‘Went too far': Musk says he regrets ‘some' of his posts about Trump
'The conciliatory tone from Musk recently might indicate his desire to protect his businesses in the light of the position he has found himself in,' said Mamta Valechha, consumer discretionary analyst at Tesla investor Quilter Cheviot.
Loading
Tesla shareholder Matthew Britzman, an analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said both Musk and Trump appeared to have de-escalated the situation.
'It still feels unlikely that we'll see these two giant personalities so closely intertwined again, but it's in neither's best interest to let the drama continue,' he said.
Shawn Campbell, adviser and investor at Camelthorn Investments, said the relationship between Musk and Trump could be restored but also said it was unlikely it would return to where it once was. Trump last week threatened to terminate government contracts with Musk's companies.
'The stakes between the richest man in the world and leader of the most powerful nation in the world are just so big, with billions of dollars of government contracts at stake, not to mention the power to investigate and regulate and tax,' said Campbell, who personally holds Tesla shares.
Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles spoke to Musk on Friday, one of the people briefed said. That same day, James Fishback, a Tesla investor and external DOGE adviser, posted on X that the billionaire owed Trump 'a full-throated apology.'
Musk retorted: 'What's the apology for exactly.'
But Musk subsequently deleted several posts, and a senior Trump adviser called Fishback to thank him, according to one of the sources.
Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, spending nearly $US300 million ($460 million) in last year's US elections and taking credit for Republicans retaining a majority of seats in the House and retaking a majority in the Senate.
Loading
Trump then named him to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending.
Musk left the role late last month after criticising Trump's marquee tax bill, calling it too expensive and a measure that would undermine his work at the Department of Government Efficiency.
Declaring their relationship over on Saturday, Trump said there would be 'serious consequences' if Musk decided to fund US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Trump also said he had no intention of repairing ties with Musk.
On Monday, Trump said he would not have a problem if Musk called and that he had no plans to discontinue the Starlink satellite internet provided to the White House by Musk's SpaceX but might move his Tesla off-site.
'We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well,' Trump said. Musk responded with a heart emoji to a video on X showing Trump's remarks.
Tesla shares have recouped all the losses they suffered during the public feuding between Trump and Musk last Thursday, when more than $US150 billion ($231 billion) was wiped off the company's market value.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
an hour ago
- 9 News
The US can end Iran conflict with one call, Iranian official says
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Diplomacy with Iran can "easily" be started again if US President Donald Trump orders Israel's leadership to stop its strikes on Iran, Majid Farahani, an official with the Iranian presidency, told CNN on Friday. "Iran believes in civilian dialogue," he said. "Directly or indirectly is not important." "President Trump can easily stop the war by only one telephone (call) to (the) Israelis," he said, repeating the Iranian position that talks were impossible while Israeli bombs were striking Iran. Majid Farahani speaks during an interview in Tehran, Iran, on Friday. (CNN) Farahani said that Iran would not countenance halting nuclear enrichment – which Tehran insists is for peaceful purposes - but added that concessions were possible. "Maybe it can be lower but we don't stop it," he said. In recent days, European powers have joined American and Israeli calls for a ban on enrichment, hardening their positions on the key issue, with France putting forward "a clear position on zero enrichment," France's foreign ministry spokesperson Christophe Lemoine told CNN Friday. Iran says it needs enriched uranium for peaceful purposes, while also manufacturing large quantities of near-weapons-grade material. Trump's decision to open a two-week negotiating window before deciding on striking Iran has offered a slim – if improbable – path to a peace deal between Iran and Israel. Demonstrators in Tehran, Iran, on Friday. (CNN) Talks took place in Geneva on Friday between the foreign ministers from Iran, Britain, France, and Germany, along with the European Union's foreign policy chief, the first confirmed face-to-face meeting of its kind since the conflict began. After days of increasingly aggressive messages from the Trump administration, it has opened the possibility that military action can be averted. Indeed, Trump's own camp appears to be starkly divided on whether to pursue direct strikes against Iran. "If America gets involved in the war," Farahani said, "there are so many options and all (of) those options are on the table." Pro-government protests on Friday on the streets of Tehran saw an outpouring of anger at both Israel and the United States. A CNN team in Tehran witnessed massive crowds, with protesters waving Iranian, Hezbollah and Palestinian flags and burning US and Israeli flags. Chants of "death to Israel, death to America" – a staple at such events – rang out, while Iranians spoke of their fury at the bombing campaign. "Trump, you are threatening my leader," one woman told CNN, "Don't you know that my nation believes death is sweeter than honey?" World Iran Israel Israel Iran Conflict USA Donald Trump CONTACT US
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Vance stirs the pot in California, after a tense week
