Small NZ Company Wins Contract to Supply UK With Drones Bound for Ukraine
A four-year-old New Zealand company, operating from an unassuming warehouse in Tauranga—best known as a seaside holiday and retirement location—has won a NZ$66.8 million (US$39.88 million) contract to supply the UK government with drones for use in Ukraine.
Syos Aerospace was formed in 2021 and specialises in the manufacture of uncrewed vehicles for air, land, and sea use.
It makes 'heavy-lift' unmanned helicopters suitable for aerial operations in remote locations. Its flagship model is the SA200, with a payload capacity of 200 kilograms and a flight endurance of 2 hours.
The company already has a production site in the UK and plans to expand into Australia and the United States.
Syos has developed a proprietary control system that can operate in areas where satellite-based navigation is unavailable or unreliable due to various factors such as interference, signal blockage, or intentional jamming.
The drones use AI to support remote human pilots but can also operate autonomously. Built at its factory in Hampshire, southeast of London, they have previously been deployed to combat zones.
Related Stories
4/8/2025
4/22/2025
The deal was announced by British Prime Minister Sir Kier Starmer as the UK and New Zealand both increase their defence spending to 2.5 and 2 percent of GDP, respectively, and NZ Prime Minister Chris Luxon visits Britain.
The expansion of defence spending has led Syos to forecast that its revenue will triple in the coming year.
Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer (C) and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky (2nd-R) attend a presentation of Ukrainian military drones in Kyiv, on Jan. 16, 2025.
TETIANA DZHAFAROVA/AFP via Getty Images
Starmer said in a statement that the two countries would continue to work 'to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position to deter an increasingly aggressive Russia.'
'From the beaches of Gallipoli to the vital work we have been doing together on Operation Interflex and our support for Ukraine, the UK and New Zealand have stood shoulder-to-shoulder for generations in pursuit of peace and stability,' he said.
New Zealand, which has also been contributing to plans for post-conflict support for Ukraine through the Coalition of the Willing, confirmed on April 23 that it would extend its support for Operation Interflex.
The operation has trained more than 54,000 Ukrainian soldiers in the UK to date and will now continue until the end of the year. Luxon visited on April 22 to see the training firsthand.
The two countries plan to increase their cooperation on defence and security matters.
The UK government has confirmed that the respective defence ministers were instructed to work on a new joint defence partnership to replace the one signed in 2015.
'It will also recognise the vital partnership between the UK and New Zealand in upholding stability and security across Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific,' a government release said.
The Royal New Zealand Navy frigate HMNZS Te Kaha has joined the UK Carrier Strike Group, which left Portsmouth today bound for the Indian Ocean.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
An isolated Iran looks for allies on the world stage
Iran's top diplomat arrives in Moscow after the U.S. attack on three nuclear sites. Former Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul warns that its the U.S who is "isolating itself", which leaves an opening for China.
CNBC
23 minutes ago
- CNBC
U.S. strikes in Iran spark airline cancellations and travel turmoil
Commercial airlines around the world on Monday were weighing how long to suspend Middle East flights after the U.S. struck Iran. Singapore Airlines, one of the highest-profile in Asia, had called the situation "fluid" on Sunday as it cancelled flights from Singapore to Dubai following a security assessment. The Middle East route has become more important for flights between Europe and Asia since Russian and Ukrainian airspace closed due to war, but flight tracking website FlightRadar24 showed empty space over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. Air France said on Sunday that it cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Riyadh on Sunday and Monday. British Airways, owned by IAG, also cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Doha for Sunday. It was still reviewing the situation, it said in a statement on Sunday evening, when asked about later flights. Missile and drone barrages in a growing number of conflict zones represent a high risk to airline traffic, and an organization that monitors flight risks, Safe Airspace, a website run by OPSGROUP, warned on Sunday that U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear sites could heighten the threat to American operators in the region. In the days before the U.S. strikes, American Airlines suspended flights to Qatar and United Airlines UAL.O did the same with flights to Dubai. Airlines are also concerned about a potential spike in oil prices following the U.S. attacks, which will increase the cost of jet fuel. Israel meanwhile is ramping up flights to help stranded travellers at home and abroad. The country's Airports Authority says that so-called rescue flights to the country would expand on Monday with 24 a day, although each flight would be limited to 50 passengers. Israeli airline El Al on Sunday said it had received applications to leave the country from about 25,000 people in about a day.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's how Iran could retaliate after US strikes on its nuclear program
