TotalEnergies on trial: Greenwashing claims could set legal precedent in France
PARIS, June 6 — Environmental groups took TotalEnergies to court yesterday in a landmark Paris trial, accusing the French oil and gas giant of misleading consumers with ads that overstate its climate commitments and fossil fuel transition.
It is the first such case in France targeting a major energy company and could set a legal precedent for corporate environmental advertising, which is starting to face tighter regulations in the European Union.
The civil case stems from a March 2022 lawsuit by three environmental groups accusing TotalEnergies of 'misleading commercial practices' for saying it could reach carbon neutrality while continuing oil and gas production.
The plaintiffs took that legal route as 'greenwashing', or the act of claiming to be more environmentally responsible than in reality, is not specifically covered under French law.
Starting in May 2021, TotalEnergies advertised its goal of 'carbon neutrality by 2050' and touted gas as 'the fossil fuel with the lowest greenhouse gas emissions'.
At the time, the company had changed its name from Total to TotalEnergies to emphasise its investments in wind turbines and solar panels for electricity production.
The plaintiffs allege that TotalEnergies made around 40 'false advertisements' in their lawsuit.
'For the average consumer, it is impossible to understand that TotalEnergies is actually expanding fossil fuel production,' said Clementine Baldon, a lawyer for the NGOs.
The company's strategy 'will not help the energy transition', Baldon told the court.
'It delays it, even prevents it, and it contributes to putting the objectives of the Paris accord at risk,' she added, referring to the international agreement aimed at curbing climate change.
TotalEnergies maintains it has not engaged in misleading commercial practices.
'Greenwashing would be to promise that the petrol sold in service stations is carbon neutral,' said the company's lawyer, Francoise Labrousse.
TotalEnergies had 'never said its products are good for the climate', she added.
TotalEnergies also insisted that the messages are part of its institutional communications regulated by financial authorities and not consumer law.
It also argued the NGOs are misusing consumer protection rules to challenge its corporate strategy, and that no consumer organisation is party to the case.
The NGOs want the Paris court to rule on the legality of ads presenting natural gas as essential to the energy transition. Climate experts say methane leaks from the gas industry have a powerful warming effect on the atmosphere.
But TotalEnergies noted Greenpeace Belgium had previously considered natural gas useful for the energy transition and noted the group still uses fossil fuels in its boats.
Correcting ads
Environmental groups in recent years have turned to the courts to establish case law on companies misleading consumers by appearing more eco-friendly than they are.
In Europe, courts ruled against Dutch airline KLM in 2024 and Germany's Lufthansa in March over misleading consumers about their efforts to reduce the environmental impact of flying.
In Spain, utility Iberdrola failed to secure a conviction against Spanish oil and gas company Repsol over similar allegations of 'false' environmental claims.
A greenwashing case against Australian oil and gas producer Santos, challenging its claim to be a 'clean fuels' company, has been ongoing since 2021.
Other fossil fuel companies, under pressure from advertising regulators or legal complains, have had to scrap or correct ad campaigns.
Shell, for example, received a warning in the UK and had to stop promoting 'carbon-neutral' gasoline in several countries, including Germany, the Netherlands and Canada.
New European laws now ban vague, generic environmental claims such as 'green' or '100 per cent natural' product, and aim to require brands to more strictly substantiate environmental claims on labels and in advertising.
TotalEnergies has said it plans to show that its messages 'about its name change, strategy and role in the energy transition are reliable and based on objective, verifiable data'.
At the end of the hearing, the judge said a ruling would be given on October 23. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
41 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
More microplastics in your beer? Blame the glass bottle, says French study
PARIS, June 22 — Drinks including water, soda, beer and wine sold in glass bottles contain more microplastics than those in plastic bottles, according to a surprising study released by France's food safety agency Friday. Researchers have detected the tiny, mostly invisible pieces of plastic throughout the world, from in the air we breathe to the food we eat, as well as riddled throughout human bodies. There is still no direct evidence that this preponderance of plastic is harmful to human health, but a burgeoning field of research is aiming to measure its spread. Guillaume Duflos, research director at French food safety agency ANSES, told AFP the team sought to 'investigate the quantity of microplastics in different types of drinks sold in France and examine the impact different containers can have'. The researchers found an average of around 100 microplastic particles per litre in glass bottles of soft drinks, lemonade, iced tea and beer. That was five to 50 times higher than the rate detected in plastic bottles or metal cans. 'We expected the opposite result,' PhD student Iseline Chaib, who conducted the research, told AFP. 'We then noticed that in the glass, the particles emerging from the samples were the same shape, colour and polymer composition — so therefore the same plastic — as the paint on the outside of the caps that seal the glass bottles,' she said. The paint on the caps also had 'tiny scratches, invisible to the naked eye, probably due to friction between the caps when there were stored,' the agency said in a statement. This could then 'release particles onto the surface of the caps', it added. Wine fine For water, both flat and sparkling, the amount of microplastic was relatively low in all cases, ranging from 4.5 particles per litre in glass bottles to 1.6 particles in plastic. Wine also contained few microplastics — even glass bottles with caps. Duflos said the reason for this discrepancy 'remains to be explained'. Soft drinks however contained around 30 microplastics per litre, lemonade 40 and beer around 60. Because there is no reference level for a potentially toxic amount of microplastics, it was not possible to say whether these figures represent a health risk, ANSES said. But drink manufacturers could easily reduce the amount of microplastics shed by bottle caps, it added. The agency tested a cleaning method involving blowing the caps with air, then rinsing them with water and alcohol, which reduced contamination by 60 per cent. The study released by ANSES was published online in the Journal of Food Composition and Analysis last month. — ETX Studio
