EU to sanction nine over Congo violence
BRUSSLES: The EU is expected to sanction nine individuals in connection with violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo, two EU diplomats said on Friday.
They did not identify the people set to be listed, in keeping with the practice of not revealing such details before the sanctions are officially approved.
EU foreign ministers are expected to approve the sanctions in Brussels next Monday.
Rebels of the M23 group have seized east Congo's two biggest cities since January in an escalation of a long-running conflict rooted in the spillover into Congo of Rwanda's 1994 genocide and the struggle for control of Congo's vast mineral resources.
The government of the Democratic Republic of Congo has said at least 7,000 people had died in the fighting since January.
Congo is considering sending representatives to peace talks with the M23 group that Angola plans to host next week, government sources said on Thursday.
Rwanda is accused of backing the Tutsi-led M23 rebels, a charge it denies.
The EU summoned the ambassador of Rwanda last month, calling on the country to 'immediately withdraw' troops from Congolese territory and to 'stop supporting the M23 and any other armed group.'
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has also said that the 27-nation bloc will review its agreement with Rwanda over critical raw materials due to the country's links with the M23 rebels.
Rwanda denies providing arms and troops to M23 rebels.
Congo's government has said at least 7,000 people have died in the fighting since January.
According to the UN Humanitarian Affairs Office, at least 600,000 people have been displaced by the fighting since November.
With Congo's army and allied forces putting up weak resistance to the rebel advance, regional powers appear in agreement that dialogue is the only way forward, diplomats and analysts said.
'I haven't talked to a single African country that says Kinshasa shouldn't talk to M23,' one senior diplomat said.
'The line of everyone is, 'How do you stop the fighting if you don't engage with them?''
One source said on Friday that government participation was a sure thing but that it was still too early to say who would represent Kinshasa in Luanda.
Other sources said the debate was still ongoing and a final decision would not likely be made until next week.
M23, for its part, said on Thursday it was demanding an unequivocal commitment from DRC President Felix Tshisekedi to engage in talks.
Both sides said they had questions about the framework and how the Angola-hosted talks would comply with decisions from regional bodies attempting to resolve the conflict.
Southern and East African foreign and defense ministers are due to meet in Harare on Monday to discuss the push for a cessation of hostilities and political dialogue.
Sitting down with M23 would likely be deeply unpopular in Kinshasa, especially after Tshisekedi's repeated vows never to do so.
But it would amount to an acknowledgment that Tshisekedi's pursuit of a military solution has 'failed,' said Congolese analyst Bob Kabamba of the University of Liege in Belgium.
'Kinshasa's position of dialogue is understandable because it finds itself stuck, thinking that the (rebel alliance) must not reach a critical threshold,' he said.
Stephanie Wolters, a Congo analyst with South Africa's Institute for Security Studies, said Angola had 'clearly decided that it is necessary to intervene to prevent the advance of the M23 toward the west of the DRC.'
The lack of faith in Tshisekedi's ability to turn the tide militarily was also seen this week in Southern African leaders' approval of the 'phased withdrawal' of a regional deployment known as SAMIDRC that had a mandate to fight rebels.
