Britain's ‘trendiest' beach town is set for biggest transformation in a DECADE as fresh plans unveiled
NEW plans have been revealed for a seaside development project - months after the council blocked proposals.
The seaside town was named
Advertisement
3
The plans were narrowly rejected by the local council in January of this year
Credit: Folkestone Harbour & Seafront Development Company
3
A total of 84 luxury beachfront properties have already been built at the site
Credit: Folkestone Harbour & Seafront Development Company
3
The revised proposals could bring significant change the seaside town
Credit: Folkestone Harbour & Seafront Development Company
Folkestone harbour and seafront could undergo a significant transformation if development plans are approved.
While Sir Roger De Haan's Folkestone Harbour and Seafront Development Company has already made significant changes to the area - they are still awaiting approval for the eastern section of the
The company previously submitted development plans in January which were narrowly refused.
Councillors voted 5-4 to reject the application, expressing concerns about the design, heritage impacts and housing affordability.
Advertisement
Read more News
Public response was
After making revisions to the plans that address the councillors' concerns, FHSDC is hoping the new proposal will be approved at a planning committee meeting on June 17.
One of the most drastic changes between the proposals is a 50 per cent increase in public parking provisions.
The increase correlates to 323 proposed public spaces, up from 215 in the original proposal - as well as a car club that should reduce pressure on residential parking.
Advertisement
Most read in The Sun
They have also made alterations for the proposed plan to build 410 homes and 54 commercial units.
This will include 53 affordable homes, intended for shared ownership in order to meet affordability needs - as the original proposal faced backlash for failing to address local social issues.
The up-and-coming English seaside town with cheap booze and huge beaches
The new proposal includes more three-bedroom homes, as well as moving one of the proposed buildings away from the harbour station to "better respect" its historic setting.
84 beachfront properties have already been built, with prices ranging from £430,000 to £2.1 million.
Advertisement
FHSDC released a statement clarifying the restrictions they faced under the council's Local Plan.
The statement from FHSDC reads: 'The original permission dictated, for example, the maximum and minimum height of the buildings, and a maximum and minimum number of homes we can build, and these cannot be changed through a Reserved Matters Application.
'Any revised plans must remain within these, and other, parameters.'
Local residents had previously
Advertisement
One particularly outspoken resident, Georgina Baker, campaigned against the development as she believed it was "not the right development for the harbour" and that the "community deserves more."
However, FHSDC consultants believe the development would do more good for the area, with an emphasis on social benefit.
The proposal includes a new Section 106 agreement to contribute £5.19 million to local services including children's play areas, GPs, schools, social care, libraries and youth services.
This is in addition to the amount promised in the original proposal, bringing the total contribution to £8.72 million.
Advertisement
It is estimated that the development could generate 760 long-term jobs, boost the local economy by £21 million each year, and generate £148 million during construction.
With the
FHSDC told
A spokesperson said: "Ten years ago, the original outline planning permission provided for the demolition of the station, Customs House and Signal Box.
Advertisement
"At the time, these buildings were dangerous and inaccessible to the public.
"Sir Roger De Haan decided to restore and retain the station rather than demolish it and to prioritise its place in the development."
In addition to the residential properties, the
The upcoming planning meeting will decide the fate of the remaining section of the project.
Advertisement
It comes as other areas of Folkestone are undergoing their own redevelopment.
A
The town's
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Teddy Sheringham hits out at Man Utd chief Omar Berrada's ‘dreamlike' comments
Teddy Sheringham has hit out at chief executive Omar Berrada's 'dreamlike' comments about Manchester United winning the Premier League by 2028, stressing the need for patience rather than 'pie in the sky' remarks. The Red Devils are reeling from their worst top-flight campaign in 51 years after they stumbled home 15th and missed out on European football by losing the Europa League final to Tottenham. Rivals Liverpool rubbed salt into the wound by equalling United's record of 20 English league titles – their second since the Old Trafford club last lifted the Premier League when Sir Alex Ferguson bowed out as champion in 2013. I firmly believe that we can do it Ruben Amorim's side look some way off challenging and fulfilling the club's 'Project 150' vision to mark their 150th anniversary in 2028 by winning both the men's and women's league titles. Chief executive Berrada this month underlined his confidence in fulfilling the goal and told United We Stand 'I firmly believe that we can do it' – but Sheringham thinks such a timescale can be unhelpful. 'Omar Berrada's comments are dreamlike,' the former United striker told Sky Bet. 'In football clubs, you've got to have small steps to get to places and if you see those small steps and are encouraged and moving in the right direction, that's when you start looking positively (at the future). Teddy Sheringham scored the equaliser in Manchester United's Champions League final comeback win against Bayern Munich in 1999 (Phil Noble/PA) 'But when people come out with quotes like that, it can be pie in the sky when you've got to give the manager time to get things right.' Quite whether Amorim will get that patience and belief is another thing given the Portuguese's struggles since taking charge in November. The United head coach retains the hierarchy's backing, but Sheringham says he can ill afford a slow start to the season. 'For Manchester United, the results must improve,' the 1999 treble winner said. 'It can't go on like this. 'The way the talk is – 'it's alright, we're gearing for next year, everything is OK for next season' – but I think they're a long way off being anything like the Manchester United of old and the pressure will be on Ruben Amorim, without a doubt. Ruben Amorim was unable to end a frustrating first season with the Europa League (Nick Potts/PA) 'If he starts the season like the end of last season, there is only one way things will go.' Sheringham hopes United come out 'all guns blazing and rip Arsenal apart' in their season opener on August 17, when Amorim will be hoping to have more firepower in place. Matheus Cunha has joined from Wolves and the Red Devils are pushing to sign Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo, but questions remain about the striker position given Rasmus Hojlund's struggles 'We've been speaking about Rasmus Hojlund for a good couple of years now,' Sheringham said. 'First and foremost, I still think he's a decent striker, I just think he's been starved of service at Manchester United. Rasmus Hojlund has endured a frustrating second season (Adam Davy/PA) 'The way they play, they play with two out-and-out wingers, no real support apart from Bruno Fernandes getting forward. It's all about the service for centre-forwards and he's had none. 'I struggle to think about any striker that you could put in there, that would suffer from the same service and still score goals. 'You'd have to be some player like Didier Drogba who did things on his own at times, to score goals. Being a young man as Hojlund is and coming into a new country and into the Premier League, trying to understand it, I think he's had a tough ride.'
