logo
EXCLUSIVE Target employees reveal embarrassing Pride collection mistake amid backlash

EXCLUSIVE Target employees reveal embarrassing Pride collection mistake amid backlash

Daily Mail​30-05-2025

Target knew this year's Pride collection would be under the microscope.
Still, the company made a glaring misstep: several self-identified employees have shared photos of a slip-up on the Pride clothing's hang tags.
'body copy tincidunt ut lorem ipsum,' the tags say. 'dolor sit amet, consectet adipiscing elit, sed diam ad nonummy nibh...'
If that sounds like gibberish, that's because it is. The sentences are frequently-used placeholder text for graphic designers and publishers looking to test out different fonts.
Reddit users pointed out that Target clearly forgot to finish the graphics on a heavily scrutinized collection.
'They didn't finish editing the tags on the Pride merch,' one staffer pointed out.
It looks like the incorrect tags impacted clothing items across the lineup. Pictures show placeholder text on tags for products like the 'adult athletic pant' and the 'adult woven top.'
'These kinds of mistakes do occasionally happen, but this clearly slipped through a lot of nets,' Neil Saunders, a retail expert at GlobalData, told DailyMail.com.
Several self-identified Target employees have posted pictures of the company's Pride collection hang tags on Reddit
'It's very sloppy for a product range that is supposed to be meaningful and significant.'
Saunders said the company might soon be sending new hang tags to stores to swap out the mistake.
But some shoppers, who have already felt spurned by the brand's reversal on diversity and inclusion policies, said the mistake was 'tone deaf.'
'Someone said it was Pride in the closet,' one shopper said.
Another added: 'I swear this will end up on some random Facebook page as evidence of the Pride merch being "demonic."'
Others joked that the tags would inspire more Queer art.
'Lorem Ipsum is actually my drag name,' one shopper chided.
Another added: 'Wow, they really put their heart and soul into this, didn't they?'
Target has been at the center of several culture war issues - in 2023, the CEO had to move product because right-wing activists allegedly called in bomb threats
Employees have been sounding off on Target this year as frustration about the company's negative headlines mounts
'These kinds of mistakes do occasionally happen, but this clearly slipped through a lot of nets,' Neil Saunders, a retail expert at GlobalData, told DailyMail.com
'We're aware of the error that originated with our vendor and are working to address the issue,' a Target spokesperson said in a statement to DailyMail.com.
For years, the company has been caught in the middle of culture war fights.
The anger largely started with violent frustration over the Pride collection.
In 2023, conservative backlash started against the company when activists called out a bathing suit designed for trans swimmers.
Brian Cornell, the company's CEO, said anti-LGBT activists threatened store employees and placed bomb threats in response to the product.
He responded by moving the merchandise to the back of nationwide stores.
The right-wing anger triggered profit problems for the brand: Target said sales dropped 5.4 percent in the quarter after the backlash.
In January of this year, the company cancelled a three-year program meant to diversify its leadership team, angering some shoppers on the left.
Shoppers were closely watching this year's Pride collection to see if Target would start leaning on either political direction
The decision has spawned a new wave of customer boycotts, with liberal shoppers swearing off the brand. Sales for the company fell 2.8 percent to $23.85 billion in the quarter, the brand announced earlier this month.
Employees have been worried the drop in profits and consistent negative headlines impacting the stores will start resulting in job losses and store closures.
The company has not shut down a store since 2023, and didn't confirm if it was planning any major cuts.
Meanwhile, shoppers have been using this Pride collection as a litmus test to see whether Target would be capitulating to either side in the culture war.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer warns of ‘risk of escalation' following US strikes against Iran
Starmer warns of ‘risk of escalation' following US strikes against Iran

The Independent

time22 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer warns of ‘risk of escalation' following US strikes against Iran

Sir Keir Starmer warned there was a risk of the Middle East crisis spiralling beyond the region after Donald Trump ordered US planes and submarines to attack Iran's nuclear programme. The Prime Minister urged all sides to return to negotiations but said he had taken 'all necessary measures' to protect British interests in the region if the conflict escalates. There was no British involvement in the action but the Government was informed before the US strikes. Tehran has threatened to retaliate and Mr Trump has warned of further US action if necessary, saying: 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran.' Speaking at his Chequers country retreat, the Prime Minister said there was a 'risk of escalation' adding: 'That's a risk to the region. It's a risk beyond the region, and that's why all our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme. 'In relation to the UK, we were not involved in the attack. We were given due notice, as we would expect, as close allies to the US, and we have been moving assets to the region to make sure we're in a position to protect our own interests, our personnel and our assets, and, of course, those of our allies.' The US action comes just days after Sir Keir, who attended the G7 summit in Canada with Mr Trump, said on Tuesday there was 'nothing' from the president to suggest he was about to get involved in the conflict. Mr Trump pushed ahead with the action anyway, which he claimed had 'completely and fully obliterated' key nuclear facilities. Asked if he had been left looking foolish by the UK's closest ally ignoring his calls for de-escalation and pushing ahead with military strikes, the Prime Minister said: 'It's clearly a fast-moving situation and there's been a huge amount of discussion in the days since the G7 ended.' The Prime Minister sought to dodge questions about whether the UK could get dragged into the conflict if Iran targeted the bases of the US, a Nato ally. 'I'm not going to speculate about what may happen, because all of my focus is on de-escalation,' he said. 'But I do want to reassure the public we have taken all necessary measures to protect UK interests, UK personnel and to work with our allies to protect their interests as well.' Extra RAF Typhoon jets have already been moved to the region and Defence Secretary John Healey said 'force protection is at its highest level' following the US strikes. Sir Keir will chair a meeting of the Government's Cobra crisis committee on Sunday afternoon and has held a series of calls with world leaders. The US attacked Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz which are linked to Iran's nuclear programme. The Tehran regime has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful but its uranium enrichment process has gone far beyond what is required for power stations. The strikes followed a build-up of US military equipment, with B-2 stealth bombers – which are the only aircraft to carry a 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb – reportedly used to target the underground facilities. The aircraft have previously used the UK-US airbase on Diego Garcia, one of the Chagos Islands, but it is understood that was not involved in these strikes. The attack on Iran also involved US submarines, which launched around 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'By targeting Iran's nuclear sites, the US has taken decisive action against a regime that fuels global terror and directly threatens the UK. 'Iranian operatives have plotted murders and attacks on British soil. We should stand firmly with the US and Israel.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also backed Mr Trump's decision to strike Iran. He said: 'Iran must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons, the future of Israel depends on it.' Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey said 'robust diplomacy' was now needed to eliminate Iran's nuclear threat, adding: 'Following the US strikes, it is essential that we work to de-escalate the conflict and achieve that diplomatic solution.' Scotland's First Minister John Swinney called for diplomacy, saying the Middle East conflict has reached 'an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran'. Iran launched a ballistic missile barrage against Israel in retaliation to the US action. The foreign ministry in Tehran issued a statement condemning 'the United States' brutal military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities'. It added: 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is resolved to defend Iran's territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means against the United States' criminal aggression.' Mr Trump said any retaliation would be met with 'force far greater' than that used in the initial strikes.

