Slashed tyres raises Guernsey deputy's fear for politicians
A Guernsey politician has been targeted by vandals who slashed the tyres of his motorbike, e-bike and his grandson's car while they were parked at his home.Although the motive behind the attack remains unknown, Deputy Peter Roffey suspects it may have been politically motivated.Police said they were investigating the attack after Roffey discovered the damage on Sunday after returning to his St Andrews home from a family bereavement.Roffey, who is standing down at the general election on 18 June after decades of service in the States of Guernsey, said: "At first, I thought it was just bad luck, but when I found all three vehicles had been targeted, it became clear this was deliberate."
He added: "There hasn't been a spate of vandalism in the area, and my property seems to have been specifically targeted."Roffey, who was the youngest ever elected deputy in 1982, said the attack has left a "dusty taste" at the end of his political career. "There's no excuse for this kind of behaviour," he told BBC Radio Guernsey."In Guernsey, politicians are very accessible, if someone is upset with a decision, they can just talk to us."This kind of mindless vandalism is not what our community is about."
'Worst thing'
Roffey said he had faced hostility throughout his political career. He recalled receiving threats, particularly during his campaign to introduce public smoking restrictions nearly 20 years ago.However, he said this was the first time threats had escalated into physical damage."This is probably the worst thing that's actually happened to me," he said. "It's one thing to receive threats, but another to come home and find your property attacked."
Roffey also expressed concern about the message this sends to prospective candidates. "I hope it doesn't put people off standing for election, but I wouldn't blame them if it did," he said. "We need people willing to make tough decisions, and this kind of intimidation narrows the field."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bank of England's Bailey defends bond programme after Reform UK criticism
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters) - Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey defended the central bank's programme of government bond purchases and sales which has come under fire from some politicians for its cost. In a letter to Richard Tice, deputy leader of the Reform UK party which is led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage, Bailey said claims that the programme was more expensive than those run by other central banks did not tell the full story. Britain's government issued more long-term debt than other countries at a time when the BoE's bond-buying - or quantitative easing - was keeping borrowing costs low, giving the country a longer-lasting benefit, Bailey said. "Put simply, the cash flow cost of QE/QT is not therefore what it seems, and the outcome in these terms will be better," he said in the letter published on Monday. Reform - which is leading Britain's more established political parties in opinion polls - has said the government could save as much as 40 billion pounds ($53.6 billion) a year by stopping payment of interest to banks on reserves held at the BoE. Most of those reserves were created as a byproduct of the central bank's bond purchases which began in 2009 and reached a peak of almost 900 billion pounds in holdings in 2021. Since then, the BoE has sold much of its bond portfolio - known as quantitative tightening - and the programme is due to incur losses for the public finances because of a rise in interest rates and a subsequent fall in the value of the bonds. In his letter, Bailey said the bond purchases shielded Britain's economy from a string of economic shocks over the past 16 years. "It is easy to forget the severe problems we faced with these shocks," he said. "Although the counterfactual is unknowable with any precision, most estimates indicate that QE provided very significant support to the UK economy, protecting both jobs and tax revenues." Bailey said that ceasing paying interest on reserves was tantamount to increasing taxes on banks and would lead to lower interest payments for savers or higher interest rates for borrowers. He also disputed Reform's view that British banks were making excess profits. "Interest paid on reserves is not free money for the banks, not least as most of it is paid on to customers in the form of interest on their deposits," Bailey said.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
PSNI disclosing information to inquiry ‘as quickly as it can'
The PSNI is disclosing information to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry 'as quickly as it can', its legal team has said. The pledge came after the overall pace of disclosure to the proceedings was deemed not to be fast enough by the inquiry's counsel. Advertisement The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous UK government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. Philip Henry KC, for the PSNI, said the police service had implemented a new team for the Omagh Bombing Inquiry review, adding that the organisation offers its sincere condolences to those who lost loved ones and its deepest sympathy to all those affected. However, he said there were significant challenges and limitations associated with old, outdated and non-interconnected information technology systems as well as paper records. Advertisement As an example, he said an electronic system that stores criminal investigation papers on the Omagh Bombing holds 26,000 documents of varying length and 2,000 exhibits. In addition, he said the 'magnitude of the request' by the inquiry to provide material in connection with 31 previous attacks and attempted attacks from 25 years ago is 'a huge undertaking'. 