Is it time to give our ancient trees the same protection as Stonehenge?
On its website alongside its menu, Toby Carvery offers customers some advice on the intricacies of cutting. In a section entitled 'A Few Words on Carving', a long sharp, serrated blade is recommended in order to make the most precise cut, as well as using the entire length of the knife.
One presumes the tree contractors employed by the branch of the restaurant chain in Enfield, north London, did not pay similarly careful consideration when lopping down a 450-year-old ancient oak overlooking its car park. Instead, there has been an act of ecological vandalism which has provoked similar national outrage to 2023's felling of the Sycamore Gap tree.
The loss of the Toby Carvery oak, campaigners say, is perhaps even more disastrous compared to the 150-year-old Sycamore Gap tree, due to the vast array of species which such veteran trees support. A single ancient oak can harbour up to 2,300 species, meaning that an entire ecosystem has now been chainsawed into oblivion. That, and as pointed out by the writer Robert Macfarlane, this was a tree that pre-dated the Gunpowder Plot.
A 450-yo oak is felled without permission/consultation by @tobycarvery, who falsely claimed it was "dead".
A tree alive when The Gunpowder Plot was hatched, which supports a web of 2000+ species, is in pieces.
Legal protection for heritage trees needed. https://t.co/gUygaCbyDF
— Robert Macfarlane (@RobGMacfarlane) April 15, 2025
But it is also a case which highlights the lack of protection currently afforded to Britain's cherished ancient trees, and raises the question whether, to ensure their survival, these totems of the landscape should now be granted the equivalent legal rights to scheduled ancient monuments such as Stonehenge.
There is a bitter irony in the fact that the only 'listed' tree in the UK, meaning it is granted the same protection as heritage buildings, is already dead. The Grade-II listed stump of the Elfin Oak, which stands in Kensington Gardens, was carved with elves, fairies and woodland animals in the late 1920s by the artist Ivor Innes and is protected for its cultural value.
Otherwise, unless covered by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) granted by a local authority or growing in a designated site such as a conservation area or nature reserve, Britain's ancient trees have no legal protection at all.
'Thousands of trees being cut without permission'
While the Sycamore Gap tree was felled without permission, Mitchells and Butlers (the company which owns Toby Carvery) believed it had a legal right to fell the tree as it stood on land leased from Enfield Council and was not covered with a TPO. In a statement, the firm said it commissioned 'specialist arboriculturist contractors' who advised that the tree posed a potential health and safety risk and so the decision was made to cut it down.
In response, Ergin Erbil, the leader of Enfield council, said on Wednesday that he was 'outraged the leaseholder has cut down this beautiful ancient oak tree without seeking any permissions or advice from Enfield council' and the local authority would be pursuing 'appropriate legal action'. The tree has been valued at £1 million, £300,000 more than the Sycamore Gap tree.
Legal experts have said the owners of the Toby Carvery could be forced to pay for the value of the tree under the Cavat (Capital Asset Value for Amenity Trees) system, if it is proven that they failed to take appropriate action before felling it.
Under the current system, even existing tree preservation orders can also still be overruled. The Cubbington Pear, for example, a 250-year old specimen once voted English Tree of the Year, was felled in 2020 to make way for HS2.
Meanwhile, the Darwin Oak, a 550-year-old specimen near Charles Darwin 's childhood home which was shortlisted in the 2024 Tree of the Year contest, remains under threat from a proposed Shrewsbury bypass. Despite requests from campaigners to grant a TPO, Shropshire Council says this would still not protect it from being felled under the proposed scheme.
Catherine Nuttgens, an independent urban forester, says the current system creates significant grey areas which leaves ancient trees at risk. She makes the point that it would be theoretically possible to grant listed status to the wrought iron props underneath the famous Major Oak in Sherwood Forest, but not the 1,000-year-old tree itself which they are designed to protect.
Often, as was apparently the case with the Toby Carvery oak, these inadequate legal protections can result in tree surgeons becoming judge, jury and executioner (a role which some are unqualified to carry out). 'Any trained arboriculturist knows about ancient trees,' says Nuttgens, who previously worked as a local authority tree officer and community forestry manager. 'Clearly whoever did this was not a tree expert, maybe a chainsaw expert instead?'
Liam McGough, who runs the north London-based Liam McGough Tree Services, agrees that greater legal protections should be afforded to ancient and veteran trees. The 40-year-old trained as a tree surgeon aged 16 and later worked on the Duke of Northumberland's estate before setting up his own business. He is a professional member of The Arboricultural Association, which acknowledges best practice, and alongside his business works with local authorities advising on tree protection.
