Dutch center-left parties unite to challenge the right in a historic merger

Two center-left Dutch political parties agreed Thursday to a formal merger, just months away from a general election where they will seek to turn the political tide in the Netherlands away from right-wing populism.
Members of the Labor Party and Green Left both voted overwhelmingly in favor of the move to form a single new party. The parties have been working together in parliament for years.
Now they will go to the polls as a single entity known by its Dutch name, Groen Links-PvdA. A new party with a new name will follow next year, the parties said after the vote.
'This is a historic moment. This step shows that we, as parties, believe in the power of cooperation, because we can achieve so much more together than apart,' the chair of the Labor Party, Esther-Mirjam Sent, said in a statement.
Green Left chair, Katinka Eikelenboom, added that her party's members 'choose with full conviction for cooperation and renewal. We are building a broad, green and social people's party that is ready for the future.'
The Oct. 29 election for all 150 seats in the lower house of the Dutch parliament was triggered when right-wing anti-Islam lawmaker Geert Wilders pulled his ministers out of the four-party ruling coalition in a dispute over the pace of reforms to implement tough new measures to rein in migration.
The remaining three parties remain in power in a caretaker capacity under Prime Minister Dick Schoof until a new government is formed.
The Labor Party is led in parliament by former European Commission climate chief Frans Timmermans, a former Dutch foreign minister. The two center-left parties currently trail Wilders' Party for Freedom in Dutch polling.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

As UK households struggle with energy bills, staff at industry watchdog Ofgem enjoy 'woke' quizzes and Pride movie nights at 4.30pm on a Tuesday

Officials working for energy regulator Ofgem have spent thousands of pounds on ' woke ' events including movie nights and quizzes during working hours, the Mail can reveal. At a time when Britain has been hit with some of the highest energy prices in Europe, the quango tasked with regulating such matters has a host of 'staff networks' given money to hold gatherings over the past year. They included a 'Pride Movie Night', which started at 4.30pm on a Tuesday last July, as well as an 'End of Pride Quiz' which ran from 4pm to 5.30pm later that month. Another gathering organised by the LGBT + network was on 'Perspectives from Rainbow Regulators' which ran for almost 90 minutes on a Thursday afternoon last September. The quango also held an event on the 'art and history of black hair' which lasted 75 minutes on a work day in October. In total, Ofgem has spent £66,954 of the internal HR Equity, Diversity and Inclusion budget on staff networks since 2021, although funding was stopped in May 2024. The figures were revealed in response to a Freedom of Information request by the TaxPayers' Alliance and shared exclusively with the Mail. Ofgem has come under fire in recent years over the cost of bills, its handling of the prepayment meter scandal and its failure to prevent suppliers going bust. Joanna Marchong, of the TPA, said: 'It's beyond parody that as Brits face some of the highest energy prices in the world, our energy watchdog is spending time on woke movie nights and quizzes. 'Ofgem has repeatedly failed billpayers with its endless meddling in the energy market, which has both added to the costs of bills while also failing to prevent major firms from going bust. 'It's clear that there is a complete lack of focus on the core priorities of the organisation.' An Ofgem spokesman said: 'Our workforce reflects the communities we serve, offering a wide range of experiences and skills which helps to support our work as an effective energy regulator.' The spokesperson added: 'Staff networks are no longer funded centrally following the introduction of the EDI Expenditure rules last year.' Firms are spared green levy Thousands of businesses will be exempt from paying green levies in an industry shake-up, the Prime Minister will announce. Sir Keir Starmer will vow to slash energy bills for more than 7,000 firms by up to 25 per cent from 2027 when he launches his industrial strategy today. The ten-year plan to promote growth will see some firms exempted from the Renewables Obligation and Feed-in Tariffs. Manufacturers have previously warned energy costs are much higher in the UK than overseas. Government sources insisted the move would not be funded by raising taxes or household bills. Sir Keir said last night the plan would deliver 'long-term certainty' for British businesses.

Times

an hour ago

• Times

Predictions of £40bn hit to public finances from Brexit ‘correct'

