Woman accuses film executive in Cannes of sexual assault during event, actor banned from red carpet over rape accusation

A vice president of one of the parallel film events at the Cannes Festival was suspended Thursday after being publicly denounced for sexual violence, witnesses and organisers told AFP.
During a roundtable discussion about sexual assault organised by France's film board (CNC), a woman stood up and publicly denounced an executive from the ACID Cannes film section.
"The young woman acted with great courage and was immediately taken care of by charities present," Erwan Balanant, a French MP who was in the room, told AFP.
It came as the main Cannes Festival barred a French actor from the premiere Thursday of a film in the running for the Palme d'Or top prize because he has been accused of rape by three former partners.
The ACID Cannes event is not part of the official festival, but runs at the same time and has some organisational links. It showcases up-and-coming directors and more experimental cinema.
"Today, during a public roundtable, we heard testimony implicating one of our members, currently vice-president of ACID, in serious acts that could amount to sexual violence," two other co-presidents of the organisation said in a statement to AFP.
They said the man had been suspended as a precautionary measure and that "an internal investigation process has been entrusted to an external body." The vice president cannot be named for legal reasons.
Cannes has been under pressure from MPs and activists to take a tougher line on sexual violence.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

First Post

38 minutes ago

• First Post

Did US strikes destroy Iran's nuclear sites? Can it still build a nuclear bomb?

