding phone talks with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. "To achieve this, we will accelerate the negotiations led by France and its European partners with Iran." Macron reiterated that "Iran must never acquire nuclear weapons." "It is up to Iran to provide full guarantees that its intentions are peaceful," he added. He once again demanded that Iran must release French nationals Cecile Kohler and Jacques Paris, who have been held since May 2022 on espionage charges their families reject. "Their inhumane detention is unjust," Macron said. "I expect them to return to France."
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
Leila Sansour, filmmaker: 'France's recognition of Palestine would summon others to follow'
On June 13, I stood among a group of Palestinian and Israeli delegates on the lawn of the Elysée Palace, listening to President Emmanuel Macron reiterate his commitment to recognizing the state of Palestine. Despite the gathering storms and the burdens of realpolitik, he seemed to be telling us he would stand firm. I, a Palestinian from Bethlehem, and a friend from Gaza stood at the edge of the crowd, clapping with everything we had – as if trying to breathe life into his words. In that moment, Macron looked rather presidential, especially against the backdrop of the managerial figures who now dominate global leadership. The spirit of the Republic was in the air – or so we chose to feel – amplified by the striking absence of overbearing security and Macron's willingness to freely mingle with the guests. My friend and I exchanged a glance. Could we dare believe that one world leader might still move by codes of honor, not cold calculation? We had long stopped hoping. Yet in that moment, the air was thick with fragile expectation. Foundational step But even as I write, history leans dangerously toward senseless ruin. The clash between Israel and Iran is unfolding before our eyes. And once again, the question of Palestine – the unfinished project – risks being pushed further into the margins of global attention. This war, horrific in its own right, is already obscuring the one conflict that has destabilized the region for decades. Yet, Palestine is not a sideshow. Its fate is a central node in the architecture of Middle Eastern peace. And, a nuclear Iran, should this become a reality, in a world where Palestine is free, is a very different equation than a nuclear Iran in a world where Palestinians still live under Israel's domination. It is with this in mind that I write – because we cannot wait. Postponing the recognition is not just illogical. It is dangerous. Western leaders have long argued that recognition should be the final act – the crowning achievement of a successful negotiation. The tragedy is: No real negotiation will ever begin without this foundational step. Recognition is what will make real talks possible. It defines the endgame and draws the map of an inevitable journey we must take – before the map is swallowed by chaos. It forces a reckoning with ambiguity and evasion. It tells all actors – Palestinians, Israelis, and the international community – what the future must include, so that the first steps can, at last, be taken.
