
Ads pressured to evolve as AI changes Google search
Google CEO Sundar Pichai addresses the crowd during Google's annual I/O developers conference in Mountain View, California on May 20, 2025. The Internet giant is dabbling with ads in its new AI Mode for online search, a strategic move to fend off competition from ChatGPT while adapting its advertising business for an AI age. — AFP
SAN FRANCISCO: As Google races to lead in artificial intelligence, it faces the challenge of making sure the technology doesn't slow its profit-pumping advertising engine.
The Internet giant is dabbling with ads in its new AI Mode for online search, a strategic move to fend off competition from ChatGPT while adapting its advertising business for an AI age.
"There's no question that AI is becoming more commonplace as a source for answers," IDC advertising and marketing technology research director Roger Beharry Lall told AFP.
"That will inevitably result in a shift in terms of search and the opportunities to promote a brand."
The integration of advertising has been a key question accompanying the rise of generative AI chatbots, which have largely avoided interrupting the user experience with marketing messages.
However, advertising remains Google's financial bedrock, accounting for more than two-thirds of its revenue.
"Google certainly needs to find a way to monetise AI search in the way that it has monetised its past versions of search," Techsponential analyst Avi Greengart told AFP at the tech giant's annual developers conference this week.
AI-fueled ads
A new AI Mode enables conversational interaction with Google during search queries, providing answers in diverse formats, such as video, audio or graphs.
The Internet giant said it is testing integrating ads into AI Mode responses, building on insights gained from AI-generated summaries, or "Overviews," introduced to search results a year ago.
These Overviews display comprehensive AI-generated summaries of results above traditional website links and ads.
"The future of advertising fueled by AI isn't coming – it's already here," stated Vidhya Srinivasan, Google's vice president of Ads & Commerce.
"We're reimagining the future of ads and shopping: Ads that don't interrupt, but help customers discover a product or service."
Google is extending ads in AI Overviews to desktop in the US, following successful mobile implementations.
More than 1.5 billion users see AI Overviews monthly, according to the company.
"Google's doing very good job of adapting," Beharry Lall said.
"The move right now is to experiment and to gain traction, just as they have."
Google's aggressive push into generative AI intensifies its competition with OpenAI's ChatGPT, which added search engine capabilities to its popular chatbot.
AI ad tools too
Google announced it is making AI tools available to streamline the creation of online ads, mirroring similar initiatives by Facebook-owner Meta, Google's primary rival in online advertising.
New features, available in the United States, will enable merchants to leverage AI for effective marketing campaigns and to "power an algorithm capable of targeting new searches and generating additional conversions," Google said.
"AI helps a lot in advertising as far as targeting customers more precisely," Creative Strategies analyst Carolina Milanesi told AFP.
Google should have opportunities to charge for AI tools for ad campaigns, and even for insights from data the tech firm has about its users' lives.
"When you have AI agents doing things for you, those agents are going to need data," Milanesi said.
"To get access to that data, you're going to have to pay."
For example, Google knowing the kinds of restaurants or places someone has searched for online would have value for targeting ads, she said.
Making money from AI tools and data could help Google diversify revenue sources at a time when its ad business is under pressure from regulators, according to Milanesi.
"There could be entirely new business models around how a brand connects into those AI results," said Beharry Lall.
"In the long run, it's going to be additive and beneficial to Google."
How Google and other platforms make clear the difference between paid messaging and organic results generated by AI "is going to be the US$64mil (RM 272.89mil) question", Beharry Lall said.
"It'll be incumbent on regulatory bodies to develop guidelines," the analyst said. – AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BusinessToday
an hour ago
- BusinessToday
Dear ChatGPT, Do You Love Me Back?
