Mom Reports 3-Year-Old Daughter Missing, Then Police Charged Her for Murder
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A Delaware mother who reported her 3-year-old daughter missing on Tuesday was charged with murder in Maryland after officials determined the abduction claim was false, according to police.
Darrian Randle, 31, was initially arrested for falsely reporting by New Castle County Police before authorities expanded their investigation and charged her with murder and other offenses in Maryland linked to the death of her daughter, Nola Dinkins.
Darrian Randle was initially arrested for falsely reporting by police in Delaware, before authorities expanded their investigation and charged her with murder and other offenses in Maryland linked to the death of her daughter, Nola...
Darrian Randle was initially arrested for falsely reporting by police in Delaware, before authorities expanded their investigation and charged her with murder and other offenses in Maryland linked to the death of her daughter, Nola Dinkins. More
New Castle County Police
The Context
The case prompted an AMBER Alert, mobilizing federal, state and local law enforcement in a multi-state investigation.
In order to issue an AMBER Alert, authorities must confirm that an abduction has occurred.
"To allow activations in the absence of significant information that an abduction has occurred could lead to abuse of the system and ultimately weaken its effectiveness," the Department of Justice said on its website. "At the same time, each case must be appraised on its own merits and a judgment call made quickly."
What To Know
On Tuesday evening, patrol officers responded to a 911 call on the 500 block of Gender Road in Newark. Randle reported that her daughter, Dinkins, had been abducted by an unknown male armed with a handgun who allegedly fled in a dark SUV, New Castle County Police said in a news release. This led authorities to issue an AMBER Alert for the missing child, launching an intensive investigation involving New Castle County Police, Maryland State Police and the FBI.
Detectives later determined that Randle's story was false, according to New Castle County Police. She was charged with felony falsely reporting and booked into the Baylor Women's Correctional Institution in lieu of $1 million cash bail. The Amber Alert was subsequently canceled. Officials announced that the case is now being investigated as a homicide.
Maryland State Police charged Randle with first- and second-degree murder, first- and second-degree assault, child abuse, reckless endangerment, neglect, burying/disposing of a body in an unauthorized place, and failure to report a child death, according to records obtained by the Delaware News Journal. A second individual, 44-year-old Cedrick Antoine Britten, was also arrested and charged as an accessory to first- and second-degree murder after the fact, along with related offenses.
Newsweek reached out to Maryland State Police for comment.
Human remains consistent with a young child were found in a vacant lot in North East, Maryland, on Wednesday.
Identification of the remains is pending autopsy results by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Baltimore.
What People Are Saying
New Castle County Police, in a news release: "This remains an active investigation for both the New Castle County Division of Police and the Maryland State Police."
What Happens Next
The Maryland State Police Homicide Unit is leading the investigation with assistance from the FBI and New Castle County Police.
Police said Britten is in custody in Maryland, awaiting transport to the Cecil County District Court for an initial appearance. Randle is in custody in Delaware and is expected to be extradited.
Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@newsweek.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Watch JD Vance Call Senator Alex Padilla 'Jose'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Vice President JD Vance on Friday referred to Senator Alex Padilla of California as "Jose" while speaking to reporters. Vance made his remark while visiting Los Angeles amid the Trump administration's efforts to quell demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids targeting areas with high immigrant populations and labor-intensive industries in the area. While Vance was taking questions on Friday, a reporter referenced when Padilla was recently forcibly removed from a news conference that Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, held earlier this month. "The New York Times just did a story" about lawmakers who "keep getting handcuffed, suggesting that ... the Trump administration is cracking down on Democrats," the reporter said. "Can you comment on that?" "Well, I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question, but unfortunately I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't the theater," Vance said. "And that's all it is. I think everybody realizes that's what this is." JD Vance refers to Senator Alex Padilla as 'Jose Padilla' — Acyn (@Acyn) June 20, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Alito Says Supreme Court Forcing Judges To Do 'Mind-Bending Exercises'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Justice Samuel Alito said a U.S. Supreme Court's ruling requires judges to engage in "mind-bending exercises" in a dissent on Friday. Alito said under the court's decision, the judge must review "the nature and circumstances" of a defendant's offense but is not allowed to consider "the seriousness of the offense." "The Court interprets the Sentencing Reform Act to mean that a federal district-court judge, when considering whether to impose or alter a term of supervised release, must engage in mind-bending exercises," Alito wrote in a dissent, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch. Associate Justice Samuel Alito joins other members of the U.S. Supreme Court as they pose for a group portrait on October 7, 2022, at the Supreme Court building in Washington. Associate Justice Samuel Alito joins other members of the U.S. Supreme Court as they pose for a group portrait on October 7, 2022, at the Supreme Court building in Washington. AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File Why It Matters The court's ruling could influence what judges take into account when considering changes to the terms of a supervised release. What To Know The case centers around Edgardo Esteras, who was arrested and charged with domestic violence and other crimes while on supervised release for conspiring to distribute heroin. A district court revoked his supervised release and ordered 24 months of reimprisonment, arguing that his sentence must "promote respect for the law." The Supreme Court said the district court was not permitted to consider a statute requiring the sentence to "reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense." Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered the court's majority opinion. She wrote that "text, structure, and precedent all point in the same direction" in finding that district courts cannot consider the seriousness of the offense in revoking supervised release. Barrett said district courts "generally enjoy discretion over sentencing," but Congress chose to limit their discretion in this instance. Alito said the court failed to consider the practical application of its ruling. "Veteran trial judges often complain that their appellate colleagues live in a world of airy abstractions and do not give enough thought to the practical effects of their holdings. Today's decision is likely to earn the rank of Exhibit A in the trial bench's catalog of appellate otherworldliness," Alito said. Alito argued that the court's ruling lacks textual support and "it does not solve the problem faced by a judge who is compelled to consider the nature and circumstances of an offense but forbidden to consider its seriousness." "Imposing such a soul-searching obligation as a requirement that may be enforced in litigation is utterly impractical," Alito wrote. What People Are Saying Justice Samuel Alito, in a dissenting opinion: "None of this has any textual support, and it does not solve the problem faced by a judge who is compelled to consider the nature and circumstances of an offense but forbidden to consider its seriousness." Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: "Like the Court, I agree with Esteras: Courts cannot consider this omitted sentencing purpose when revoking supervised release. That answer is straightforward and responsive." What Happens Next The Supreme Court's ruling vacated the decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@
