Sweeping move-on police powers blasted by protesters
Controversial new laws grant police an unconstitutional level of power and could have a chilling effect on protests, critics have claimed in a court challenge.
Josh Lees, on behalf of the Palestinian Action Group, has taken the NSW government to the NSW Supreme Court over the anti-protest laws implemented in February.
The activist is challenging the constitutional validity of police powers to move people on during protests deemed to be near places of worship.
His lawyers argue the laws allow police to direct protesters to desist, even in instances where there is no evidence a worshipper has been obstructed, harassed or is in fear.
That meant the laws have stretched police powers beyond their legitimate constitutional bounds, the court was told.
The lawyers claim neither police nor protesters can determine the reach of those powers or the definition of nearness to a place of worship to take into consideration.
"Because of those vagaries, the upshot is that a person might just stay home," Craig Lenehan SC told the court.
He took aim at the "legislative blunderbuss" which he said was "blasting away at an ill-defined mischief" and could have a chilling effect on protesting in NSW.
The laws were discriminatory because they expressly targeted certain types of political speech in a way that inevitably favoured some viewpoints over others, Mr Lenehan contended.
When deciding to move on protesters, police needed to make a subjective determination of whether someone feels obstructed or fearful near a place of worship.
That could be extended beyond worshippers to the protection of passers-by and people unconnected to the holy place, Mr Lenehan said.
"(It) is a very broad police power conferred by very ill-defined application," he said.
"It has nothing to do with the exercise of religious freedom."
NSW Solicitor General Michael Sexton SC will address the court about the validity of the new legislation on behalf of the state government on Thursday afternoon.
The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the nation and amid concerns about rallies going past the Great Synagogue in the Sydney CBD.
Before their passage, Attorney-General Michael Daley said stronger penalties and boosted police powers would ensure people could practise their faith in safety.
"We believe these proposed reforms strike the right balance between protecting people of faith and the community's right to protest," he said.
Premier Chris Minns underscored his determination to protect the Jewish community in his first speech to parliament in 2025.
"We will not be a state where someone feels like they have to remove their yarmulke (skullcap) just to walk down the street, where people are made to hide their heritage because of the ignorance, the bigotry, the racism of other people," he said.
Mr Lees said the challenge against the expanded police powers was urgent because they presented a threat to the right to protest in NSW.
Controversial new laws grant police an unconstitutional level of power and could have a chilling effect on protests, critics have claimed in a court challenge.
Josh Lees, on behalf of the Palestinian Action Group, has taken the NSW government to the NSW Supreme Court over the anti-protest laws implemented in February.
The activist is challenging the constitutional validity of police powers to move people on during protests deemed to be near places of worship.
His lawyers argue the laws allow police to direct protesters to desist, even in instances where there is no evidence a worshipper has been obstructed, harassed or is in fear.
That meant the laws have stretched police powers beyond their legitimate constitutional bounds, the court was told.
The lawyers claim neither police nor protesters can determine the reach of those powers or the definition of nearness to a place of worship to take into consideration.
"Because of those vagaries, the upshot is that a person might just stay home," Craig Lenehan SC told the court.
He took aim at the "legislative blunderbuss" which he said was "blasting away at an ill-defined mischief" and could have a chilling effect on protesting in NSW.
The laws were discriminatory because they expressly targeted certain types of political speech in a way that inevitably favoured some viewpoints over others, Mr Lenehan contended.
When deciding to move on protesters, police needed to make a subjective determination of whether someone feels obstructed or fearful near a place of worship.
That could be extended beyond worshippers to the protection of passers-by and people unconnected to the holy place, Mr Lenehan said.
"(It) is a very broad police power conferred by very ill-defined application," he said.
"It has nothing to do with the exercise of religious freedom."
NSW Solicitor General Michael Sexton SC will address the court about the validity of the new legislation on behalf of the state government on Thursday afternoon.
The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the nation and amid concerns about rallies going past the Great Synagogue in the Sydney CBD.
Before their passage, Attorney-General Michael Daley said stronger penalties and boosted police powers would ensure people could practise their faith in safety.
"We believe these proposed reforms strike the right balance between protecting people of faith and the community's right to protest," he said.
