Understanding the exemption of legacy policies in the new pension system
Any policy in respect of a retirement annuity plan entered into before 1 September 2024 - is exempted from the two-component benefit system.
Members of pension funds must understand the implications of the new two-component retirement system and how legacy policies are exempted from it, following a recent ruling by the Pension Funds Adjudicator.
Any policy in respect of a retirement annuity plan entered into before 1 September 2024 - is exempted from the two-component benefit system.
The two-component pension system, implemented on 1 September 2024, splits retirement fund contributions into a "Savings Component" and a "Retirement Component". One-third of contributions goes to the Savings Component, which allows members to withdraw funds before retirement, while the remaining two-thirds go to the Retirement Component, which must be used to purchase a retirement income product.
Muvhango Lukhaimane, the Pension Funds Adjudicator, recently ruled on a complaint received from a fund member, who was aggrieved that the South African Retirement Annuity Fund denied him his right to withdraw from his savings component.
The complainant's policy commenced on February 1, 1998, with a contractual retirement option date of February 1, 2028. The complainant had a fund credit of R63 134.74 on June 15, 2024. The fund submitted the Income Tax Act (ITA) provides for the exclusion of legacy policies, defined as pre-universal life and universal life policies. It indicated that the complainant's policy fell under this category and was, therefore, excluded from the new two-component retirement system.
In compliance with the rules of the Financial Services Conduct Authority, the fund amended its rules to provide that the relevant elements of the two-component system would not apply to legacy retirement annuity policies.
The fund submitted that the complainant had an option to transfer his current policy to a two-component compliant retirement annuity to benefit from the new system. The deadline for this transfer was August 1, 2024, and the fund did not receive a transfer request within this period. The fund indicated that the complainant may transfer this contract to a compliant retirement annuity.
However, he would need to reinstate the premiums to start accumulating value in the savings component going forward to exercise a savings withdrawal in terms of the two-component retirement system.
In her determination, Lukhaimane said it was clear from the fund's submissions that the complainant's policy was exempted from the two-component retirement system in terms of section 1 of the ITA and the fund rules.
She said she was satisfied the fund acted lawfully in terms of its rules, the ITA and the policy contract in refusing to pay the complainant the withdrawal he requests. The complaint was dismissed.
The Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator is a statutory body established to resolve disputes in a procedurally fair, economical, and expeditious manner. The adjudicator's office investigates and determines complaints of abuse of power, maladministration, disputes of fact or law and employer dereliction of duty in respect of pension funds.
THE POST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Tshwane mayor vows to fix city's leasing system as illegal business closed during raid
Moya complained that business that were previously shut down by the City of Tshwane have reopened. While the City of Tshwane had its hands full with prolonged power outages and the switching on and off of its own reservoir, Mayor Nasiphi Moya was out on the streets this week with the Reclaim Our City campaign, which resulted in two arrests, illegal businesses being closed and notices issued. The two arrests were for illegal immigration and possession of stolen goods, while three vehicles were also impounded. Eviction notices served in Tshwane On Thursday night, Moya joined the bylaw enforcement operation in Sunnyside, with the Reclaim Our City campaign kicking off at the popular nightspot House 22. 'That club and many other businesses here have been served with eviction notices by the City of Tshwane. These businesses don't have valid permits and many are non-compliant. We were here a few months back and some of those we closed managed to reopen. We are closing them down again,' she said. Moya said the Sunnyside precinct is a strategic area that will be offered to the private sector for investment. 'All illegal businesses here will be evicted from this area. Another store we've closed. The people running this establishment supply food concoctions to predominantly Ethiopian nationals. There's no compliance with health regulations. They also don't have certification legalising the operation of a business. 'This man runs a spaza shop in Sunnyside. His visa states that he is an asylum seeker and, by law, he doesn't qualify to run a business in this city. He can only work and study in South Africa. But here he is overseeing a business operation. We've closed his store,' she added. This man runs a spaza shop in Sunnyside. His visa states that he is an asylum seeker and by law he doesn't qualify to run business in this City. He can only work and study in South Africa. But here he is overseeing a business operation. We've closed his store. @CityTshwane — Dr Nasiphi Moya (@nasiphim) June 19, 2025 ALSO READ: 'Even if it's Chinese, he's in SA' – China Town raid finds expired food, employee hiding in toilet Hijacked properties Earlier this week, Moya and her team discovered hijacked city properties in Danville, which led to the closure of five businesses. Three other premises were found to have illegal electricity connections, while one was found with an illegal water connection. ALSO READ: Pothole crisis: Tshwane mayor blames rain for municipality not fixing crumbling roads Moya said an illegal early childhood development centre, operating for 22 years from a city property without a lease, was also closed. Moya said the City of Tshwane's leasing system has not worked to benefit the municipality's income-generating capacity. 'We are determined to fix this,' she said. NOW READ: R63 million 'wasted' on Tshwane City Hall as historic site crumbles
Daily Maverick
4 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Promises, potholes and a R71bn budget — can Mayor Xaba Fix Durban?
