Land exemption given for tree felling at Delhi's Central Vista

The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi VK Saxena has granted a special exemption to a 5.037-hectare government construction site from area restrictions under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act (DPTA), 1994. The move clears a procedural hurdle for the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) to seek permission to transplant or fell 476 trees for two buildings that are part of the Common Central Secretariat (the sixth and seventh ones) at Maulana Azad Road , part of the Central Vista redevelopment project.
The exemption was approved in an official gazette notification dated May 30 and published on Thursday.
The exemption was granted under Section 29 of the DPTA by Saxena, allowing the Tree Officer (West Forest Division) to consider a pending application concerning the transplantation or felling of 476 trees within the project site. The application was submitted through the DPTA e-Forest portal by Kushagra Singh, Executive Engineer at the Central Public Works Department (CPWD).
The usual limit for considering applications under Section 9(3) of the Act is one hectare. Since the project spans over five hectares, the Tree Officer requested an exemption to process the application legally.
Section 29 of the DPTA, 1994 gives the power to the Government to effect such exemptions.
'The Tree Officer shall give his decision within sixty days from the date of receipt of the application: provided that no permission shall be granted to any person from the same area on more than two occasions during the same year subject to a maximum area of one hectare at a time,' the act states.
To be sure, the notification clarifies that the exemption does not grant permission to cut or transplant any trees. It merely allows the Tree Officer to consider transplantation and felling on a larger plot. 'This notification for exemption under Section 29… shall not be considered as permission for transplantation/felling of trees under the DPTA, 1994,' the act adds.
The next step will be an independent assessment of the application by the Tree Officer. This will include scrutiny under the DPTA, the Delhi Preservation of Trees Rules, 1996, relevant guidelines, and court orders.
The Tree Officer must apply due diligence and aim to minimize the number of trees affected by the project.
This construction site forms part of the broader Central Vista redevelopment initiative, aimed at reorganizing and modernizing central administrative infrastructure. Work is progressing on Common Central Secretariat (CCS) Buildings 6 and 7, following approval by the Heritage Conservation Committee in January and the issuance of construction bids in November 2024. These buildings, rising on the sites of the old Vice-President's House and Vigyan Bhawan Annexe respectively along Maulana Azad Road, will form the core of the new Defence Enclave. This enclave will consolidate offices for the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), and the armed services, including the Department of Defence Production and the headquarters of the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force.
A retired IFS and former official in Delhi's forest and wildlife department said the decision does not mean trees will be felled, but simply uses the exemption clause for a tree officer in Delhi to pick up the project case.
'The tree officer will still have to approve or reject the plan and decide eventually how many trees are felled or transplanted. Since the area was more than one hectare, the tree officer would not have been able to pick up the case. At the same time, it is likely this was not forest land. In order for the tree act to apply, one needs to use such an exemption to allow the tree officer to consider greater area — more than one hectare,' said the retired official, on condition of anonymity.
The official added such exemptions have been used in the past as well, to allow projects over one hectare in area to be processed, including several road and highway projects in Delhi. 'This is the standard procedure to allow DPTA to apply to projects in non-forest land.'
The LG had a day earlier granted a similar approval for the exemption of a 2.16 hectares patch for a flyover project at the Nand Nagri to Gagan Cinema junction in north-east Delhi. The project involves transplantation of 27 trees.
Officials in Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) did not respond to HT's queries.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