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
China urges US to ‘look at the whole picture' on tariffs to see true trade ties
The envoys of the world's two leading powers painted starkly different pictures of US-China ties, each offering a competing assessment of the state of their economic relations – as a recently agreed framework to ease trade tensions hung in limbo. Speaking at the US-China Business Council in Washington on Wednesday, Chinese ambassador Xie Feng called the trade relationship 'generally balanced' and tariffs on Chinese imports 'still unreasonably high', warning that the US goods deficit would not shrink while export controls, visa denials, and barriers to Chinese firms persist. 'We are willing to buy more from America,' Xie said, adding that 'unfortunately' the US had imposed 'strict restrictions on the exports of its most competitive products, such as semiconductors, and shut the door on Chinese enterprises, buyers, tourists and students who want to invest and spend in the US'. 'If one is reluctant to sell others what they want, how can it ever get its deficit reduced by exporting only products like soybeans and beef?' Since 2022, the US has steadily tightened restrictions on China's access to American technology over concerns it could fuel military advancements. These curbs intensified under US President Donald Trump's second term. However, earlier this month, the US agreed to ease some restrictions and allow Chinese students unhindered access to American universities in exchange for increased exports of critical minerals from China. Talks between the two sides in London produced a framework to implement the trade consensus reached in May in Geneva regarding Trump's new tariffs on Chinese imports – now reduced from 125 per cent to 55 per cent. Xie said the current US tariffs on China were 'still unreasonably high, will severely constrain and undercut bilateral trade and should be removed completely'. He added that it was 'unrealistic to try to block the flow of capital, technology and talents in a globalised world, if any country builds up barriers, these resources will naturally flow elsewhere'. Since June last year, the China-US trade has dropped by 8 per cent, while China's trade with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and EU countries grew by 9 per cent and 3 per cent, respectively compared to the same period last year. Meanwhile, David Perdue, America's newly posted ambassador to Beijing, said that trade should be a means by which sovereign nations provide benefits to their citizens, 'not an ideological goal to be pursued in favour of transforming the world'. He added that Trump's vision was to have a trading relationship with China based on reciprocity, fairness and respect, 'one of which the United States puts the American people first, just as China does for its own people'. 'Our mission in China is to do everything we can to make that vision happen and to make America safer, stronger and more prosperous,' Perdue emphasised, blaming unfettered globalisation for making US business 'overly dependent' on China for components, inputs, intermediate goods and even entire supply chains. 'Our economy cannot be so dependent on foreign supply chains that can be severed at any moment,' he said. Addressing US businesses' concerns about losing the Chinese market due to strained bilateral relations, Perdue said that the administration understands the 'risk of change' and 'we will be there to support you and protect you from unfair practices'. However, Xie urged the US to 'look at the whole picture' to see that 'the benefits our two countries have taken from bilateral trade are generally balanced'. 'Any selective reading of the statistics would be misleading,' he added. Xie said that focusing only on goods trade overlooked the US surplus in services, American firms' strong revenues in China, the heavy environmental and resource costs China has borne, and the fact that the 'Chinese people have chosen to spend much of the trade gains buying a large amount of US Treasury bonds'. After Japan and Britain, China is the third-largest holder of US Treasuries – government debt securities used to finance federal spending. In December last year, China's holdings fell to US$759 billion, the lowest level since February 2009, when they stood at US$744.2 billion. By March, China had slightly reduced its holdings again, to US$765.4 billion. The senior officials' remarks came weeks after the latest US-China trade talks in London. The meeting was believed to focus on semiconductors and critical minerals, areas in which Washington and Beijing hold significant leverage over each other, respectively. Yet neither Beijing nor Washington has released an official readout of the dialogue since the negotiations ended, hinting at considerable uncertainty. Delegations from both sides said the trade agreement would require approval from their leaders, US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Shortly after the negotiations, Trump on social media said a deal with Beijing was 'done', adding that China would supply full magnets and any necessary rare earths 'up front'. Beijing has yet to issue a comprehensive response regarding its take on the talks, nor has Xi commented on them publicly. Meanwhile, US investor sentiment towards China has declined sharply. According to a survey last month by the China General Chamber of Commerce-USA, nearly half of the more than 100 Chinese companies who responded said they planned to reduce their investment in the US. The shift was also evident last month at the Commerce Department-backed SelectUSA Investment Summit, where only about 50 