Questionable pub jokes protected in proposed law change
Telling a questionable joke at a pub will not land people before an anti-discrimination complaints hearing under a territory's proposed new laws.
Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby has defended the Northern Territory government's planned anti-discrimination laws to be introduced to parliament in July.
At an estimates hearing on Monday, she rejected accusations from shadow attorney-general Chansey Paech that the planned laws "watered down" protections for people offended by comments made about them.
Ms Boothby said her government was restoring "fairness and common sense" to laws that went too far when revised by the previous Labor government in 2022.
The proposed laws remove "vague" terms such as '"offend" and "insult".
They will be replaced with clearer terms to prohibit conduct that "incites hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule" based on personal attributes such as race, sexuality, gender identity, religion and more.
"It's still a strong measure of anti-vilification, so we don't put up with that kind of behaviour," Ms Boothby said.
"Any kind of hate speech is not acceptable in our community."
The attorney-general said the new laws also restored protections for religious schools, allowing them to hire staff who upheld their faith while protecting against discrimination based on race, sexuality or gender.
Territorians wanted their freedom to enjoy the territory lifestyle, she said.
"It's not just having a joke at the pub that's going to land you in front of a hearing, we want something that's more serious than that," Ms Boothby said.
"We still want to be able to tell a joke. We still want to have freedom of speech debates."
It was a case of restoring balance and ensuring the law did not overreach into everyday conversations, religious freedoms, or basic rights to express an opinion, Ms Boothby said.
The government consulted on the new laws with religious and multicultural groups, sex workers, LGBTQI+ groups, the anti-discrimination commissioner and others.
The proposed legislation was in line with changes made in other Australian jurisdictions, the attorney-general said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump ‘snubs' Anthony Albanese at the G7
Sky News Political Editor Andrew Clennell discusses US President Donald Trump's decision to leave the G7 early to address the escalating conflict in the Middle East. 'Now, since that snub, the President has reached out to two other leaders who he also cancelled G7 meetings with,' Mr Clennell said. 'Despite the failure of Mr Trump to hang around to meet Mr Albanese, the Australian government's view is that Donald Trump has agreed to a meeting. It really is just a question of when it occurs.'
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Three reform scenarios shaping Treasurer Jim Chalmers' tax agenda at upcoming productivity roundtable
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has foreshadowed significant tax reform, but there are three possible scenarios likely to arise from his upcoming productivity roundtable. The Albanese government's productivity summit in August 2025 will bring together businesses, unions and leaders to discuss potential economic reforms. Mr Chalmers opened the door to major tax changes for the first time in years at the National Press Club on Wednesday, outlining 'progressive and patriotic' reform. According to sources, there are three possible scenarios likely to emerge from the reform push - and each one could shape the future of the tax system. The first scenario sees the best-case outcome for Mr Chalmers - business and other stakeholders unite behind a shared reform agenda. This would give the Albanese government the political cover to act decisively and push ahead with meaningful changes. The second scenario is less rosy, and would result if consensus breaks down and scare campaigns erupt. In such a case, the government would decide to shelve major changes and instead focus on implementing the modest agenda it took to the last election. The third scenario would be the boldest, and it would be that, even in the face of criticism, Mr Chalmers proceeds with tax reform proposals anyway. He would either put these to voters at the next election in 2028 or design a phased system that would not come into effect until after it. Emboldened by Labor's strong electoral mandate, there have been loud calls to lift the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in exchange for income tax cuts. However, Mr Chalmers poured cold water on such a possibility, dampening the hopes of economists who have requested the change for decades. 'Historically I've had a view about the GST. I think it's hard to adequately compensate people,' he told reporters at the National Press Club. 'I think often an increase in the GST is spent three or four times over by the time people are finished with all of the things that they want to do with it. 'But what I'm going to try to do… I'm going to try not to dismiss every idea that I know that people will bring to the roundtable.' Despite this, AMP's chief economist Shane Oliver has since urged Labor to hike the GST and apply it across the board to minimise income tax. 'In an ideal world you would have less reliance on income tax and reduce the disincentive effects associated with it and have more reliance on GST,' he said 'It's seen as a fairly efficient tax because if you're taxing all goods and services at the same rate it doesn't distort people's economic decisions. 'The GST is a good tax. Economists like it because it's neutral.' CPA Australia's chief executive Chris Freeland also urged reform as the tax system remains 'overly reliant on personal and company income tax'. 'We welcome that the Treasurer was careful not to rule in or rule out any changes at this stage,' Mr Freeland said. 'Australians deserve a mature and honest conversation about the trade-offs required to fund the services and resources they expect. 'That must also include examining and fixing the GST and federal-state arrangements.' CreditorWatch's chief economist Ivan Calhoun said the Treasurer expressing a more open attitude towards GST than he, or his predecessors, had in the past was positive. 'He actually used that three letter GST acronym which has just been off the agenda for any political party,' Mr Calhoun said.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Future focus as inflation blare dims but change needed
