Iran is isolated against the US and Israel
America's entry into the war against Iran is the latest step up an escalation spiral that began in October 2023. What started with an attack by a Palestinian Islamist organisation on a poorly defended Israeli border, and then became a fight between Israel and a series of Iran-supported Islamist paramilitary groups by the end of 2023, and then extended to limited exchanges between Israel and Iran itself in April 2024, and then turned into war between Iran and Israel, has now become a confrontation pitting the US and Israel against their longest standing and most powerful adversary in the Islamic world.
Now at war with both Israel and the US, it has no major power interested in fighting alongside it.
So what are the implications of this latest turn, and what may happen next?
While prediction remains unwise regarding the current US president, the notion that the Trump administration will be dominated by isolationism can be laid to rest. In Washington a few weeks ago, I found that much of the talk behind the scenes was worried assessments concerning the rise of isolationism and of individuals professing such views at the top reaches of the administration. People with past associations with hawkish or pro-Israel circles were having trouble getting confirmed for posts. Vice President J.D. Vance and Donald Trump Jr, I heard, were the most senior and influential members of the rising camp.
An old friend of mine who has interviewed the President on a number of occasions cautioned against despair. His advice: don't take too much notice of the people around Trump. Pay attention to Trump himself, and to what his track record suggests regarding his views on Israel. Possessing no special insights of my own, I hoped he was right. It appears he was.
Over the last two years, much ink has been spilled regarding a supposedly emergent axis of anti-western states. This axis, as usually depicted, is headed by China, with Russia, Iran and North Korea as members.
Cooperation between these countries has indeed measurably increased over the last half decade. Chinese purchase of Iranian oil to foil Trump's strategy of 'maximum pressure' on Tehran during his first term is one example of this growing operational closeness. Yearly joint naval exercises between the Chinese, Russian and Iranian navies, the role of Iranian Shahed 136 drones and North Korean ground troops in the Ukraine war, the provision of advanced air defence systems by Moscow to Tehran all support this view.
But while the eventual emergence of such an axis may be likely, it is also the case that no such crystallised alliance currently exists.
Russia is bogged down in its own forever war in Ukraine. There are no indications that Moscow supports Tehran's ambition for a nuclear weapon, and still less that Russia would jeopardise its own interests, security or relations with other states in support of this goal. Moscow is a rival but not an enemy to US-aligned Israel, and clearly prefers to maintain this ambiguous status, which brings some benefits.
As for China, while rumours have abounded regarding mysterious Chinese cargo planes reaching Iran in recent days, Beijing's interest in the region and its growing influence depends on stability and relations with all sides. The mood music from China has shifted over the last two years, with increasingly harsh criticism of Israel. Beijing has strongly condemned Jerusalem's pre-emptive action against Iran. But China has also sought to build diplomatic leverage on the basis of strong commercial ties with all major regional powers. It has no interest in involving itself in conflicts.
What all this means is that Iran currently finds itself isolated. Now at war with both Israel and the US, it has no major power interested in fighting alongside it. This is no doubt a matter for concern and consternation on the part of the mullahs. It's a blessing for the rest of us.
So, isolated and faced with attacks by powers enjoying massive technical advantage, what are the options now available to Tehran?
Tehran could, of course, agree to a new nuclear deal which sees the final abandonment of uranium enrichment on Iranian soil. This would represent a historic victory for the US and for Israel. As of now, Tehran may not yet feel that the regime faces existential danger. Short of this, surrender appears unlikely.
If it wants to opt for defiance, Iran has a number of means of possible pressure. It will need to consider carefully, of course, if it wishes to use them, and thus invite further US retribution.
Tehran still has its proxies, even in depleted form. The Houthis are likely to recommence attacks on US flagged vessels on the Gulf of Aden-Red Sea route now.
The Iraqi Shia militias are relatively unscathed from the last 20 months of regional war. The US has bases in Iraq, at Erbil and ain al-Asad. Iran itself or its client militias might attempt missile or drone attacks on these facilities, or on the remaining US presence in northeast Syria.
Theoretically, Tehran could order its once powerful Lebanese Hizballah proxy back into the fray. But to do so would be to risk the final decimation of an organisation that has already been battered by Israel.
US bases throughout the region could potentially be targeted by Iranian missiles. Iran might also seek to hit at US allies in the Gulf, and their oil producing capacity as it did in 2019. But Israeli attacks on launch sites and supply chains throughout Iran in recent days have significantly reduced Iranian capacities in this regard.
Iran could block the Strait of Hormuz, through which one fifth of global petroleum exports are shipped. This is a potent threat, which would cause oil prices to rise. But this would also almost certainly precipitate a full US entry into the war.
Finally, of course, Tehran could accelerate efforts toward the testing of a nuclear weapon.
All these potential courses of action bring with them the likelihood of increased global isolation, and increased US counter measures. These, in turn, would lead to deteriorating internal conditions in the country, which could hit at the regime's legitimacy and stability.
