WW3 fears explained and if world is safer or more dangerous after US bombs Iran
Iranian foreign minister Abbas Aranghchi warned the Donald Trump-ordered bombing campaign would "have everlasting consequences" amid fears Tehran will carry out a strong retaliation to avoid regime collapse
Donald Trump's call to bomb key nuclear sites in Iran has sparked fears Tehran could retaliate - with mounting concerns that instability in the region could spark World War Three.
Over the weekend the US attacked three nuclear sites in Iran, including the deep underground Fordow facility, with President Trump claiming they had been "completely and fully obliterated." The US President ordered the strikes - dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer - after Israel carried out attacks against the country's nuclear, energy and military infrastructure last week.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Iran had been wanting to develop a nuclear weapon to threaten the Jewish-majority state, and said the strikes were to damage its nuclear programme. The International Atomic Energy Agency also found the Fordow site had enriched uranium to 83.7 per cent, which was close to the 90 per cent required to develop nuclear weapons.
But Mr Netanyahu has warned of an imminent threat from Iran for decades, including him using a drawing of a bomb at a 2012 session at the United Nations to warn "by next spring" Iran would have moved onto the final stage of its enrichment programme. The Israeli leader has also called for regime change in Iran without explaining how this would take place and what the impacts of instability in the region could have.
The attacks have split the American electorate, who are grappling with President Trump's move to go against his campaign promise of no more wars in the Middle East. They also have the possibility of splitting the US and its allies over what the next steps in the Middle East, with defence analyst Michael Clarke warning it could be the mark the "real end" of the Transatlantic relationship.
What are the risks facing the world following the Iran bombing campaign?
Cyber attacks 'likely'
The US Department of Homeland Security warned on Sunday that cyber attacks against networks in the country were a distinct possibility. In an advisory shared on its national terrorism advisory system website, a Homeland Security expert said: "The ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States.
"Low-level cyber attacks against US networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against US networks." The department also revealed that both hacktivists and the Iranian government have previously targeted "poorly secured" US networks and internet-connected devices as part of their cyber attacks in the past.
Iran out for revenge
Iranian government officials primarily blame the US over the death of its general Qasem Soleimani who was killed in a drone strike near Baghdad in January, 2020. US security officials warned Iran's government held a long-standing commitment "to target" US government officials in retaliation for the attack.
In a statement shared over the weekend, a Homeland Security advisory warned: "The likelihood of violent extremists in the Homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland.
"Multiple recent Homeland terrorist attacks have been motivated by anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment, and the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict could contribute to US-based individuals plotting additional attacks."
End of Transatlantic relationship
Defence analyst Michael Clarke told The Mirror that the attacks on the nuclear facilities could spell the "real end" of the Transatlantic relationship. He added: "The politics of this will be impossible to smooth over and the lack of the common values that the Transatlantic Relationship has always been based on will from now on become very evident.
"This week's NATO Summit will be the real breaking point - whatever the very short communique says."
Iran's warning
Following the American bombing of its nuclear sites, Iran's president Masoud Pezeshkian warned: "The Americans must receive a response to their aggression." His warning was joined by the country's foreign minister Abbas Aragchi stating the strikes would have "everlasting consequences."
While Iran's capabilities to coordinate terror attacks across the Middle East has been severely dented after Israel carried out devastating strikes against its terror proxies Hamas, in Gaza, and Hezbollah, in southern Lebanon, there remains concerns its networks could inflict some significant damage on the US and its allies.
Middle East 'regime change'
Mr Trump's strikes have opened the door on further American involvement in the Middle East, just months after he vowed to put an end to the country's militaristic involvement in the region. The Republican even made mention of an increasingly loathed phrase in the US, namely "regime change" which invokes doomed projects to establish flourishing democracies in Afghanistan and Iraq following the 9/11 attacks.
In a post shared to his social media platform TruthSocial, Mr Trump said: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!"
The post reflects a change in tone from Mr Trump, who previously slammed both Democrats and Republicans over their support for regime change rhetoric over Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan.
Military bases on red alert
British forces stationed across the Middle East are now on red alert for potential drone strikes from Iran, Defence Secretary John Healey warned. He added protection of UK Armed Forces was now at its "highest level" following the bombing campaign.
In a column in The Telegraph, he said: "The safety of UK personnel and bases is my top priority. Force protection is at its highest level, and we deployed additional jets this week."
Strait closure risks 'economic suicide'
Iran has warned it could shut down a vital Middle East oil "choke point" that could send oil prices spiking across the globe. The US has warned any closure of the Strait of Hormuz would be a "terrible mistake."
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Fox News: "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil.
"If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
29 minutes ago
- Daily Record
What is the Strait of Hormuz and why does it matter to global trade?
