How Trump cuts to universities could trickle down to college sports

USA TODAY Sports contacted more than 25 universities and college leadership organizations to ask them about concerns that athletics could be affected at least indirectly by this federal funding uncertainty. Almost all of them dodged the question by not responding at all, or by providing vague, undetailed answers, or by saying they didn't want to talk about it on the record.
"I'm not surprised that nobody wants to talk, particularly at red-state public universities," said Robert Kelchen, a professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Tennessee. "It's such a touchy topic right now."
At the same time, many of the same colleges are bracing for another coming financial earthquake after a federal judge recently approved the House vs. NCAA legal settlement. This allowed colleges to start paying their athletes directly for the first time ever, creating a massive new cost of up to $20.5 million per school per year starting July 1, according to the NCAA.
Trouble and tension in major college sports
Add it all together and tensions have started simmering during a titanic moment in history for higher education and college sports. Expenses are going up in athletic departments while the other side of campus remains anxious about Trump cuts to higher education, such as grants for medical and scientific research.
"There's never been a time in college sports where so many issues have hit at once - both with the squeeze on institutional support and now this brand-new way of doing business in college sports," said Amy Perko, CEO of the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics.
USA TODAY Sports examined how it might affect athletics, why it's a sensitive topic and what some schools are doing about it.
How the federal uncertainty trickles down
Trump's attempted funding cutbacks at American universities aren't directly related to college sports. They instead largely involve funding for research at these universities, including from the National Institutes of Health, which faces $18 billion in cuts under the Trump administration.
But as part of their universities, most athletic departments depend on university financial support to pay the bills. And when universities face funding shortfalls, they have to make decisions about what to cut and where. That's where that institutional support for athletics could get squeezed.
Out of 232 Division I public schools tracked by USA TODAY Sports in fiscal year 2023, only 12 athletic departments reported receiving no institutional support from their schools, including from student fees or university transfers. That includes big football schools such as Ohio State, Penn State, Texas and LSU.
On the other end of the spectrum, 75 Division I public schools received at least $20 million in university support from their schools in fiscal year 2023, including from student fees. Sixteen received direct institutional support from their schools of more than $20 million, not counting student fees, led by Houston ($39.7 million), California ($36.7 million), Cincinnati ($35.5 million) and Connecticut ($30.2 million).
"As a matter of basic math, less money from any source will constrain any university's ability to make discretionary decisions about how to allocate their finite resources," said Roger Pielke, emeritus professor at the University of Colorado. "Something then has to give - either more revenues are needed or some activities must be cut back. If athletics demands more funding (such as for paying athletes) that compounds the issues."
A number of examples have emerged.
At the University of Washington
In March, the provost at the University of Washington sent out a message outlining the financial risks the university was facing, including state budget shortfalls and the "unprecedented and rapid policy changes at the federal level." The provost mentioned possible cutbacks including "pausing non-essential staff hiring," limiting faculty hiring and reducing food purchases and other discretionary spending.
"These measures apply to all units that report to the President and Provost, including Athletics," university spokesman Victor Balta confirmed to USA TODAY Sports.
How that applied to athletics isn't clear. The university didn't get into detail about that when asked about it. But the athletic department received $10 million direct institutional support in fiscal 2024. Now the House settlement is also pressuring the Huskies, too, just like all the other schools in major college sports.
The Huskies are projecting a $19 million deficit in athletics for fiscal year 2026. Loans will help cover the gap, including $10 million from the Big Ten Conference in the form of a revenue-sharing advance and more from an "internal loan of institutional funds," Balta said.
"Rising expenses and back damages related to the House settlement are factors, as are expenses associated with transitioning to the Big Ten Conference," Balta said. "UW Athletics did execute required budget reductions and revenue enhancements in their approved FY26 operating budget - they were not held harmless in this exercise related to overall budget concerns."
At Michigan State
This is happening to different degrees at other universities, too, each dealing with it in different ways. At Michigan State, for example, President Kevin Guskiewicz sent a message to faculty and staff fin May, noting financial challenges that included navigating "federal policies and directives that undercut our ability to advance our land-grant mission and continue essential research projects that make life better."
A subsequent memo went to university leaders calling for a 9% base reduction in university-wide general funds over the next two years.
Asked if that included MSU athletics, university spokeswoman Amber McCann replied, "The reductions are to general funds across the university."
Additional details were not provided. MSU athletics received less than $650,000 in direct institutional support in fiscal 2024 and $3.6 million in indirect institutional support in the form of costs covered by the university but not charged to athletics. MSU athletics also reported an annual operating deficit of $16.7 million for fiscal 2024.