Premier Chris Minns underscored his determination to protect the Jewish community in his first speech to parliament in 2025.
"We will not be a state where someone feels like they have to remove their yarmulke (skullcap) just to walk down the street, where people are made to hide their heritage because of the ignorance, the bigotry, the racism of other people," he said.
Mr Lees said the challenge against the expanded police powers was urgent because they presented a threat to the right to protest in NSW.
Controversial new laws grant police an unconstitutional level of power and could have a chilling effect on protests, critics have claimed in a court challenge.
Josh Lees, on behalf of the Palestinian Action Group, has taken the NSW government to the NSW Supreme Court over the anti-protest laws implemented in February.
The activist is challenging the constitutional validity of police powers to move people on during protests deemed to be near places of worship.
His lawyers argue the laws allow police to direct protesters to desist, even in instances where there is no evidence a worshipper has been obstructed, harassed or is in fear.
That meant the laws have stretched police powers beyond their legitimate constitutional bounds, the court was told.
The lawyers claim neither police nor protesters can determine the reach of those powers or the definition of nearness to a place of worship to take into consideration.
"Because of those vagaries, the upshot is that a person might just stay home," Craig Lenehan SC told the court.
He took aim at the "legislative blunderbuss" which he said was "blasting away at an ill-defined mischief" and could have a chilling effect on protesting in NSW.
The laws were discriminatory because they expressly targeted certain types of political speech in a way that inevitably favoured some viewpoints over others, Mr Lenehan contended.
When deciding to move on protesters, police needed to make a subjective determination of whether someone feels obstructed or fearful near a place of worship.
That could be extended beyond worshippers to the protection of passers-by and people unconnected to the holy place, Mr Lenehan said.
"(It) is a very broad police power conferred by very ill-defined application," he said.
"It has nothing to do with the exercise of religious freedom."
NSW Solicitor General Michael Sexton SC will address the court about the validity of the new legislation on behalf of the state government on Thursday afternoon.
The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the nation and amid concerns about rallies going past the Great Synagogue in the Sydney CBD.
Before their passage, Attorney-General Michael Daley said stronger penalties and boosted police powers would ensure people could practise their faith in safety.
"We believe these proposed reforms strike the right balance between protecting people of faith and the community's right to protest," he said.
Premier Chris Minns underscored his determination to protect the Jewish community in his first speech to parliament in 2025.
"We will not be a state where someone feels like they have to remove their yarmulke (skullcap) just to walk down the street, where people are made to hide their heritage because of the ignorance, the bigotry, the racism of other people," he said.
Mr Lees said the challenge against the expanded police powers was urgent because they presented a threat to the right to protest in NSW.
Controversial new laws grant police an unconstitutional level of power and could have a chilling effect on protests, critics have claimed in a court challenge.
Josh Lees, on behalf of the Palestinian Action Group, has taken the NSW government to the NSW Supreme Court over the anti-protest laws implemented in February.
The activist is challenging the constitutional validity of police powers to move people on during protests deemed to be near places of worship.
His lawyers argue the laws allow police to direct protesters to desist, even in instances where there is no evidence a worshipper has been obstructed, harassed or is in fear.
That meant the laws have stretched police powers beyond their legitimate constitutional bounds, the court was told.
The lawyers claim neither police nor protesters can determine the reach of those powers or the definition of nearness to a place of worship to take into consideration.
"Because of those vagaries, the upshot is that a person might just stay home," Craig Lenehan SC told the court.
He took aim at the "legislative blunderbuss" which he said was "blasting away at an ill-defined mischief" and could have a chilling effect on protesting in NSW.
The laws were discriminatory because they expressly targeted certain types of political speech in a way that inevitably favoured some viewpoints over others, Mr Lenehan contended.
When deciding to move on protesters, police needed to make a subjective determination of whether someone feels obstructed or fearful near a place of worship.
That could be extended beyond worshippers to the protection of passers-by and people unconnected to the holy place, Mr Lenehan said.
"(It) is a very broad police power conferred by very ill-defined application," he said.
"It has nothing to do with the exercise of religious freedom."
NSW Solicitor General Michael Sexton SC will address the court about the validity of the new legislation on behalf of the state government on Thursday afternoon.