The UK could be hit hard if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz in response to American strikes on its nuclear sites Fears of a widening conflict in the Middle East have deepened in recent days after the US bombed Iran. President Donald Trump made the unprecedented decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend. The UK was not involved in the air strikes but was informed beforehand. John Swinney has called for the conflict to end, while Keir Starmer said Iran's nuclear programme is a "grave threat" which US military action would "alleviate". The world is now bracing for Iran's response to the US joining Israel in the biggest western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. One way Iran could hit back, according to analysts, is to close off the strait of Hormuz, a vital trade route, through which over a fifth of the world's oil supply, 20m barrels, and much of its liquified gas, passes each day. Iran's parliament approved a measure to close the strait. Iran has threatened to close the strait in the past, which would restrict trade and impact global oil prices, but has never followed through. This time may be different, though. What is the strait of Hormuz? The strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and links the Gulf to the north with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond. It is 33km wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 3km wide. The strait is one of the world's most important oil chokepoints and is crucial to the US and beyond, as the strength of the global economy is heavily dependent on the flow of oil. Why is it so important? About one-fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. Between the start of 2022 and last month, approximately 17.8 million to 20.8m barrels of crude, condensate, and fuels flowed through the strait daily, according to data from analytics firm Vortexa. Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) – Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq – export most of their crude via the strait, mainly to Asia. The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, is tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the area. What happens if it closes? Closing the strait would trigger a global oil crisis, skyrocket inflation rates and potentially plunge the economy into a downturn. On Sunday, specialists cautioned that such a move to shut the strait might also elicit "a significant military response" from both the US and its allies. Ami Daniel, CEO of maritime data company Windward, noted that even the mere "perception" of an Iranian assault on shipping could reduce maritime traffic to a mere trickle. Countless drivers could be hit with soaring fuel costs at the filling stations. The UK, which relies on imports for roughly half its oil supply, stands to be particularly exposed. Iran has been warned that shutting down the strait would be tantamount to "economic suicide", as reported by The Telegraph. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called on Iran's allies, including China, to exert pressure on Tehran to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, stating that any closure would be a "terrible mistake". Iranian oil also uses the same gateway, and shutting Hormuz risks bringing Gulf Arab states, who have been highly critical of the Israeli attack, into the war to safeguard their own interests, according to The Guardian. China would be particularly affected. The world's second-largest economy buys almost 90 per cent of Iran's oil exports, which are subject to international sanctions. What is Iran saying about the strait? Iranian lawmakers have voted to obstruct vital shipping routes through this key waterway after Trump decided to engage in the conflict between Israel and Iran. Iran's Press TV reported at the weekend that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the strait of Hormuz However, the vote by the Iranian parliament is not definitive, and state television has emphasised that the ultimate decision lies with Iran's top security officials. On Sunday Iran's foreign minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, said that Trump's decision to bomb Iran " will have everlasting consequences". Israel has made a "grave mistake" and "must be punished." He did not, however, make any specific reference to the strait of Hormuz. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Israel hits Iranian government targets, including Evin Prison in Tehran
'The Iranian dictator will be punished with full force for attacking the Israeli home front,' the ministry said. The move came after the US bombed Iranian nuclear sites (Iranian Army Press Service via AP) Iran's underground enrichment site at Fordo, which was one of those hit in Sunday's attack by the US on three nuclear facilities, was also struck again on Monday, Iranian state television reported. There was no immediate word on damage nor who launched the attack, though Israel said earlier it was conducting airstrikes on Iran. In Vienna, the head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog said he expected there to be heavy damage at the Fordo facility already following Sunday's US airstrike there with sophisticated bunker-buster bombs. 'Given the explosive payload utilised … very significant damage … is expected to have occurred,' said Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency. With the strikes on Sunday on Iranian nuclear sites, the United States inserted itself into Israel's war, prompting fears of a wider regional conflict. Iran said the US had crossed 'a very big red line' with its risky gambit to strike the three sites with missiles and 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. IAEA Director General @RafaelMGrossi addressed the Board of Governors this morning at an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Iran. — IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency ⚛️ (@iaeaorg) June 23, 2025 Several Iranian officials, including Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi, have claimed Iran removed nuclear material from targeted sites ahead of time. Mr Grossi told the IAEA board of governors on Monday that Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi had informed him on June 13 that Iran would 'adopt special measures to protect nuclear equipment and materials'. 'I indicated that any transfer of nuclear material from a safeguarded facility to another location in Iran must be declared,' Mr Grossi said, without saying whether Iran had responded. Iran described its Monday attack on Israel as a new wave of its Operation 'True Promise 3,' saying it was targeting the Israeli cities of Haifa and Tel Aviv, according to Iranian state television. Explosions were also heard in Jerusalem. There were no immediate reports of damage. In Iran, witnesses reported Israeli airstrikes hit areas around Iran's capital, Tehran, around midday. Iranian state television confirmed one Israeli strike hit the gate of Iran's notorious Evin prison. Foreign ministers remain focused on a diplomatic solution, but concerns about the war escalating are high. Any Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz would be extremely dangerous. My doorstep ahead of today's Foreign Affairs Council ↓ — Kaja Kallas (@kajakallas) June 23, 2025 The report shared what appeared to be black-and-white-surveillance footage of the strike. The prison is known for holding dual nationals and Westerners often used by Iran as bargaining chips in negotiations with the West. Israel did not immediately acknowledge carrying out the strike. Evin also has specialised units for political prisoners and those with Western ties, run by the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which answers only to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The facility is the target of both US and European Union sanctions.