a day ago

• Time of India

NMMC announces 501 dangerous buildings in Navi Mumbai

Navi Mumbai: A comprehensive survey conducted by Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) for 2025-2026 has identified as many as 501 dangerous buildings within its jurisdiction. These structures have been officially classified as hazardous under Section 264 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. However, the number of such structures has reduced from last year's data of 527 which is attributed to ongoing redevelopment work of unsafe buildings. The classification includes 51 buildings in 'C-1' category deemed extremely dangerous and requiring immediate evacuation, whilst 104 structures fall under 'C-2A' category necessitating evacuation and structural repairs. Additionally, 297 structures are categorised as 'C-2B', requiring structural repairs without evacuation, and 49 buildings under 'C-3' category need minor repairs. "Citizens can access this information on under 'Departments', 'Encroachment Department', and 'General Information' sections. For public awareness, details of 51 'C-1' category buildings are highlighted in bold letters," said NMMC commissioner Kailas Shinde. Following Section 264 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, notices have been issued to owners and occupants, informing them about the dangerous status of their buildings. As per the Government Circular dated November 5, 2015, by Maharashtra Urban Development Department, utilities for 'C-1' category buildings will be disconnected. The corporation advises immediate cessation of residential/commercial activities and demolition of these dangerous structures to prevent potential loss of life and property. The notice explicitly states that NMMC bears no responsibility for damages resulting from building collapses, with liability falling solely on the occupants who fail to comply. The notice indicates the current occupancy status of each dangerous building. Residents must take appropriate action based on their building's classification, whether immediate evacuation or structural repairs. NMMC emphasises it will not be liable for any unfortunate incidents. The corporation particularly stresses the heightened risks during monsoon season. NMMC strongly urges citizens to cease occupation of these dangerous structures, stating that occupants will bear full responsibility for any unfortunate incidents that may occur. According to Section 265(A) of the Act, structures over 30 years old must undergo a mandatory structural assessment by a civil engineer or structural engineer registered with the corporation. The age calculation begins from the date the property was first occupied, either partially or fully. Property owners must submit certification confirming the completion of recommended repairs and the structure's sound condition. Section 398 (A) stipulates penalties for non-compliance, with fines of Rs 25,000 or the annual property tax amount, whichever is greater, for those who fail to conduct structural inspections.

The Hindu

2 days ago

• The Hindu

8,583 students allotted seats in second phase free admissions in private schools in A.P.

Samagra Shiksha State Project Director B. Srinivasa Rao on Friday said 8,583 students had been selected in the second and final phase of lottery conducted to select students for free admissions under clause 12 (1) (C) of the Right to Education (RTE) Act in private unaided schools across the State for the academic year 2025-26. In a statement, Mr. Rao said information about the selected students will be sent via SMS to the mobile numbers of the parents, and it will also be made available on the website The students who were allotted seats must visit their respective schools with valid documents between June 21 and 28 to confirm their admissions. For details, the toll-free number 18004258599 can be contacted. Verification He said school managements had been instructed to verify the documents and provide admissions, and warned that if any school denied admission without valid reasons, departmental action will be taken against it. Mr. Rao said these admissions will be verified through special logins allotted to the Additional Project Coordinators (APCs) of Samagra Shiksha at the district level. He said should there be any doubt, the school managements must call the respective Mandal or District Education Officers or Regional Joint Directors of the School Education Department. Mr. Rao informed that in the first phase, applications for Class 1 admissions were accepted from May 2 to May 19, during which 37,427 children registered. Out of them, 28,561 were deemed eligible through the verification process. In the first phase lottery, 23,118 students were allotted seats, and 15,541 students have joined the schools. .

New Indian Express

3 days ago

• New Indian Express

Only those who executed gift deed can cancel it: Madras HC

CHENNAI: In a significant judgment on the applicability of the provisions of the Maintenance and Care of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, that allows cancellation of settlement (gift) deeds by parents over lack of care by children, the Madras High Court has ruled that only the person who had transferred the property can seek its cancellation. The order passed by Justice N Anand Venkatesh also said that for the deed to be cancelled for noncompliance, it must have a specific condition that mandates care for the senior citizen concerned. The court made the ruling while quashing an order of the Kallakurichi sub-collector who had cancelled the deed executed by the father of the petitioner, Karuppan, in 1997 transferring certain properties to his son. The sub-collector issued the order, in 2019, under Section 23 (1) of the Act based on the application submitted by Karuppan's mother seeking cancellation of the deed as her son was not offering her care. As per the petitioner's case, the property was gifted by his father who later died and his mother cannot seek cancellation of the deed as she is not the executant of the transfer deed. 'Hence, except a transferor, no other person can maintain an application under Section 23(1) of the Act before the authority concerned. As a consequence, the application submitted by the mother of the petitioner is not maintainable,' he said.