Iran on the brink? Regime officials may seek refuge in Canada, long seen as safe ground for Tehran's elite
Iran regime collapse fears are rising, and Canada may become the destination of choice for fleeing Tehran elites. Security expert Casey Babb says many Iranian regime officials have already entered Canada despite laws meant to stop them. With Iran's leadership under pressure after devastating Israeli attacks, more high-level figures could claim asylum here, a move that deeply worries Iranian-Canadians. Canada's long-standing status as a quiet refuge, paired with recent asylum claim surges, shows a clear pattern.
Iranian regime collapse may push top officials to Canada, where many have already entered via asylum loopholes. Experts warn of growing security risks as Canada quietly becomes a destination for Tehran's elite fleeing the Islamic Republic's crumbling government.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Why is Canada seen as a safe haven for Iranian regime officials?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
How are these officials entering despite Canada's ban?
Why are Iranian Canadians worried about these arrivals?
'Canada is known as a safe haven for Islamic regime officials and their families.'
'It is very traumatizing for Iranian Canadians to see officials from the Islamic regime in Canada.'
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Are Iranian asylum claims rising in Canada?
What's happening in Iran that's driving this fear?
As Iran faces growing instability and reports swirl about the possible collapse of the Islamic Republic, a pressing concern is emerging in Canada—what happens if high-ranking Iranian regime officials start showing up at the country's doorstep?Security experts say it's not just a hypothetical. Canada already has a track record of quietly hosting former regime members from Tehran, and despite legal blocks in place, several senior officials have found ways to enter, stay, or claim asylum in Canada.Even though Canada banned Iranian regime officials from entering the country in 2022, there's strong evidence that many have already made their way in—and more could be on the way.Security analyst Casey Babb, a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, told The Ben Mulroney Show that 'many, many senior officials of the Iranian regime, despite inadmissibility laws, have already made it in here.' Babb warns that if the regime collapses, these insiders 'know how to get into Canada.'In fact, according to the Canada Border Services Agency, as of April 2025, at leastwho once held senior positions in the Tehran government were living in Canada. Out of those,. Others have either left voluntarily or are still here.One high-profile example includes, the former Tehran police chief involved in brutal crackdowns on protests. He was spotted casually working out at a Toronto gym back in 2021.Back in October 2022, the Canadian government barred any 'senior officials' affiliated with the Iranian regime since, a move connected to the killing of Canadian photojournalist, who died under Iranian custody.But despite the ban, former Iranian officials are slipping through Canada's asylum system. A key loophole? If they claim refugee status, they can remain in Canada while their claims are processed. That's exactly what Afshin Pirnoon, a former director-general at Iran's Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization, did in 2022.Once inside, the Canadian refugee system allows these individuals time to settle, appeal, or even integrate into local communities. Meanwhile, human rights advocates and Iranian-Canadian activists have been raising red flags for years.Canada is home to one of the largest Iranian diaspora communities in the world. Many fled the regime's repression and torture, so seeing former officials living freely in Canada is deeply disturbing for them.During the recent Foreign Interference Commission inquiry, Nazanin Afshin-Jam Mackay, an Iranian-born activist and wife of former Justice Minister Peter MacKay, said it plainly:Others spoke of officials visiting places like Montreal for summer vacations or embedding themselves in community events. One witness mentioned a former Iranian cabinet minister vacationing in Quebec.An advocacy group called StopIRGC, launched in 2022, is made up of volunteer lawyers tracking and reporting on regime figures allegedly living in Canada. According to their reports, they've submitted 91 cases to law enforcement so far.In the first quarter of 2025, Iranian nationals made up the second-largest group of asylum claimants in Canada. Out of 28,830 total claims, 1,730 came from Iran. Only India had more with 4,195 claimants.This surge is part of a wider refugee spike that's pushing the Canadian government to take urgent action. Under Prime Minister Mark Carney, a new bill is being fast-tracked to tighten eligibility rules for asylum seekers.The concern isn't only about numbers—it's about who is making these claims and what risks they may pose to national security and the safety of the diaspora community in Canada.The Islamic Republic of Iran is reportedly on the edge of collapse, according to security sources and international observers. A series of devastating Israeli military attacks has badly damaged Iran's military and political hierarchy.In a video address to Iranians earlier this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged citizens to rise against their government, claiming that Iran's leaders were already 'packing their bags.'If the regime collapses completely, many insiders are expected to flee the country—and Canada remains a top destination on their list.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
When America joins Israel's war with Iran
The US bombing of key Iranian nuclear facilities Sunday will have significant geopolitical implications for regional stability, global geopolitics, and India's immediate and medium-term interests. However, for now, it doesn't appear that the US-Israeli attack on Iran is likely to go all the way, making it improbable that Iran will be completely denuclearised or that the Islamic regime in Tehran will fall. A severely weakened Iranian regime is likely to respond with military and grey-zone tactics, increasing political and economic instability in the region. Moreover, neither Israel nor the US appear to have an endgame in mind in this war. The US-Israel attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines (REUTERS) There are at least six key implications of this ongoing war. First, West Asia is likely to revert to a period of chaos, conflict, and uncertainty, at least for some time. Despite Iran's strained relations with many of its neighbours, the US decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities and join Israel's military campaign will make it difficult for other regional powers to resume efforts to normalise relations with Tel Aviv. Iran and its regime may not be popular in the Sunni strongholds