gensol engineering: Death of the sustainability poster child: What does it teach us?
ADVERTISEMENT
The year 2019 can be recalled for two events that today give rise to interlinked questions about green ventures in the Indian transportation sector. 2019 was the year when Blu Smart was launched. It was also the year that the government rolled out the National Mission on Transformative Mobility and Battery Storage. BluSmart started in January 2019 with an exciting green mandate, prepared to take on the duopoly that Uber-Ola firmly commandeered in India's top three megacities. Here was a cab service that used electric vehicles while the customers had transparency and surety, largely due to their fixed pricing model. It caught attention and grew into a cab service with its own loyal customers that demonstrated a preference towards its pocket-friendly, reliable rides. At the height of its success, Blu Smart managed close to 10,000 electric vehicles utilising about 6300 charging points across the three cities of Delhi NCR, Bengaluru, and Mumbai. Here was an aspiring environment-friendly startup that resonated with its urban commuters as an attractive alternative, one which did not pollute the air they breathed. And it wasn't just the environmentally-conscious commuters who flocked towards the service. The business model with its zero-cancellation policy, friendly drivers, and clean vehicles filled the market gap.Around the same time, the Indian Government rolled out the National Mission on Transformative Mobility & Battery Storage. It contained two phases of the Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of (Hybrid &) Electric Vehicles in India (FAME) scheme. FAME , in its first phase, subsidised prices and incentives for electric vehicles and their infrastructure. Green companies could avail a reduction in GST (5% to 12%), exemption from permit requirements and a reduction in costs under its second phase. Bring in this mix, the Delhi EV policy in 2020, with many such other incentives, such as favourable tariffs and a pollution cess.On the face of it, this was a startup that was at the right place at the right time. And no one could have anticipated the headlines that have greeted us lately. Except that there were signs. In 2024, there was the introduction of surge-pricing. There also lurked in the shadows whispers of mismanagement and lack of corporate governance. These problems lingered beneath the surface for years and culminated in a SEBI investigation after significant defaults on payment by the company. The fairytale came to an abrupt halt with services suspended, employees suddenly jobless, and customers uncertain of whether they will get back the money in their wallet option. The reasons were plenty. Gensol Engineering , the entity where BluSmart leased its cabs, had been facing its own liquidation crisis, heavily impacting the former's operations. But the final nail in the coffin of public opinion was the co-founders diverting funds towards luxury real-estate and other personal indulgences from a loan intended for purchasing more vehicles for the fleet.BluSmart's abrupt closure was brought on by alleged violations of SEBI's anti-fraud (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003 and potential breaches of corporate governance under the Companies Act, 2013. Investigations revealed that funds previously earmarked for EV fleet expansion were diverted for personal use by the co-founders, seemingly a case of criminal misappropriation. Additionally, the company's abrupt shutdown left partners like Gensol Engineering stranded, triggering contractual disputes and worsening liquidity crises. SEBI's scrutiny highlighted misleading disclosures to investors, possibly violating green bond compliance if the company raised sustainable financing.The BluSmart tragedy raises significant questions about the future of electric vehicles in India. A startup that was taken as a poster child by those keen to demonstrate the ease and viability of the green transportation sector has instead done the opposite. BluSmart's misuse of FAME-II subsidies and Delhi's EV incentives raised questions about oversight in green funding, with this collapse being seen as one that could prompt stricter due diligence for EV startups seeking subsidies or green investments and thus slowing sectoral growth. Startups starting out with the same kind of vision will have greater difficulty attracting investors. The EV system will, in the future, invite reduced investor trust and therefore hinder adoption.The mismanagement and irresponsibility of the startup spell caution for others geared towards bringing about a better future for the planet. Lofty goals for the environment and consumer-friendly policies mean little if the basic tenets of corporate governance and financial management are brushed aside. It is time that the policy framework around EVs is not just focused on infrastructure and subsidies, but also introduces checks to prevent advantages being taken for corporate greed and the propensity to misuse enabling policies for short-sighted negligence. The time is ripe for a specialised statutory body to be formed to monitor the utilisation of subsidies and other SOPs offered to companies in the clean energy space. BluSmart may then go down in case studies as a benchmark for how not to scale green ventures—highlighting the need for stronger audits, transparent governance, and regular scrutiny to prevent similar collapses.Talish Ray is an advocate and Managing Partner at TRS Law Offices. Tejaswini Singh contributed to this article as a researcher.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Qatar, UAE airspace closure sends air traffic completely out of gear
. New Delhi: The closure of UAE and Qatar airspace late Monday night as missiles were fired from Iran towards US bases in Qatar and Iraq threw commercial air traffic completely out of gear. Hundreds of lights to and from the region — that houses mega hubs like Dubai, Doha and Abu Dhabi along with multiple smaller ones like Sharjah — were impacted. Flights headed there from across the world, including multiple Indian cities, were diverted, returned to origin or were put on hold. Flights headed from Lucknow to Dammam; Mumbai to Kuwait and Amritsar to Dubai were among those that turned back to the origin from over the Arabian Sea. And aircraft supposed to take off from there, remained on the ground. The India market is served by biggies including Emirates Group, IndiGo, Air India Group, Qatar Airways, Etihad and multiple smaller airlines like Akasa, SpiceJet and Air Arabia. Dubai, Doha, Abu Dhabi are key transit points for travel between India and rest of the world. Dozens of flights to and from India alone were impacted on Monday night itself. In a statement, IndiGo said: 'In view of the evolving situation in the Middle East, some of our flights may experience delays or diversions. These adjustments are being made to ensure operations remain within safe and compliant airspace. We recommend checking your flight status regularly. If your flight is impacted, alternate options can be easily explored through our website. We continue to monitor the situation closely in coordination with the relevant authorities. We appreciate your patience and understanding.' An AI Express spokesperson said: 'As a result of the ongoing situation in the Middle East and suspension of Qatar