But even at the small number of schools that provide little or no institutional support for athletics, disharmony can increase across campus if athletic departments are insulated from university budget cuts. Take Nebraska, for example.
Is athletics 'sharing the pain?'
The University of Nebraska Board of Regents on June 19 approved a 5% tuition increase amid financial challenges that included less state funding than they asked for and an estimated federal funding reduction of nearly $12 million. The new budget included $18 million in cuts and no funding for pay increases for university staff.
But over in the athletic department, football coach Matt Rhule is set to get a $1 million pay increase this year, then another $1 million more in 2026, according to the terms of his contract. Athletic director Troy Dannen is set for a $100,000 annual raise.
The athletic department didn't respond to an inquiry about it.
"There is a feeling that the athletic department should be sharing the pain," said Jordan Gonzales, president of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Staff Senate.
Nebraska is one of the relatively few schools in the nation that reported receiving no university support for athletics in fiscal 2023. Even so, any immunity from university austerity measures adds to the perception that athletic departments are becoming increasingly detached from their universities as they move to become more like professional sports.
"When the university asks its core academic support staff to tighten their belts and absorb budget cuts while the athletic department appears to operate under a separate set of financial rules, it fosters a sense of two separate universities - one that's facing austerity and another that is investing in and entering into multimillion deals and contracts," Gonzales said.
Why it's a sensitive subject
As the Trump administration targets certain colleges such as Harvard for funding cuts, others are wary of becoming the next target. When resources shrink on campus, discord also intensifies about university priorities and who is or isn't taking on a fair share of the burden. Some colleges might not even want to talk about any cutbacks in sports because now is the time they want to appear flush with cash to pay athletes.
Among those that didn't respond to inquiries about federal funding cuts affecting athletics were UCLA, Virginia, Stanford, Minnesota, Houston, Northwestern, Harvard and the National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics.
"I think people are laying low," said Ruth Johnston, vice president of consulting at the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO). "I think people are wanting to wait and see a little bit."
In the meantime, the pressure mounts for Division I athletic departments to spend money on players, all the way up to the initial cap of $20.5 million. Not doing so would mean falling behind the competition.
"They need more money right now," said James Nussbaum, a former Northwestern football player and in-house counsel at Indiana University now at the firm Church Church Hittle + Antrim. "It's those schools in the middle that are going to be really interesting to watch as they try to figure out if they want to continue to fund athletics at the level they have been as it becomes more and more clear that they're not going to be able to compete with those top-tier schools, just from a resource standpoint."
Where will the money come from?
Some athletic departments are getting students to help pay the bills. Some are getting more from their universities. Some might pursue other sources:
? The Board of Governors for the State University System of Florida on June 18 granted permission for state universities to give a $22.5 million annual lifeline to athletics through at least June 2028.
? At the University of Michigan, athletic director Warde Manuel sent a letter to supporters after the House settlement was approved, saying his department faced a projected deficit of $27 million for the 2025-26 academic year, including $20.5 million for paying players. The letter asked for support and mentioned a planned 10% reduction in staff, in addition to other cost-cutting moves. Spokesman Dave Ablauf said the university also has offered the department a loan of up to $15 million.
? Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry recently signed a bill to increase taxes on sports gambling, helping raise more than $20 million to be divided among 11 state universities for athletics, including LSU. Incidentally, LSU athletics is not subject to university cutbacks there because it is considered "auxiliary" to the university, according to the Louisiana Illuminator in April. LSU didn't respond to a follow-up question about that from USA TODAY Sports.
? At the University of Colorado Boulder, the school approved an increase of the student athletic fee from $28.50 to $90 per semester, the first change to this fee since 1994. Funding from it was to support women's sports scholarships and non-revenue sports.
? At Virginia Tech, student athletic fees are set to go up by $295 annually, up to $732.
? At Wichita State, the university proposed a 3.5% tuition increase, citing the challenging financial landscape for higher education, as well as the House settlement.
? At the University of Kansas, Chancellor Douglas Girod told the Lawrence Journal-World that KU athletics possibly could pay the university a reduced tuition rate for its athletes.
? Private investment in athletics is on the way. Elevate, a sports strategy and marketing company, recently announced the launch of the Collegiate Investment Initiative to provide colleges with "capital and strategic resources to develop revenue-generating projects." What those schools must provide in return for that is not yet clear.
Johnston of NACUBO said "everything is going to be affected" by federal funding cuts at the top, in addition to the big new cost for athletic departments. New sources of funding are needed in the absence of cutbacks.
"It's not gonna go back to normal," Johnston said. "I think we' re in an inflection point."
Contributing: Steve Berkowitz
Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

