Canford incinerator: Environment Agency grants permit
A planned energy-from-waste incinerator which could burn up to 260,000 tonnes of waste a year has been given a permit to operate.The Environment Agency (EA) said it had granted a permit to MVV Environmental Ltd for the proposed facility at Canford Resource Park near Bournemouth.A meeting of Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole (BCP) council's planning committee on Thursday is due to decide whether the project can go ahead. The EA said it had considered the responses to a public consultation when granting the permit which covers the management and operation of the plant along with monitoring of emissions.
The planned facility would burn non-recyclable and non-hazardous domestic, commercial and industrial waste to generate electricity.It would provide 28.5MW of electricity to businesses at Churchill Magna Business Park as well as to Arena Way and Magna Road.A public consultation by the EA was held last year.A statement by the agency said: "This permit will ensure that robust levels of environmental protection are applied. "Our permitting decision process is objective and based on the applicant demonstrating they will meet the legal requirements outlined in the permit."The EA permit is separate to the council granting planning permission, although the plant could not operate until both have been granted.The area is already an active waste management site, alongside a former landfill.Thirty two people would be employed if the project goes ahead, according to the planning application.The council said 469 objections to the scheme had been received during the planning process.They included objections to building on green belt land, issues over transporting waste into the site and removing residue, as well as air pollution.Critics also pointed to the emissions of CO2 from the plant and that waste incinerators were considered the "dirtiest" way the UK generates power.The proposal is due to be discussed by BCP Council's planning committee on Thursday.
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
CMA to review wrong turns on road and rail building projects
The UK's competition regulator has opened an investigation into Whitehall's delivery of rail and road infrastructure. The inquiry by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) comes just a day after a damning report into the failed delivery of the HS2 high-speed rail line between London and Birmingham which is hugely over-budget, hopelessly late and which ministers have admitted has made Britain the laughing stock of infrastructure investment. It also follows the government's renationalisation of the railways, which it is planning to complete incrementally over the next couple of years. • What happened to HS2? The project that made Britain a laughing stock The CMA said its inquiry would focus 'on persistent issues around costs and delivery of road and railway infrastructure across the country', especially in the light of Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves's new ten-year infrastructure strategy to help grow the economy. 'There's no question that reliable, high-quality infrastructure is critical in accelerating economic growth,' said Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA. 'To achieve this, public authorities and the civil engineering sector must be able to work together to deliver projects on time, within budget and to high standards. 'This review is a crucial step in identifying barriers holding back the sector — supporting the drive to get Britain building and ensuring every penny spent is delivering value for taxpayers.' Identifying the long-standing friction and dysfunctional procurement engagement between Whitehall and its agencies, and private sector contractors, the CMA inquiry states: 'The market study will examine whether there are opportunities to improve how the public sector and industry work together, for example through improvements to public procurement, so more cost-effective infrastructure can be built in support of the government's growth mission.' • Pumping money into infrastructure may not keep Labour in power The CMA said it would make recommendations to government but does not have the power to intervene in the market directly. Civil engineering is reckoned to be worth £23 billion annually to the UK economy. The National Infrastructure Commission has estimated that public and private sector investment will need to increase by up to 50 per cent over the next decade to deliver more complex infrastructure. Road and railway projects account for up to 75 per cent of government spending on economic infrastructure such as transportation and energy. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors indicated the sector has previously suffered from a lack of what its chief executive Justin Young called a 'clear, joined-up infrastructure strategy that incorporates long-term thinking and vision'. Young said he believes 'the country is on a considerably clearer path and represents a significant shift in how the government approaches infrastructure and industrial capacity', but warned of 'skills and labour shortages [that] stifle construction projects and investment in skills for new professionals'.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Labour's tax strategy under fire as Reeves defends fiscal rules
The chancellor has defended Labour's record as the party of business and its fiscal rules after controversial tax rises, saying the government had stabilised the economy and enabled interest rate cuts. Rachel Reeves told The Times CEO Summit that the government had achieved its 'number one job' to return economic stability after the 'turbulence' of the 'previous decade'. The contentious decision to raise employers' national insurance contributions in October's budget provoked a sharp backlash from business leaders, who had been courted by senior Labour figures in the run-up to July's general election. Bosses have since warned of hiring and investment cuts, while the decision is still being felt in the jobs market and in sentiment.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Passport prices could rise AGAIN in another blow for British holidaymakers
The cost of a new passport could rise by a whopping £32 in the latest blow for millions of British holidaymakers. Ministers have been urged to increase the current £95 renewal fee to address a growing black hole in the Passport Office's budget. The department recorded a budget shortfall of £223million last year and a £916million deficit over the past five years. The National Audit Office, which scrutinises public spending, has recommended that the Passport Office increase the cost of its services to address the issue. It did not, however, give a figure for how much the passport renewal fees should increase by. According to The Telegraph, the Passport Office, would need to charge each applicant £32 more to overcome last year's shortfall. The cost of renewing passports has already risen significantly in recent years. The department drastically hiked prices for adult passports in February 2023 - from £75.50 to £82.50. Fees then rose again by 7 per cent last year - before an inflation busting increase of 6.7 per cent in April. The Home Office previously said the new fees were necessary to ensure the cost of passport operations is met without relying on taxpayer funding. It added that fees help cover passport processing, consular services for lost or stolen passports, and border operations. Adults must currently pay £94.50 for a new passport, while a one-day renewal costs £222. Nearly seven million new passports were issued last year. Adult passports are valid for ten years, while passports for children are valid for just five. A Home Office spokesperson said there were no 'immediate plans' to increase fees. Meanwhile, the National Audit Office declined to comment on the estimated price hike. The call for higher passport renewal fees came in a wider report by the National Audit Office into government services. A total £340million shortfall was found across all the services looked at - including UK Visas and Immigration, the Court and Tribunals Service and the Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency. The National Audit Office's report concluded: 'Many government departments rely on charging fees to recover the costs of providing services to people and businesses. 'But none of the services we looked at recovered costs consistently, and the charges for the services may not accurately reflect the costs.' 'The government is missing opportunities to deliver efficiencies and share good practice,' it added. 'This poses risks to the financial resilience of public services, the costs of which are likely to be borne by future fee payers.' Gareth Davies, head of the National Audit Office said: 'Government bodies provide important services for the public and businesses, including issuing passports and driving licences, and filing company information. 'But many are not consistently recovering their costs - posing risks to the financial resilience of these services and fairness between users. 'HM Treasury should strengthen how it oversees cost recovery processes and provide more comprehensive guidance to charging bodies.'