Let's be real: everyone likes a little affirmation now and then. Whether it's a 'you got this!' from a friend or a heart emoji from your crush, that stuff feels good. But lately, more people are turning to AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok, you name it; we are there for those warm fuzzies. And sometimes, things get a little out of hand. We're talking about people catching real feelings for their digital buddies, getting swept up in constant 'love bombing' and even making life decisions based on what a chatbot says. Sounds wild? It's happening all over the world, and there are some serious risks you should know about. Humans crave validation. It's just how we're wired. But life gets messy, friends are busy, relationships are complicated and sometimes you just want someone (or something) to listen without judgment. That's where chatbots come in. They're always available, never get tired of your rants and are programmed to be so supportive. A recent study found that about 75% of people use AI for emotional advice, and a lot of them say it feels even more consistent than talking to real people. No awkward silences, no ghosting, just endless and endless of encouragement pouring. Link Here's the thing: chatbots are designed to make you feel good. They mirror your emotions, hype you up and never tell you your problems are boring. This creates a feedback loop: ask for affirmation, get it instantly and start feeling attached. It's like having a cheerleader in your pocket 24/7. Some folks even customize their AI 'friends' to match their ideal partner or bestie. The more you interact, the more it feels like the bot really 'gets' you. That's when things can get blurry between what's real and what's just really good programming. 'Love bombing' usually means someone is showering you with over-the-top affection to win you over fast. With AI, it's kind of built-in. Chatbots are programmed to be positive and attentive, so every message feels like a little hit of dopamine. If you're feeling lonely or stressed, that constant stream of support can be addictive. But let's be real: it's not real, we are. Pun intended. The bot doesn't actually care, it's just doing what it's trained to do. Still, that doesn't stop us. Actual cases of people falling in love with AI are happening around, and it's not mere a theory. One guy in the US, Chris Smith, went on TV to say he was in love with his custom ChatGPT bot, 'Sol.' He even deleted his social media and relied on the bot for everything. When the AI's memory reset, he felt real grief, like losing a partner. Link Another case: a nursing student named Ayrin spent over 20 hours a week chatting with her AI boyfriend, Leo, even though she was married. She said the bot helped her through tough times and let her explore fantasies she couldn't in real life. Link A global survey found that 61% of people think it's possible to fall for a chatbot, and 38% said they could actually see themselves forming an emotional connection with one. That's not just a niche thing, it's happening everywhere. Link 1. We are getting too dependent on it. You might start to prefer those interactions over real ones, and real-life relationships can start to feel less satisfying by comparison. If the bot suddenly glitches or resets, it can feel like a real breakup, painful and confusing. 2. They still can give bad advice that leads to repercussions. Some people have made big decisions, like breaking up with partners or quitting jobs based on chatbot conversations. But AI isn't a therapist or a friend; it's just spitting out responses based on data, not real understanding. That can lead to regret and even bigger problems down the line. 3. Not just humans, AI can also scam us. There are AI-powered romance scams where bots pretend to be real people, tricking users into sending money or personal info. More than half of people surveyed said they'd been pressured to send money or gifts online, often not realizing the 'person' was actually a bot. 4. Kids are in danger, for sure. Some chatbots expose minors to inappropriate stuff or encourage unhealthy dependency. There have even been tragic cases where heavy use of AI companions was linked to self-harm or worse. Awareness: Know that affirmation from AI isn't the same as real human connection. Balance: Use chatbots for fun or support, but please, don't ditch your real-life relationships. Education: Teach kids (and adults) about the risks of getting too attached to AI. Safeguards: Push for better protections against scams and inappropriate content. AI chatbots like ChatGPT are changing the way we seek affirmation and emotional support. While they can be helpful, it's easy to get caught up in the illusion of intimacy and constant love bombing. The risks, emotional dependency, bad advice, scams and harm to young people are real and happening now. The bottom line? Enjoy the tech, but don't forget: real connections still matter most. Related


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Europeans ditch US tech over trust, turn to local options
BERLIN: At a market stall in Berlin run by charity Topio, volunteers help people who want to purge their phones of the influence of U.S. tech firms. Since Donald Trump's inauguration, the queue for their services has grown. Interest in European-based digital services has jumped in recent months, data from digital market intelligence company Similarweb shows. More people are looking for e-mail, messaging and even search providers outside the United States. The first months of Trump's second presidency have shaken some Europeans' confidence in their long-time ally, after he signalled his country would step back from its role in Europe's security and then launched a trade war. 