Immigration officers target amateur football matches in the United States as part of controversial crackdown during the Club World Cup
Immigration officers target amateur football matches in the United States as part of controversial crackdown during the Club World Cup

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Immigration officers target amateur football matches in the United States as part of controversial crackdown during the Club World Cup

Immigration officers in the US are targeting amateur soccer matches – as the country hosts FIFA's Club World Cup. Mail Sport understands that a series of raids have taken place at games, with ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officials swooping on parks and football fields. Those with knowledge of the situation believe the sport is being targeted thanks to the large number of people from immigrant communities who play. It comes as part of a controversial crackdown, after President Donald Trump returned to office, that has triggered protests across the country which have, in some instances, turned violent. The optics, at a time when clubs from around the world are taking part in FIFA's expanded tournament, are questionable at best. The swoops also come a year before the US hosts the World Cup, along with Canada and Mexico. Both US Customs and Border Protection and FIFA declined to comment, despite a number of requests. However, one witness described the situation at a match in Orlando in recent weeks. 'We were playing in a Sunday league game,' they explained. 'The pitch was in a cage with one door. During the game, a van came and blocked the entrance and lots of officers jumped out and came onto the field. 'The match was stopped for about an hour while they checked everyone's papers. 'They were clearly looking for people who didn't have the right documentation. In my opinion they are targeting football, which isn't a great look when you're meant to be opening your doors to soccer fans from across the world.' As has been previously reported, concerns were raised that those heading to Club World Cup matches would be targeted by ICE officials after both they and CBP officers confirmed they would be present at games. An ill-advised post on X, which was later removed, stated that CBP would be 'suited and booted' at venues around the US. Officials later insisted that the presence of CBP and ICE officers was part of standard security protocol. They did not, however, respond the direct question of whether they would be checking the documentation of those attending. On June 11, Coast Guard and CBP agents raided a catamaran off the coast of Miami, with those onboard asked to provide identification proving their legal status. The boat was part of a year-to-go to the World Cup event, being staged by broadcast giants Telemundo. Among the invitees were the mayor of Miami and a group of FIFA VIPs.

Oil to open higher as US strikes on Iran boost supply risk premium
Oil to open higher as US strikes on Iran boost supply risk premium

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Oil to open higher as US strikes on Iran boost supply risk premium

LONDON, June 22 (Reuters) - Oil is likely to rise by $3-5 per barrel when trading resumes on Sunday evening after the U.S. attacked Iran at the weekend, market analysts said, with gains expected to accelerate only if Iran retaliates hard and causes a major oil supply disruption. U.S. President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes overnight, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Global oil benchmark Brent crude could gain $3 to $5 per barrel when markets open, SEB analyst Ole Hvalbye said in a note. Brent settled at $77.01 a barrel on Friday and U.S. West Texas Intermediate at $73.84. "An oil price jump is expected," said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad and a former OPEC official. "Even in the absence of immediate retaliation, markets are likely to price in a higher geopolitical risk premium." Crude had settled down on Friday after the U.S. imposed fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice posted to the U.S. Treasury Department website. Brent has risen 11% while WTI has gained around 10% since the conflict began on June 13 with Israel targeting Iran's nuclear sites and Iranian missiles hitting buildings in Tel Aviv. Currently stable supply conditions and the availability of spare production capacity among other OPEC members have limited oil's gains. Risk premiums have typically faded when no supply disruptions occurred, said Giovanni Staunovo, analyst at UBS. "The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions - which would likely result in higher prices - or if there is a de-escalation in the conflict, resulting in a fading risk premium," he said. A senior Iranian lawmaker on June 19 said that the country could shut the Strait of Hormuz as a way of hitting back against its enemies, though a second member of parliament said this would only happen if Tehran's vital interests were endangered. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. SEB said that any closure of the strait or spillover into other regional producers would "significantly lift" oil prices, but said they saw this scenario as a tail risk rather than a base case given China's reliance on Gulf crude. Ajay Parmar, oil and energy transition analytics director at consultancy ICIS, said it was unlikely Iran would be able to enforce a blockage of the strait for too long. "Most of Iran's oil exports to China pass through this strait and Trump is unlikely to tolerate the inevitable subsequent oil price spike for too long - the diplomatic pressure from the world's two largest economies would also be significant," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store