‘The idea that KB Hedgewar was an ultra-Hindu is patently false': Biographer Sachin Nandha

Hedgewar: A Definitive Biography by Sachin Nandha delves into the life and philosophy of the elusive Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) founder Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. The biography sheds light on Hedgewar's philosophy of cultural nationalism, his contributions to the socio-political cultural landscape of his times, and highlights his radical vision to fight the caste barriers within the RSS framework. Hedgewar's early critique of the increasing ritualism among Brahmins during British rule, including his distrust of the militant philosophy of Subhas Chandra Bose and private disagreements with Gandhi over his strict adherence to non-violence, is also covered. The biography charts Hedgewar's journey from an orphaned child in colonial India to becoming the mastermind behind RSS, one of the world's most secretive and largest voluntary organisations that completed its 100 years of existence.
In an interview with Scroll, author Sachin Nanda talked about how the biography locates Hedgewar within the political and cultural ferment of his time, his key influences while growing up in poverty leading up to the creation of the RSS, his role in creating Shakhas to build social capital, and why he believes Hedgewar should not be labeled as an 'ultra-Hindu' or someone who 'hated' minorities.
This biography claims to be a definitive biography of Hedgewar. How is this biography different from other biographies published earlier on Hedgewar and what are some unique insights and new archival information you were able to bring forth about his role and contribution within and outside the RSS?
This is the first biography of Hedgewar in the true sense of the word. Previous works have largely been hagiographies – reverential, one-sided portrayals. This book took over seven years to research and write. It's grounded in archival material, over 700 references, and includes both focused and unstructured interviews with individuals connected to the RSS since the 1930s. What makes it unique is the attempt to locate Hedgewar within the political and cultural ferment of his time – inside and outside the RSS – while resisting both vilification and blind admiration.
What were some key influences on Hedgewar while growing up that shaped his worldview and ideology of cultural nationalism that led to the founding of RSS? How did his exposure to Western education shape his understanding of political systems and nationalism?
The early death of Hedgewar's parents left a deep emotional imprint – he was raised in poverty but later adopted by Dr BS Moonjay, one of Nagpur's wealthiest and most influential nationalists. This gave him access to both hardship and privilege, grounding him in India's social realities. He was deeply disturbed by the backwards condition of women and the fragmented state of Hindu society. He saw how the 'tyranny of custom' meant that women had almost no access to healthcare and medication that could have saved many thousands of lives during cholera outbreaks.
Though rooted in tradition, Hedgewar had a curious and open mind. His time in Calcutta exposed him to revolutionary politics, and Western thinkers (from the age of 14) – Mazzini's nationalism, Marx's class analysis, Nietzsche's will to power, and even Greek political philosophy. He read widely and saw value in ideas that could help rebuild Indian society with discipline, unity, and pride. His vision for the RSS was neither orthodox revivalism nor blind Westernisation – but a fusion of Indian cultural rootedness with the organisational and philosophical insights he absorbed from across the world. He realised that the answer to India's problems was not political but cultural – and that Indian society was trapped by caste, class and creed, which had to be overcome if India was to reclaim its position as a great civilisation again.
What was the motivation and thought behind the creation of RSS Shakhas which Hedgewar was instrumental in establishing? What kind of social and cultural capital was he hoping to reap through these Shakhas for the growth of RSS?
Hedgewar's creation of the Shakha was, in many ways, a response to the deep deficit of social capital within Hindu society. India lacked the civic glue – networks of trust, norms, and cooperation – needed to build strong, inclusive institutions. Hindu society, fragmented by caste, region, and sect, had never developed the habits of collective action beyond its rigid hierarchies.
Hedgewar's critique was not aimed outward – it was directed inward, at Hindu society itself. The Shakha was designed as a daily ritual of reform: a caste-blind, community-centric space where young men could forge bonds across social divisions, learn discipline, and cultivate a sense of shared civilisational responsibility. His vision was to rebuild Hindu society from the bottom up, laying the cultural foundations for a future India that was cohesive, self-confident, and capable of collective action.