'It's about the concentration of power in U.S. firms,' said Topio's founder Michael Wirths, as his colleague installed on a customer's phone a version of the Android operating system without hooks into the Google ecosystem. Wirths said the type of people coming to the stall had changed: 'Before, it was people who knew a lot about data privacy. Now it's people who are politically aware and feel exposed.' Tesla chief Elon Musk, who also owns social media company X, was a leading adviser to the U.S. president before the two fell out, while the bosses of Amazon, Meta and Google-owner Alphabet took prominent spots at Trump's inauguration in January. Days before Trump took office, outgoing president Joe Biden had warned of an oligarchic 'tech industrial complex' threatening democracy. Berlin-based search engine Ecosia says it has benefited from some customers' desire to avoid U.S. counterparts like Microsoft's Bing or Google, which dominates web searches and is also the world's biggest email provider. 'The worse it gets, the better it is for us,' founder Christian Kroll said of Ecosia, whose sales pitch is that it spends its profits on environmental projects. Similarweb data shows the number of queries directed to Ecosia from the European Union has risen 27% year-on-year and the company says it has 1% of the German search engine market. But its 122 million visits from the 27 EU countries in February were dwarfed by 10.3 billion visits to Google, whose parent Alphabet made revenues of about $100 billion from Europe, the Middle East and Africa in 2024 - nearly a third of its $350 billion global turnover. Non-profit Ecosia earned 3.2 million euros ($3.65 million) in April, of which 770,000 euros was spent on planting 1.1 million trees. Google declined to comment for this story. Reuters could not determine whether major U.S. tech companies have lost any market share to local rivals in Europe. DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY The search for alternative providers accompanies a debate in Europe about 'digital sovereignty' - the idea that reliance on companies from an increasingly isolationist United States is a threat to Europe's economy and security. 'Ordinary people, the kind of people who would never have thought it was important they were using an American service are saying, 'hang on!',' said UK-based internet regulation expert Maria Farrell. 'My hairdresser was asking me what she should switch to.' Use in Europe of Swiss-based ProtonMail rose 11.7% year-on-year to March compared to a year ago, according to Similarweb, while use of Alphabet's Gmail, which has some 70% of the global email market, slipped 1.9%. ProtonMail, which offers both free and paid-for services, said it had seen an increase in users from Europe since Trump's re-election, though it declined to give a number. 'My household is definitely disengaging,' said British software engineer Ken Tindell, citing weak U.S. data privacy protections as one factor. Trump's vice president JD Vance shocked European leaders in February by accusing them - at a conference usually known for displays of transatlantic unity - of censoring free speech and failing to control immigration. In May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio threatened visa bans for people who 'censor' speech by Americans, including on social media, and suggested the policy could target foreign officials regulating U.S. tech companies. U.S. social media companies like Facebook and Instagram parent Meta have said the European Union's Digital Services Act amounts to censorship of their platforms. EU officials say the Act will make the online environment safer by compelling tech giants to tackle illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material. Greg Nojeim, director of the Security and Surveillance Project at the Center for Democracy & Technology, said Europeans' concerns about the U.S. government accessing their data, whether stored on devices or in the cloud, were justified. Not only does U.S. law permit the government to search devices of anyone entering the country, it can compel disclosure of data that Europeans outside the U.S. store or transmit through U.S. communications service providers, Nojeim said. MISSION IMPOSSIBLE? Germany's new government is itself making efforts to reduce exposure to U.S. tech, committing in its coalition agreement to make more use of open-source data formats and locally-based cloud infrastructure. Regional governments have gone further - in conservative-run Schleswig-Holstein, on the Danish border, all IT used by the public administration must run on open-source software. Berlin has also paid for Ukraine to access a satellite-internet network operated by France's Eutelsat instead of Musk's Starlink. But with modern life driven by technology, 'completely divorcing U.S. tech in a very fundamental way is, I would say, possibly not possible,' said Bill Budington of U.S. digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Everything from push notifications to the content delivery networks powering many websites and how internet traffic is routed relies largely on U.S. companies and infrastructure, Budington noted. Both Ecosia and French-based search engine Qwant depend in part on search results provided by Google and Microsoft's Bing, while Ecosia runs on cloud platforms, some hosted by the very same tech giants it promises an escape from. Nevertheless, a group on messaging board Reddit called BuyFromEU has 211,000 members. 'Just cancelled my Dropbox and will switch to Proton Drive,' read one post. Mastodon, a decentralised social media service developed by German programmer Eugen Rochko, enjoyed a rush of new users two years ago when Musk bought Twitter, later renamed X. But it remains a niche service. Signal, a messaging app run by a U.S. nonprofit foundation, has also seen a surge in installations from Europe. Similarweb's data showed a 7% month-on-month increase in Signal usage in March, while use of Meta's WhatsApp was static. Meta declined to comment for this story. Signal did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment. But this kind of conscious self-organising is unlikely on its own to make a dent in Silicon Valley's European dominance, digital rights activist Robin Berjon told Reuters. 'The market is too captured,' he said. 'Regulation is needed as well.'