The 42
2 days ago
- The 42
Drogheda debacle has many fathers, but Uefa are more culpable than all
DROGHEDA UNITED' EXCLUSION from Europe is a dispiriting fact not because they didn't play by the rules, but because they did not follow a Uefa-designed loophole at Uefa's behest. It's easy to lose a grip on the story amid its blizzard of finicky detail, so stick with us for a moment. Drogs are part of a multi-club organisation owned by an American investment fund named the Trivela Group, who first moved into football with a purchase of English club Wallsall in 2022. They acquired Drogheda in February last year, and added Danish club Silkeborg to the portfolio in December last year. They also control a club in Togo. Uefa don't allow clubs controlled by the same ownership group to compete in the same competition, citing integrity concerns, and so we could sound the Danger Here klaxon when Silkeborg joined Drogheda in the Conference League qualifiers at the start of June. To ensure both of their clubs could compete, Trivela needed to follow precedent in transferring its ownership of one of the clubs to a blind trust, which would reassure Uefa they would not be dictating sporting matters at both clubs at the same time. This precedent was set last year, when the owners of Man City and Man United were allowed to transfer Girona and Nice respectively into a blind trust, to allow all four clubs compete in their Uefa competitions. They were allowed to do this in June last year, whereas this year Uefa brought the deadline forward to 1 March. Trivela missed the March deadline, and so went to the Court of Arbitration for Sport to argue they should be given dispensation to do the blind trust business this week, in advance of the draw. CAS ruled that Trivela ought to have known the deadline, as it had been properly communicated by Uefa in October last year. Given Drogheda finished lower in their league than Silkeborg, it is they who miss out, and the bigger Danish club are allowed to compete. The story is chiefly a travesty for Kevin Doherty and his players, many of whom will have made career decisions around the expectation that Drogheda would be competing in Europe. The club, meanwhile, have lost out on at least €500,000 in prize money and the league as a whole will now have one club fewer fighting for co-efficient ranking points. (The damage will be somewhat limited by the fact the co-efficient total will be divided by the three competing clubs, rather than four, as was to be the case if Drogheda had been competing.) And, as ever, the fans are probably the biggest losers of all, who have had their European trip taken away from them. If you want to play the blame game, then it's a target rich environment. The FAI insist they flagged concerns with Trivela last November, and while they might have done more to repeat these concerns and urge rival clubs to apply for a European licence in case Drogheda missed out, to turn this into another FAI screw-up story is OTT. Rules cannot be enforced without the principle that those involved have a responsibility to know all of those rules, and if the League of Ireland wants to be taken more seriously, the errors of clubs cannot automatically be pinned on the FAI, just as the Association can't take all the credit for clubs' many recent achievements. No, this is an almighty balls-up by the Trivela Group. They had one club in Europe and bought another presumably with the ambition to qualify for Europe, so they should have known the rules and acted to comply. But take a step back and look at the bigger picture. Advertisement The blind trust business is a legal means of satisfying the obvious sporting integrity issues thrown up by multi-club ownership. These concerns were established ahead of the 1998/99, when two Joe Lewis' owned clubs, Slavia Prague and AEK Athens, qualified for the Uefa Cup. Uefa and then CAS barred the lower-ranked AEK, given the possibility for a conflict of interest were they paired together. CAS pointed to one hypothetical: what if both sides were paired together in a group phase and were incentivised to draw their game? In that instance, the owner would have the power to award the players a bigger bonus for drawing the game than winning. But having acknowledged the many potential issues with multi-club ownership, Uefa did not outlaw it. Instead they found a regulatory means of making it acceptable. The proximity of relationship between Red Bull clubs Leipzig and Salzburg was summed up in 2016 when a Salzburg defender, Andreas Ulmer, accidentally wore a Leipzig shirt during the second half of a Champions League qualification match against FK Liepaja. Uefa initially banned Leipzig when both qualified for the Champions League in 2017, but both clubs were allowed to compete on appeal, once the clubs agreed to limit player trading and Salzburg fiddled about with a few bits and pieces – including their branding and board composition – to the point they could satisfy Uefa that Red Bull were merely sponsors, rather than owners. Multi-club ownership then exploded: a 2022 Uefa report said it had risen by more than 400% across Europe in the space of a decade. Uefa are now trying to sift through the wreckage sprung forth from Pandora's Box. The latest workaround has been the blind trust, piloted by the owners of City and United last year. Both clubs' owners transferred their shares in their