Vice President JD Vance has used an appearance in Los Angeles to renew criticism of the city's officials over violent unrest there, and rebut claims that it was fuelled by the Trump administration sending in federal officers. Vance also referred to US Senator Alex Padilla, the state's first Latino senator, as 'Jose Padilla,' a week after the Democrat was forcibly tackled and handcuffed by officers for speaking out during a news conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. "I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question," Vance said, in an apparent reference to the altercation at Noem's event. "I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theatre." In a statement on X, California Governor Gavin Newsom responded to Vance's reference to "Jose Padilla," saying the comment was no accident. Jose Padilla also is the name of a convicted al-Qaida terrorism plotter during President George W Bush's administration, who was sentenced to two decades in prison. A spokesperson for Padilla, Tess Oswald, noted in a social media post that Padilla and Vance were formerly colleagues in the Senate and that Vance should know better. "He should be more focused on demilitarising our city than taking cheap shots," Oswald said. Responding to the outrage, Taylor Van Kirk, a spokesperson for Vance, said of the vice president: "He must have mixed up two people who have broken the law." Vance's visit to Los Angeles to tour a multi-agency Federal Joint Operations Centre and a mobile command centre came as demonstrations calmed down in the city and a curfew was lifted this week. Vance echoed the president's harsh rhetoric toward California Democrats as he sought to blame them for the protests in the city. "Gavin Newsom and (Los Angeles Mayor) Karen Bass, by treating the city as a sanctuary city, have basically said that this is open season on federal law enforcement," Vance said after he toured federal immigration enforcement offices. "What happened here was a tragedy," Vance added. "You had people who were doing the simple job of enforcing the law and they had rioters egged on by the governor and the mayor, making it harder for them to do their job. That is disgraceful.' Newsom's spokesperson Izzy Gardon said in a statement, "The Vice President's claim is categorically false. The governor has consistently condemned violence and has made his stance clear." At City Hall, Bass said Vance was "spewing lies and utter nonsense." She said hundreds of millions of dollars were wasted by the federal government on a "stunt." The friction in Los Angeles began June 6, when federal agents conducted a series of immigration sweeps in the region that have continued since. Amid the protests and over the objections of state and local officials, Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the city. Trump has said that without the military's involvement, Los Angeles "would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years." Earlier Friday, Newsom urged Vance to visit victims of the deadly January wildfires while in Southern California and talk with Trump, who earlier this week suggested his feud with the governor might influence his consideration of $40 billion in federal wildfire aid for California. "I hope we get that back on track," Newsom wrote on X. "We are counting on you, Mr Vice President."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Is Iran close to building a nuke? Trump says his intelligence community 'is wrong'
"My intelligence community is wrong." With those words, Donald Trump waved away the advice of the entire US spy infrastructure — from the CIA, to the Defence Intelligence Agency, to the intelligence arms of the US Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force — and its assessment that Iran was not trying to build a nuclear weapon. That assessment was presented to the US Congress in March by Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's hand-picked director of National Intelligence. "The IC [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," Ms Gabbard said. "Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised a nuclear weapon program that he suspended in 2003." On Wednesday, Donald Trump said simply, "She's wrong." As is so often the case under Trump, what once would have been a breathtaking shattering of norms is just another day. Trump's rejection of the intelligence community's advice has deep resonance in the United States, and particularly among Trump's MAGA base in the Republican Party. Trump campaigned hard on keeping America out of foreign 'forever' wars like Iraq, based on faulty intelligence over Saddam Hussein's non-existent weapons of mass destruction. It's why key figures in Trump's MAGA, America First base of support are dead against any US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. But there are influential old-school Republican Iran hawks, like Senator Lindsey Graham, who are pushing the president for regime change in Iran. "Be all in, President Trump, in helping Israel eliminate the nuclear threat," Senator Graham said. "If we need to provide bombs to Israel, provide bombs. If we need to fly planes with Israel, do joint operations. "But here's the bigger question: Wouldn't the world be better off if the ayatollahs went away and were replaced by something better? Wouldn't Iran be better off?" The two sides met head-on in a fiery exchange between media figure Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz, both firm Trump supporters. "How many people live in Iran, by the way?" Carlson asked. "I don't know the population at all," Cruz replied. Carlson was incredulous. "You don't know the population you seek to topple?" The big question is — which side is getting in the president's ear as he waits to decide on whether the US will attack Iran? Tulsi Gabbard certainly appears to be on the outer. Today, she took to X to try to repair the relationship with Trump. "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division," she wrote. "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." The "missing" context was that Iran's enriched uranium stockpile was "at its highest levels, and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons". She also testified that nuclear weapons advocates in the Iranian leadership were feeling "emboldened". The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) also recently found that Iran has not been complying with weapons inspectors since 2019 — its first such finding in two decades. In the end, none of that may matter. Donald Trump has said he will decide in two weeks about whether to choose the military or diplomatic option. He may be waiting to see which option is more likely to succeed — or which way the debate among his supporters goes.