Metro
31 minutes ago
- Metro
Map shows safest countries to be in if global conflict breaks out
As the US joins Israel in its strikes on Iran and its nuclear facilities and Iran retaliates with attacks on Israel, fears have grown over 'World War 3' breaking out. Overnight 20 Israeli jets targeted military infrastructure in Kermansh in western Iran and vowed to continue hitting the country, while they also continue to pummel Gaza and its people. Iran meanwhile appears to have fired just the one drone towards Israel overnight, which Israeli officials say was shot down. It's not clear if their limited response is down to a depleted missile capacity or if the Iranian leadership is just considering its next move. But United Nations ambassador Vassily Nebenzia told an emergency meeting of the US Security Council on Sunday he feared the conflict would escalate significantly, saying 'no one knows what new catastrophes and suffering it [the Israeli attacks on Iran] will bring.' He said Russia offered to mediate an agreeable solution to Iran's nuclear programme, but the US – especially its leaders – are 'clearly not interested in diplomacy today.' Nebenzia warned: 'Unless we stop the escalation, the Middle East will find itself on the verge of a large scale conflict with unpredictable consequences for the entire international security system, plus the entire world might end up on the verge of a nuclear disaster.' There are also ongoing fears war between the west and Russia could break out after an escalation in nuclear threats from Putin. Vladimir Putin previously said he he had lowered the bar for carrying out a nuclear strike. Russia's official nuclear doctrine, which previously said the country could only use nuclear weapons in response to a nuclear attack, last year said the country can use such weapons in response to conventional strikes. Analysts said the move was an open threat to the US and UK, who allowed Ukraine to fire longer-range Western-supplied missiles into Russia. Open conflict between the powers would likely drag in allies from across the globe. If 'World War III' did break out, however, some parts of the world are likely to avoid the brunt. Here we take a closer look at where might be a sensible place to hide out. The continent sits at the most southerly point of the planet making it one of the safest places to survive a nuclear war. There is an enormous geographic distance between Antarctica and countries with nuclear warheads. With more than 14 million square kilometres, there is plenty of room for people to take refuge. But some may find the icy and freezing climate unforgiving. Iceland has earned a reputation as one of the most peaceful countries in the world. The country has consistently topped the Global Peace Index, having never taken part in a full-scale war or invasion. Iceland's government has signed bilateral agreements with Ukraine, although its support is limited to financing and a small amount of transportation. A relatively remote island geographically, it would avoid the effects of conventional war in Europe – although the fallout of widespread nuclear strikes on the mainland would likely reach its shores in small amounts. New Zealand ranks second in the Global Peace Index and has taken a neutral stance on most conflicts. The country also has a mountainous terrain making it easier for citizens to be protected. The Kiwi government has provided financial support to Ukraine's military and assisted in action against Russia in the International Court of Justice. However it is extremely unlikely to face any attacks in the event of a Western conflict with Russia. This country is the most readily associated with political neutrality, even during World War Two. It is well protected by its terrain, landlocked geography and various nuclear shelters. Switzerland is one of the few European countries not to have provided assistance to Ukraine, and has even been accused of favouring Russia through its neutrality – so Putin is unlikely to see it as an enemy. The Swiss government has blocked the delivery of Swiss-made weapons and ammo bought from other European countries who blocked them. Greenland is the world's largest island and it belongs to Denmark. It is geographically remote, and politically neutral. The island's current population of 56,000 people means it is unlikely to be targeted by any superpower. Indonesia has often taken a neutral stance on political issues, with the country's first president, Achmed Sukarno, describing their foreign policy as 'free and active'. They act independently within international affairs, and say they are most concerned with world peace. Tuvalu is located in the Pacific Ocean, halfway between Hawaii and Australia. Only 11,000 people live on the island and it has weak infrastructure. It also has a limited number of natural resources, meaning it would make an undesirable target to any aggressors. Although Argentina has engaged in conflict, most notably during the Falklands War in 1982, the country is one of the most likely places to survive famine. The country has an abundance of crop, including wheat, which means if nuclear dust were to block the sun, Argentinians will already have crops in supply. In 1971 Bhutan declared itself neutral in regards to any conflict after joining the United Nations. It is also landlocked and surrounded by mountainous regions, making it easier to defend the country. The country's 4,000 mile long coastline spans the distance between Moscow and Madrid. Chile is also home to a variety of different crops and natural resources, making survival easier. Its infrastructure and development is also considered the most advanced in South America. The island nation is 2,700 miles away from its closest country Australia. Along with a lack of clear military strategy and an army consisting of just 6,000 soldiers, Fiji ranks highly on the Global Peace Index. More Trending Much of the island is also made up of dense forests, minerals and fishing spots. South Africa is home to multiple sources of food, fertile land and fresh water, making survival easy. The country's modern infrastructure could also increase chances of survival as these resources are managed. This is an updated version of a previous article published November 22, 2024. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Iran threatens to return '50,000 US soldiers in coffins' after Trump's strikes MORE: Meet Britain's Doomsday preppers stockpiling for World War Three MORE: Four places which could be safe if World War Three erupts – including one in UK
