Dual taxation on broadcasting services permissible in law: Supreme Court judgment
The Supreme Court has held in a judgment that broadcasting through television for the purpose of the entertainment of the subscribers can be separately taxed by the Centre and the State concerned
A Bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and N. Kotiswar Singh said The Centre can impose service tax on the broadcasting service while the State concerned can, on the other hand, make cable operators and entertainment providers liable to pay entertainment tax.
'Broadcasting service being a taxable service under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, read along with the amendments made from time to time would enable both the Parliament to impose service tax on broadcasting service and the State Legislatures having the legislative competence to levy entertainment tax on those who provide entertainment to the recipients [television viewers],' the top court interpreted the law.
Justice Nagarathna, who authored the judgment dated May 22, said imposition of two different taxes on two separate aspects of the same activity - broadcasting service - was permissible in law. There was no danger of overlapping taxation.
'There is no overlapping in fact or in law, inasmuch as different aspects of the same activity are being taxed under two different legislations by two different legislatures. This is because the activity of broadcasting is a service and liable to service tax imposed by the Parliament (Entry 97 – Union List) and the activity of entertainment is a subject falling under (Entry 62 - State List),' Justice Nagarathna held.
The court said the expression 'entertainment' came within the ambit of 'luxury' defined in Entry 62 of the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.
'Advances in technology have resulted in varied forms of entertainment through various media and in a variety of ways, not only in a public place but also in the confines of private space such as a home, through mobile or a cell phone or smartwatch and other personal devices, etc. The expression 'entertainments' must be given a broad, liberal and expansive meaning,' the court said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
20 minutes ago
- India Gazette
K'taka Minister Priyank Kharge questions MEA's
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], June 22 (ANI): Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge questioned the Centre on Sunday for its 'U-turn' on its decision to grant him approval to visit the United States, claiming that the delay in approval has led to loss of investment opportunities for the state. Kharge alleged that the MEA's decision is politics being played by Opposition-ruled states. 'This question should be asked to the MEA. Why did they deny the delegation led by me, and why are they allowing it now? What was wrong then and what is right now?...We were supposed to be there from 13th June, and it is 21st already. Do you think World Expos and World Trade exhibitions will wait for us?' Kharge told ANI. The state minister said that Karnataka is 'one of the biggest economic growth engines' for the country, making it important to seek investments too. He alleged that while certain southern states are driving the GDP of the country, they are also facing problems. 'The politics being played is also to be explained by the MEA not by me. (This is) denying us the right to seek investments and create jobs, we are one of the biggest economic growth engines for the country... if we don't get to go abroad and seek investments, have you seen UP or Bihar CM going to get investment? It is always Karnataka, Telangana, Tamil Nadu - we are the ones who are driving 50% of the GDP of the country and you (central Govt) doing such things is of no use to anybody,' the state minister said. On Saturday, the Congress leader had posted on X demanding an explanation for denying him permission to visit US and represent Karnataka in various global forums and official meetings. He said that he had submitted his request for travelling to US from June 14 since May 15, but was rejected without an explanation. His post read, 'So in a U-turn, the Ministry of External Affairs has now decided to revoke its earlier decision and grant me a clearance for an official visit to the United States. I had sought permission on 15 May to travel between 14-27 June to represent the Government of Karnataka at two major global forums and over 25 official meetings with top companies, universities and institutions for collaborations and pitch for application was denied without any official explanation.' He explained that the application for the minister and his delegation was submitted on May 15, which was later rejected on June 4. Kharge added that an application for the officer delegation without the minister was submitted on June 6, and it got clearance on June 11. (ANI)
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ordinance raj during Emergency: 48, including 5 to amend MISA, promulgated