After Operation Midnight Hammer, Donald Trump claims that the three nuclear sites — Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — in Iran were 'totally obliterated'. But what do satellite imagery and experts say about the damage caused by American airstrikes? read more 'Totally obliterated.' 'Monumental Damage.' 'Hits were hard and accurate.' These are just some of the ways US President Donald Trump has described the American strikes on Iran's nuclear sites and the outcome of the American military action. On Sunday (June 22), the US president waded into Israel's war against Iran and triggered a more dangerous phase in the conflict when it struck three key nuclear sites in Iran — Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Following America's strikes, dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran downplayed the damage to the nuclear sites – just as they did when Israel first struck Iran's facilities on June 13. Independent experts are still analysing commercial satellite imagery to ascertain the true impact of the US strikes, but some note that while the sites may have suffered extensive damage, Iran's nuclear programme is far from dead and buried. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Here's what we have learnt so far. US takes aim at Iran's nuclear sites In the wee hours of Sunday, Trump told the world from the White House that it had hit Fordow , Iran's most important nuclear enrichment facility, buried deep inside a mountain to guard it from attacks, Natanz, which is Iran's largest nuclear enrichment centre, and Isfahan, home to the country's largest nuclear research complex. To carry out these strikes, America used the dangerous bunker-buster bombs as well as Tomahawk missiles. People watch US President Donald Trump address the nation from the White House in Washington, DC following the announcement that the US bombed nuclear sites in Iran. AFP Trump later said, 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' This claim was later reasserted by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in a Pentagon press briefing. 'It was an incredible and overwhelming success. The order we received from our commander in chief was focused,' said Hegseth. He further added, 'Thanks to President Trump's bold and visionary leadership and his commitment to peace through strength, Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated. The operation President Trump planned was bold and it was brilliant.' Assessing the extent of the damage While Trump and Hegseth have claimed that Iran's nuclear sites have been 'totally obliterated', General Dan Caine, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was more measured in his response, telling the media that the true extent of the damage caused to Iran's nuclear sites would only be known in a few weeks' time. However, he did mention that 'initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction'. And satellite imagery and independent analysts agree with this sentiment. A combination picture shows satellite images over Fordow underground complex, before and after the US struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran. Maxar Technologies/Reuters Visuals of the Fordow site after the US' bombing shows some holes in the mountain above it, which may be consistent with damage. A senior US official told the New York Times that the American strike on the Fordow site did not destroy the heavily fortified facility but said the strike had severely damaged it, taking it 'off the table.' In fact, an Iranian official was also quoted as saying that the site had been evacuated 'a long time ago' in anticipation of attacks. Michael Horowitz, a Middle East-based geopolitical analyst, trying to ascertain the damage told Wall Street Journal, 'It is very hard to tell whether the strike was successful or not. What I can say is that the US appears to have specifically targeted weak spots within Fordow, namely ventilation shafts that were covered with rocks to protect them. I would expect that this was done in an effort to maximise the chance of success.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A crater over the underground facility of Natanz Enrichment Facility, after it was hit by US airstrikes, near Natanz, Iran. Maxar Technologies/Reuter The Americans also struck Natanz with a US official saying a B-2 bomber had dropped two bunker-busting bombs on the site. Satellite imagery shows two new craters at the site, likely caused by the bunker-busting bombs. The craters — one with a diameter of around 5.5 metres, the other around 3.2 metres, according to the Maxar images — sit directly above parts of the complex located underground. However, the extent of damage underground is still to be determined. At Isfahan, the US used Tomahawk missiles. Satellite photos show at least 18 partially destroyed structures at the site. Moreover, images reveal visible black spots at the site. The Institute for Science and International Security said that the Isfahan facility had been 'heavily damaged', adding that the complex's main uranium conversion facility, which converts natural uranium into the form of uranium entered into gas centrifuges, was 'severely damaged.' A close view of the Isfahan nuclear technology in Iran after US strikes on Sunday. Maxar Technologies/AP But despite the damage at the nuclear sites, there hasn't been any reports of a radiation leak . Reza Kardan, the deputy director of the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran and the head of the National Nuclear Safety System Center in the country was quoted as saying that 'no radiation contamination or nuclear radiation has been observed outside' the sites. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Preliminary plans had been made and measures had been taken to protect the safety and health of the dear people of the country, and despite the criminal actions this morning in attacking nuclear facilities, due to the previously planned measures and the measures taken, no radiation contamination or nuclear radiation has been observed outside these sites and facilities,' Kardan said. Even the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said the radiation levels near targeted sites had not increased. 'Following attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran – including Fordow – the IAEA can confirm that no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported as of this time,' the agency said in a social media post on Sunday. Future of Iran's nuclear programme But what does all this mean for Iran's nuclear ambitions? Has the US effectively made it impossible for Tehran to build a nuclear weapon? Experts note that only a complete picture of the overall damage would determine if Tehran's nuclear ambitions have been nullified. Clionadh Raleigh, head of the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), a conflict-monitoring group, told The Telegraph that although the strikes might alter the timeline of Iran's nuclear programme, they would do little to alter its ultimate trajectory. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Shiite Muslims hold portraits of Iran's Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to condemn US and Israel's attacks on Iran, during a protest in Karachi. The United States struck three nuclear sites in Iran on June 22, joining Israel's bombing campaign. AFP 'The regime's broader power and intentions are likely to remain intact,' said Raleigh. 'Iran's military and intelligence systems are designed and built to survive. The structure is deeply layered and resistant to collapse. Even if key infrastructure is destroyed, the system adapts – and in some cases, becomes more dangerous in the process. 'There's no evidence that the strikes will permanently end Iran's pursuit of nuclear capabilities. What they may do is shift the timeline.' Darya Dolzikova, Senior Research Fellow, Proliferation and Nuclear Policy, also agreed with this assessment. She noted, 'The fundamental reality remains that military action alone can only roll back the programme by degrees, not eliminate it fully. 'Iran retains extensive expertise that will allow it to eventually reconstitute what aspects of the programme have been damaged or destroyed. The Iranian nuclear programme is decades old and draws on extensive Iranian indigenous expertise. The physical elimination of the programme's infrastructure - and even the assassination of Iranian scientists - will not be sufficient to destroy the latent knowledge that exists in the country.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Other experts also speculated that Iran had moved its enriched uranium out of these sites, which means that their nuclear ambitions remain alive. David Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and International Security, was quoted as saying, 'There were trucks seen in imagery apparently hauling stuff away. One would assume that any enriched uranium stocks were hauled away.' Ian Stewart, a former UK Ministry of Defence specialist and now director of the James Martin Centre for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute in the United States, also stated that the key to Iran's nuclear plans is the enriched uranium. In a Times report, he said that the enriched uranium is the 'most valuable asset in Iran right now'. With inputs from agencies

