Top reasons stopping Aussies from financial success
The cost of living crisis has pushed many into high levels of financial stress, yet comparison site Finder discovered many are sabotaging themselves even further.
A survey of 1,011 respondents from Finder revealed that most Aussies are setting themselves up for financial failure and have exposed the biggest obstacles that stood in the way.
The most common barrier was wasteful spending with the average Aussie wasting $154 per month.
Over a third of respondents said the biggest waste was spending too much money on shopping, according to Finder.
MORE: Insane demands of mega wealthy exposed by staff
Other money mistakes included paying bills late, which one quarter of respondents were guilty of, one in five fell into credit card debt and 20 per cent said they spent too much money at bars, pubs and clubs.
Sarah Megginson, personal finance expert at Finder, said majority of Aussies are unknowingly standing in their own way.
MORE: Simple way to unlock $20k in extra home value
New neighbourhood coming to Sydney
'Most people don't have a money problem – they have a mindset problem. Breaking these patterns could be the difference between staying stuck and building real financial freedom.
'The idea that you're 'too old' or 'too busy' to build wealth is a myth – and one that's costing Australians dearly.'
Another major roadblock was that one in five felt their lack of financial knowledge was preventing them from financial success.
'These blockers are silent wealth killers – they creep into our everyday choices and steal opportunities,' Ms Megginson added.
MORE: Alarming way Gen Z are getting homes
What homes will be worth in each suburb by 2030
'But the good news is once you are aware of them, you can change them.'
She urged Aussies to scrutinise all their living costs to free up more discretionary income.
'It's never too late to take control – increasing personal wealth does require a plan and discipline to reach your goals,' she said.
Young Australians wasted the most money, according to a Finder survey, with gen Z admitting to wasting a whopping $237 a month, compared to just $65 by baby boomers.
Finder money expert Rebecca Pike said whether you're wasting $5 or $500, it all adds up.
'It's not about living like a monk – no one is saying not to have fun and enjoy yourself from time to time,' she said. 'The more you can segment or budget what you will spend for fun, the better.
'Once you think about spending as a long-term investment rather than short-term indulgence, the more you will actually enjoy when you do splurge.'
Ms Pike said even small changes can have a big impact.
'When you add it all up, that's money you could be saving for a home deposit, a holiday, or just a rainy day.
'Redirecting just a small portion of that could set you up for greater financial security, whether it's building savings or paying off debt.'
Her tips included manually tracking your spending, through apps like Gather or WeMoney and putting savings into a high-interest savings account.
'It's a low-risk way to let your money grow – helping you build a financial cushion.'
Other tips included putting 24-hours between unplanned purchases and unsubscribing from tempting emails and alerts.
MORE: Top NSW regions for lifestyle and investors
Oroton heirs' stunning $30m payday
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
42 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Workers' retirement nest eggs set for super boost
Australian workers can look forward to a bigger nest egg, with an increase to the superannuation guarantee to add tens of thousands of dollars to the average super account. From July 1, employers' minimum required contribution to employees' superannuation accounts will rise from 11.5 per cent to 12 per cent. It's the latest and last in a series of incremental increases from nine per cent over more than a decade since they were legislated by the Rudd-Gillard Labor government in 2012. With the latest bump, a 30-year-old earning $60,000 would have an extra $20,000 in super by retirement, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds Australia. It will add about $300 each year to the superannuation of a worker on a $60,000 salary, or $500 for someone on a $100,000 salary. "The system foundations are cemented for young, working people to have a comfortable retirement," ASFA chief executive Mary Delahunty said. "It's a moment all Australians should be proud of." The association says the cost of a comfortable retirement increased 1.6 per cent in the past year, while the cost of a modest retirement rose 1.7 per cent. A "comfortable" retirement includes top-level health insurance, a reasonable car and leisure activities. The cost of either outcome was increasing slower than Australia's current 2.4 per cent headline inflation but retiree budgets remained under pressure from rising food, energy and health costs. Couples on average need $73,900 annually for a comfortable retirement, while most singles needed $52,300 per year, ASFA says. For a modest retirement covering the basics, couples needed $48,200 each year, singles $33,400, or for renting couples, $64,250, and $46,660 each year for singles who rent. The figures underlined the importance of increasing Australia's housing stock, Ms Delahunty said. "They also illustrate how super can be the difference between hardship and stability later in life, especially for renters." For some workers, the extra contribution will come from their existing pay package, according to CPA Australia's superannuation lead Richard Webb. "It's a good idea to check with your employer to see how they view the changes and what it means for you," he said. Workers on contracts with a total remuneration package could see a slight drop in their take-home pay, while those on award or enterprise agreements would likely receive the contribution on-top of their current pay. When compulsory superannuation was introduced in 1992 - in part to reduce government spending on the Age Pension - only one in 10 Australian retirees listed super as a source of income. Nine in 10 people between 30 and 50 now have super. Government spending on the Age Pension is projected to fall from 2.3 per cent of gross domestic product in 2020 to two per cent by 2062/63, despite a doubling of the over-65 population and a trebling of over-85s over the same period. However the super guarantee increase wouldn't help those who missed out on paid work for extended periods, Super Consumer Australia chief executive Xavier O'Halloran said. "(For) people who have caring responsibilities or who have been locked out of the unaffordable housing market ... increasing SG further won't address those inequalities," he told AAP. Mr O'Halloran said there was more that could be done to support people struggling in retirement, when a significant portion of their autumnal years' savings were made. "Right now, there are no minimum standards for retirement products like there are for MySuper," he said. "There is also no performance testing of retirement products, so super funds can still sell poor products."