airspace, Air India Express has diverted our Doha bound flight from Kochi to Muscat and returned our flight bound from Kannur. Air India Express has no aircraft on the ground in Qatar. We are monitoring the situation closely and will take all necessary precautions for the safety and security of our guests and crew, with inputs from the relevant authorities… regret inconvenience. ' The airspace closure in the region started around 9 pm (IST) when Qatar closed its airspace for commercial airliners 'to ensure safety of citizens, residents, and visitors.' As a result, a large number of flights headed to Doha — including many from Indian cities — were impacted. The enroute ones diverted to other nearby places like Abu Dhabi or Bahrain; some returned to their origin cities in India; boarding for those about to depart was put on hold and others were suspended till the airspace restrictions remain in force. The point-to-point trafic between India and Doha is rather low, with the majority being one-stop transit flyers. IndiGo, the biggest Indian operator to Doha, saw the maximum impact. Its enroute flights to Doha from Delhi and Hyderabad were diverted to Bahrain and one from Kochi went to Abu Dhabi. Comments were sought from Qatar Airways and awaited till the time of going to press. Air India's three flights were immediately impacted: one was diverted to Abu Dhabi, other returned to India and the third was put on hold. AI Express put boarding of its Doha-bound flights on hold at Indiana airports. AI Express has flights between Doha and six Indian cities — Kannur, Kochi, Kozhikode, Mangaluru, Thiruvananthapuram and Tiruchchirappalli. Multiple flights headed from the west to Doha diverted to nearby cities including Riyadh, Abu Dhabi and Dubai. Within an hour, the UAE airspace was also closed. That threw flights completely ot of gear. 'At this point, there's utter chaos and we can't even guestimate the impact,' said senior official of multiple airlines.
India Gazette
35 minutes ago
- India Gazette
India's national interest non-negotiable in US trade talks, say government sources
New Delhi [India], June 23 (ANI): With about two weeks remaining before the critical July 9 deadline, India and the United States face mounting challenges in finalising their Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) as the 90-day tariff pause period draws to a close. Government sources emphasised that India's national interests will remain paramount in ongoing negotiations, even as both nations work intensively to reach an interim deal before the deadline expires. The negotiations have hit significant roadblocks, with the US maintaining its demands for substantially reduced duties on American agricultural and dairy products, along with market access for genetically modified (GMO) crops. India, however, has firmly rejected these proposals, citing concerns over food security, environmental protection, and the welfare of its domestic farming sector. 'India is unwilling to compromise on GMO crops or provide broad-based access for US agricultural and dairy products,' a senior government source said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. 'Our position remains clear that any agreement must serve India's strategic and economic interests first.' The American side has been particularly insistent on securing lower tariffs for its agricultural exports, viewing India's vast consumer market as crucial for its farming sector. However, Indian negotiators have expressed concerns that unrestricted access could undermine local farmers and food security frameworks. Despite these fundamental disagreements, both sides remain committed to achieving a breakthrough before the July 9 cutoff. The current tariff pause, implemented 90 days ago, has provided breathing room for negotiations while preventing an escalation of trade tensions. If no agreement is reached by the deadline, tariffs will automatically revert to the levels that existed on April 2, potentially reigniting trade friction between the two nations. However, government sources suggest that even in such a scenario, India would maintain a relative advantage compared to other competing manufacturing economies. The potential return to higher tariffs underscores the delicate balance both nations must strike between protecting domestic interests and fostering bilateral economic cooperation. For India, the negotiations represent a critical test of its ability to engage with major trading partners while safeguarding key sectors of its economy. Trade experts suggest that failure to reach an agreement could have broader implications for Indo-US relations, particularly as both countries seek to strengthen economic ties amid shifting global trade dynamics. The coming days will prove crucial as negotiators from both sides work round-the-clock to bridge their differences and avoid a return to the pre-negotiation tariff regime. Government sources remain cautiously optimistic about finding a middle ground that respects India's red lines while addressing legitimate US trade concerns. As the deadline approaches, all eyes will be on whether diplomatic pragmatism can overcome the current impasse in what has become one of the most closely watched trade negotiations of the year. (ANI)
India Gazette
36 minutes ago
- India Gazette
US visa applicants must make social media accounts public for screening
Washington [US], June 23 (ANI): In a move aimed at strengthening visa screening procedures, the United States has announced that effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa are required to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under U.S. law. In a post on X, the official handle of the U.S. Embassy in India (@USAndIndia) shared the announcement stating, 'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision. Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their personal social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States.' It also reiterated that since 2019, the United States has required visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms. The post added: 'We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security.' Meanwhile, the U.S. government has also unveiled a sweeping new 2025 travel ban, barring nationals from 12 countries entirely and partially limiting visa access from seven others. The move prioritizes national security and focuses on countries deemed high-risk for security loopholes and terrorism concerns. Most affected countries are reportedly in the Middle East and Africa. Citizens from these nations now face a total ban on immigrant and non-immigrant visas, including those for tourism, education, and employment. Simultaneously, seven other countries face partial restrictions, involving tighter screening or limited visa categories. Amid growing concern in South Asia, the U.S. has clarified that India is not on the list. The U.S. is continuing to process applications for Indian nationals across all categories, including B1/B2 tourist visas, H1B work permits, and F1 student visas. However, visa applicants from India still face long delays due to high demand and administrative backlog. Most U.S. consulates in India are booking interview slots up to 10-12 months in advance. So while India remains unaffected by the new travel ban, long processing times may still impact travel plans, education, and employment opportunities for many. (ANI)
