Western media misquotes Moscow on NATO expansion threat
A Western news outlet has misrepresented statements made by a senior Russian official on NATO expansion toward its borders, in an apparent attempt to fuel the narrative that Russia poses a threat to European members of the US-led military bloc.
The US-based weekly Newsweek published an article earlier this week titled 'Russia won't end Ukraine war until NATO 'pulls out' of Baltics: Moscow,' in which it claimed that Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov, who oversees relations with the Americas, non-proliferation, and arms control, made the remarks in an interview with TASS news agency.
'The Ukraine war won't end until NATO withdraws troops from the Baltics, a top Russian official has warned,' Newsweek wrote.
However, in Ryabkov's quotes, there was no mention of the Baltic states.
Two days after publication, the outlet added a disclaimer, stating it had 'updated' both the headline and the text 'to reflect that Sergei Ryabkov did not reference the Baltic states, but rather NATO's 'Eastern European contingent'.'
The correction came after Latvia's ambassador to NATO, Maris Riekstins, criticized the report. 'He didn't make any reference to Baltic states,' Riekstins posted on X, calling Newsweek's interpretation 'very strange.'
Despite the correction, Newsweek's claim was picked up by several other outlets, including Lithuanian state broadcaster LRT, which cited the original headline while adding comments from 'Baltic officials and observers' alleging that Russia plans to attack the region after the Ukraine conflict ends – an accusation Moscow has dismissed as 'nonsense.'
In the interview with TASS Ryabkov discussed the root causes of the Ukraine conflict, including NATO expansion toward Russia's borders and Western support for Ukraine's ambition to join the bloc. He stressed that to deescalate tensions and normalize Russia-US relations, Washington must 'show respect for Russia's fundamental interests,' particularly its border security.
'The American side requires practical steps aimed at eliminating the root causes of the fundamental contradictions between us in the area of security. Among these causes, NATO expansion is in the foreground,' Ryabkov said. 'Without resolving this fundamental and most acute problem for us, it is simply impossible to resolve the current conflict in the Euro-Atlantic region.'
He reiterated Russia's demand for 'legally binding and long-term guarantees of non-expansion of NATO to the East, as well as demands for non-deployment of strike weapons near Russian borders.' Ryabkov noted that Russia's position on this 'remains unchanged' and added that 'reducing NATO's contingent in Eastern Europe would probably benefit the security of the entire continent.'
At no point in the interview did Ryabkov mention the Baltics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Moscow blasts US redo of ‘Iraqi weapons of mass destruction' stunt
Russia has sharply condemned the United States for its airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling the attacks 'irresponsible, provocative and dangerous,' and warning they risk pushing the Middle East toward a large-scale war with potentially catastrophic nuclear consequences. Speaking at an emergency session of the UN Security Council on Sunday, Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia accused Washington of violating the UN Charter, international law and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). 'The United States has opened a Pandora's box, and no one knows what consequences may follow,' Nebenzia said, noting that by targeting IAEA-supervised nuclear sites, Washington has 'once again demonstrated total disregard for the position of the international community.' Nebenzia drew a pointed comparison to the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq War, when then-US Secretary of State Colin Powell presented false evidence to 'justify the invasion of another sovereign state, only to plunge its people into chaos for decades and not find any weapons of mass destruction.' 'Many today feel a strong sense of déjà vu,' he said. 'The current situation is essentially no different: we are once again being urged to believe in fairy tales in order to once again bring suffering to millions of people living in the Middle East.' Russia argued that Tehran has not been proven to be pursuing a nuclear weapon, echoing earlier assessments by US intelligence that were dismissed by President Donald Trump as 'wrong.' Nebenzia accused Washington of fabricating a narrative to justify the use of force and of undermining the decades-long diplomatic framework built around Iran's peaceful nuclear program. The Russian envoy also criticized what he described as the hypocrisy of Western nations that had for days called for 'restraint' in the same Security Council chamber, yet failed to condemn Washington for joining Israeli strikes – and even blamed Iran for the escalation. 'We are witnessing an astonishing example of double standards,' he said. 'Iran has been and remains one of the most thoroughly inspected states under the NPT, but instead of encouraging such an attitude, it receives bombardments of its territory and civilians by a state that refuses, in principle, to sign the NPT.' Nebenzia warned that the US strikes undermine the authority of the IAEA and the global non-proliferation regime, and that continued escalation could return the world to an era of uncontrolled nuclear risk. 'This is an outrageous and cynical situation, and it is very strange that the Director General of the IAEA did not say a word about it. Neither has he ever called on Israel to join the NPT,' Nebenzia added. Calling for urgent action, Russia – joined by China and Pakistan – submitted a draft Security Council resolution demanding an immediate and unconditional ceasefire and a return to diplomatic talks on Iran's nuclear program.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Zelensky makes new threats against Russia
Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has suggested that Kiev's forces will conduct more long-range strikes targeting facilities deep inside Russian territory. Ukraine has significantly escalated drone attacks deep into Russia in recent weeks, despite ongoing diplomatic efforts to end the conflict. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has described the actions as an attempt to derail the peace process. In a post on his Telegram channel on Sunday, Zelensky wrote that he had held a meeting with the head of Ukraine's military intelligence, Kirill Budanov, claiming that Kiev was keeping tabs on Russia's 'main pain points.' He pledged to 'strike appropriate blows' with a view to 'significantly reducing' Moscow's military potential. Zelensky also stated that Kiev was sharing its intelligence on Russia with its Western backers, with which it is 'preparing joint defense solutions.' Speaking to reporters also on Sunday, Ukraine's commander-in-chief, Aleksandr Syrsky, similarly said that Kiev 'will increase the scale and depth' of its strikes on Russian military facilities deep inside the country. On June 1, Ukrainian intelligence conducted a coordinated attack on several Russian airbases across five regions, from Murmansk in the Arctic, to Irkutsk in Siberia. Ukrainian media later reported that the operation codenamed 'Spiderweb' involved dozens of first-person view (PFV) kamikaze drones. At least some of them were reportedly launched in close proximity to the targets, from commercial trucks that had been covertly brought into Russia. The strikes were said to have been prepared for more than a year and a half and focused on Russia's 'strategic aviation.' The Defense Ministry in Moscow said that a number of aircraft in Murmansk and Irkutsk regions had caught fire as a result of the attack. Kiev claimed that the strikes had damaged or destroyed approximately 40 Russian military aircraft, including Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range bombers. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov later dismissed these estimates as incorrect. 'The equipment in question… was not destroyed, but damaged. It will be restored,' the diplomat told TASS in early June. Around the same time, Keith Kellogg, US President Donald Trump's special envoy, cautioned that 'when you attack an opponent's part of their national survival system, which is their nuclear triad… that means your risk level goes up because you don't know what the other side's going to do.'
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
NATO summit to ditch Ukraine meeting
An upcoming NATO leaders summit in the Netherlands will have a shortened schedule, with the focus on Ukraine drastically reduced, Politico reported on Saturday, citing five people familiar with the matter. The summit, set to be held in the World Forum in The Hague from June 24 to 25, will only feature two main events – a welcome dinner at the Dutch royal family's castle and a single meeting of the North Atlantic Council instead of the usual two or three, according to Politico. There also will not be a meeting of NATO's Ukraine Council. Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has been only invited to attend the welcome dinner, and it still remains unclear whether he will come, the outlet noted. The sources suggested the abbreviated schedule was a concession to the US and President Donald Trump in particular, who has repeatedly shown impatience with and shunned multilateral gatherings of a ceremonial nature. NATO officials reportedly pared down the agenda after the G7 debacle, when Trump abruptly left the summit in Canada halfway through the two-day program. He also reportedly opposed a draft joint statement on the Ukraine conflict, and the summit ultimately ended without one. The upcoming gathering is expected to yield no lengthy joint communique, with the bloc likely to produce only short statements on new commitments. Cuts to the agenda have also been attributed to a need to minimize the risk of derailing the main event of the summit, where members are expected to pledge to hike defense spending to 5% GDP. Trump has long demanded that NATO countries spend more on defense, and the new commitment will be regarded as a big 'win' by the US president, the sources suggested. 'He has to get credit for the 5% – that's why we're having the summit,' a European defense official told Politico. 'Everything else is being streamlined to minimize risk.'