You write in the biography that in order to understand modern India, it should be viewed through the legacy of RSS founder Hedgewar. Why do you think Hedgewar shouldn't be looked at with a preconditional mindset formed by academics who, as you write in the biography, 'label him as an ultra-Hindu and hater of minorities'?
To reframe the assertion in your question, I believe there are many ways to understand modern India. But no understanding can be complete without engaging seriously with the RSS – and that journey must begin with Hedgewar. He may well be more influential today than any of his contemporaries, precisely because of how deeply the institution he founded has shaped Indian society and politics.
The idea that Hedgewar was an 'ultra-Hindu' or a hater of minorities is not just reductive – it's patently false. In seven years of research, I found no evidence, no data, no statements by him that support that claim. On the contrary, while at university, Hedgewar was deeply influenced by a Maulvi named Liaqat Hussain. His framework was not one of religious exclusion – it was about psychological unity with the nation. The red line for him was desh bhakt i – a profound emotional connection to the land and its civilisation.
This inevitably came into tension with orthodox Islamist clerics of the time, who saw desh bhakti as a form of idolatry. So, the conflict wasn't about faith per se, but about whether loyalty to the nation could transcend religious dogma. The 1920s were a period of rupture – between Hindus and Muslims, between castes, between linguistic and regional identities. The RSS's early reputation as anti-minority must be understood in that turbulent context.
Hedgewar was not a bigot. He was a complex and subtle thinker who recognised that to build a nation, one needed to bridge capital – something to unify diverse groups. For him, desh bhakti was that bridge: a shared emotional and cultural bond that could transcend sectarian lines and forge a common civilisational purpose.
Can you elaborate on the idea of cultural nationalism that Hedgewar and RSS came to espouse? And where did he situate the minorities and their religious and cultural identities in this nationalism?
Cultural nationalism, as Hedgewar conceived it, is distinct from political nationalism. Political nationalism is often tied to statehood, electoral power, or constitutional identity – a capture of the State. Cultural nationalism, by contrast, is about emotional belonging – a shared sense of civilisational continuity, values, and memory that binds people across time and difference.
Hedgewar's idea was rooted in the belief that India was not just a geography but a civilisation. His vision wasn't to erase differences but to find a common thread – desh bhakti – a deep psychological commitment to the nation and its culture, which could serve as a unifying principle.
In this framework, minorities weren't excluded. They were invited to participate in a shared national project, provided there was alignment on that emotional bond to the land and its heritage. Hedgewar wasn't seeking uniformity; he was looking for coherence. He believed that each group could retain its unique identity, but that the nation required bridging capital – the kind of social trust and civic relationships that link people across group boundaries.
Robert Putnam makes the distinction between bonded and bridging social capital. Bonded capital ties people within a group; bridging capital connects people across groups. Hedgewar recognised that Hindu society lacked both. His effort, through RSS and the Shakhas, was to create a framework where bonded capital could grow amongst Hindus in order to bring coherence and then bridging capital across castes/creeds – by building a cultural nationalism that was broad, cohesive, and rooted in desh bhakti rather than religious affiliation.
The challenge that Hedgewar faced, and the RSS still face, is that desh bhakti in this sense is tantamount to idolatry for conservative Deobandi clerics who resist this path, frightened that their identity will be subsumed. India will need to solve this problem sooner or later; or face further ruptures in the future!
What do you make of assessments that say Hedgewar's idea of cultural nationalism and Hindu-centric ideology was a form of exclusionary nationalism detrimental to social cohesion that further marginalised minority communities in India?
Critics often conflate two very different ideas: political nationalism and cultural nationalism. Political nationalism is concerned with capturing state power – rajya – in order to shape society. Political parties, by their nature, operate in this domain. They mobilise vote banks, often by constructing an 'us' versus 'them,' and in doing so, risk falling into majoritarianism. Whether it's the BJP or the Congress, both have, at times, prioritised one group over another to consolidate political capital.