The Indira Gandhi government promulgated 48 ordinances during the Emergency period, including five to amend the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, often dubbed as "draconian", that gave the administration the powers to detain any individual without a warrant. The 21-month-long Emergency, which was imposed 50 years ago on June 25, 1975, also saw the government amend the Constitution several times, including to keep the elections to the offices of President, Vice President, Prime Minister and Speaker beyond the scrutiny of courts and insert the words 'socialist', 'secular' and 'integrity' in the Preamble. The amendments to the various laws also shifted the balance of power in favour of the Centre and curtailed the powers of the higher judiciary. The first ordinance to amend the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) was promulgated on June 29, 1975, within days of the Emergency proclamation. The MISA (Amendment) Ordinance was promulgated four more times during the Emergency period and cleared by Parliament. Live Events A day later, President Fakruddin Ali Ahmed promulgated the Defence of India (Amendment) Ordinance that gave the government broad powers to maintain public order. Brief sessions of Parliament were held during the Emergency. The Congress, using its brute majority and with several opposition leaders in jail, passed draft legislation to put the parliamentary stamp of approval on several ordinances. "The sessions of Parliament were shorter than usual during the Emergency period, mostly to pass bills to replace ordinances and approve new legislations," former Lok Sabha secretary general P D T Achary told PTI. Another key ordinance issued during the Emergency was the Disputed Elections (Prime Minister and Speaker of the House of the People) Ordinance to set up an authority to deal with a petition questioning the election of the prime minister and the speaker. It was issued on February 3, 1977, just over a month before the Emergency ended on March 21. Instead of allowing an election petition to be filed in a high court against the verdict of an election, it created an authority to deal with such high-profile cases. The Ordinance was converted into a law and subsequently repealed by the next government. While 26 ordinances were issued in 1975 after the imposition of the Emergency, 16 were brought in 1976. In 1977, before the Emergency ended, six ordinances were promulgated. Referring to the functioning of Parliament, Achary said most of the opposition members of Parliament were in jail and hence passage of bills was easy. He said the 42nd Constitution (Amendment) Act brought "radical" changes to the Constitution. The 44th Constitution (Amendment) Act later passed by the next government overturned many changes brought by the 42nd Amendment. Changes made to Article 352 relating to the imposition of the Emergency left things "open for interpretation", Achary said. The phrase internal disturbances was open for interpretation, he said. The 44th Amendment later inserted the phrase armed rebellion due to which the Emergency can be imposed. Achary said armed rebellion could not be interpreted or misinterpreted. PM Gandhi recommended the imposition of the Emergency to the President without the consent of the Union Cabinet, citing the deteriorating situation due to which a Cabinet meeting could not be convened immediately, Achary said. He said as the amendment stands now, signatures of all Cabinet members are required to send the recommendation to the President to proclaim Emergency. Achary asserted that the most important amendment was the one made to Article 359 post-Emergency. Article 359 states that after the Emergency declaration, the President can issue orders suspending civil liberties and fundamental rights. But according to the amendment brought by the Janata government, the President can suspend fundamental rights except Articles 20 and 21. While Article 20 protects from unfair conviction, Article 21 deals with the protection of life and personal liberty. Achary described Article 21 as the "essence" and "fulcrum" of fundamental rights. Parliament also approved bills to extend the tenure of the Lok Sabha by one year each on two occasions. The House of the People (Extension of Duration) Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on February 4, 1976, weeks before the term of the House was to end on March 18, 1976. The Rajya Sabha passed the Bill on February 6, 1976, to extend the tenure of the Lok Sabha by one year. A similar bill was passed by both Houses of Parliament in November 1976 to further extend the term of the Lok Sabha by a year beyond March 1977. However, Gandhi called for elections on January 18, 1977, and the Emergency was lifted as the new government led by Janata Party leader Morarji Desai assumed office on March 24, 1977. The MISA was repealed in 1978 after widespread criticism of its misuse, especially during the Emergency period. The Defence of India Act, enacted amid the 1962 India-China war to deal with public safety, lapsed after the Emergency ended in March 1977. Some laws enacted during the Emergency, including the amendment to the Preamble of the Constitution and the introduction of fundamental duties alongside fundamental rights, continue to be in force. Article 123 of the Constitution provides that ordinances having the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament may be issued by the President from time to time except when both Houses of Parliament are in session.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bitcoin as a hedge: Evaluating Bitcoin's role in India's economic strategy