secondary clubs, Girona and Nice, to an independent trustee who is overseen by Uefa, while promising not to trade players or share coaching or scouting intel. (City were still allowed to sign Girona star Savinho, who had been on loan the previous season from French club Troyes, whom the City Football Group also own.) Uefa demand that nobody in a multi-club network is in a position to influence the sporting decisions made at more than one club at any one time. That said, the blind trust is a temporary thing, and both Girona and Nice will revert to their old ownership structure on 1 July. So while owners can't in theory exercise control over sporting decisions at two clubs during the season, they are free to do so in advance of that season. While the blind trust complies with Uefa's rules the optics offer a different impression entirely. Evangelos Marinakis, for instance, put his Nottingham Forest shares into a blind trust earlier this year, in order to avoid a potential European conflict with another of his clubs, Olympiakos. He remained a very visible presence during the season run-in, however, infamously storming onto the pitch at the City Ground in May. (Gary Neville, heavily critical of Marinakis' intervention, found himself banned from Forest's stadium for the season's final game.) But Marinakis has satisfied Uefa's rules. Drogheda's owners must take responsibility for their feckless, costly error, though they made one with regard to a rule which ultimately legitimises multi-club ownership. Such is its prevalence now, Uefa can only mitigate against its impacts: it's another malign trend in the sport that moved fast to break things and become too unwieldy to rein in. It is, after all, an easy solution to the original sin of professional football: vast financial inequity. Uefa did initially ban the Red Bull clubs, but their workaround was heavily influenced by the EU's principle of free movement of people, goods, and services. Block a club from the Champions League and a club may successfully argue that Uefa are violating that principle. And were Uefa to lose that, they could lose their right to organise all of European football. This is what the vestigial Super League clubs have argued, with Uefa fighting back by arguing that sport has a special status enshrined within the EU's founding treaty, one that would render moot these anti-competitive arguments. Uefa, though, have been much too slow in finding their voice on this special status, and have been guilty of a terrible paralysis in the face of multi-club owners. Hence they are reduced to enforcing rules like that under which Drogheda have been condemned. It has been a brutal defeat for Drogheda United, but the game as a whole is suffering more than anyone wishes to acknowledge. This is a sport full of rules but missing proper governance and, above all, leadership.
Irish Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Conor McGregor linked with shock takeover bid of English football club
Conor McGregor has been linked with a takeover bid for English football club Hartlepool United. The club has been the subject of takeover rumours for many months with chairman and owner Raj Singh reportedly looking to sell the club. A consortium named the Herd International Group has emerged as front runners to take over the National League side, and there has speculation that Irish MMA star McGregor could be involved in the takeover, speculation which was intensified when the Dubliner followed the club on social media. One to often flaunt his wealth, the ex-UFC champion has spoken in the past of his desire to become more involved in football, even going as far as to suggest that he would be interested in investing in clubs such as Liverpool, Manchester United and Celtic. Earlier this year, he teased purchasing two League of Ireland clubs amid a public spat with Drogheda United, who distanced themselves from McGregor when he posed with the FAI Cup at his Dublin pub. In what appears to be a response to the speculation surrounding McGregor's potential involvement, the Herd International Group have issued a statement revealing that they have turned down the opportunity to 'involve a high-profile individual whose values and public behaviour we believe do not align with the spirit of Hartlepool United Football Club.' "As the directors and board members of Herd Group, we want to speak openly and clearly in light of recent speculation. "We were offered the opportunity to involve a high-profile individual whose values and public behaviour we believe do not align with the spirit of Hartlepool United Football Club. "We respectfully, but firmly declined. "While others in the local business community may feel that such an association represents a path forward, we do not share that view - and we never will. "Hartlepool United is a club rooted in community. It is a safe space for all, especially for women, girls, and families who proudly support this club and this town. "Our commitment is to preserve and strengthen that identity - not compromise it. "We remain fully committed to completing the takeover and investing in the future of Hartlepool United - not just as a football club, but as a central part of the community. "We believe in the potential of this town, and we stand ready to help it grow with integrity. unity, and purpose. "Thank you for your trust and continued support. Herd Group."