Then again, acceptance of defeat, and surrender might have a similar effect. Supreme Leader Khamenei and his isolated regime have few good options at present. Whichever one they take, they are likely to be privately cursing the memory of their brother and comrade Yahya Sinwar, deceased former Hamas leader, whose decision to launch the massacres in October 2023 has led directly to Tehran's current predicament.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Jacqui Lambie lashes out a Donald Trump in extraordinary rant: 'We don't owe you anything'
Independent Senator Jacqui Lambie has warned that Australia's military should not get involved in any war in the Middle East after the Albanese government backed US military attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. Senator Lambie spoke out after US President Donald Trump 's decision to 'obliterate' Iran 's nuclear facilities on Sunday. Senator Lambie said the military attacks destroyed any trust between the US and Iran, and issued a warning to Trump. 'You just put your shoe in the water there, your toes in the water there, and you're back in that war,' Sen Lambie told Channel Nine's Today show on Monday. 'But what I will say is this - we certainly can't back you up this time, and we don't owe you anything.' Sen Lambie also believes that Australia's military is not 'fit for purpose'. 'It'll be 10 years before this country can commit troops that are fully fit, ready to go,' she said. 'We've got no idea where this is going, we've got no idea where this is going to end up, and on the other side we have Ukraine and Russia still going on.' The Albanese government dramatically shifted its tone on the US strikes on Monday morning. On Sunday, a government spokesperson offered no endorsement of the US decision to target Iranian nuclear facilities, instead calling for 'de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy'. But after the Coalition offered its full support for the 'proactive action', Foreign Minister Penny Wong came out in support of Trump's military intervention. 'The world has agreed Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon. So yes, we support action to prevent that. And that is what this is,' Senator Wong told ABC's News Breakfast. 'The big question is, now what? And Australia says, like so many other countries, we do not want escalation and a full-scale war, and we continue to call for dialogue and diplomacy.' When asked about the legality of the strikes, Senator Wong said: 'I think we are all clear that Iran… cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon. So yes, the government does support action to prevent that.' Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison slammed Albanese for failing to speak publicly in the 24 hours after the US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Shock gas price hike revealed as oil markets are rocked by Trump's Iran strikes - and it's set to get even worse
Gas prices at the pump are expected to rise a further five cents per gallon as the aftershock of US missile strikes in Iran continue to rock the stock market. National average gas prices rose five cents to $3.22 per gallon when Israel struck Iran's nuclear facilities last week, and experts have warned they're due to rise by a similar amount again as a result of Donald Trump 's intervention on Saturday night. Andy Lipow of Lipow Oil Associates told the Daily Mail that further retaliatory strikes from Iran could cause petrol prices in the US to rise to around $3.27 per gallon in the coming days. 'It usually takes about a week or two for the change in oil prices in the futures market to filter into the gasoline price at the pump,' Lipow said on Sunday night. 'Early when the market opened we were seeing futures up about 10 cents a gallon, but it's now only five cents a gallon, while diesel futures are up about 10 cents a gallon. 'Over the next week we expect gasoline prices overall will continue to rise another five to six cents a gallon. Lipow added that 'any retaliatory attacks could impact gas prices further'. GasBuddy expert Patrick De Haan also said on X that he expects gas prices to rise to a maximum of $3.50 per gallon, up from the current national average of $3.22. GasBuddy expert Patrick De Haan said average diesel prices have 'seen their biggest seven-day rise since August, 2023', increasing by 17 cents per gallon He said the average diesel prices have 'seen their biggest seven-day rise since August, 2023', increasing by 17 cents per gallon. The situation could also dramatically worsen if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, the sea passage out of the Persian Gulf which acts as a conduit for at least 20 percent of the world's oil supply. Iran's Parliament voted on Sunday in favor of closing the narrow passage - but the move is yet to be approved by the country's Supreme National Security Council. The final decision hangs in the balance, since closing the strait would also have devastating impacts for Iran's own economy. Donald Trump entered the conflict between Israel and Iran on Saturday night by using American warplanes to target Iranian facilities in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Known as Operation Midnight Hammer, the strike involved more than 125 US military aircraft, along with submarines. Iran has warned that there will be repercussions, and Trump hit back by saying that any retaliation would be met with 'even greater force than what was unleashed today'. The Middle Eastern country launched more missiles on Tel Aviv in Israel on Sunday morning, and Iran's Houthi allies in Yemen also said they would join the retaliation. GasBuddy expert Patrick De Haan also said on X that he expects gas prices to rise to a maximum of $3.50 per gallon, up from the current national average of $3.22 There have already been hundreds of casualties. Iran's health ministry said Israeli strikes killed at least 400 people and injured 3,000, while at least 24 people in Israel have died in missile strikes from Iran. The conflict escalated 10 days ago when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched attacks on Iran's nuclear and military strikes. Israel first warned people in Tehran's District 18, which comprises military buildings and residential neighborhoods, to evacuate. Hours later, the first volley of strikes were reported in the area. Netanyahu said the attacks, called Operation Rising Lion, targeted Iran's nuclear program. 'If not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time,' Netanyahu said. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel 'should anticipate a severe punishment', while its foreign minister called the strikes a 'declaration of war'.
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Anthony Albanese responds to Iran crisis: 'We don't want escalation and a full-scale war'
The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, says the government supports action to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon while underlining the need for a diplomatic end to the Israel-Iran war. 'We continue to call for dialogue and for diplomacy. As I have said for many days now, we are deeply concerned about any escalation in the region and we want to see diplomacy, dialogue and de-escalation,' the PM said. Pushed by reporters on whether Australia was briefed before the US bombed Iran's nuclear site at Fordow and whether Australia provided any military support via US bases in Australia and the region, Albanese told reporters 'we don't talk about intelligence matters', before saying this 'was a unilateral action by the United States'