Canberra Times
4 hours ago
- Canberra Times
Do you have $3 million in super? Me neither. These changes will actually help you
Do you have $3 million in super? Me neither. It is estimated that the changes will only impact a tiny fraction of the Australian population, around 80,000 people. That's fewer people than can fit in the MCG. In fact, 99.5 per cent of Australians currently do not have more than $3 million in super. According to ATO data, the average super balance is a mere $182,000 for men and $146,000 for women. Greg Jericho, chief economist at the Australia Institute, crunched the numbers and found that around 97 per cent of people currently in the labour force will never have $3 million in superannuation, no matter how hard they work for their entire lives. Even if a young person works their entire life on the full-time average wage, with no time out of the workforce for kids or illness, they will never accumulate $3 million in super. Not surprising when you consider the median super balance for women aged 60-64 is less than $160,000, meaning half of Australian women have less super than that (half of Australian men the same age have just $211,996 or less).
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Net negative': Positive Economics Advisory's David Williams-Chen delivers warning as Labor mulls family trust tax changes
Labor imposing a flat tax rate on family trusts could be a 'net negative' for the economy, an expert has warned after a report arose the government is considering trusts in its raft of tax reforms. Sources told the Australian Financial Review Labor is likely to propose higher taxes on family trusts as Treasury ramps up scrutiny of the tax-friendly investment vehicles in its economic reforms. Many Australian families and businesses use the trusts to protect their assets and split income between beneficiaries to reap the benefits from the lower tax rates. The report follows Labor proposing a minimum 30 per cent tax rate on trusts as part of its failed swath of tax reforms it took to the 2019 election. Positive Economics Advisory's managing director David Williams-Chen said if Labor were to apply a flat tax rate, Aussies would find a way to avoid it. 'People will respond to incentives and we see this time and again,' Mr Williams-Chen told 'Whether it's smokers buying black market tobacco to avoid paying high price cigarettes as excise levies have increased. 'Or whether it's the wealthy who have taken advantage of lower tax settings in superannuation before balance transfer caps and contribution limits came into place. 'We know there'd be a response.' He pointed to research from US academics Shahar Rotberg and Joseph Steinberg where it was found increasing wealth taxes incentivised people to hide their assets and resulted in lower tax revenue. Mr Williams-Chen urged the government to keep in mind taxpayers' capacity to avoid other taxes and even warned this could lead to a situation shown in the work of Rotberg and Steinberg. 'The evidence from the US shows that once the behavioural responses to wealth taxes on capital are factored in, there's a likelihood that they're actually negative for the economy,' he said. 'Rotberg and Steinberg in 2024 found wealth taxes would cause an overall decline in economic welfare between 0.3 and 0.4 percent.' The individuals who are the beneficiaries of a trust pay their personal income tax rate on the distributions. This means the tax paid on a trust can vary from zero per cent to 47 per cent. Labor considering changes to family trusts, alongside plans to tax high earning super accounts and wind back electric vehicle rebates, come as Labor faces a decade of deficits and ballooning costs of the NDIS and defence. The Albanese government also faces reduced tax revenue from lower tobacco excise and falling fossil fuel exports as Australia continues on its renewables shift.