Hedgewar's idea of cultural nationalism is fundamentally different. It's not about state power – it's about building a rashtra, society. For him, the nation was not a political construct but a civilisational one. The RSS, in his conception, wasn't to be a political party but a cultural force – a space where people of all castes, classes, and creeds could find common cause through desh bhakti, a deep emotional and psychological union with the land and its civilisational ethos.
So to say that Hedgewar's vision was exclusionary misunderstands both his intent and the institutional architecture he laid down. His red line was never religion – it was disloyalty to the idea of India as a shared civilisational space. The test was not what God you prayed to, but whether you saw yourself as part of the rashtra – and were willing to act in service of it.
Of course, any cultural movement can be distorted in later years. But if one reads Hedgewar closely, it becomes clear he was trying to transcend India's divisions – not deepen them. His idea of nationalism was not to marginalise minorities, but to invite all into a unifying project – provided they could emotionally invest in the shared destiny of the nation.
One should also note that Patriotism is not akin to desh bhakti – this is also another false application which creates linguistic confusion in popular discourse.
By this same account Hedgewarian thought forces Muslims in India, not as a collective, but as individuals, to reflect – and ask themselves if they wish to be part of this civilisational project, or not? Is it compatible with being Muslim? What does it mean to be a desh bhakt, and a Muslim? These are questions that I do not claim to know, nor can I answer them. But Indians of all creeds will have to face up to these difficult questions sooner or later.
Hedgewarian thought might give a 'way out of the fly bottle'
The biography touches on Hedgewar's radical plans to combat the caste system which he came to loathe. What was his plan to integrate all castes within the RSS at the organisational level and how successful was he in dismantling the caste barriers within the RSS?
Hedgewar loathed the caste system. He believed it had fractured Hindu society and weakened its capacity for collective action. His tool for addressing this was the Shakha – a deliberately secular, egalitarian space where young Hindu men, regardless of caste or class, could play, eat, and train together. It was revolutionary for its time.
He understood that social reform couldn't be forced – it needed to be lived. Through physical exercise, gamification, and shared routines, the Shakha built social capital – trust, bonding, and cooperation across caste lines. Over time, participants were introduced to a shared historical and cultural consciousness through lectures and discussions – a slow, subtle reshaping of identity.
The early RSS was very much this kind of space – as Gandhi himself acknowledged during his visit in 1934, when he noted the absence of caste discrimination in an RSS camp. That kind of testimony says something about the kind of social experiment Hedgewar was quietly running.
I don't have enough reliable data to fully assess how successful the RSS has been in dismantling caste barriers within the RSS – but we do have clarity on the Hedgewarian intent and method.
Why was Hedgewar opposed to Gandhi's strict adherence to nonviolence? What were some of these private disagreements with Gandhi in the context of communal and colonial violence during India's struggle for independence and their influence on the ideological foundations of RSS?
Gandhi was a political nationalist. In that sense, he wanted to capture the state and then build a new India. Hedgewar was a cultural nationalist who had felt that the fundamental bonds between individuals were weak, and the society too fractured to build a state that could be held accountable. So Gandhi was top down; Hedgewar was bottom up.
Furthermore, Hedgewar believed in diffused power; the RSS in his time was highly devolved and each Shakha was an autonomous outfit working independently, held together by the Prachaarak order, which is akin to the friars of medieval Europe.
Gandhi was dictatorial – this is well evidenced; and often used his veto to drive policies he believed in even when his committees held differing views. The national flag controversy is a case in point.
Also, Gandhi naively later sidelined nationalists such as Maulana Abul Kalam Azad (1888–1958), while pandering to Deobandi conservative clerics.
In his final speech to the RSS Prachaaraks before his death, you quote Hedgewar telling RSS workers that the 'final redemption of Hindu society will only happen through the Sangh.' What did he mean by that?
The Sangh means community. Community implies a surplus of social capital. The redemption of 'Hindu society' could only come through rebuilding the social capital amongst the vastly divergent Hindu groups.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

