Farmer Satisfaction With Banks Better
Farmers are feeling more satisfied with their banks, pointing to improved communication and less 'undue pressure', Federated Farmers' latest Banking Survey shows.
"It's good to see things are improving but farmers' trust in their banks is still fragile," Federated Farmers banking spokesperson Richard McIntyre says.
"Where farmers have given positive feedback in the survey, it's usually about their individual managers, not bank policy.
"When those individual staff leave, that trust can erode quickly."
Nearly 700 farmers responded to the May survey, with 60% of them 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with their bank.
That's up from 53% in Federated Farmers' November 2024 survey but well shy of the 80% peak rating recorded in 2017.
"It's helped that over the last year banks have been grilled by the select committee inquiry on banking competition that Federated Farmers pushed for," McIntyre says.
"There has been a lot of scrutiny and banks have definitely been feeling the pressure, so it's good to see them start to lift their game as a result."
In the survey, 61% of farmers rated their bank's communication as good or very good - the best result since 2020.
Just on 18% of farmers said they were feeling undue bank pressure, down from 24% six months earlier and the lowest rating recorded since 2018.
"Many farmers said bank pressure has eased over the past six to 12 months, with some noting their bank had become more understanding or backed off earlier demands," McIntyre says.
"However, for those still under pressure, the situation remains serious.
"A few farmers shared difficult stories with us, including being forced out of farming altogether."
One farmer said: "We've sold the farm. If the bank had been more understanding, things might have been different."
The survey shows interest rates on farm mortgages have also eased by about 1% since late 2024 to an average of 6.52%.
"Even so, we're still very concerned that, compared with average residential mortgage interest rates, farm mortgage interest rates are around 0.92% higher - and were about 1.12% higher late last year," McIntyre says.
From 2016 until 2021, the margin of difference hovered between about 0.6% and 0.35%.
"These don't seem like big differences, but when total agricultural lending is around $61 billion, a 1% margin difference puts $600 million of extra interest costs on the sector each year.
"It's crazy how much more money farmers are having to shell out to the banks in interest payments.
"Part of the problem is the unnecessarily conservative Reserve Bank capital requirements, and the recent decision to review those settings is very welcome," McIntyre says.
"What we desperately need as well is stronger competition among banks in the rural sector. That would really help lower costs for farmers and drive better bank performance."
In the open comment section of the May survey, many farmers said they were still paying far too much in interest.
Several expressed frustration that banks were quick to hike rates, but slow to pass on savings when the OCR falls.
"OCR drops come through like a feather. Increases hit like a brick," one said.
The May survey also found that just under 20% of farmers said their bank has inquired about their farm's emissions profile or environmental footprint as part of loan requirements.
Westpac and ASB were much more likely to ask such questions, at 32% and 40% respectively.
"Federated Farmers' view is that our democratically elected Government is the correct body to be setting emissions and environmental policy, not banks," McIntyre says.
"Farmers are closely watching what's happening with Bills passing through Parliament, promoted by MPs Andy Foster and Mark Cameron, that would rein in banks' ability to make lending decisions on non-commercial grounds."
Foster's proposed law would prohibit banks from refusing loans or services purely for environmental or emissions reasons. May survey responses show 70% of farmers support such a law (18% oppose, 12% unsure).
Other key findings from the survey:
Farm Debt Levels: 84% of farmers surveyed have a mortgage. The average mortgage in the survey was $4.7 million, compared to $4.4 million six months ago.
Overdraft Use Declining: Only 76% of farms now have an overdraft facility, down from 88% a decade ago.
Overdraft Limits: Average overdraft limits have risen to $349,000. Arable farms saw the largest increase (from $500k to $718k).
Overdraft Interest Rates: Rates have dropped. The average is now 9.0%, down from 10.0%. Rabobank offers the lowest (7.3%), while BNZ remains highest (9.7%).