Hindustan Times

an hour ago

• Hindustan Times

‘Haven't received a single call': Mahmoud Khalil slams Columbia's ‘hypocrisy,' joins rally outside university

Mahmoud Khalil has criticised Columbia University for its silence on his arrest shortly after being released from immigration custody. Khalil, a graduate student of the university, flew back to the New York area Saturday, June 21, after spending 104 days in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Louisiana. 'Haven't received a single call': Mahmoud Khalil slams Columbia's 'hypocrisy' (Photo by kena betancur / AFP)(AFP) Meanwhile, videos on social media claimed to show Khalil joining a rally outside Columbia University soon after his release. Take a look: 'The hypocrisy of Columbia University' Khalil made his recent remarks while speaking to the media and supporters on the steps of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City, just a few blocks from Columbia. He said Columbia did not allow him to host the news conference at the university. 'It's often hard to find patience in ICE detention. The center is crowded with hundreds of people who are told that their existence is illegal, and not one of us knows when we can go free,' Khalil said, according to NBC News. 'I found myself literally scratching this into my bunk bed and looking at it as I fell asleep and as I woke up. I find myself repeating, repeating it even now, knowing that I have won in a small way by being free — by being free today,' he added. Khalil previously compared Columbia University's administration to Nazi collaborators in an incendiary op-ed published by the school newspaper. He accused Columbia of laying the 'groundwork for my abduction' and also alleged that the Morningside Heights institution suppressed 'student dissent under the auspices of combating antisemitism.'' Now, in his recent remarks, Khalil called out Columbia's 'hypocrisy.' 'I must call the hypocrisy of Columbia University, a university that just two weeks ago said that they want to protect their international students. Why? While over 100 [days] later, I haven't received a single call from this university,' he said. 'While I'm grateful to be here with you all, I must say that this is only the beginning of a longer fight towards justice. I want everyone to understand that my being here today is sweet, but it's not a victory,' he further said, adding that the Trump administration initiated a 'wave of repression' with his detention, which was 'intended to silence the movement for Palestinian liberation' and 'scare people into silence.' Khalil joined hundreds of supporters on a short march following the conference. They were escorted by New York police.

New Indian Express

2 hours ago

• New Indian Express

'Massive' Russian attack on Kyiv kills at least five: Ukraine

KYIV: Ukraine said Monday that "another massive attack" on the capital Kyiv killed at least five people, a day after the country's top military commander vowed to intensify strikes on Russia. Diplomatic efforts to end the three-year war have stalled, with the last direct meeting between the two sides almost three weeks ago and no follow-up talks scheduled. AFP journalists in Kyiv heard the buzzing of a drone flying over the city centre and explosions, as well as gunfire. "Another massive attack on the capital. Possibly, several waves of enemy drones," said a statement from Tymur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv's military administration. Four people were killed in Shevchenkivsky district, where part of a residential high-rise building was destroyed, and another person was killed to the south in Bila Tserkva, said Interior Minister Igor Klymenko. AFP journalists saw around 10 people sheltering in the basement of a residential building in the centre of the capital waiting for the attack to end, most of them scrolling their phones for news. The latest strikes came after Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky vowed to intensify strikes on Russia. "We will not just sit in defence because this brings nothing and eventually leads to the fact that we still retreat, lose people and territories," he told reporters, including AFP. Syrsky said Ukraine would continue its strikes on Russian military targets, which he said had proved "effective". "Of course we will continue. We will increase the scale and depth," he said.