of West Asia, but neither is Israel, especially given its actions in Gaza and the ongoing humanitarian tragedy there. Russia and China are likely to increase their geopolitical influence in the region, and neither will miss opportunities to challenge Israel and the US, making the regional balance even more complex and unpredictable. Second, the attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines. While the US and Israel may achieve immediate military gains, many others will be dissatisfied: With their geopolitical standing threatened, they might seek to undermine the dominance established by the US-Israel alliance in the region. Many in the Global South are likely to condemn the unilateral actions and violations of international law by the US and Israel. Meanwhile, China will look to exploit the emerging regional fractures, while Moscow will seek to recover the influence it lost in West Asia — due to the fall of the Assad regime in Syria and now, through the attack on Iran — and spot an opportunity in the post-war scene. Interestingly, Europe has maintained a curious silence. However, it will inevitably ask why the US, which wanted its Nato partners to pay for their defence and abandoned Ukraine thus increasing Europe's insecurity, would resort to force in a distant country. Clearly, Trump has prioritised Israel over Nato allies; that rude reality won't be lost on Europe. Third, the American and Israeli attacks on Iran lack legitimacy under international law, and as a result, these will further undermine the credibility of the United Nations and weaken the influence of international law worldwide. For America's western partners, this presents several dilemmas. It will test their commitment to international legal frameworks as condemning the attack risks alienating Trump further, and not condemning it risks being seen as tacit support for an illegal action. Moreover, if they do not condemn the US action, the moral ground to criticise Russia will be considerably weakened. It also undermines the geopolitical standing of key western States, which were actively engaged in negotiations with the Iranian foreign minister in Geneva to end the conflict. They face the risk of losing credibility considering how Trump went ahead and bombed Iran ignoring the talks. Fourth, American engagement in the West Asian conflict could divert attention from Ukraine's ongoing war with Russia. The Iran war would be disastrous for Ukraine, especially as the US has been unable to bring Russia to the negotiating table. Meanwhile, Russia's gains on the battlefield are growing and Moscow shows no enthusiasm to negotiate a ceasefire with Kyiv. Fifth, the attempted denuclearisation of Iran will likely have the opposite effect internationally, prompting several other countries to consider developing their own nuclear weapons for after all those who possess nuclear weapons have little to fear. Rather than strengthening the global nuclear order, the US and Israel's military action to denuclearise Iran will end up weakening it, encouraging more States to pursue nuclear arms as insurance against potential threats. Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal, while Iran failed to reach the finish line; both faced significant consequences. Israel developed its nuclear programme secretly, North Korea built its nuclear weapons at great domestic cost, and India and Pakistan developed theirs despite sanctions and US pressure. The lessons are many, and will not be lost on nuclear aspirants around the world. Finally, for India, the war in West Asia will likely unsettle the country's grand plans for broader engagement with the region. Energy prices are likely to spike, while heightened geopolitical divides will challenge India's ability to manage regional fault lines. If the war spreads or persists, it could also impact Indian nationals in the region and the remittances they send home. Moreover, the Iran conflict will, at least for the moment, stall India's regional plans for the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) and the Chabahar port in Iran, projected as India's gateway to central Asia. Happymon Jacob teaches India's foreign policy at Jawaharlal Nehru University and is the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pentagon Chief LAUDS 'Op Midnight Hammer' Success; 'Used Decoys To Misdirect,' Says Hegseth
/ Jun 22, 2025, 08:06PM IST The Pentagon has provided new details on the U.S. operation targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth praised the mission's execution, highlighting the use of decoys and coordinated air power. B-2 bombers launched from the U.S. and struck targets across Iran during an 18-hour mission. Officials described it as one of the most complex long-range strike operations in recent history. Watch.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Obama will start a war with Iran to win re-election': Amid US strikes on Tehran, Donald Trump's old tweet resurfaces
A decade-old tweet from Donald Trump has come back to haunt him, at a time when he's leading a real war effort. As tensions between Israel and Iran exploded into open conflict, and the United States confirmed bombing three Iranian nuclear sites, Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz, an old Trump tweet from 2013 has gone viral for its eerie irony. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly, not skilled!' Trump wrote on X (formerly Twitter), accusing Obama of planning a war to mask diplomatic failure. Similar posts from 2011 and 2012 echo the same idea: that Obama would start a war with Iran to boost poll numbers and win re-election. But now it's Trump who's ordering strikes on Iran, an action drawing both political backlash and international concern. 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran,' Trump warned Saturday night on social media, before announcing that US strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear infrastructure. He blamed Tehran for rejecting his nuclear deal and reiterated, 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON.' The irony wasn't lost on critics, who shared clips of Trump once saying Obama had 'no ability to negotiate' and would 'start a war with Iran' just to stay in power. Meanwhile, the fallout from the US strikes is spreading, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the US action as a violation of the UN Charter and warned of "everlasting consequences." UN Secretary-General António Guterres called the attacks 'a dangerous escalation' and urged diplomacy over war. Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu praised Trump's move, saying history would remember his 'bold decision' to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Hamas declared full solidarity with Iran, calling the US action 'brazen aggression.' As the region teeters on the brink of broader war, Trump's resurfaced words from a decade ago are being replayed in a starkly new, and deeply ironic, context.