eThekwini Mayor Cyril Xaba is trying to lead a turnaround, but the city faces spiralling debt and a billing crisis. eThekwini Mayor Cyril Xaba is talking it up, and who can blame him? The man at the helm of a city hobbled by corruption is putting his best foot forward, trying to build trust with citizens fed up with crooks. Last week, Xaba passed a R70.9-billion budget, and his recent speeches to council and business have been measured and optimistic. Xaba, constantly drilled by ratepayers, is basking in a bit of glory after Durban successfully pulled off a host of big sporting events, which saw the city spruce up and the metro police out in full force. But while the mayor's reassuring language is laden with mollifying words about National Treasury prescripts and the virtues of consequence management, he is in the spotlight. The city's public relations machine aims to signal competency and accountability, distancing Xaba from the ineptitude and looting that have come to characterise the municipality. The jury's out on how much difference Xaba has made since he was parachuted into the top job a year ago. His installation coincided with a provincial intervention in the city headed by former city manager Mike Sutcliffe and former presidential director-general Cassius Lubisi. A month before their arrival, President Cyril Ramaphosa established a working group in response to business concerns about city failures. And, a year before that, the city launched a turnaround strategy. So, while First Citizen Cyril is trying hard, ratepayers, business and opposition parties are concerned that the city is sliding deeper into debt. Not everyone likes Xaba's numbers, especially tariff increases. The average property rate increase is 5.9%; Electricity is up by 12.72%; Water is up by 13% for residents and 14% for businesses; Sanitation is up by 11%; and Solid waste is up by 9%. Daily Maverick sent the city a detailed list of questions relating to the budget, which it says the treasury department wants to answer fully. We will share this when it becomes available. In broad strokes, the budget allows R63-billion for operational expenses and R7.3-billion for capital projects. The big-ticket items include bulk purchases from uMngeni-uThukela Water (R5.7-billion) and Eskom (R18.7-billion). The city spends R15.2-billion on salaries for about 24,000 staff, R7.6 billion on contractors and R1-billion on interest for loans. Debt crisis The city's big issue is growing debt. Residents owe R35.5-billion, which the city puts down to the economic crunch, but critics say rates and services are too costly. Of the total debt, 40% is for unpaid water. Outstanding property rates and unpaid electricity account for 25% and 15%. Most of the debt (75%) is owed by households. Businesses owe 20% and state departments the balance. In December 2023, the debtor's book was at R28-billion. A year later, it was at R35.5-billion, which had risen to R38.6-billion by April. This means the city will need to borrow more or bill more for services. In a bid to staunch the losses, it is offering businesses and residents a chance to write off 50% of their debt if they settle before the end of June. The valuation roll has only 554,280 rated properties (481,000 residences, 17,000 businesses and 7,000 industrial). About 330,000 properties are valued at less than R350,000 and rates-exempt. Another 150,000 are worth more than R350,000, but are not rateable. Durban, with a population of about four million, has more informal settlements than any other city in the country (about 600 with 314,000 households). And, other metros in South Africa have more rate-paying households. Figures from the Centre for Affordable Housing Finance in Africa show about 824,000 residential properties on the deeds registry in Johannesburg and about 767,000 in Cape Town. In eThekwini, the Ingonyama Trust (land administered by the Zulu king) controls huge swathes of land where properties are not rated. Alan Beesley is an accountant, a former eThekwini councillor and ActionSA's finance spokesman. 'The only way for the city to fix its books is to spend less and offer a better service that will attract more ratepayers. At the moment, Durban has a shrinking ratepayer base subsidising a growing number of people not paying for services.' Business backlash Xaba has promised the city will bring in more money from rates and services, and that officials will waste less and work harder. 'Dashboards linked to service delivery targets' are among a host of measures to improve and cut annual water losses of R2-billion. 'We will bury potholes, sweep the streets, cut the verges and keep the lights on,' Xaba promised. Reaction to the budget has been testy. The Durban Chamber of Commerce and Industry is concerned with low confidence in the municipality's ability to spend on priorities. There was a 'continuous disconnect' between what happened on the ground in Durban and the 'grand plans' emerging from the Presidential Working Group. 'We need to see meaningful action with key timelines and tangible reforms that will accelerate service delivery and reverse the economic decline,' the chamber said. Water losses might be higher because many meters were 'dysfunctional or not working at all'. Tariff tensions The Ethekwini Ratepayers Protest Movement (ERPM) is tired of city hall promises. ERPM's Rose Cortes roasted the 'habit of reckless lending and spending', saying some parts of the municipality were 'delinquent'. The ERPM says city billing is a mess. 'For example, they didn't read the water meters for extended periods and some residents had underground leaks which they didn't know about. Then, when they actually read the meter, you are hit with a massive bill you can't pay. They won't give us stats on how many meter readers they have. The contractors are paid, but they don't read the meters, some for as long as 500 days.' Cortes says some houses valued at less than R350,000, which qualify for rates exemption, free water and discounted electricity, don't receive this benefit, but others that don't qualify do. The only way to stop blatant theft and crooked deals was line-by-line scrutiny of spending. Cortes said the city recently ran out of money to pay contracted plumbers and even the mayor expressed concerns about the poor workmanship by contractors. Also, city schemes to provide poor relief were dubious, Cortes said. 