Chhattisgarh teachers union challenges school rationalisation orders in HC citing constitutional violations
RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh Vidyalayin Shikshak Karmachari Sangh, along with 34 teachers, challenged two state govt orders dated 28 April 2025 and 2 August 2024 in the High Court. The petitioners contend that the govt's ongoing rationalisation process for schools and teachers violates established norms.
Counsel Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, representing the petitioners, stated that the move to approach the court came after their protests against the initial orders did not receive a positive response from the govt.
The petitioners claim the state govt's orders are arbitrary, illegal, and were issued without proper authority. They highlight a decision by the State Council of Ministers on 9 July 2024 regarding the rationalisation of schools and teachers.
However, they allege that the School Education Department Secretary subsequently issued instructions and guidelines for this process without legal authority.
Citing Article 166 of the Constitution of India, the petition argues that all executive actions of a state govt must be expressed in the name of the Governor. As the challenged orders were not issued in the Governor's name, the petitioners assert they are not valid state govt orders and are therefore unenforceable.
The petitioners have referred to a judgment by the Chhattisgarh High Court in the case of Shitala Diwan Vs.
State of CG and Ors., decided on 24 January 2017.
According to the petitioners, the orders mandate the merger of primary schools with middle schools, and both primary and middle schools with higher secondary schools when co-located. This merger, they argue, would lead to headmasters in primary and middle schools being reassigned as teachers, thereby reducing the number of sanctioned headmaster posts as per the Chhattisgarh School Shiksha Sewa (Shaikshik evam Prashasnik Samvarg) Bharti Tatha Padonnati Niyam, 2019.
They contend this makes the orders illegal and liable to be quashed.
The petitioners also pointed out that the amalgamation would reduce the total number of schools below sanctioned and approved figures, without separate orders for such changes. They added that the new orders would disrupt the Balwadi scheme, which runs alongside primary schools under the Right to Education Act, 2009, and the New Education Policy, 2020, as regular school teachers are engaged in Balwadi activities.
They also highlighted that many teachers engaged as Cluster Academy Centre coordinators, overseeing various schools and coordination, have been overlooked in the new orders, leading to conflicts.
Furthermore, the petitioners submitted that the rationalisation proposed in the orders is subject-wise, which they argue is futile and contrary to the Niyam, 2019, as the subject-wise posting of teachers was amended and deleted in the 2019 rules. The petitioners have therefore filed a writ petition seeking to quash the orders issued by the School Education Department Secretary, deeming them to be without authority of law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Union slams T.N. govt. decision to move Supreme Court on career advancement scheme for guest lecturers
The Association of University Teachers (AUT) has expressed concern over the actions by the Directorate of Collegiate Education on the implementation of the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) for faculty of aided colleges. In an official release, AUT general secretary K. Raja said: 'On one hand, the Commissioner of Collegiate Education issued a letter on June 9, instructing all Regional Joint Directors to urgently submit updated CAS-related data of eligible teachers by June 10. This communication clearly signalled the Government's affirmative intention to proceed with the long-overdue CAS promotions with monetary benefits, offering hope and justice to thousands of eligible teachers in aided colleges. 'Surprisingly, in a completely contradictory move, a communication dated June 16 addressed to A. Muraliraj, assistant professor of Mathematics, Urumu Dhanalakshmi College, Tiruchi, reveals that the government has chosen to challenge a favourable High Court judgment in the Supreme Court by filing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) with a motive to deny CAS monetary benefits due to the teachers. This action directly undermines the rightful claims of teachers, seeking career progression and represents a serious breach of trust.' The association demanded immediate withdrawal of the SLP and urged the authorities to honour the High Court verdict. 'The Career Advancement Scheme is a statutory right, not a privilege. Any attempt to delay or deny this right adversely affects the morale, dignity, and academic integrity of the teaching community,' the release said.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Calcutta HC stays Mamata govt's financial relief scheme for non-teaching staff who lost jobs after SC order
KOLKATA: The Calcutta High Court on Friday ordered an interim stay till September 26 on the West Bengal government's financial scheme to provide interim relief for Group C & D non-teaching employees in state-aided schools, who had recently lost their jobs following the Supreme Court order on April 3. Justice Amrita Sinha in the interim order prohibited the state from implementing the scheme till September 26 or until further orders. Earlier, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had announced a monthly honorarium of Rs 25,000 and Rs 20,000 for some 5,000-odd Group C and D non-teaching employees in state-aided schools who had lost their jobs after the apex court's ruling. The Calcutta High Court's order is related to the West Bengal government's notification providing monthly interim relief of Rs 25,000 and Rs 20,000 respectively to them. Justice Sinha on Friday directed the petitioners to file affidavits within four weeks. The West Bengal government will file an affidavit in reply within a fortnight thereafter before the petition comes up for the next hearing. The waitlisted candidates had filed the petition in the High Court urging for a stay on the state government's relief scheme arguing that the scheme 'frustrated' the Supreme Court order. Reacting to the High Court order, the Trinamool Congress attacked the opposition parties and labelled them as 'real enemies of people of Bengal'. The party spokesperson Kunal Ghosh said, 'After the Supreme Court's order, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee extended an interim financial allowance to the affected Group-C and Group-D workers. But the Bangla-Birodhi brigade (anti-Bengal brigade) ran to the Calcutta High Court and got it struck down.' He further added, 'They won't help the people, and they won't let anyone else help either. They are enemies of Bengal. Enemies of our people. Plain and simple.'
Scroll.in
5 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Karnataka HC stays SIT probe into land grabbing allegations against Union minister HD Kumaraswamy
The Karnataka High Court on Thursday ordered an interim stay on an inquiry by a Special Investigation Team into allegations of land grabbing by Union minister HD Kumaraswamy, Live Law reported. The Janata Dal (Secular) leader and former chief minister of Karnataka has been accused of encroaching on 14.04 acres of government land in Kethaganahalli in the state's Ramanagara district. On January 28, the state government formed a Special Investigation Team headed by Bengaluru Regional Commissioner Amlan Aditya Biswas to look into the allegations. The tehsildar of the Ramanagara taluk had issued summons to Kumaraswamy on May 29. However, on Thursday, Justice ES Indiresh of the High Court stayed the inquiry, noting that there appeared to be no official notification for forming the Special Investigation Team, PTI reported. The judge stayed both the formation of the SIT as well as the summons issued to Kumaraswamy. He directed the state government to respond to the Janata Dal (Secular) leader's petition challenging the legality of the investigation. An activist named SR Hiremath had made the allegations of land grabbing against Kumaraswamy in 2020, The Hindu reported. He had claimed that the former chief minister and his relatives had encroached on grazing land in Kethiganahalli, and that despite a High Court order for the land to be recovered, no action was taken. Hiremath's organisation, Samaj Parivartana Samudaya, has filed a contempt petition in the High Court, questioning why action was not taken. However, Kumaraswamy has claimed that he legally purchased multiple plots in the village between 1985 and 1987 through registered sale deeds. He maintained that he had been in lawful possession of the land for nearly 40 years. The former chief minister added that the tehsildar had no jurisdiction to issue the notice as such a power was vested only with the assistant commissioner under the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act.
