'Serious problem': Afghan capital losing race against water shortages
Every week, Bibi Jan scrapes together some of her husband's meager daily wage to buy precious water from rickshaw-drawn tankers that supply residents of Afghanistan's increasingly parched capital.
Kabul faces a looming water crisis, driven by unruly and rapid urbanization, mismanagement over years of conflict, and climate change, meaning people like Bibi Jan are sometimes forced to choose between food and water.
"When my children have only tea for a few days, they say, 'You bought water and nothing for us,'" the 45-year-old housewife said, describing reusing her supplies for bathing, dishes and laundry.
Experts have long sounded the alarm over Kabul's water problems, which are worsening even as many international players have backed off big infrastructure projects and slashed funding to Afghanistan since the Taliban government took power in 2021.
"There could be no ground water in Kabul by 2030" without urgent action, the U.N. children's agency UNICEF warned last year.
Other experts are more cautious, citing limited consistent and reliable data, but say the situation is clearly deteriorating.
A 2030 cliff is a "worst-case scenario," said water resources management expert Assem Mayar.
But even if slated development projects are completed in a few years, it "doesn't mean the situation would become better than now," Mayar said.
"As time goes on, the problems are only increasing," he added, as population growth outstrips urban planning and climate change drives below-average precipitation.
'Decreasing day by day'
The Taliban authorities have launched projects ranging from recycling water to building hundreds of small dams across the country, but larger interventions remain hampered by financing and technical capacity.
They remain unrecognized by any country since they ousted the Western-backed government and imposed their severe interpretation of Islamic law, with restrictions on women a major sticking point.
They have repeatedly called for nongovernmental groups to reboot stalled projects on water and climate change, as Afghanistan faces "some of the harshest effects" in the region, according to the United Nations.
The water and energy ministry wants to divert water from the Panjshir River to the capital, but needs $300 million to $400 million. A dam project near Kabul would ease pressures but was delayed after the Taliban takeover.
For now, Kabul's primary drinking water source is groundwater, as much as 80% of which is contaminated, according to a May report by Mercy Corps.
It is tapped by more than 100,000 unregulated wells across the city that are regularly deepened or run dry, the nongovernmental organization said.
Groundwater can be recharged, but more is drawn each year than is replenished in Kabul, with an estimated annual 76-million-cubic-meter deficit, experts say.
"It's a very serious problem ... Water is decreasing day by day in the city," said Shafiullah Zahidi, who heads central Kabul operations for the state-owned water company UWASS.
Water systems designed decades ago serve just 20% of the city's population, which has exploded to around 6 million over the past 20 years, said Zahidi.
'Use less water'
At one of Kabul's 15 pumping stations, maintenance manager Mohammad Ehsan said the seven-year-old well is already producing less water. Two others nearby sit dry.
"The places with shallower water levels are dried out now," said 53-year-old Ehsan, who has worked in water management for two decades, as he stood over an old well.
It once produced water from a depth of 70 meters, but a newer well had to be bored more than twice as deep to reach groundwater.
At one of the two large stations in the city, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) recently procured four new pumps where only one had been functioning.
"If that pump collapsed for any reason, that means stopping the service for 25,000 beneficiary households," which now have uninterrupted water, said Baraa Afeh, ICRC's deputy water and habitat coordinator.
Everyone in Kabul "should have 24-hour service," said Zahidi, from the state water company.
But in reality, Bibi Jan and many other Kabulis are forced to lug water in heavy jugs from wells or buy it from tankers.
These suppliers charge at least twice as much as the state-owned utility, with potable water even more pricey in a country where 85% of the population lives on less than a dollar a day.
Bibi Jan said she has to police her family's water use carefully.
"I tell them, 'I'm not a miser but use less water.' Because if the water runs out then what would we do?"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
3 days ago
- NHK
Dealing with the Taliban, securing female rights
Some four years after the Taliban retook power in Afghanistan, no country has recognized the group as the legitimate government. But some are looking to improve relations, despite human rights concerns.
