Kneecap rapper faces charges for alleged support of terrorist group, court told

Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in November last year.
Westminster Magistrates' Court heard the 27-year-old is 'well within his rights' to voice his opinions on Israel and Palestine, but the alleged incident at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, is a 'wholly different thing'.
Dozens of supporters had surged around the entrance of the court as the band arrived, with some also entering the lobby before the hearing, trying to get close to the trio.
After the brief hearing concluded, the defendant exited the court building to a festival-like atmosphere, with fans waving flags, playing drums and one supporter setting off a smoke canister.
As he left the court with the other Kneecap members, Naoise O Caireallain and J J O Dochartaigh, loud cheers could be heard as well as chants of 'Free Palestine' from hundreds of their supporters.
During the hearing, the allegations against O hAnnaidh were summarised by prosecutor Michael Bisgrove, who said: 'It's not about Mr O hAnnaidh's support for the people of Palestine or his criticism of Israel.
'He's well within his rights to voice his opinions and solidarity, as is anybody else.
'The allegation in this case is a wholly different thing and deals with a video recording showing that, in November of last year, Mr O hAnnaidh wore and displayed the flag of Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist organisation, while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'.
'Of course, support for the one is not the same as support for the other.
'So the issue in this case, and the reason it has come to court, it centres on the apparent support by Mr O hAnnaidh of a proscribed terrorist organisation.'
Wearing a dark zip-up jacket and trousers, the defendant spoke briefly to confirm his identity at the beginning of the hearing.
He was greeted by hundreds of supporters as he arrived at court on Wednesday morning alongside the other two members of the Belfast rap trio.
Outside court following the hearing, O hAnnaidh's bandmate, Mr O Caireallain, led the huge crowds in chants of 'Free Palestine'.
Wearing sunglasses and a keffiyeh, Mr O Caireallain said: 'For anybody going to Glastonbury, you can see us there at 4pm on the Saturday.
'If you can't be there we'll be on the BBC, if anybody watches the BBC. We'll be at Wembley in September.
'But most importantly: free, free Palestine.'
O hAnnaidh was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing at the same court on August 20.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Edinburgh Live

2 hours ago

• Edinburgh Live

Abandoned Edinburgh restaurant of 'disappearing Armenian cook' joins the market

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info An abandoned Edinburgh restaurant that is 'shrouded in mystery' has been put up for sale. The historic building at 55 Abbeyhill dates back to 1896, when it was designed for use as a police station. It closed in 1932, and was owned by a church until the '80s. The derelict structure had a second (or third) life as an Armenian restaurant. An elusive eatery, entry was 'notoriously gaurded' - and the spot was found only by rumour or word of mouth. The owner, and cook, was a man who liked to be known simply as Peter. His restaurant, however, had a more extensive honorific - Aghtamar Lake Van Monastery in Exile - though locals labelled it simply 'The Armenian Restaurant'. Edinburgh resident Jo Spiller ate at the restaurant in 2010. She told the BBC: "I heard about it from friends, who heard about it from friends, and it was so difficult to book. My friend thinks he was calling a public phone box to make a reservation." Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox Out of nowhere, Peter disappeared in 2012. The restaurant, which has sat empty for over a decade, closed down. Having become a well-known figure in Edinburgh, residents were left perplexed. This was until 2021, when a segment on BBC's The Nine set out to find him - and it didn't take long. They found Peter had owned an Armenian rug shop, which was also in a derelict state. They ended up leaving a note for Peter, who agreed to meet them. Speaking to The Nine, he said: "People were so keen, I couldn't control the numbers. "Some nights we had guests in the three figures, people would bring chairs from home for more seating." As it turns out, Peter had been in Edinburgh the whole time. A robbery at the restaurant had seen all of his priceless Armenian antiques stolen. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. Peter was distraught, and simply shut the eatery down and retreated from the public eye. Allied Surveyors Scotland's head of commercial agency Iain Mercer said: "'For years people have driven past these properties and often wondered about their past and, indeed, their availability. "As such, we anticipate they will pique the interest of domestic and international buyers such is their rich and colourful history. Whilst preserving their historic interest, the buildings would now lend themselves to a range of potential uses such as residential, gallery, museum, brewing or restaurant." Now, the B listed property is on the market. offers over £500,000 are being sought.

Metro

7 hours ago

• Metro

'I beat the system and proved I didn't need a TV licence'