Since Bitcoin's first public release, it has developed unprecedentedly to arguably become the world's best-performing risk asset. Based on its capability for hedging against inflation , and the emergence of DeFi (Decentralised Finance), Bitcoin has witnessed increased adoption across levels, including retail, institutional and government participation. With increased activity by state players like the USA, Bhutan, El Salvador, Russia, Brazil, and many others, India is in a unique dilemma regarding Bitcoin: to be or not to be? If we take a close look at India's economic policies over the last decade and compare them with pre-Bitcoin times, a stark difference can be seen. Pre-2009 India's economic strategies were overtly reactionary to global cues, which have been transformed in the last decade as the country positions itself as one of the most proactive nations regarding economic growth. The impact of this has been massive, with India becoming the 4th largest economy in the world. At the same time, India is increasingly becoming receptive to newer economic models and experiments, something that could be highlighted through the proposed Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill of 2021, and the Supreme Court's recent direction to regulate the sector. Crypto Tracker TOP COIN SETS Crypto Blue Chip - 5 -5.10% Buy Web3 Tracker -10.91% Buy AI Tracker -11.52% Buy DeFi Tracker -12.23% Buy NFT & Metaverse Tracker -12.54% Buy TOP COINS (₹) Bitcoin 8,904,124 ( -0.56% ) Buy BNB 54,750 ( -1.64% ) Buy XRP 180 ( -2.07% ) Buy Solana 11,798 ( -2.86% ) Buy Ethereum 198,264 ( -5.56% ) Buy While many project it as a negative aspect, the intent of regulating an otherwise decentralised sector highlights the government's openness to get involved in it, especially given that India boasts one of the world's fastest Bitcoin-adopting populations. Did you Know? The world of cryptocurrencies is very dynamic. Prices can go up or down in a matter of seconds. Thus, having reliable answers to such questions is crucial for investors. View Details » This also means that in the long term, Bitcoin is increasingly garnering a favourable sentiment from the policymakers who are setting India's economic strategy for the years ahead. But questions remain — what does Bitcoin offer India's economic strategy that traditional models don't? Let's find out. Live Events Bitcoin's a hedge against inflation Global economies are going through uncertain times owing to several internal and external factors. While we will not indulge in making mathematical assumptions, if we take a look at the data of benchmark indices around the world, like the S&P 500 to the Hang Seng, it becomes clear that these indices have not performed as well as their projections. On the other hand, the global commodity market has been largely vulnerable to market dynamics. These factors have led nations to look at alternative finance or DeFi, in terms of Bitcoin, as the new-age asset has provided multibagger returns in the last few years. BTC has not only outperformed global indices, but also commodities like Gold and Silver — a trend that has piqued the interest of economists around the world. For instance, the US retail inflation on March 25 was 2.4%, as per the Consumer Price Index, a significant rise from the previous year. Similar cases of inflation have been seen in European countries like the United Kingdom and the EU. In the Indian context, the retail inflation rate has been on a downward curve for the past three years, owing to the country's economic rise in recent years, coming down to 4.6% in 2024-25 from 6.7% in FY 22-23. If we look at annualised returns over different global indices, Bitcoin has returned over 250%, more than 10 times that of NASDAQ in the second spot. In the Indian context, the Nifty 50 gave a return of approximately 40% since FY 22-23, highlighting how participation and adoption in the Bitcoin space could help India's economic strategy in the long run. Role in India's economic strategy? While many nations around the world have made significant strides in Bitcoin already, such as the USA, Bhutan and El Salvador, much of it has been reactionary. In India, DeFi is emerging as a real possibility for government participation, however, much of it weighs on the possibility of establishing a regulatory framework. India has been a vocal advocate of creating a global framework for regulating Bitcoin and other VDAs, and it is being considered as the lynchpin of the country officially joining the race. However, while officially the Indian government does not endorse Bitcoin, prominent reports have revealed that the country has used Bitcoin for energy trade with one of its European allies. While the efficacy of the report has not been admitted by the Indian government, what it shows is Bitcoin's increasing popularity at the upper echelons of the government. However, the significant tax levied on the capital gains from Bitcoin and other VDAs is largely considered counterproductive in this aspect. We must understand that India's economic strategy to become a developed nation by 2047, or the goal of Viksit Bharat, is a multilayered strategy. While Bitcoin is not included in the ongoing cohort, its rising popularity and governmental agencies like SEBI and RBI having strong opinions on the asset means it may have a role to play in the future, given that regulations or frameworks are established in a universally accepted means. This does not mean that India may create a Bitcoin strategic reserve, or use it as legal tender like El Salvador, but in a larger context that benefits the country's bid to become a developed nation. Furthermore, the already existing high adoption rate will supplement this bid and could position India as one of the innovators when it comes to a robust economic strategy. (The author Roshan Aslam is Cofounder & CEO, GoSats. Views are own)