The man who writes the cheques for Australia's largest state budget can finally focus on the future. Inflation was "blaring" in NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey's ears when he was compiling his first two budgets after Labor returned to government in 2023 for the first time in 12 years. "But the challenge in front of the state and the nation is making sure that we are growing our economy fast enough to support a rise in living standards," he tells AAP as he prepares to hand down his third. Mr Mookhey says Tuesday's state budget is about the future of the state's essential services and economic growth. "There's a lot of opportunity and a lot of ambition in NSW and the changes we're making are designed to hold on to what we love ... but also ensure that our kids and our grandkids have the same level of opportunity that we had," he says. While receding inflation and distance from the COVID-19 pandemic's associated spending have allowed the treasurer to cast an eye to the future, issues from the past remain. Framed in Mr Mookhey's parliament office is a newspaper headline relating to the underpayments scandal in the state's workers' compensation scheme he played a role in exposing in opposition. The page is yellowing with age as Mr Mookhey pushes to reform a scheme he is now in charge of, and which he argues is becoming unsustainable due to the rising cost and prevalence of psychological injuries. "It's been a hard case to argue," he says. "This system is failing everybody. It's a system that is fundamentally broken." Changes are simmering on the back burner after a parliamentary inquiry prevented action before the budget. Mr Mookhey hopes reform can create a "prevention culture" that limits psychological injuries from occurring. Outside of the workplace, he has promised some reassurance to people dealing with mental health issues and their loved ones. "They will see more investment in mental health resources in our health system and they will see more investment when it comes to our social interventions," he says. However, public psychiatrists at the pointy end of mental health crises should not expect the budget to deliver a pay rise at the level they have been calling for amid resignations in protest and arbitration in the state's Industrial Relations Commission. The federal distribution of GST to the states also continues to frustrate Mr Mookhey after dashing his hopes of a surplus in 2024. NSW now receives its lowest share of GST since it was introduced - about 85 cents for every dollar raised. "What frustrates me is not so much that we support the other states, it's just the missed opportunities," he says. The distribution needs to change but the tax's bigger proportional hit on the spending power of lower-income Australians means Mr Mookhey does not support raising the rate. "We can do better," he says. "What we need to focus on is just making sure the system is simple, the distribution is fair, the distribution is predictable, but also the distribution is understandable." Another federal issue with implications for state budgets is the rise of the black market for illicit tobacco fuelled by rising excise on dinky-di durries. The market shift is robbing the Commonwealth of expected revenue and creating criminal complications for states. It has already led to increased funding for enforcement within the health budget, but Premier Chris Minns indicated earlier in June a decision would have to be made about the resources devoted to combating illicit tobacco sales. While smoke clouds what the budget might do to address the issue, Mr Mookhey notes it is a source of public anxiety. "It's right and fair that we respond to community concerns about it ... we're going to have to work through what is the right solution." The tax issues are part of what economic researchers at the e61 Institute call a "vertical fiscal imbalance" that characterises the nation. "The states carry many of the spending responsibilities but lack equivalent revenue-raising capacity," chief executive Michael Brennan says, warning state finances are drifting onto an unsustainable path. But NSW will at least bank a cash surplus in Tuesday's budget for the first time since 2021. "Which means we're no longer borrowing money to pay our day-to-day bills as a government," Mr Mookhey says. "That gives us a platform for further progress." Australian Public Policy Institute chief executive Libby Hackett expects the budget will be a step forward, building on previous years. "This will be a structural reform budget: supporting better service delivery, infrastructure alignment and long-term productivity, even in a tight fiscal environment," Professor Hackett tells AAP. "Moreover, this budget presents a real opportunity to advance whole-of-government objectives in cross-cutting areas." Opposition Leader Mark Speakman sees it differently, warning the state is heading for "yet another low-vision, low-value, low-energy budget". "We have had not one visionary pre-budget announcement."