The problem, he says, is that 'anybody can buy a chainsaw and call themselves a tree surgeon'. Despite established guidance on tree maintenance, there remain few legal requirements placed on those in the industry beyond basic health and safety rules. 'The term is so loosely used there are people walking around with shorts and trainers going and knocking on people's doors and asking if they want their trees cut,' says McGough.
While he insists his firm will always make an application to seek approval from a specific local authority when managing any urban trees, many others in the profession do not. 'There are thousands upon thousands of trees that are being cut without permission,' McGough says.
He has studied photographs of the remains of the Toby Carvery oak (whose stump is still standing after being belatedly granted a Tree Preservation Order by Enfield Council in the hope it will grow back) and says the condition of the wood demonstrates there was no need for the tree to be felled. 'It makes me angry,' he says. 'It's a huge loss to the area.'
Emblems of our national identity
There are in excess of 190,000 trees logged on the UK's Ancient Tree Inventory, which maps the oldest specimens in the country. As well as hosting an abundance of life, these ancient trees are also of vital cultural importance; acting as repositories of the nation's history and emblems of our national identity.
In 2023, for example, a more than 1,000-year-old yew tree was felled on private land near Battle in east Sussex. The tree was located just a mile from Senlac Hill (which is regarded as the site of the Battle of Hastings) meaning it would have bore witness to the Norman invasion in 1066. It is estimated, meanwhile, that there are at least 500 churchyards in England which have yew trees older than the buildings themselves.
Oak trees, in particular, represent some of our most long-lived and cherished species. After all, Britain is home to more ancient oaks than the rest of Europe combined. The trees were revered as far back as the ancient druids, while the Magna Carta was written with ink produced by the oak marble gall wasp. Among numerous venerable examples include the 1,000-year-old Queen Elizabeth Oak, which sits in the grounds of Cowdray Park in Sussex, and in whose shade Elizabeth I supposedly rested during a royal hunting party in 1591.
Martin Hugi, a senior conservation adviser at the Woodland Trust, has worked as an ancient tree verifier over the past two decades. In 2023, he also undertook an 'ancient tree pilgrimage' from Land's End to John O'Groats. Using the ancient tree inventory as a guide, he walked 1,000 miles and visited 1,085 trees en route.
'From a cultural point of view, these organisms are probably the oldest entities that we will ever meet and that just deserves our respect in its own right,' he says. 'I think when a lot of people actually meet an ancient tree, then it puts them in their place.'
There is perhaps slow progress in granting greater legal protections for ancient trees. Public consultation is currently being sought on a new tree protection bill in Northern Ireland which would strengthen legal rights for their like, and woodland more generally, by introducing a heritage tree designation and improving enforcement.
But across the rest of Britain, no such moves are underway, meaning trees still remain under threat. The scene in the grounds of the Enfield Toby Carvery demonstrates the folly of further delay. A taped-off cordon reminiscent of a crime scene, and a stump where 450-years of history has been hacked away in an instant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
3 days ago
- Daily Record
West Lothian lime trees in historic street saved from the chop
West Lothian Council's Development Management Committee was asked to decide on whether to support the TPO that was imposed in March. A row of lime trees in a historic West Lothian street have been protected by a Tree Preservation Order in a dispute of demand for felling. West Lothian Council's Development Management Committee was asked to decide on whether to support the TPO that was imposed in March. Without councillors backing the TPO would have lapsed in September which could have seen up to six of a line of 10 lime trees in Provost Road, Linlithgow, fall to the axe. A planning officer told the DMC: 'The site is located within the Linlithgow Palace & High Street Conservation Area, and as such, all proposed tree works within this area, first requires notification to be submitted to the council.' A tree works consent notification for the felling of six lime trees at 7 Provost Road, Linlithgow was received on the 13th February 2025. The notification was for the removal of the six trees in settlement of a legal action. A report to the DMC added: 'During assessment of the notification, a visual assessment of the trees was undertaken along with a Tree Evaluation Method for Preservation Orders (TEMPO) assessment. The TEMPO assessment was completed by the council's Arborist and it was determined that the trees subject to the notification, and an additional four others, were found to 'Definitely merit TPO', this was further supported by the visual assessment carried out. 'As a result of this, Tree Preservation Order (No. 1) 2025, 7 Provost Road, Linlithgow was made on the 27th March 2025. The order covers ten Common Limes which form part of a lime tree feature, at the heart of east Linlithgow's historic centre, requiring to be protected due to amenity and contribution to local landscape, which adds to the wooded character and setting of local paths, roads and public realm.' Legal action is ongoing and a separate issue to the confirmation of the TPO, the committee heard. Councillors heard there was one objection to the TPO from a neighbour who claimed that the trees were damaging property. The owners of the trees had applied to the council for a felling licence which prompted the move to the TPO. Councillors heard that the trees were in good condition 'were safe, and in good health despite previous pollard, and without major defect.' The report added: 'The avenue of limes at the site, is a landscape feature of the local neighbourhood, and forms part of the wooded character of this part of Linlithgow. The trees are highly visible from local footpaths, and roads as they take advantage of the rising gradient. 'The lime trees have been previously pollarded and crown lifted, with the epicormic growth managed. In general, Limes are long-lived trees and there is little evidence to suggest the previous works to the trees have been detrimental to the tree health and vitality. 'The objection received relates mostly to the ongoing court action between no.7 and 11 Provost Road. The court action is a separate legal matter that does not form part of the assessment when determining the notification on whether these trees were worthy of a TPO.' It concluded: 'It was considered expedient in the interests of amenity to make the TPO in order to protect these 10 lime trees. It is recommended that this TPO be confirmed without modifications.' The committee agreed to confirm the TPO with question or comment.