'Reports on indigent households are inaccurate and the process to register for indigent care is ineffective and stupid.' ERPM's chair Asad Gafar said 500,000 ratepayers effectively cross-subsidised eThekwini's four million-plus residents. 'Ratepayers wouldn't object to the cross-subsidy if the city improved the lives of the poor, but it doesn't. Instead, losses increased, like the water that bleeds into the ground through leaking pipes, or just flows 24/7 at standpipes, unmonitored. Or, the water is pumped into tankers by the mafias and then dumped so they can turn the truck around and fill it up and get paid for another trip.' Broken billing Democratic Alliance councillor Alicia Kissoon sits on the city's finance committee. She said the budget was 'polished on paper', but operationally detached. The real picture emerged in the adjustments budget, where money was 'constantly reallocated in a cycle of crisis management which is like robbing Peter to pay Paul'. R345-million for 100 new water tankers was a prime example of short-term thinking. 'Tankers do not fix leaking infrastructure. It masks a systemic failure to repair broken pipes.' Kissoon said it was unsustainable for so many residents not to pay for rates and services. The city was dealing with a 'dangerous culture of administrative neglect, contractor abuse and non-payment.' Inkatha Freedom Party councillor Jonathan Annipen voted for the budget because the city provided free services to poor residents. He praised the city's recent 'determined effort at transparency'. To 'avoid collapse', the city had to improve revenue collection, debt recovery and credit control. But, Annipen said, billing was bedevilled. 'Daily, we hear heart-wrenching stories where frail, elderly and disabled citizens have their services disconnected, and the city has no credible dispute mechanism. I intervened in the case of a pensioner who was suicidal because he was lumped with a R1.3-million monthly bill for water and electricity, but investigations revealed he was actually owed a credit. 'People wait three months for a water leak to be repaired. Water is flowing down the street by gallons and you call the contact centre, they tell you the fault has been closed.' DM
IOL News
14-06-2025
- IOL News
Adjudicator criticises pension fund for ignoring complaints
The South African Local Authorities Pension Fund faces scrutiny after the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator reported it to the FSCA for failing to respond to multiple complaints, raising concerns over its compliance and fiduciary duties. Image: Pexels The Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator (OPFA) has come down hard on the South African Local Authorities Pension Fund for ignoring repeated requests for information, in what it describes as serious non-compliance with regulatory obligations. Adjudicator Muvhango Lukhaimane reported the fund to the Financial Services Conduct Authority (FSCA) after it failed to respond to multiple enquiries from her office in the course of investigating a complaint. 'There were several complaints against the fund,' Lukhaimane says. 'And the lack of response from the fund reflects a disregard for the Pension Funds Act, its rules, and the best interests of members.' The complaint in question was brought by a former South African Police Service employee who believed his withdrawal benefit had been improperly calculated. He asked the OPFA to determine whether his employer had consistently paid overall contributions to the fund, a factor that would directly affect the value of his benefit. Despite being called upon to respond, the fund failed to file any response to the OPFA's request. As a result, the adjudicator proceeded to determine the matter without their input. Lukhaimane described the fund's behaviour as 'intolerable,' saying it suggested multiple contraventions of the law and showed poor standards of fiduciary duty. 'The fund's unreasonable delay in responding to the complaint could not be entertained as it prejudiced the complainant,' she added. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Noting the volume of cases her office handles, Lukhaimane stressed the importance of timely cooperation. 'It is, therefore, incumbent upon pension funds and administrators to ensure that enquiries from the Adjudicator are properly and adequately responded to. This is especially so since boards of funds and Principal Officers are required to be fit and proper.' She says: 'The failure to respond to enquiries and to timeously response to complaints by such persons is a failure to uphold their fiduciary responsibilities. It impedes the Adjudicator's ability to deliver on its mandate, and if allowed to continue, will render the Adjudicator ineffective. It also constitutes a barrier to the complainant being able to have their complaint properly resolved.' Lukhaimane also raised concerns about systemic issues within the fund's administration. 'When the administrative wheels of a fund come off, it starts with the fund's failure to respond to complaints that require data from its administration system relating to payment of contributions.' She named the fund's administrator, Fairsure Administration (Pty) Ltd, saying: 'All indications are that there is an issue with the receipt and allocation of contributions. It is, therefore, imperative that the FSCA acts with haste to avoid further prejudice to members.' In her ruling, Lukhaimane ordered the fund to reconcile all contributions and advise the employer of any shortfalls. The fund must also furnish the complainant with a full breakdown of both his contributions and withdrawal benefits. In addition, the employer has been ordered to pay any outstanding contributions to the fund, which in turn must credit the complainant for any shortfall. PERSONAL FINANCE
