Trump's Un-American Parade
To discern the values of a nation and its leaders, watch their parades. Tomorrow, on the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, President Donald Trump plans not only to display the country's military might but also to present himself as its supreme leader. Some 6,600 soldiers and 200 tanks, warplanes, helicopters, and the like are expected to descend on Washington, D.C., to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. According to reports, parachuters will land on the Ellipse, where Trump instructed rioters on January 6 to 'fight like hell,' and submit to him a folded American flag. All of this will occur on the president's birthday, which spurs the question of whether we're celebrating the country or the man who seeks to dominate it.
President George Washington offered a very different model of an American parade—one better suited for a moment that tested the nation's founding principles. In October 1789, Washington was scheduled to visit Boston, which had planned a celebration in his honor. Unlike Trump, Washington resisted attempts to turn the event into a military display. The very notion of a ceremony organized around him made the first president uneasy.
As Washington explained to John Hancock, the governor of Massachusetts, 'I am highly sensible of the honor intended me. But could my wish prevail, I should desire to visit your metropolis without any parade, or extraordinary ceremony.' Various newspapers echoed his concern. The Herald of Freedom reminded readers that Washington was traveling to Boston 'not for the purposes of empty parade, or to acquire the applause of gaping multitudes.' He needed no 'splendid mercenary guard.'
Eliot A. Cohen: A parade of ignorance
Hancock failed to get the message. He insisted that the president deserved a grand military spectacle. Without consulting Washington, he put forward his own plan. As Hancock explained, 'a military parade has been determined, & a body of about 800 men, will be under arms at Cambridge on the day of your entering Boston.' To the governor's shock, Washington objected. After some delicate negotiations, Hancock eventually accepted a much smaller number of soldiers.
Other elected officials in Boston apparently understood America's ideals more clearly than Hancock did. They organized a parade that honored not just Washington and the military but also the city's artisans and tradespeople. Workers marched past the president in alphabetical order: First came the bakers and blacksmiths; much later, the wharfingers and wheelwrights. They carried banners expressing pride in their various crafts and in the values that united the nascent republic. The carvers displayed their belief that the Arts flourish under Liberty. The coppersmiths extolled Union. The lemon dealers proclaimed Success through Trade.
Although the day was very cold and the parade lasted many hours, the event pleased Washington because it represented what was, for him, the most important achievement of the American Revolution. That achievement wasn't military in nature but political: a constitutional republic based on the will of the people, dedicated to advancing prosperity and protecting liberty. In Boston, he witnessed newly empowered citizens giving voice to an egalitarian order. 'Your love of liberty—your respect for the laws—your habits of industry, and your practice of the moral and religious obligations,' he observed, 'are the strongest claims to national and individual happiness.'
Washington served in the Continental Army, so he understood the sacrifices that soldiers make for their country, and the public reverence those sacrifices are due. But he also knew the dangers of using the military for personal purposes. He saw clearly the need for the citizens of a republic to stand vigilant against the pretensions of a leader who would use the Army to flex his own might. He had no wish to become America's elected monarch.
The current president may eagerly anticipate the sound of marching troops, warplanes, and tanks, a display to rival those of Vladimir Putin in Moscow. But for the many Americans now anxious about their basic rights, these spectacles ought to be a warning. As The Massachusetts Magazine explained in 1789, the freer 'the constitution of any country, the less we see of pageant, titles, and ceremonies.' What looks like an excess of strength may really be a deficit of liberty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm an Economist: 4 Questions To Ask About Tariffs (and 2 Not To Worry About)
President Trump's tariffs has been dominating headlines for months now, prompting concerns about how they may affect everything from grocery bills to investment accounts. While it's tempting to react to every trade policy shift, not all impacts are immediate or relevant to everyday consumers. Trending Now: Try This: Here's a quick breakdown on Trump's tariffs, why they have been implemented, and what everyone knows so far: Tariffs are taxes charged on imported goods. For example, a 10% tariff means a $10 product would have a $1 tax on top, which would make your total $11. President Trump has doubled U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50%. There is a 25% tax on imports from both Canada and Mexico and a 10% levy on Canadian energy. Though there has been a lot of back and forth as to the amount, the current tariff on goods from China is 20%. The White House also implemented a 20% tariff on most European Union goods, but halved it to 10% until July 8, 2025, to allow time for trade talks. Trump is mandating that most countries have a 10% 'baseline' tariff on all goods sent to the U.S. GOBankingRates spoke with Jared Ashworth, Ph.D., assistant professor of economics at Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, to determine the four questions you should be asking about tariffs — and the two things you shouldn't worry about. Most consumers don't need to follow every twist in trade policy. However, they do need to understand how tariffs might affect their wallets, savings and investments. Here are four practical financial questions worth asking right now. Uncertainty is the biggest concern about the tariffs. 'In recent months, there have been significant swings in what the actual tariffs will be,' Ashworth said. 'Many of these tariffs could also be rolled back if, for example, a target country changes its trade policy.' This has caused a lot of uncertainty. 'As a result, financial markets have become much more uncertain. Standard advice about risk and uncertainty, like considering your risk aversion or how close you are to retirement, matters even more in this context,' Ashworth said. Many retailers have already or will likely adjust their prices quickly in anticipation of the tariffs. According to Wired, the price of refrigerator staples like apple juice is already increasing, as most apple juice that Americans drink comes from China. Apple juice is just one of the many goods American consumers count on that will likely become more expensive due to the tariffs. 'The goal of tariffs is to allow domestic firms to charge higher prices and compete with the raised prices of international firms,' Ashworth said. Consumers are making big purchases in anticipation of the tariffs. For example, sales of cars and motor vehicles parts were up by 8.8% from last year, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. 