Edinburgh Live
4 days ago
- Edinburgh Live
West Lothian lime trees in historic street saved from the chop
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A row of lime trees in a historic West Lothian street have been protected by a Tree Preservation Order in a dispute of demand for felling. West Lothian Council's Development Management Committee was asked to decide on whether to support the TPO that was imposed in March. Without councillors backing the TPO would have lapsed in September which could have seen up to six of a line of 10 lime trees in Provost Road, Linlithgow, fall to the axe. READ MORE: West Lothian disabled veterans facing eviction 'must be offered new homes' A planning officer told the DMC: 'The site is located within the Linlithgow Palace & High Street Conservation Area, and as such, all proposed tree works within this area, first requires notification to be submitted to the council.' A tree works consent notification for the felling of six lime trees at 7 Provost Road, Linlithgow was received on the 13th February 2025. The notification was for the removal of the six trees in settlement of a legal action. A report to the DMC added: 'During assessment of the notification, a visual assessment of the trees was undertaken along with a Tree Evaluation Method for Preservation Orders (TEMPO) assessment. The TEMPO assessment was completed by the council's Arborist and it was determined that the trees subject to the notification, and an additional four others, were found to 'Definitely merit TPO', this was further supported by the visual assessment carried out. 'As a result of this, Tree Preservation Order (No. 1) 2025, 7 Provost Road, Linlithgow was made on the 27th March 2025. The order covers ten Common Limes which form part of a lime tree feature, at the heart of east Linlithgow's historic centre, requiring to be protected due to amenity and contribution to local landscape, which adds to the wooded character and setting of local paths, roads and public realm.' Legal action is ongoing and a separate issue to the confirmation of the TPO, the committee heard. Councillors heard there was one objection to the TPO from a neighbour who claimed that the trees were damaging property. The owners of the trees had applied to the council for a felling licence which prompted the move to the TPO. Councillors heard that the trees were in good condition 'were safe, and in good health despite previous pollard, and without major defect.' The report added: 'The avenue of limes at the site, is a landscape feature of the local neighbourhood, and forms part of the wooded character of this part of Linlithgow. The trees are highly visible from local footpaths, and roads as they take advantage of the rising gradient. 'The lime trees have been previously pollarded and crown lifted, with the epicormic growth managed. In general, Limes are long-lived trees and there is little evidence to suggest the previous works to the trees have been detrimental to the tree health and vitality. 'The objection received relates mostly to the ongoing court action between no.7 and 11 Provost Road. The court action is a separate legal matter that does not form part of the assessment when determining the notification on whether these trees were worthy of a TPO.' It concluded: 'It was considered expedient in the interests of amenity to make the TPO in order to protect these 10 lime trees. It is recommended that this TPO be confirmed without modifications.' The committee agreed to confirm the TPO with question or comment.