BreakingNews.ie

31 minutes ago

• BreakingNews.ie

Israel-Iran war stretches into a second week without diplomatic breakthrough

Hours of talks aimed at de-escalating fighting between Israel and Iran failed to produce a diplomatic breakthrough as the war entered its second week with a fresh round of strikes between the two adversaries. European ministers and Iran's top diplomat met for four hours on Friday in Geneva, as President Donald Trump continued to weigh US military involvement and worries rose over potential strikes on nuclear reactors. Advertisement European officials expressed hope for future negotiations, and Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said he was open to further dialogue while emphasising that Tehran had no interest in negotiating with the US while Israel continued attacking. 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy if aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its committed crimes,' he told reporters. Benjamin Netanyahu visits the site of the Weizmann Institute of Science, which was hit by missiles fired from Iran (Jack Guez/Pool Photo via AP) No date was set for the next round of talks. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel's military operation in Iran would continue 'for as long as it takes' to eliminate what he called the existential threat of Iran's nuclear programme and arsenal of ballistic missiles. Advertisement Israel's top general echoed the warning, saying the Israeli military was ready 'for a prolonged campaign'. But Mr Netanyahu's goal could be out of reach without US help. Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility is considered to be out of reach to all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. Mr Trump said he would put off deciding whether to join Israel's air campaign against Iran for up to two weeks. The war between Israel and Iran erupted on June 13, with Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear and military sites, top generals and nuclear scientists. Advertisement At least 657 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,000 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Iran has retaliated by firing 450 missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, according to Israeli army estimates. Most have been shot down by Israel's multi-tiered air defences, but at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded. Israel's defence minister said on Saturday it killed a commander in Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard who financed and armed Hamas in preparation for the October 7 2023 attack on Israel that sparked the 20-month long war in Gaza. Israel said Saeed Izadi was commander of the Palestine Corps for the Iranian Quds Force, an elite arm of the Guard that conducts military and intelligence operations outside Iran, and that he was killed in an apartment in the city of Qom. Advertisement

Daily Mail​

37 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Four-star general reveals Iran's Ayatollah isn't cutting peace deal as Trump's countdown begins