'Most people won't be able to gain by making major changes based on broad news,' Ashworth said. 'For example, with cars, even though the vehicles currently on lots weren't directly affected by tariffs, the rush to buy before the tariffs take full effect has driven up prices.' According to USA Today, the manufacturing, construction, transportation, warehousing, retail and supply chain sectors are most likely to be affected by tariffs and are paring back on hiring. Ashworth said individuals should consider shifting investments to companies less affected by tariffs, even though the market expectations are already reflected in stock prices. Healthcare and financial services are among the sectors that are still poised to grow or remain stable, per USA Today. Tariffs can feel like a threat to every part of one's financial life, but not all impacts are immediate or personal. Here's what to set aside for now. The uncertainty about the impact of the tariffs also means that it's hard to know what will happen next or how long the effects will last. 'While the U.S. is part of a globally connected economy, imports and exports still make up a relatively small percentage of the GDP (Gross Domestic Product),' Ashworth said. 'The idea of a full-out trade war often depends on how it's framed, which is part of the problem.' For example, tariffs are viewed as either a measure that protects domestic industries or a policy that punishes countries engaging in unfair trade. 'But those goals can be contradictory,' Ashworth said. 'If tariffs are a punishment, then the once the country reforms its trade practices, we're expected to drop the tariffs, potentially ending the protection for domestic industries.' It's easy to feel powerless when trade policy shifts overnight. But for most consumers, the best response isn't control; it's adaptability. 'While tariffs can affect exchange rates and relative interest rates, most of those impacts aren't something everyday people can or should try to take advantage of,' Ashworth said. 'Unless you have direct influence over national policy, there's little you can do to change it. Instead, focus on staying flexible in this period of heightened uncertainty.' While there isn't much that can be done when it comes to government policy, consumers can take other actions to protect themselves and their finances. 'As with any pressure that raises prices, find ways to reduce consumption and spend less. While tariffs might contribute to a recession, individuals should still prioritize cutting back on spending and increasing savings,' Ashworth said. Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on I'm an Economist: 4 Questions To Ask About Tariffs (and 2 Not To Worry About) Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Veterans pay debts while reality TV elites get pardons
It's disheartening to see veterans penalized for government errors while wealthy tax evaders walk free and secure media deals. Justice should honor sacrifice — yet far too often, it rewards fame and fortune. This is not just mismanagement; it is a systemic betrayal. We must demand a system that truly values those who serve. The Department of Veterans Affairs is reclaiming from disabled veterans billions in alleged overpayments. Many of these veterans were unaware of this until they received debt notices months or even years later. Meanwhile, elites emerge from prison with smiles, stylists and TV contracts. Todd and Julie Chrisley, convicted of millions in tax fraud, were pardoned by President Trump. Days later, news broke that they would return to television with a rebooted reality show produced by Scout Productions. The agents are reportedly tied to Trump-aligned media and political circles, proving once again how power and privilege convert even scandal into profit. And while they sign new deals, veterans remain on hold with the VA Debt Management Center, disputing errors that might cost them rent. Where is our president and commander-in-chief? The numbers don't make sense. The VA has issued $5.1 billion in overpayments since 2021 and is now aggressively trying to recoup those funds from veterans, many disabled, retired or transitioning out of service. IRS data from 2024 shows the wealthiest Americans evade more than $150 billion in taxes each year. And what did Congress do? It rescinded $20.2 billion in IRS funding, cutting the resources needed to pursue those very tax cheats. In other words, the Trump administration is actively targeting working-class veterans and letting billionaires off the hook. Service, sacrifice and integrity are not political ideas, but American ideals. When we demand repayments from disabled veterans while pardoning millionaire fraudsters, we don't just betray those who served, but the very foundation of what America is meant to represent. We don't need more lawmakers, but leaders who remember the purpose and legacy of the oath to defend life, liberty, and the sacred right of free will. This is not a partisan issue, and it's time to call this what it is: moral decay at the highest level. Tim James, a retired U.S. Navy lieutenant, served 22 years honorably — 11 years enlisted and 11 years as a commissioned officer through the Navy's Limited Duty Officer program. He is a volunteer with Veterans For Ethical Leadership and advocates for policies that uphold the dignity of service and expose systemic failures affecting veterans and democracy.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Biden in Juneteenth remarks rips ‘efforts to erase history'
Former President Biden during a speech Thursday night to mark Juneteenth, the holiday that commemorates the emancipation of slaves in the U.S. in the 1860s, blasted 'efforts to erase history.' 'I took the view as president, we need to be honest about our history — especially in the face of ongoing efforts to erase our history,' Biden said at a historically Black church in Galveston, Texas, founded by slaves in 1848. Biden also took a swipe at President Trump's decision to restore the names of military installations that honored Confederate generals. 'I played a role in changing names of all those military camps with names tied to slavery,' Biden said. 'What are they doing now? Reinstating those names.' 'Folks, darkness can hide much but can erase nothing, and only with truth can come justice and healing,' he added. Congress passed bipartisan legislation to make Juneteenth a federal holiday in 2021, and Biden signed it into law. 'Democrats and Republicans came together in overwhelming numbers memorialize this profound moment in American history,' Biden recalled late Thursday. 'The events of Juneteenth are of monumental importance to the American story.' Trump, who vowed on the campaign trail in 2020 to establish Juneteenth as a federal holiday, didn't formally recognize the holiday on Thursday, as he had during his first term. He posted on social media that there are 'too many non-working holidays.' 'Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked during Thursday's press briefing whether Trump planned to sign a Juneteenth proclamation. 'I'm not tracking his signature on a proclamation today,' she said. 'We are working 24/7 right now.'