Chinese delegates attended, down from roughly 180 in 2018. Xie's remarks also came against the backdrop of escalating tensions between Israel and Iran. The Jewish state last week launched air strikes on the Islamic Republic, targeting Iranian nuclear facilities amid ongoing nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran. Israel's strikes have led to the deaths of multiple Iranian army heads and nuclear professionals. In retaliation, Iran carried out air strikes against Israel, causing casualties in Tel Aviv. Trump has issued ambiguous messages about whether the US would join Israel in striking Iran, a prospect that has stirred divisions in Washington and among his own supporters. On social media, Trump claimed the US knew the exact location of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, hinting at a possible assassination and calling on Tehran to surrender unconditionally. Tehran responded that it would not surrender. In China, Xi affirmed Beijing's willingness to mediate the crisis in a development anticipated by many as the country seeks greater visibility and sway in the Middle East. Foreign Minister Wang Yi has reached out to regional stakeholders, including his counterparts in Israel, Iran, Egypt and Oman. Wang has called for peace and condemned Israel's attacks. -- SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Cheerleaders to critics: German machinery makers call for EU action on China
Germany's iconic machine makers used to be among the loudest cheerleaders for ever-closer economic ties between China and Europe. Now, as exports dwindle and facing 'increasingly strong [Chinese] competitors' beefed up by 'unfair state subsidies', the industry is demanding that Brussels put in place trade barriers to protect it. A new position paper published on Thursday by the Mechanical Engineering Industry Association (VDMA), representing medium-sized manufacturers that help constitute Germany's famed Mittelstand group of businesses, marks a dramatic reversal for an industry that until recently lauded the Sino-German economic miracle. 'The EU should impose countervailing duties on imports from third countries if they violate EU anti-dumping or anti-subsidy rules. China is a particular focus here with its aggressive export policy,' read the VDMA's paper. The industry group – whose 3,600 members make everything from power transmission systems and machine tools to semiconductor machines and precision tools – made clear that it was ready to compete with Chinese rivals on a level playing field. However, it was also unequivocal that it feels those conditions do not exist and that it wants governments to intervene. 'Chinese companies are heavily subsidised by the government. And they supply products to Europe that sometimes disregard our technical regulations. China is not playing fair, and politicians must respond to this,' said Bertram Kawlath, VDMA's president. The paper marks a break from decades in which German industry grew rich from selling machines made for powering the workshop of the world. Since the Covid-19 pandemic, the VDMA has turned sharp critic of a harsh new reality in Germany's economic ties with China. It has spoken of being out-competed by fierce rivals in China, Europe and third markets. It will provide an early challenge for new Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who has taken a tougher rhetorical line on China than predecessor Olaf Scholz, but who will also have to deal with the country's powerful automotive lobby, whose views are unrecognisable from those of the VDMA. While Scholz backed the EU's de-risking strategy, research has shown that this support did little to unpick Germany's dependencies on China for critical goods. 'Compared to the previous year, there has been little change in Germany's potentially critical import dependency on China,' wrote Juergen Matthes of the German Economic Institute in an assessment published last week. The VDMA's statistics showed a substantial loss of market share in China for its companies. German machinery went from holding a 20.4 per cent share in China's import market in 2015 to 15.1 per cent in 2024. The shipments were down 12.2 per cent over the first quarter of 2025 year-on-year, German government stats showed, exacerbating a trend of declines in five of the last six years. 'Supported by the 'Made in China 2025' strategy, Chinese mechanical engineering companies have become increasingly strong competitors on the global market. Unfair state subsidies for Chinese companies play a major role in international business,' the paper said. The figures chime with broader German and EU trends: over the first five months of 2025, EU exports to China fell 7.3 per cent compared with a year earlier, while Germany's shipments fell 5.9 per cent. At the same time, China's shipments to Germany and Europe are booming. In May alone, exports to Germany – the EU's largest economy – soared 21.5 per cent, following 20.3 per cent growth in April. To France, shipments were up 24.1 per cent in May, stoking fears that Europe will become a 'dumping ground' for Chinese products that are effectively blocked from the United States due to sky-high tariffs. Soapbox, a newsletter focused on Chinese trade, forecast that for 2025 as a whole, Switzerland will import more from the EU than China, the world's second largest economy. The VDMA's intervention comes amid a clamorous debate over the direction of the EU's China policy and ahead of a crunch summit in July, where leaders will meet in Beijing to discuss thorny issues from trade gripes to China's ties with Russia. With the return of US President Donald Trump to the White House and his swift abandonment of the transatlantic alliance, many expected Europe and China to patch up their many differences. A growing body of evidence is emerging, however, to suggest that this will be more difficult than anticipated. While China's commerce ministry has talked up the prospect of a blockbuster deal on electric vehicles – which would see EU tariffs imposed last year replaced with a minimum import price – EU officials and diplomats said that was highly unlikely in the short term. Briefing ambassadors from the bloc's 27 member states on Wednesday, meanwhile, the European Commission gave no hint that a deal was close, diplomatic sources said. - South China Morning Post
