Alarm bells for Trump as military insiders fear U.S. lacks the muscle to take out Iran's nuclear arsenal if warranted

As the president mulls U.S. strikes in Iran, lawmakers in Congress displayed concerns about whether the U.S. is capable of executing a mission that would eradicate the country's nuclear program.
The 79-year-old commander-in-chief teased on Wednesday he is keeping his options open when it comes to military action regarding the Israel-Iran war, now in its sixth day.
Israel has requested that Trump get involved, specifically asking for the use of a 30,000-lb American-made bunker buster bomb. The longtime U.S. ally says it needs the bomb - which can penetrate more than 200 feet of concrete - to disable Iran 's nuclear capability.
However, at least one Republican senator questioned whether U.S. military might could truly eviscerate Iran's technology.
'Everybody has an opinion about whether we should do something, but the first question to be answered is, could, and that's what I'm interested in at the moment,' Louisiana Republican Sen. John Kennedy told the Daily Mail. 'I mean, do we have a bomb that could destroy the underground labs? Would our bombs do it?'
Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., a former Navy pilot, expressed concern over the president's Cabinet's ability to orchestrate a potential military offensive.
'He doesn't have a good team around him,' Kelly said. He told reporters he was 'very concerned' as Iran has 'a lot of medium-range ballistic missiles that could hit our bases in the region.'
It's unclear which top congressional leaders have been briefed on the brewing situation in the Middle East.
Left hanging in the air was the question of whether lawmakers would support using American-made planes with American pilots in a strike, an escalation that would firmly push the U.S. into another war in the Middle East.
'I don't have confidence in the DNI,' Kelly said of Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's intelligence chief. He also expressed worry about Secretary of State Marco Rubio, saying 'this person is trying to do two jobs at once,' running the State Department as serving as national security adviser.
A defiant Iran has pledged it will not heed the U.S. president's demands, despite the saber-rattling. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed Wednesday in a televised address that he would 'never surrender' despite Trump's demands for an 'unconditional' end to hostilities.
The Ayatollah also chillingly warned Americans that 'any military involvement by the U.S. will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage to them.'
I don't have any confidence in DNI.
The possibility of a conflict that could metastasize out of control with an uncertain outcome has some Capitol Hill lawmakers uneasy.
'If we did that, would that cause a regime change in Iran,' Kennedy asked. 'If there was a regime change, what kind of new regime would we get? Would it be better or worse? I mean, these could questions matter.'
The Republican repeatedly stressed that he's not seen any intelligence on whether the U.S. really 'could' carry out the strikes the Israelis are asking for, though he doesn't doubt Trump has all the necessary reports.
'I don't want us fighting a war,' Missouri Republican Josh Hawley told CNN. 'I don't want another Mideast war … I'm a little concerned about our sudden military buildup in the region.'
Hawley said he'd be 'concerned' about the U.S. going on the offensive. 'I don't think there's a need for the United States to affirmatively insert ourselves.'
The Senate's top Pentagon official, Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker told the Daily Mail he does not believe the president needs approval from Congress to carry out strikes in Iran.
He did not respond when asked by the Daily Mail whether an airstrike could lead to a larger regional conflict.
The Mississippi Republican said his constituents 'probably are' for the strikes,' but acknowledged he did not have any analysis to back up that claim.
West Virginia Sen. Jim Justice was confident his voters would be ok with Trump striking Iran, saying his constituents are supportive of Israel.
'We don't like the fact that somebody is trying to say 'we're going to extinguish Israel,' he said.
Devout Israel supporter John Fetterman, increasingly at odds with his own party, urged Trump to bomb Iran.
'I think that's entirely appropriate,' the towering Pennsylvania Democrat told the Daily Mail, arguing 'that's not war-mongering, that's actually peace-mongering.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

25 minutes ago

• The Guardian

Are the Maga isolationists losing influence over Trump's Iran deliberations?