Brexit has blown a £40 billion tax hole in the public finances, according to a forecasting audit that finds that the Office for Budget Responsibility's projections on the impact of leaving the EU have broadly materialised. On the ninth anniversary of the leave vote, the OBR's estimate of a 4 per cent loss in the UK's long-run productivity has been borne out by declining investment and trade volumes, according to John Springford, an associate fellow at the Centre for European Reform. The 4 per cent productivity loss translates to an approximate £40 billion tax loss for the exchequer between 2019 and 2024, a period in which the government raised taxes by £100 billion. 'A large chunk of [the tax rises] would not have been necessary if the UK had voted to remain in the EU or chosen a softer form of Brexit,' Springford said. • Britons may not have right to use e-gates in Europe this ­summer The figures underscore the growth and fiscal implications of leaving the EU at a time when the government is desperate to revive productivity and repair the public finances. In May this year Labour agreed a deal with Brussels to align UK food regulations with the bloc — a breakthrough that will have limited economic effects but could signal the path to closer regulatory alignment that will make trade in goods and services easier for UK firms. The OBR's estimate, which has been criticised by pro-Brexit economists, was derived from an average of independent forecasters' whose calculations ranged from a productivity hit of about 1 per cent to 10 per cent. The watchdog said the full impact of leaving the EU would be felt over the course of 15 years and estimated a drop of 15 per cent in trade volumes, compared with if the UK had stayed in the bloc. Springford, whose findings were published by the Constitution Society and the Federal Trust, tested the OBR's projections and found the consensus view 'has been borne out'. Springford has also devised a method to calculate the impact of Brexit, which compares the UK's economic outcomes with similar economies since 2016, and found a growth impact of around 5 per cent of GDP, similar to the OBR's figure. Springford said it was 'undeniable' that Brexit had hurt the UK's economic growth prospects and its trade volumes. 'The question is about the magnitude of the effect and we remain a little in the dark because it is incredibly difficult to isolate the Brexit effect,' he said, citing factors such as the pandemic, which complicate how to judge whether trade and investment was lower simply as a result of the UK leaving the single market and customs union. The leave vote in June 2016 led to a prolonged period of negotiation about the UK's new economic and trade relationship with the EU. Britain formally exited the bloc in January 2020, with a trade and co-operation agreement that included a zero tariff on most goods but British businesses lost access to the single market and the UK was no longer part of the EU's trade deals with the rest of the world. • UK economy contracts by greater-than-expected 0.3% The research found that the Brexit effect was most clear in the 'unambiguous stagnation in investment since 2016.' Estimates from Springford and economists including Jonathan Haskel, a former Bank of England rate-setter, calculate an investment gap of 10 per cent if the UK had stayed in the EU. Sectors where the Brexit impact was most pronounced include the auto industry, where the share of exports made up by cars has dropped more sharply than in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the US since 2019. Exports of financial services, which have grown since Brexit, haven't expanded as fast as peer economies after 2020, when UK-based firms lost their access to the single market.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Nigel Farage unveils plans to charge non-doms a one-off £250,000 fee in exchange for tax breaks... with the money distributed to Britain's lowest earning 10 per cent of workers

Nigel Farage will today unveil a plan to charge non-doms £250,000 in return for avoiding a raft of taxes, with the proceeds going to the lowest-paid workers. In his latest lurch to the Left, the Reform UK leader will use a speech this morning to pledge to 'restore the social contract between rich and poor' in Britain. Under the plan, non-doms would be offered the chance to pay a £250,000 one-off 'Entry Contribution' in return for not being taxed on any offshore income or gains. They would also not be liable to pay inheritance tax, the Mail understands. The 'contribution' would then be distributed to Britain's lowest earning 10 per cent of full-time workers, delivered automatically by HMRC as a cash dividend. It is designed to make the UK a more attractive place to wealthy individuals, as it would reinstate the non-dom regime which Labour abolished in April. Non-domiciled status allows people who live in the UK, but who have a permanent home elsewhere, to only pay tax on the money they earn in the UK. It can be used to shield any overseas income and profits from UK taxes, unless they are transferred into the country. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reportedly seeking to soften the changes, however, after fears that it is leading to an exodus of wealth creators. It comes after three of Britain's richest men – including a top investment banker -became the latest to join an exodus of the super-rich amid a government crackdown on wealthy non-doms. In April, Ian and Richard Livingstone, brothers who own a £9bn property empire in the UK and abroad, an online casino and plush Monte Carlo hotel, were revealed as having quit the UK for Monaco, according to corporate documents. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs' top banker, Richard Gnodde, worth over £130m, is understood to have ditched London for Milan. Mr Gnodde is believed to be is the first senior banker leaving the UK for a different country, leading to fears the exodus of wealthy talent is spreading among the City's higher echelons. Leslie Macleod-Miller, chief executive of the non-dom lobby group, Foreign Investors for Britain, called for action to 'stem the flow of highly desired – and highly mobile – individuals such as Gnodde'. He told the City AM newspaper: 'We are calling on the government to create an internationally competitive environment that attracts and retains top global talent and investment.' In her budget last October, Rachel Reeves scrapped centuries-old tax privileges for non-doms – under which they were only taxed on income and gains brought into Britain. Now all UK residents will be taxed in Britain on their worldwide income and gains.