The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the nation and amid concerns about rallies going past the Great Synagogue in the Sydney CBD.
Before their passage, Attorney-General Michael Daley said stronger penalties and boosted police powers would ensure people could practise their faith in safety.
"We believe these proposed reforms strike the right balance between protecting people of faith and the community's right to protest," he said.
Premier Chris Minns underscored his determination to protect the Jewish community in his first speech to parliament in 2025.
"We will not be a state where someone feels like they have to remove their yarmulke (skullcap) just to walk down the street, where people are made to hide their heritage because of the ignorance, the bigotry, the racism of other people," he said.
Mr Lees said the challenge against the expanded police powers was urgent because they presented a threat to the right to protest in NSW.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
South Australia Police drops literacy and numeracy tests for new applicants
Liberal senator Alex Antic discusses South Australia Police's dropping of literacy and numeracy tests for new applicants. 'The first thing I'd say about this is, this actually really shows the crisis that we've got in amongst policing,' Mr Antic told Sky News host James Macpherson. 'This is just another one that this Labor government is struggling with and having problems with.'
Mercury
9 hours ago
- Mercury
Labor's plan for night-time economy zones
Don't miss out on the headlines from Tasmania. Followed categories will be added to My News. A Salamanca bar manager has thrown his support behind Labor's plan for night-time economy zones saying they will create jobs and attract young people. Daniel Conway of The Pavilion said restrictions were costing the hospitality sector and venues' takings were down between 20 and 50 per cent on 12 months ago. 'We need to draw people back out, bring them back down to Salamanca and just create a massive culture and just an environment with something for them to do in a fun and safe environment,' he said. 'It is all about growth. Growth equals more jobs, more opportunities. 'It's everything from creating more businesses, pop-ups, entrepreneurship, everything that can make hospitality fun again. 'We should be leaders in tourism and hospitality.' Mr Conway said by having a night-time economy zone in Salamanca it would create activities for young people to enjoy and encourage talented musicians. Labor candidate for Franklin, Amelia Meyers, 19, said with the closure of the Uni Bar many young people were looking at other places to visit at night. 'A lot of us do end up drinking with our friends in the uni accommodation just because it's a bit cheaper and a bit easier, but also there hasn't been as much going on in town and especially in Salamanca,' Ms Meyers said. 'A lot of other states and territories have had a better nightlife than what Hobart has seen.' Labor leader Dean Winter is basing his night-time economy zones on NSW and said concerns of Hobart Lord Mayor Anna Reynolds 'can be overcome'. 'This is a business that had to battle to put TVs outside. This is an area where you still can't have a full band play outdoors despite it being Tasmania's biggest nightlife precinct,' he said. 'We need to have a state government that is going to drive change within local government so we can have a vibrant hospitality sector and a night time economy that's fun and safe. 'This strategy will help revitalise Tasmania's nightlife and contribute to my vision of making our state the easiest place in Australia to do business.' Mr Winter said his bold plan for a night life revival would start in Salamanca and be expanded to Launceston and Devonport. 'Salamanca's markets are iconic in the day time. I see an opportunity to make the precinct iconic in the night time too,' he said. 'What we've seen in our cities over the course of the last few years is businesses that have been curtailed by a red tape from local councils. 'We need to help young people see a future here, and make them want to stay. Our plan is for more housing, well-paid jobs and a night life that is thriving.' Labor also wants to modernise the 35-year-old Liquor Licensing Act and introduce a simplified, low-cost liquor licence for small businesses, pop-up events, and food trucks. Premier Jeremy Rockliff said he had been working with the Tasmanian Hospitality Association on a range of measures to free up red tape to support the hospitality industry.
Sky News AU
10 hours ago
- Sky News AU
JD Vance accuses Gavin Newsom of inciting riots and endangering law enforcement
US Vice President JD Vance has accused California Governor Gavin Newsom of endangering law enforcement during his trip to Los Angeles. This comes after the anti-ICE protests in the city, and Mr Vance stressed the need for soldiers on the ground if the situation worsens. 'Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass, by treating this city as a sanctuary city, have basically said that it is open season on federal law enforcement,' Mr Vance said.