Japan Times
5 days ago
- Japan Times
U.N. slashes global aid plan over 'deepest funding cuts ever'
The United Nations said on Monday that it was drastically scaling back its global humanitarian aid plans due to the "deepest funding cuts ever" — leaving tens of millions of people facing dire straits. The U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said it was seeking $29 billion in funding for 2025 compared to the $44 billion originally requested in December, in a "hyper-prioritised" appeal. UNHCR, the U.N. refugee agency, said later on Monday that it would have to terminate 3,500 jobs, cutting 30% of its workforce costs, as aid funding evaporates. Since U.S. President Donald Trump returned to office in January, the United States — the world's top donor — has heavily slashed foreign aid, causing havoc in the humanitarian sector across the globe. Drastic U.S. funding cuts have had dramatic consequences for emergency aid, vaccination campaigns and the distribution of drugs to fight AIDS. Other major donor countries have also cut back their contributions in the face of an uncertain economic outlook. "Brutal funding cuts leave us with brutal choices," OCHA chief Tom Fletcher said in a statement. "All we ask is 1% of what you chose to spend last year on war." 'Cruel', 'heartbreaking' In late April, while visiting a hospital in Kandahar in Afghanistan, Fletcher warned, "The impact of aid cuts is that millions die." Almost halfway through 2025, the U.N. has received only $5.6 billion out of the $44 billion originally sought for this year — a mere 13%. In total, the original plan covered more than 70 countries and aimed to assist nearly 190 million vulnerable people. Even so, that plan acknowledged that there were 115 million people the U.N. would not be able to reach. "We have been forced into a triage of human survival," Fletcher said on Monday. The mathematics "is cruel, and the consequences are heartbreaking." "Too many people will not get the support they need, but we will save as many lives as we can with the resources we are given," he said. Aid will now be directed so that it can "reach the people and places facing the most urgent needs," with those in "extreme or catastrophic conditions" as the starting point, said Fletcher. 'Red alert' Fletcher's call came as the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Food Programme (WFP) issued a joint early warning report identifying worsening hunger in 13 hot spots. Sudan, the Palestinian territories, South Sudan, Haiti and Mali have communities "already facing famine, at risk of famine or confronted with catastrophic levels of acute food insecurity," said the report. "The devastating crises are being exacerbated by growing access constraints and critical funding shortfalls," it said. Yemen, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar and Nigeria are now considered of very high concern and requiring urgent attention to save lives, it added, with Burkina Faso, Chad, Somalia and Syria the other hot spots. "This report is a red alert," said WFP chief Cindy McCain. "Without funding and access, we cannot save lives. Urgent, sustained investment in food assistance and recovery support is crucial as the window to avert yet more devastating hunger is closing fast." Refugee agency slashes jobs Washington previously made up more than 40% of the UNHCR refugee agency's budget — $2 billion per year, the agency's chief Filippo Grandi told the U.N. Security Council in April. "In light of difficult financial realities, UNHCR is compelled to reduce the overall scale of its operations," Grandi said in Monday's statement. UNHCR estimates that it will end 2025 with available funding at about the same level as a decade ago — despite the number of people forced to flee their homes having nearly doubled over the same period to more than 122 million. "In total, approximately 3,500 staff positions will be discontinued," the statement said, while hundreds of temporary workers have gone already. "Overall, UNHCR estimates a global reduction in staffing costs of around 30%," the agency said.
Japan Times
10-06-2025
- Japan Times
Trump's cuts are 'devastating' for vulnerable women worldwide, U.N. says
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has faced budget cuts before, but the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's policies has been even more "devastating" for reproductive health worldwide, chief Natalia Kanem said. The agency has been targeted by U.S. conservatives since the Kemp-Kasten Amendment's enactment in 1985 by Congress, when the administration of then President Ronald Reagan rallied against China's population policies, accusing Beijing of promoting forced abortions and sterilizations. All subsequent Republican presidencies have cut U.S. funding to UNFPA, and the second Trump administration is no exception. "We've had over $330 million worth of projects ended," virtually overnight, in "some of the hardest-hit regions of the world" like Afghanistan, Kanem said in an interview coinciding with the release of the UNFPA's annual report Tuesday. "So yes, we are suffering." Kanem pointed to the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan as an example, where, over the years, more than 18,000 pregnancies were delivered by "heroic midwives" who "conducted these over 18,000 deliveries without a single maternal death, which you know, in a crisis situation is extraordinary." "Those maternity wards today have closed. The funding cuts immediately have meant that those midwives are no longer able to do their jobs," Kanem said. Although it is too soon to estimate the precise impacts of the U.S. cuts, they will inevitably result in increased maternal mortality and more unintended pregnancies, according to Kanem. "What's different this time for UNFPA is that our ecosystem of other reproductive health actors who might be able to fill in for us," Kanem said, adding they are "reeling from huge impact of having their funding denied." The Trump administration has slashed many such external aid programs. "So, it is very lamentable that this year, to me, has been drastically worse than ever before, precisely because now everybody is caught up in the whirlwind. "The withdrawal of the United States from the funding arena for reproductive health has been devastating," Kanem said. American policy is not only marked by funding cuts, but also a challenge to gender equality matters. "There will be debates about concepts, but there shouldn't be any debate about the nonnegotiability of the rights and choices of women and adolescent girls," Kanem emphasized. "We always embrace change, but we should not compromise on these common values which spell the difference between life and death for women and girls all around the world," she continued. "Women deserve support. Adolescent girls deserve to finish their schooling, not become pregnant, not be bartered or sent off into marriage as a nonsolution to issues that families may face." The UNFPA's annual report, published Tuesday and based on the results of an survey of 14,000 people from 14 countries — nations which represent over a third of the world's population — also underscores concerns that millions of people around the world cannot create the families they desire. More than 40% of those over the age of 50 reported not having the number of children they wanted — with 31% saying they had fewer kids than they desired and 12% saying they had more than they wanted. More than half of respondents said economic barriers prevented them from having more children. Conversely, one in five said they were pressured into having a child, and one in three adults reported an unintended pregnancy. The majority of people "live in countries where fertility rates have fallen so far and so fast that they are below replacement," Kanem said. "We know that the issue of population pressure takes almost like a headline drastic view. Some people think there are way too many people. Others are saying we don't have enough, women should have more babies," Kanem said. "What UNFPA really cares about is a woman's true desire, rights and choices," Kanem said.