Efficiency Concerns: 19% of farmers feel their bank isn't allowing them to structure debt as efficiently as possible - down slightly from 23% in November. Rabobank and ANZ performed best; Westpac performed worst.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Farmers, vets say product approval too slow
New targets have been set to reduce the wait for new agricultural and horticultural products, as well as vet medicines. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Farmers' representatives are worried that plans to speed up access to new agri-chemicals won't be fast enough to compete on the world stage. Those concerns over pace of reform are shared by vets wanting to use new medicines. The Ministers for the Environment and Food Safety have set targets to reduce the queues to approve new agricultural and horticultural products and veterinary medicines. Regulation Minister David Seymour says the changes will speed up the application process. Kathryn discusses the change with David Birkett, Federated Farmers arable industry spokesperson and Kevin Bryant, CEO of the Veterinary Association.
Newsroom
5 days ago
- Newsroom
No political party has a handle on long-term growth
Comment: The Budget was promoted as a 'growth' Budget, with new initiatives to boost the country's capital stock and attract additional foreign investment. But the reality is the measures outlined were cautious and are unlikely to produce the levels of sustainable growth New Zealand will need over the longer term to maintain the standard of living and level of government support services New Zealanders reasonably expect. The Budget's growth projections were also conservative – Treasury is forecasting a contraction of 0.8 percent this year, but almost 3 percent growth next year. Kiwibank, which had previously projected economic growth of 1.4 percent this year, has just revised its figure down to 0.9 percent. But it also says the economy is recovering from the 'recession the Reserve Bank made us have', albeit more slowly than originally thought.
1News
5 days ago
- 1News
IRD warns about misunderstanding fringe benefit tax
Inland Revenue says it wants to clear up misunderstanding about the effect of proposed changes to fringe benefit tax (FBT), particularly when it comes to double cab utes. There was a warning this week that farmers buying expensive utes at Fieldays could be in for a shock if the FBT rules changed in line with proposals released earlier this year. Federated Farmers has also warned of a "ute tax 2.0". But Inland Revenue deputy commissioner, policy, David Carrigan, said there were misunderstandings about the tax, including a myth that utes had been FBT-free. "When it comes to double cab utes, these are treated no differently to any other vehicle. Unless the use of the vehicle meets all the requirements for an exemption from FBT, then a double cab ute is, and always has been, subject to FBT. That is the current law," Carrigan said. ADVERTISEMENT "Work-related vehicles are only exempt from FBT if they meet certain requirements. This includes double cab utes." The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Auckland's supermarket fire, Trump's threat to Iran, and how a smart watch could make you fitter. (Source: 1News) At the moment, work vehicles such as utes are only exempt from FBT on days when they are used for essential work purposes. He said what was proposed was not a change to that treatment, but to remove the necessity to count days when a vehicle was or was not available for private use. "The idea is to simplify FBT, not create additional obligations. If a business - including a farm - is not currently liable for FBT on a vehicle, then it's unlikely they would become liable for FBT under any proposals taken forward." He said the aim of the FBT proposals was not to increase revenue but to reduce compliance costs of FBT. "The government has not made any final decisions in relation to potential changes to the FBT regime and Ministers are currently considering the feedback received from submitters on the Inland Revenue issues paper with a view to refining those proposals." ADVERTISEMENT Deloitte tax partner Robyn Walker agreed there was "fake news" circulating about the FBT rules. She said there had historically been concerns about low levels of compliance with FBT. "This review essentially concluded that a lack of compliance with the existing laws (and lack of compliance by Inland Revenue) had the potential to erode the integrity of the tax system. "Essentially, if taxpayers think it is okay to not comply with FBT rules, they'll also start not complying with other tax laws." She said the idea that utes were completely exempt from FBT was long-standing but had never been the case. But under the proposals released earlier this year, a vehicle used for work purposes and generally only available for home to work travel and travelling to different worksites would be "category three" vehicle with a 0% rate for FBT purposes. "Under the proposals, if there was occasional additional private use of the vehicle, this would be ignored." ADVERTISEMENT She said the changes also opened this category up to other vehicles such as small cars and electric vehicles. "There is a proposed rule that vehicles assigned to shareholder employees would not be able to be exempted from FBT if the vehicle has a cost of $80,000-plus. "However, for FBT purposes, you only look at the cost of the vehicle and you ignore any 'business accessories'. "There is a false narrative that if a ute is purchased and it is fitted with work-related gadgets that increase the total cost to above $80,000 that the vehicle is automatically subject to full FBT. This is incorrect."