The Trump administration is managing internal dissent over deliberations on whether to launch a strike against Iran, breaking what many supporters saw as a campaign pledge not to involve the US in new conflicts in the Middle East. Trump for the second time this week disregarded testimony by his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, that Iran had not been seeking to build a nuclear weapon as of March this year. 'She's wrong,' Trump said, then added: 'My intelligence community is wrong.' In a striking about-face, Gabbard late on Friday said her March testimony had been taken 'out of context' by the media and claimed there was no difference between her opinion and Trump's. 'The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division,' she said in a post on X. 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' Gabbard was nominated to her position in large part because of her skepticism of the US intelligence community and its role in the US involvement in a series of 'forever wars' in the Middle East, especially the Iraq war. Her transition from Democrat to Trump supporter is indicative of the broad coalition that Trump has united under his America First movement – and the potential for a schism as the US grows closer to launching an attack on Iran. Steve Bannon, an influential advisor who has been critical of the potential for a US-Iran war, was seen having lunch at the White House with Trump this week, following a series of podcast episodes in which he and other popular MAGA pundits criticised what they saw as preparations for a preemptive US strike against Iran. Bannon came to lunch armed with talking points that the Iran strike would be a bad idea and the massive 30,000lb bunker-buster bombs that could target the Iranian uranium enrichment facility at Fordow may not destroy the target. The Guardian previously reported that Trump was not fully convinced the bombs would destroy the target, and has held off authorising strikes as he also awaits the possibility that the threat of US involvement would lead Iran to talks. Others close to the administration have pushed back forcefully in support of a strike on Iran. Republican congressmen including Mitch McConnell and Tom Cotton have lashed out against the isolationist wing of Trump's support; the radio host Mark Levin has personally spoken with Trump in support of stronger backing for Israel; and other top members of the administration – including secretary of state Marco Rubio – are avowed Iran hawks. Others, such as vice-president JD Vance, are public anti-interventionists but have limited their criticism of potential strikes to allow Trump the space to make a decision. But Bannon is believed to have an outsized influence on Trump's decision-making on the war. According to US media, he has warned Trump he shouldn't trust Israeli intelligence that the Iranian government was seeking a nuclear weapon imminently. Others in the MAGA wing of Trump's support have sought to rebuild ties after sharply criticising Trump's positioning on the Israeli strikes against Iran. Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host, had called Trump earlier this week in order to apologise after blasting those advising Trump to launch strikes against Iran as 'warmongers.' 'Tucker is a nice guy,' Trump said from the Oval Office on Wednesday. 'He called and apologised the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciated that.'

The Sun

28 minutes ago

• The Sun

John Healey says NATO must 'step up' and increase its military might amid plan to spend 5% of GDP on defence

JOHN Healey today says NATO must 'step up' and increase its military might - as he pushes for defence spending to hit 5 per cent of GDP. The Defence Secretary said this week's NATO summit will be a 'defining moment for our alliance and for Britain's security' as we confront a more dangerous world. 2 And as war between Iran and Israel rages, he said 'Britain stands ready' to send more RAF jets to protect UK bases in the Middle East. Keir Starmer is meeting fellow NATO leaders for crunch talks this week as the bloc is poised to agree a new target to spend 5 per cent on defence and security by 2032. It comes after Donald Trump said the bloc is shirking its responsibilities and the days of America paying for Europe's protection are over. Writing in The Sun on Sunday, Mr Healey said: 'We're living in a more dangerous and unpredictable world. 2 This Summit is a defining moment for our alliance and for Britain's security. 'It's a moment where NATO allies will pledge to step up on defence spending to boost our collective security. 'President Trump and NATO chief, Mark Rutte, are right: the current NATO spending pledge – to spend at least 2 per cent of GDP on defence – is a relic of a past era. 'We are now in a new era of threat. And as threats increase, defence spending must too.' He added: 'It's why this week, at NATO we will discuss a new, higher spending target. And Britain is up for that discussion.' NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is pushing for the bloc to spend 5 per cent of GDP on a new defence and security by 2032. This would be made up of 3.5 per cent for core military spending and 1.5 per cent on broader security related areas like infrastructure resilience. Spain is reportedly kicking off at the new target and may try to block it. But while Mr Healey does not explicitly commit to the new target in today's article, he backs talking about hiking spending. Britain faces a more 'dangerous and unpredictable world' as Iran and Israel trade missiles and Russian troops continue to fight in Ukraine, he warned. Amid spiralling tensions in the Middle East, the PM has already sent Typhoon fighter jets to the region. Mr Healey said he is prepared to send more there if security fears grow. He writes: 'Force protection for our bases and personnel is at the highest level and I won't rule out sending more capabilities if needed. Because Britain stands ready.'

The Independent

31 minutes ago

• The Independent

Kai Trump follows in family footsteps by briefly pretending to work at fast food restaurant

Donald Trump 's granddaughter, Kai Trump, followed in the family footsteps, briefly, this week by trying her hand at working at a fast food outlet. In a TikTok video posted Wednesday, the golfer and daughter of Donald Trump Jr. took on a shift at a Dunkin' Donuts drive-through. Kai, 18, wore a tank top and skirt in the brand's signature colors of pink and yellow in the nine-second clip. She took an order for a medium iced coffee, tapping it into the register and then handing the beverage through the window to the driver in his car. The stunt is to promote a YouTube video in which she and her younger brother, Tristan, tried out Dunkin's signature drinks and snacks. The clip immediately evokes the moment in October, during the peak of the 2024 presidential election, when her grandfather put on an apron at a Pennsylvania drive-through McDonald's and learned to operate the french fries station. Then-candidate Trump similarly delivered takeout orders to customers in their cars as part of the photo opportunity and also hosted an impromptu press conference. 'It requires great expertise, actually, to do it right and to do it fast,' Trump said. 'These people work hard. They're great. They're great. And I just saw something—a process that's beautiful.' The stunt was arranged for fast-food fan Trump to hit back at Democratic presidential candidate, then-Vice President, Kamala Harris, who often spoke of her time working at McDonald's during college. Trump baselessly claimed she was lying about working there. Kai Trump, who has a large social media following and is an avid golfer, saw her profile rise significantly after she spoke at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee in July, shortly after the assassination attempt on her grandfather.