'It is important to emphasise that the PSNI is not offering this as an excuse. Rather, it is a candid explanation of what is involved, so that expectations are realistic as to how quickly it is possible to reliably meet the inquiry's requirements. 'The PSNI recognises that any periods of delay can cause frustration. However, the PSNI must also do the work properly – and it is being done as quickly as it can, and in good faith.' Advertisement Mr Henry outlined how it took over three months for three highly trained sensitive researchers to investigate the first three of 31 previous incidents identified by the inquiry. It was believed it would have delayed inquiry proceedings by several years if the PSNI did not allocate additional resources to the process. While the PSNI is also dealing with more than 1,100 other pieces of legacy-related litigation, it decided to reassign all its sensitive researchers who were working on other cases to join the work on the 31 previous incidents for a period of six months. He said this 'exceptional step' was done in the knowledge that it may impact on work on other legacy-related cases. Advertisement 'However, if it did not adopt this course then there would be a delay of several years in progressing the inquiry, which was unacceptable to the PSNI, unacceptable to the inquiry, and would have been unacceptable to the other core participants.' Mr Henry said it will not be possible for the PSNI to disclose all information in an open, public format but said the service would apply for restriction orders only to protect the public interest or national security and to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights. On the subject of making concessions, he said the PSNI will do so if it becomes appropriate but added that it was not possible at this point in time as it is still in the process of reviewing thousands of documents. Ireland UK government's approach to Omagh bomb hearing 'ri... Read More He also said the PSNI believed that the examination of the preventability of the bombing needed to be calibrated with reference to what was reasonably practicable in the circumstances. Advertisement He added that a fair and balanced examination would also have to look at other demands and threats faced by the police at the time. Finally, he noted that it is 'much easier to join the dots after the event, when one already knows the outcome' as he said the inquiry must be aware of 'hindsight bias'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
80-year-old murderer handed third life sentence for prison stabbing
An elderly convicted killer who slit another prisoner's throat in a revenge attack has been handed his third life sentence. Brian Wade, 80, told a judge he was 'quite happy' to receive another maximum sentence and was 'too old to worry about it' as he accepted that he would die in jail. Wade was serving a life sentence for the manslaughter of a young man in 1998 when he attacked fellow inmate Robert Kendrick. He cut his throat with an 'improvised shank' made from a matchstick cutter. Kendrick, 40, was airlifted to hospital but survived. Wade denied attempted murder but admitted wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, stating he wanted to leave a mark 'for him to remember me by'. Judge William Mousley KC said Wade was 'clearly a dangerous offender, even at the age of 80'. Previous convictions Simon Jones, prosecuting, said: 'He has a number of previous convictions for serious violence – a grievous bodily harm in 1965, a life sentence for murder in 1966, a section 18 wounding with intent in 1972 and a life sentence for manslaughter in 1998. 'That sentence is the one he was serving at the time of this offence.' His first killing is believed to have been a neighbour called Edwin Cardwell, 21, in Rotherham, South Yorks, whom he bludgeoned to death with a sledgehammer. The 1998 killing is thought to be Johnathan Abell, a 22-year-old in Nottingham whom Wade killed with a machete and a knife before handing himself in to police. Relationship had turned sexual The court heard that Wade and Kendrick had known each other for about 10 months at the time of the attack at HMP Guys Marsh in Shaftesbury, Dorset, on Oct 28 2022. Kendrick said they had 'bonded' over their mutual love of art and their relationship had turned sexual at one point for about two months. But by October Kendrick was in a relationship with someone else and he told the other prisoner about the previous relationship with Wade. Wade lured Kendrick to his cell. Once there, he tied his hands and feet with shoe laces before cutting his throat with three deliberate movements. The wound came within a centimetre of a main vein in the neck. Mr Jones read a victim impact statement from Kendrick, who has since been released from prison. He said: 'I suffer awful night terrors and replay the incident in my mind. I see Brian on top of me slitting my throat while I lay in a pool of my blood, Brian giggling to himself and rubbing his hands together.' Wade, who represented himself, wrote a letter to the judge before the sentencing hearing to explain the motivation for the attack. He wrote: 'He put a mark on my name and good reputation so I put a mark on his neck as a reminder of what he had done.' Wade told Bournemouth Crown Court: 'I'm quite happy with a life sentence. I'm too old to be worrying about these things, I place myself at your mercy. I will die here in prison, which is fine by me.' Judge Mousley gave Wade another life sentence with a minimum term of 10 and a half years before he can be considered for parole. The court heard that Wade's letter also said that he knew who had stolen his watch and had 'now marked time on him'. The judge asked for the prison to be notified about this threat.