Although the deployment was too weak to mean much in the fight against M23, its presence was an essential sign of regional support for Congo, Wolters said, making its departure a 'significant blow.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
a day ago
- Leaders
Iran-Israel Conflict Enters 2nd Week with Dim Prospects for Diplomacy
The conflict between Iran and Israel has entered its second week with no diplomatic breakthrough achieved. On Friday, top European diplomats met with Iran's Foreign Minister in Geneva to discuss a solution for Tehran's nuclear program, but the talks has yielded no tangible results although it left the door open for future discussions. Geneva Talks The Foreign Ministers of France, Germany and the UK, collectively known as the E3, and the European Union's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, met with the Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva, in the first face-to-face meeting since the conflict erupted. After the meeting, which lasted for nearly 4 hours, the European diplomats expressed hope for future discussions on all questions relevant to Iran's nuclear program and broader issues, they said in a joint statement. They have not revealed a date for the next round of talks. The ministers said that they discussed avenues towards a negotiated solution to Iran's nuclear program, reiterating 'their longstanding concerns about Iran's expansion of its nuclear program, which has no credible civilian purpose.' Moreover, they voiced grave concern over the escalation of tensions in the Middle East and reaffirmed their firm commitment to Israel's security, urging all sides to refrain from escalation and find a negotiated solution to ensure that Iran never obtains or acquires a nuclear weapon. No Negotiations under Fire On his part, Araghchi said he was open for more talks with the E3 and the EU, the Associated Press (AP) reported. The Iranian Minister also condemned Israeli attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, expressing 'grave concern' over European 'non-condemnation' of such attacks. Moreover, Araghchi confirmed that Tehran will not engage in negotiations with Washington as long as Israeli attacks continue. 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy if aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its committed crimes,' he told reporters after the Geneva meeting. The US President, Donald Trump, has given Iran two weeks to reach a deal before he makes his decision on joining the conflict to Israel's side. On Thursday, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, delivered a message from Trump: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' Betrayal to Diplomacy Araghchi reiterated Iran's position on declining negotiations while Israeli attacks continue during an interview with NBC News. He said that his country is 'uncertain whether it can trust the US in diplomatic talks' following Israel's attacks on Iran days before a scheduled talks with American officials. Furthermore, Iran's top diplomat suggested that the US used negotiations as a cover for Israeli attacks on Iran. 'So they had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up. We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was, in fact, a betrayal to diplomacy,' he said. Araghchi added that the Trump administration has to 'show their determination for going for a negotiated solution,' saying that Israel must halt its aggression before any talks. 'We're not prepared to negotiate with them anymore, as long as the aggression continues,' he said. 'I think if Americans are serious to go back to diplomacy, what it needs is only a telephone call from Washington to Tel Aviv to stop everything. They can stop this process very quickly, and then we will consider diplomacy once again,' the Iranian Foreign Minister said. Israel will not Halt Fighting Israel launched its military operation against Iran on June 13, 2025 to eliminate Tehran's nuclear program and prevent the country from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The two countries have traded intensified aerial and missile attacks since then, raising fears that the conflict could spiral into an all-out war. The Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, insisted that the attacks would continue 'for as long as it takes' to eradicate what he described as 'the existential threat of Iran's nuclear program and arsenal of ballistic missiles,' according to AP. Similarly, Israel's Ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, pledged to continue attacks on Iran until eliminating its nuclear threat, reported Sky News. At the UN Security Council meeting on Friday, Danon said: 'We will not stop. Not until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled, not until its war machine is disarmed.' Short link : Post Views: 11
Leaders
a day ago
- Leaders
Israel in Breach of Human Rights Obligations in Gaza: EU Report Suggests
An internal review by the European Union's diplomatic service found indications that Israel's actions in Gaza violated its human rights obligations under the EU-Israel Association Agreement, Reuters reported. The EU review comes after months of mounting concerns among European countries over Israel's operations in Gaza and the humanitarian conditions in the Strip. Breach of Obligations On Friday, the European External Action Service (EEAS) said 'there are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement,' based on assessments by independent international institutions. The report added that Israel's ongoing 'restrictions to the provision of food, medicines, medical equipment, and other vital supplies affect the entire population of Gaza present on the affected territory.' Violating Human Rights The EU review examines the situation in Gaza, with an entire section covering issues such as blocking the entry of humanitarian aid, attacks with mass casualties, military