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
Fury as council bans homeowner from cutting down her 'Jack and the Beanstalk' tree despite claims from locals that huge oak could crush their homes
Councillors are facing the fury of concerned homeowners after they were told the 'Jack and the Beanstalk' tree that they believe threatens their homes has to stay - because it was vital for 'biodiversity'. Neighbours of the 45ft oak claimed the huge tree which overhangs into their gardens was a 'danger' to them and could cause damage to their listed homes in the historic heart of Winchester, Hampshire. Residents said that issuing a preliminary protection order on the tree was 'ludicrous', 'bad news' and 'grossly irresponsible' - as they urged the authority to assume responsibility for the insurance of their homes. Despite their concerns, officials have now approved the order after hearing of the 'biodiversity value' of the oak for the area, where homes sell for in excess of £1 million. The tree - which grew six foot last year - is not a historic tree and is still relatively young, officials heard. Objecting at the council meeting, which took place in Winchester's Guildhall, neighbour Dr Sandra Steele referred to an independent report from a tree consultant who found the tree preservation order (TPO) is 'completely unjustified'. Dr Steele referred to comments from the expert, who stated there is 'a definite foreseeability of long term damage to the adjacent properties from this tree'. The resident said neighbours have a 'serious problem' obtaining insurance for their properties due to the tree and raised concerns over potential 'unseen root damage'. Dr Steele said: 'The oak is a high water demand tree, the spreading roots in search of water cause structural damage to foundation, pipes, drains etcetera. 'Our historic houses, which have been here for 100 plus years, are particularly vulnerable. 'A healthy looking tree, may be good for the tree, but it's bad news for our properties. 'There's evidence of soil drying out, several dead trees, cracks in garden walls etcetera but we can't tell how far the roots have spread below the ground and their impact upon our homes. Crown reduction does not help. 'The unseen problem of oak tree root damage is a great concern and in addition we face the problem of obtaining insurance. 'For these very serious reasons, we strongly object to the TPO and request you to allow us to fell the tree without delay to protect our properties.' Dr Steele added: 'If you decide not to allow us to remove the tree, we would consider it an unreasonable decision. 'Also, if you decide not to allow us to remove the tree, would Winchester Council assume responsibility for the insurance of at least ten properties?' During the meeting, tree officer John Bartlett said the oak is 'one of the last remaining significant trees' in that area. He told councillors: 'It has a significant biodiversity value supporting many different species. 'A mature oak tree can support up to 2,300 species, possibly more, when it reaches maturity. 'And, it's importance is only increased by the fact that it's in this urban landscape.' In the end, councillors voted unanimously to protect the tree. The oak sits in the corner of 40 year old Orla Williams' garden on Canon Street. The street - just yards from Kingsgate Street, which was once described as 'one of the finest Georgian streets in England' - was where Admiral Nelson's mistress Lady Hamilton once lived. The doctor said that after moving in, she was approached by several neighbours, who raised concerns about the tree. She said they were concerned that the growing oak could cause damage to their properties and potentially harm human life, and so 'they wanted to take it down'. The mother of two said: 'We applied to the council to have it removed and someone came to look at it. '[The tree officer] said that they want to put a tree protection order on it. 'We appreciate that the tree is beautiful but it's the wrong tree in the wrong place. 'It is quite sad to remove something like that but it is only going to get bigger and potentially cause damage to lots of properties which is the main concern. 'The council said they were concerned about removing it because it's one of the only trees in the area. 'All of the local residents seem to be of the opinion that unfortunately, it's the wrong tree in the wrong place.' The oak also sheds an 'awful lot of detritus' in the autumn and winter and she is concerned about the droppings which fall down from wildlife like pigeons and squirrels. According to a council report, the tree officer visited Ms Williams' address after receiving notice from the couple that it was due to be felled. After visiting, he found that that tree met the criteria for a provisional protection order, which was issued in February of this year. Some nine residents objected to the order ahead of the meeting. They all live in the centre of the cathedral city on roads which sit just yards away from Winchester College - the country's oldest public school. Mark Pocock branded the council's preliminary decision to protect the tree as 'ludicrous'. 'If it were to fall and damage properties or persons, I would say the responsibility would be entirely with the council - not the owners of those properties,' he said. 'I think putting a tree protection order on is grotesquely irresponsible of the council.' Mr Pocock said the oak could be 'a danger to property and life'. Nick Goff, 80, moved into his property on the road adjacent to Canon Street just over a year ago. The retired British Airways pilot said he is worried that if the tree continues to go, the roots underneath will damage a medieval wall in his garden, which was built in the Tudor era. Mr Goff said: 'The issue is that in 10 years time, that will be double the height and double the width. 'It put on six feet last year it it's going to put on another six feet this year.' An independent report from a tree consultancy business found the oak is still young, and is in 'good physiological condition'. But, the consultant found that it is 'a large sized tree in a very small area' and so the tree protection order is 'unjustified'. It also said that 'the possibility of longer term damage to the retaining walls and footings of the adjacent properties as entirely foreseeable'. 'Some guy planted this as something to do 40 years ago,' Mr Goff continued 'Now, we have got Jack and the Beanstalk. 'It's not a historic tree - it's a silly mistake.' The council report issued ahead of the meeting stated that the tree officer believed the concerns raised over the tree were 'speculative'. It said that while it is 'not historic', the tree 'contributes meaningfully to local biodiversity and visual amenity'. Retired resident Graham Rule, 62, said the decision by the local authority was 'irresponsible'. He said: 'We all love trees but that shouldn't be there.