A man who thought he 'beat the system' by getting his TV licence cancelled after proving he only watches streaming services still ended up being threatened with a criminal conviction. Lee Stuart applied for one when he moved into a new home in Kirkby, Merseyside, but later decided to scrap it because he preferred bingeing Netflix and Amazon Prime. He was visited by an inspection officer last September and says they agreed he did not watch any live TV or use the BBC iPlayer. But in January this year, a letter came through saying he was being prosecuted under the controversial single justice procedure (SJP). The SJP was set up in 2015 to allow magistrates to decide on minor offences, such as using a television without a licence or driving without car insurance, without defendants going to court. Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. Around 25,000 people were convicted of not paying their TV licence in the year ending June 2024, the Standard reports. There have been calls to reform the system after it was revealed sick pensioners, people with mental health problems and bereaved families were being given criminal convictions for failing to pay. Lee said of his inspection: 'I told him I didn't pay for a TV licence because I didn't think I needed one because I don't watch live TV. I don't even have an aerial installed in my TV.' He said he 'just watches Netflix and Amazon Prime through the PlayStation', which the inspector agreed. 'To be honest, I was really made up with myself, thinking I'd beaten the system and proved I didn't need a licence,' he added. But that relief was wiped out when the SJP notice came through the letter box in January. Speaking to the Echo, he said: 'It said if I pleaded not guilty, the fine would be larger, and I may have to pay court costs. So, I'm not sure what's going on at this point.' He said the inspector's statement was included in the paperwork but the question 'May I come in to inspect the TV receiver?' was marked 'No'. It also stated he had admitted to watching the news days earlier. More Trending Lee decided to contest the case in court – despite warnings he faced a large fine as well as prosecution costs – and ended up proving his case a second time. 'I can see why people just accept it, but I knew I was innocent, and I wasn't paying for a TV licence that I didn't need so I fought it,' he said. Magistrates threw out the case due to insufficient evidence. A TV Licensing spokesperson said: 'This was reviewed by TV Licensing following the court hearing in April 2025 as is standard practice, and no failings were highlighted.' A TV licence covers you for: All TV channels – like BBC, ITV, Channel 4, U&Dave and international channels – like BBC, ITV, Channel 4, U&Dave and international channels Pay TV services – like Sky, Virgin Media and EE TV – like Sky, Virgin Media and EE TV Live TV on streaming services – like YouTube, Netflix, and Amazon Prime Video – like YouTube, Netflix, and Amazon Prime Video Everything on BBC iPlayer This includes watching, recording and downloading. On any device. The full list of rules can be found here. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: BBC star Naga Munchetty facing bullying allegations and inappropriate 'sex jibe' claims MORE: Netflix's rudely axed Mindhunter could be returning with a twist MORE: More schedule changes confirmed as EastEnders is pulled from BBC One

Wales Online

8 hours ago

• Wales Online

BBC TV licence rules and what you must not do after man taken to court

BBC TV licence rules and what you must not do after man taken to court The rules surrounding TV licensing can be confusing, but this is what you need to know about watching TV legally (Image: PA ) The ins and outs of TV licence laws can certainly be confusing. The BBC relies on the annual £174.50 charge to fund its television, radio, and online services, with payment options being a one-off sum or manageable direct debit instalments. Your watching habits are the deciding factor for whether a TV licence is necessary. Watching or recording live TV on any device, or accessing the content of BBC iPlayer, means you must pay the fee but if you're only using non-live catch-up or streaming services, you don't have to pay. ‌ The TV Licence's official website spells it out: "Your TV Licence lets you enjoy a huge range of TV. It covers you for. This includes watching, recording and downloading. On any device." ‌ As summed up by the Liverpool Echo, possessing a TV licence is essential for viewing or recording live broadcasts, regardless of the device used, as well as for catching up on any BBC iPlayer content, live or otherwise. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here If, on the other hand, your watchlist is limited to catch-up platforms like ITVX and All4, or streaming giants such as Netflix, Disney+, or Amazon Prime Video, then no licence is required, reports the Daily Record. Also exempt from the licence mandate are avid gamers and those who exclusively watch DVDs or Blu-rays. This clarification coincides with a report where a man was fortunate enough to have his TV licensing court case dismissed at Sefton Magistrates' Court. Article continues below Lee Stuart from Kirby initially purchased a TV licence when setting up his home but later chose to cancel it, as traditional television didn't appeal to him, opting instead for online streaming services exclusively. A TV Licensing spokesperson clarified: "If a property we believe should be licensed is unlicensed, letters are sent to that address advising of the requirement for a TV Licence if the occupant watches live TV or other licensable content. This stops for one year when the occupant declares they don't need a licence, when letters will resume to check if circumstances have changed." However, Lee was left confused in January this year when he received a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN), accusing him of watching television without a valid licence. ‌ Lee held his ground in court, challenging the accusation: "I can see why people just accept it, but I knew I was innocent and I wasn't paying for a TV licence that I didn't need so I fought it." "I'll be totally honest, I was surprised by the outcome and I thought it might be good to share my experience." Lee's courtroom appearance ended with an acquittal due to insufficient evidence. ‌ Post-trial, a TV Licensing official commented: "This was reviewed by TV Licensing following the court hearing in April 2025 as is standard practice, and no failings were highlighted." The spokesperson noted that though both the officer and Mr Stuart gave what seemed like credible evidence in court, the magistrates were not persuaded beyond reasonable doubt of the case's certainty. Mr Stuart was initially heartened by the outcome but became disgruntled after receiving another nudge from TV Licensing regarding the need for a licence. Subsequently, he lodged a formal complaint and submitted a No Licence Needed (NLN) declaration. Article continues below He commented: "The form asks at the end, 'What outcome do you want from this?' and I just put 'All I want is to be left alone, but an apology wouldn't go amiss." TV Licensing has confirmed they have received Mr Stuart's NLN form.