strikes on hospitals and medical facilities, displacement, and lack of accountability. Furthermore, the report examines the situation in the occupied West Bank, including settler violence. In the light of this, the EU review said it 'relies on facts verified by and assessments made by independent international institutions, and with a focus on most recent events in Gaza and the West Bank.' EU-Israel Association Agreement The EU-Israel Association Agreement – which came into force in 2000 – governs relations between the bloc and Israel across various fields. It also states that relations between both sides should be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles. In May 2025, the EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said that the EU would review the Association Agreement in light of the 'catastrophic situation' in Gaza, after over half of bloc's members backed conducting the review. No Concrete Action Expected The EU Foreign Ministers will convene on Monday, June 23, 2025, in Brussels. They are expected to discuss the bloc's relations with Israel in light of the review, although they have not reached a consensus on their approach to Israel. Some ministers might push for action following the review, but the Monday meeting is not expected to yield any concrete decisions. EU officials will likely share the review's findings with Israel, in an attempt to influence it, and will refer the issue to a July meeting. Trade Suspension The EU review comes a day after 9 European countries, including Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, sent a letter to the European Commission, urging it to halt trade of goods and services with Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. The letter cited a July 2024 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which stated that Israel's settlements and occupation of Palestinian territories are in violation of international law. It also urged states to take actions to suspend trade or investment ties that could contribute to sustaining this situation. 'We have not seen a proposal to initiate discussions on how to effectively discontinue trade of goods and services with the illegal settlements. We need the European Commission to develop proposals for concrete measures to ensure compliance by the Union with the obligations identified by the Court,' the letter said. Short link : Post Views: 1
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
Israel may have breached EU agreement, bloc's foreign policy arm says
Palestinians try to get food at a charity kitchen providing hot meals in Rimal neighborhood in Gaza City on June 18, 2025, amid the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement. (AFP) Mourners carry a body for burial outside al-Awda hospital in Nuseirat camp in central Gaza, on June 20, 2025, after several Palestinians were killed as they reportedly headed to a food distribution centre in the war-stricken Gaza Strip. (AFP) Palestinians try to get food at a charity kitchen providing hot meals in Rimal neighborhood in Gaza City on June 18, 2025, amid the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement. (AFP) Palestinians carry sacks and boxes of food and humanitarian aid that was unloaded from a World Food Program convoy that had been heading to Gaza City in the northern Gaza Strip on June 16, 2025. (AP) BRUSSELS: The European Union's diplomatic service said on Friday there were indications that Israel had breached its human rights obligations under the terms of a pact governing its ties with the bloc, according to a document seen by Reuters. Citing assessments by independent international institutions, the European External Action Service said 'there are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement.' The report comes after months of deepening concern in European capitals about Israel's operations in Gaza and the humanitarian situation in the enclave. 'Israel's continued restrictions to the provision of food, medicines, medical equipment, and other vital supplies affect the entire population of Gaza present on the affected territory,' the document said. Asked about the EU review, an Israeli official called it 'a one-sided report that exemplifies the double standards the EU uses toward Israel.' Under the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which came into force in 2000, the EU and Israel agreed that their relationship 'shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles.' The EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, announced in May that the bloc would examine whether Israel was complying with the terms of the pact, after over half of EU members backed the conducting of a review. The report includes a section dedicated to the situation in Gaza, covering issues related to denial of humanitarian aid, attacks with a significant number of casualties, attacks on hospitals and medical facilities, displacement, and lack of accountability. The report also looks at the situation in the West Bank, including settler violence. The document relies on 'facts verified by and assessments made by independent international institutions, and with a focus on most recent events in Gaza and the West Bank,' it said. Israel has said that it respects international law and that operations in Gaza are necessary to destroy Hamas, the Palestinian group responsible for the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel. EU foreign ministers are set to discuss the review during a gathering in Brussels on Monday. Member countries remain divided in their approach to Israel. While some ministers could advocate for moving toward taking action based on the review, no concrete decisions are expected at Monday's session. Diplomats expect EU officials will reach out to Israel with the outcome of the review in an effort to influence it, and that ministers will return to the subject during a July meeting.