34 minutes ago

• Time of India

UN Security Council to meet on Iran as Russia, China push for a ceasefire

Live Events The U.N. Security Council will meet Sunday to discuss U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle was not immediately clear when it could be put to a vote. The three countries circulated the draft text, said diplomats, and asked members to share their comments by Monday evening. A resolution needs at least nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the United States, France, Britain, Russia or China to U.S. is likely to oppose the draft resolution, seen by Reuters, which also condemns attacks on Iran's nuclear sites and facilities. The text does not name the United States or world awaited Iran's response on Sunday after President Donald Trump said the U.S. had "obliterated" Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 requested the U.N. Security Council meeting, calling on the 15-member body "to address this blatant and unlawful act of aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms."Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon said in a statement on Sunday that the U.S. and Israel "do not deserve any condemnation, but rather an expression of appreciation and gratitude for making the world a safer place."U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Saturday branded the U.S. strikes on Iran as a "dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge - and a direct threat to international peace and security .""At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace," Guterres said in a statement.

The Hindu

34 minutes ago

• The Hindu

INS Tamal, India's last imported warship, to be commissioned on July 1

The Indian Navy is all set to commission its latest stealth multi-role frigate INS Tamal on July 1 at Kaliningrad in Russia. This will be the last warship of Indian Navy to have been built outside India and the eighth in the series of Krivak class frigates inducted from Russia over the past two decades. The ceremony will be presided over by Western Naval Commander Vice Admiral Sanjay J. Singh in the presence of several high-ranking Indian and Russian government and defence officials. INS Tamal has been built at Yantar Shipyard in Kaliningrad, Russia, and is the last warship to be inducted from a foreign source, in line with the Government of India's impetus on 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' and 'Make in India' initiatives. India, as part of the broader contract for Tushil class, is also building two similar frigates called the Triput class at Goa Shipyard Limited with transfer of technology and design assistance from the Russian side. By the conclusion of this series of ships, Indian Navy will be operating 10ships with similar capabilities and commonality in equipment, weapon and sensor fit over four different classes. The ship has 26 percent indigenous components, including the BrahMos long range cruise missile for targeting both at sea and land. The vessel has significant upgrades in its arsenal in comparison to its predecessors. The crew, comprising of over 250 personnel have undergone rigorous ashore as well as afloat training in extremely challenging winter conditions of St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad in Russia. INS Tamal has successively completed extensive sea trials undertaken over three months, proving its systems, weapons and sensors. The 125m long, 3900-ton warship, packs a lethal punch as it features an impressive blend of Indian and Russian cutting-edge technologies and best practices in warship construction. The ship's new design provides it with enhanced stealth features and greater stability characteristics. The number of Made-in-India systems have more than doubled to 33. Upon commissioning, INS Tamal will join the 'Sword Arm' of the Indian Navy, the Western Fleet, under the Western Naval Command.

Hindustan Times

an hour ago

• Hindustan Times

India pledges to secure fuel supply amid Middle East turmoil

Jun 22, 2025 10:32 PM IST NEW DELHI, - India will take measures to safeguard domestic fuel supplies amid rising tensions in the Middle East following U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran's nuclear sites, oil minister Hardeep Singh Puri said on Sunday. India pledges to secure fuel supply amid Middle East turmoil India, the world's third biggest oil importer and consumer, has diversified its crude import sources over the last few years, reducing its dependence on the Strait of Hormuz. It gets less than half of its average 4.8 million barrels per day of oil imports from the Middle East. "We have been closely monitoring the evolving geopolitical situation in the Middle East since the past two weeks... we have diversified our supplies in the past few years and a large volume of our supplies do not come through the Strait of Hormuz now," Puri said on social media platform X. Investors and energy markets have been on high alert since Israel launched airstrikes across Iran on June 13, fearing disruption to oil and gas flows out of the Middle East, particularly through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has long used the threat of closing the Strait, through which around 20% of global oil and gas demand flows, as a way to ward off Western pressure which is now at its peak after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. "Our Oil Marketing Companies have supplies of several weeks and continue to receive energy supplies from several routes. We will take all necessary steps to ensure stability of supplies of fuel to our citizens," Puri said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.