Iran isn't cutting a U.S.-brokered peace deal with Israel because its leaders are confident they can rebuild its nuclear program even if it's wiped out, a retired general says. General Jack Keane, the former Vice Chief of Staff to the U.S. Army, told Fox News that Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei believes the country will be able to restart its nuclear bomb with relative ease after the ongoing conflict with Israel ends. The U.S. has not joined the conflict so far. President Trump says he'll decide whether to do so in the next two weeks, after urging Iran to halt its nuclear bomb building. 'The nuclear enterprise is vast, and it is resilient,' Keane told Fox News. '(There are) multiple sites, centrifuges, so you can spin up enriched uranium. They did that to survive.' Keane said the Ayatollah has 'never made a deal' because 'he has built an enterprise to survive an attack' that he believes is strong enough to withstand airstrikes even if President Trump decides to join the conflict. 'He believes they can absorb an attack, survive it, recover from it, and then rebuild. That is where this guy is,' he said. 'I don't see him, in the near term, making a deal here whatsoever.' Keane, a four-star general, was likely referring to Iran's nuclear bomb factory, which is called Fordow and which sits deep under a mountain. The United States' most powerful 'bunker buster' bomb has been touted as a possible match for the Fordow facility, if President Trump decides to join the conflict at the end of a two week deadline he's just announced. Other experts believe a tactical nuclear weapon would be needed. Using a nuclear bomb in an act of war is a huge taboo unbroken since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. "I don't see him in the near term making a deal": @gen_jackkeane on the Ayatollah's approach — FOX & Friends (@foxandfriends) June 20, 2025 The general said for Trump to succeed, he needs to 'take the whole enterprise down' and wipe out the nation's top leadership and military capabilities, after Israel significantly weakened Iran in recent weeks. 'Look, Israel have destroyed all 70 of their air defense batteries, all of them. Air force, gone. The 12 nuclear sites, damages or destroyed. Then, leadership (is) decapitated, military and nuclear scientists. They can replace nuclear scientists, but in the near term, major problem.' Iran has long vowed to obliterate Israel at the first chance it gets, with Israeli intelligence beginning their bombing campaign earlier this month over fears leaders in Tehran were just months off completing a nuclear weapon. World leaders and many military strategists have urged Trump to find a diplomatic solution to the crisis, fearing that any direct US intervention could spiral into all-out war. Trump has warned that if Iran don't agree to stop their nuclear weapons program within two weeks, he will commit US forces to join Israel in the conflict. Iran's allies include Russia and China, meaning the stakes for the current conflict could not be higher. Trump has instated a two-week deadline to make a decision, primarily whether to use a 30,000lb 'bunker buster' bomb to penetrate Iran's underground enrichment plant in Fordow. But Keane, who was heavily involved in the Iraq War, said he 'absolutely' believes Trump should use the bunker buster, saying 'the alternative is unacceptable.' He admitted that using the weapon could face challenges as we've never actually done' it before, but insisted 'that doesn't mean you don't do it.' Keane's urging of Trump to use the 'bunker buster' bomb comes as experts say the weapon is one of the only tools in the US military arsenal that could take out the Fordow enrichment site. The 30,000lb bomb is the largest non-nuclear bomb at America's disposal, and can smash through several hundred feet of earth, with the Fordow site said to be located up to 300ft underground. The GBU-57A/B 'bunker buster' bomb, as it is known, is arguably the top military reason that Israel wants the United States to join its air campaign against arch-foe Iran. The US designed and built the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) and remains the only nation to possess the bomb, as well as being the only country with warplanes capable of dropping its formidable payload. Crucially, it is also the only weapon widely believed to be capable of smashing through Iran's deeply buried nuclear facility at Fordow.

Daily Record

38 minutes ago

• Daily Record

Surprise Scottie Scheffler reveal on PGA Tour rival he's looked up to from youth

World No.1 salutues the graft and skill of one of his closest challengers Impressed Scottie Scheffler has revealed he looked up to Justin Thomas as an ascending pro and revels in his rival's desire. The American duo are locked at the top of the Travelers Championship at the halfway stage alongside England's Tommy Fleetwood. ‌ Scheffler is currently the king of the game with his World No.1 status underlined by a string of stunning recent shows including a third Major win at the PGA Championship. ‌ Thomas missed the Quail Hollow and also at last week's US Open, but his desire to keep working and fighting have never been lost on his Ryder Cup colleague. Scheffler said: 'Justin is a guy that I looked up to from a young age. He was a really talented junior player, talented amateur player. He had a lot early success out here on Tour. 'Justin is an extremely hard worker. I think Justin is more of a practicer than I am. I like to play a lot when I practice. With Justin, he is very, very disciplined in the way he approaches things and that's why you've seen him have success for so many years out here. He sticks to his process. 'He doesn't let things kind of get to him and I think a lot of that goes back to how hard he prepares to come out here and play. He's very, I would say, professional in the way he approaches things.' Thomas' ability to shot-make were evident during his Friday 64 which took him to the summit of the standings along with Scheffler and Tommy Fleetwood. ‌ The two-times Masters champ was also in control and reckons robotic golf is off the menu when the going gets tough. Scheffler said: 'I would use robotic as maybe the word. It's not as robotic. I think when you're playing under no conditions or very light winds, I think you can hit a similar flight on every single shot and it would be fine. "On days like today [Friday] you have to work the ball both ways. You have to hit low shots, hit high shots. You're always playing a different type of shot, especially in conditions like this. 'You've just got to control the ball, so it's controlling spin and trajectory. A lot of times you're not hitting very many full shots because when you hit a full shot the ball will spin more and then you really have to get the wind perfect each time. "And if you're hitting a little bit more chippy shots and working the ball, you can kind of manage some of those gusts. I think having realistic expectations of what we need to do. You get a gust into the wind and all of a sudden the ball is not on the green. "So just little stuff like that. You can't get every one correct. You just do your best to manage your way around the golf course.'