Newsweek
11 hours ago
- Newsweek
Man Who Came to US as Young Child Faces Deportation After Over 30 Years
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Karem Tadros, who has lived in the United States for more than 30 years after immigrating from Egypt with his family, who are all U.S. citizens, faces deportation to an unspecified country following his release from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in New Jersey, he told Newsweek in a Friday phone interview. Newsweek has reached out to ICE for comment via email on Friday. Why It Matters Tadros, who was detained from early May until mid-June, has been released but is still awaiting final court orders regarding his deportation status to a third country. His detention comes amid an immigration crackdown under the Trump administration. In addition to people residing in the country illegally, immigrants with valid documentation—including green cards and visas—have been detained and face legal jeopardy. President Donald Trump has pledged to carry out the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, and in the initial months of his second term, his administration has deported more than 100,000 people. Many migrants have been deported as a result of Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which grants the president authority to deport noncitizens without appearing before a judge, among other wartime authorities. The Trump administration has held discussions with several countries about taking in U.S. detainees who lack legal status and cannot be returned to their home countries due to safety risks or fears of persecution. (L): A photo of Karem Tadros as provided by him. (R): Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on June 18, 2025 in New York City. (L): A photo of Karem Tadros as provided by him. (R): Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on June 18, 2025 in New York City. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images What To Know On May 7, federal immigration officials detained 39-year-old Tadros. He told Newsweek in a phone call that agents arrived at his house, asking for Tadros, stating they had a warrant for his arrest and that there was an "administrative problem in their office that needs to be taken care of." They reportedly told him he would be gone for an hour. Tadros said they did not arrest him while he was walking out of the house to the unmarked agents' car. Once he was in the car, the agents reportedly informed him that he had a final deportation order. He then spent over a month at the Elizabeth Contract Detention Center in New Jersey, according to court documents reviewed by Newsweek. Tadros says he has a current work permit set to be renewed in August. He came to the U.S. as a young child, just over 3 years old, his attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, told Newsweek in a phone interview on Friday. He said he came to the U.S. on March 17, 1989. Tadros told Newsweek he was told he came at age 4, but also in the year 1989. Tadros' family members, an older brother, mother, and father, all obtained U.S. citizenship, he told Newsweek. "All the members of my family are U.S. citizens. They're all supporting me. We're all equally shocked," he said. His citizenship process was halted due to his 2006 conviction, telling Newsweek it was for "intent to distribute oxycodone." He said, "I was on the right path. I made a terrible mistake when I was younger." He spent six days in a county jail and was released on bail, completing his probation afterwards, he said. "Because of that, I was detained at Hudson County facility for 13 months. And I was released by the judge on a court date with no supervision, no nothing. So 17 years go by, now it's 2025, I haven't seen a single ICE officer since I was detained back in 2008, 2009," he added. In those legal proceedings, a judge found he would face persecution if he were deported to Egypt, thus ruling against it. "The government appealed that decision, and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed that decision in April of 2009," Sandoval-Moshenberg told Newsweek. Both Tadros and his lawyer told Newsweek that he is at risk of persecution because of his religion and lack of language knowledge. Tadros told Newsweek he has "a Jesus tattoo on my right shoulder." There are an estimated five to ten percent of the Egyptian population identifying as Christian. The administration isn't trying to change that ruling, and instead is looking to send Tadros to a third country. On June 16, Tadros was granted a Writ of Habeas Corpus, as U.S. District Judge for the District of New Jersey, Evelyn Padin, found the "petitioner has remained in perfect compliance with the conditions of release dictated in the April 9, 2009 Order of Supervision." The judge found it was "unlawful" for the government to keep Tadros detained and ordered his release. The judge's order stated that "ICE may identify a third country within thirty to sixty days of this order to which the Petitioner may be removed." The judge denied the Trump administration's request to place an ankle monitor on Tadros. He must stay within the tri-state area. During his June court proceeding, Tadros first learned of the possibility of being sent to Uzbekistan. His lawyer told Newsweek that's also when he found out that Sudan and Libya rejected his case. Hundreds of people have been sent to third-country locations. More than 200 Venezuelan nationals accused of gang affiliations were transferred to El Salvador, where they were imprisoned in the country's high-security mega-prison. The administration has also attempted to deport migrants to more unstable nations, including Libya and South Sudan, despite concerns over widespread violence and human rights conditions. These efforts have faced legal challenges, with U.S. courts blocking transfers to such conflict zones for now. The Trump administration has defended the use of third-country deportations as a necessary measure to deter unlawful entry and ease pressure on the U.S. immigration system. What People Are Saying Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin previously told Newsweek: "The Trump administration is enforcing immigration laws—something the previous administration failed to do. Those who violate these laws will be processed, detained and removed as required." What Happens Next The Trump administration has just under 60 days to confirm a country for Tadros' detention.