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Europeans seek ‘digital sovereignty' as US tech firms embrace Trump
BERLIN: At a market stall in Berlin run by charity Topio, volunteers help people who want to purge their phones of the influence of U.S. tech firms. Since Donald Trump's inauguration, the queue for their services has grown. Interest in European-based digital services has jumped in recent months, data from digital market intelligence company Similarweb shows. More people are looking for e-mail, messaging and even search providers outside the United States. The first months of Trump's second presidency have shaken some Europeans' confidence in their long-time ally, after he signalled his country would step back from its role in Europe's security and then launched a trade war. 'It's about the concentration of power in U.S. firms,' said Topio's founder Michael Wirths, as his colleague installed on a customer's phone a version of the Android operating system without hooks into the Google ecosystem. Wirths said the type of people coming to the stall had changed: 'Before, it was people who knew a lot about data privacy. Now it's people who are politically aware and feel exposed.' Tesla chief Elon Musk, who also owns social media company X, was a leading adviser to the U.S. president before the two fell out, while the bosses of Amazon, Meta and Google-owner Alphabet took prominent spots at Trump's inauguration in January. Days before Trump took office, outgoing president Joe Biden had warned of an oligarchic 'tech industrial complex' threatening democracy. Berlin-based search engine Ecosia says it has benefited from some customers' desire to avoid U.S. counterparts like Microsoft's Bing or Google, which dominates web searches and is also the world's biggest email provider. 'The worse it gets, the better it is for us,' founder Christian Kroll said of Ecosia, whose sales pitch is that it spends its profits on environmental projects. Similarweb data shows the number of queries directed to Ecosia from the European Union has risen 27% year-on-year and the company says it has 1% of the German search engine market. But its 122 million visits from the 27 EU countries in February were dwarfed by 10.3 billion visits to Google, whose parent Alphabet made revenues of about $100 billion from Europe, the Middle East and Africa in 2024 - nearly a third of its $350 billion global turnover. Non-profit Ecosia earned 3.2 million euros ($3.65 million) in April, of which 770,000 euros was spent on planting 1.1 million trees. Google declined to comment for this story. Reuters could not determine whether major U.S. tech companies have lost any market share to local rivals in Europe. DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY The search for alternative providers accompanies a debate in Europe about 'digital sovereignty' - the idea that reliance on companies from an increasingly isolationist United States is a threat to Europe's economy and security. 'Ordinary people, the kind of people who would never have thought it was important they were using an American service are saying, 'hang on!',' said UK-based internet regulation expert Maria Farrell. 'My hairdresser was asking me what she should switch to.' Use in Europe of Swiss-based ProtonMail rose 11.7% year-on-year to March compared to a year ago, according to Similarweb, while use of Alphabet's Gmail, which has some 70% of the global email market, slipped 1.9%. ProtonMail, which offers both free and paid-for services, said it had seen an increase in users from Europe since Trump's re-election, though it declined to give a number. 'My household is definitely disengaging,' said British software engineer Ken Tindell, citing weak U.S. data privacy protections as one factor. Trump's vice president JD Vance shocked European leaders in February by accusing them - at a conference usually known for displays of transatlantic unity - of censoring free speech and failing to control immigration. In May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio threatened visa bans for people who 'censor' speech by Americans, including on social media, and suggested the policy could target foreign officials regulating U.S. tech companies. U.S. social media companies like Facebook and Instagram parent Meta have said the European Union's Digital Services Act amounts to censorship of their platforms. EU officials say the Act will make the online environment safer by compelling tech giants to tackle illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material. Greg Nojeim, director of the Security and Surveillance Project at the Center for Democracy & Technology, said Europeans' concerns about the U.S. government accessing their data, whether stored on devices or in the cloud, were justified. Not only does U.S. law permit the government to search devices of anyone entering the country, it can compel disclosure of data that Europeans outside the U.S. store or transmit through U.S. communications service providers, Nojeim said. MISSION IMPOSSIBLE? Germany's new government is itself making efforts to reduce exposure to U.S. tech, committing in its coalition agreement to make more use of open-source data formats and locally-based cloud infrastructure. Regional governments have gone further - in conservative-run Schleswig-Holstein, on the Danish border, all IT used by the public administration must run on open-source software. Berlin has also paid for Ukraine to access a satellite-internet network operated by France's Eutelsat instead of Musk's Starlink. But with modern life driven by technology, 'completely divorcing U.S. tech in a very fundamental way is, I would say, possibly not possible,' said Bill Budington of U.S. digital rights nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Everything from push notifications to the content delivery networks powering many websites and how internet traffic is routed relies largely on U.S. companies and infrastructure, Budington noted. Both Ecosia and French-based search engine Qwant depend in part on search results provided by Google and Microsoft's Bing, while Ecosia runs on cloud platforms, some hosted by the very same tech giants it promises an escape from. Nevertheless, a group on messaging board Reddit called BuyFromEU has 211,000 members. 'Just cancelled my Dropbox and will switch to Proton Drive,' read one post. Mastodon, a decentralised social media service developed by German programmer Eugen Rochko, enjoyed a rush of new users two years ago when Musk bought Twitter, later renamed X. But it remains a niche service. Signal, a messaging app run by a U.S. nonprofit foundation, has also seen a surge in installations from Europe. Similarweb's data showed a 7% month-on-month increase in Signal usage in March, while use of Meta's WhatsApp was static. Meta declined to comment for this story. Signal did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment. But this kind of conscious self-organising is unlikely on its own to make a dent in Silicon Valley's European dominance, digital rights activist Robin Berjon told Reuters. 'The market is too captured,' he said. 'Regulation is needed as well.'