Iran has spent decades building multi-tiered military capabilities at home and across the region that were at least partly aimed at deterring the United States from attacking it. By entering Israel's war, the U.S. may have removed the last rationale for holding them in reserve. That could mean a wave of attacks on U.S. forces in the Middle East, an attempt to close a key bottleneck for global oil supplies or a dash to develop a nuclear weapon with what remains of Iran's disputed program after American strikes on three key sites. A decision to retaliate against the U.S. and its regional allies would give Iran a far larger target bank and one that is much closer than Israel, allowing it to potentially use its missiles and drones to greater effect. The U.S. and Israel have far superior capabilities, but those haven't always proven decisive in America's recent history of military interventions in the region. Ever since Israel started the war with a surprise bombardment of Iran's military and nuclear sites on June 13, Iranian officials from the supreme leader on down have warned the U.S. to stay out, saying it would have dire consequences for the entire region. It should soon be clear whether those were empty threats or a grim forecast. Here's a look at what Iran's next move might be. Targeting the Strait of Hormuz The Strait of Hormuz is the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf, through which some 20% of all oil traded globally passes, and at its narrowest point it is just 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide. Any disruption there could send oil prices soaring worldwide and hit American pocketbooks. Iran boasts a fleet of fast-attack boats and thousands of naval mines that could potentially make the strait impassable, at least for a time. It could also fire missiles from its long Persian Gulf shore, as its allies, Yemen's Houthi rebels, have done in the Red Sea. The U.S., with its 5th Fleet stationed in nearby Bahrain, has long pledged to uphold freedom of navigation in the strait and would respond with far superior forces. But even a relatively brief firefight could paralyze shipping traffic and spook investors, causing oil prices to spike and generating international pressure for a ceasefire. Attacking US bases and allies in the region The U.S. has tens of thousands of troops stationed in the region, including at permanent bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, Arab Gulf countries just across the Persian Gulf from Iran — and much closer than Israel. Those bases boast the same kinds of sophisticated air defenses as Israel, but would have much less warning time before waves of missiles or swarms of armed drones. And even Israel, which is several hundred kilometers (miles) further away, has been unable to stop all of the incoming fire. Iran could also choose to attack key oil and gas facilities in those countries with the goal of exacting a higher price for U.S. involvement in the war. A drone attack on two major oil sites in Saudi Arabia in 2019 — claimed by the Houthis but widely blamed on Iran — briefly cut the kingdom's oil production in half. Activating regional allies Iran's so-called Axis of Resistance — a network of militant groups across the Middle East, is a shadow of what it was before the war ignited by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel out of the Gaza Strip — but it still has some formidable capabilities. Israel's 20-month war in Gaza has severely diminished the Palestinian Hamas and Islamic Jihad groups, and Israel mauled Lebanon's Hezbollah last fall, killing most of its top leadership and devastating much of southern Lebanon, making its involvement unlikely. But Iran could still call on the Houthis, who had threatened to resume their attacks in the Red Sea if the U.S. entered the war, and allied militias in Iraq. Both have drone and missile capabilities that would allow them to target the United States and its allies. Iran could also seek to respond through militant attacks further afield, as it is widely accused of doing in the 1990s with an attack on a Jewish community center in Argentina that was blamed on Tehran and Hezbollah. A sprint toward nuclear arms It could be days or weeks before the full impact of the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites is known. But experts have long warned that even joint U.S. and Israeli strikes would only delay Iran's ability to develop a weapon, not eliminate it. That's because Iran has dispersed its program across the country to several sites, including hardened, underground facilities. Iran would likely struggle to repair or reconstitute its nuclear program while Israeli and U.S. warplanes are circling overhead. But it could still decide to fully end its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. North Korea announced its withdrawal from the treaty in 2003 and tested a nuclear weapon three years later, but it had the freedom to develop its program without punishing airstrikes. Iran insists its program is peaceful, though it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA assess Iran hasn't had an organized military nuclear program since 2003. Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but does not acknowledge having such weapons. ___ Gambrell reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Joseph Krauss And Jon Gambrell, The Associated Press
