Women's jobs are already precarious, and AI may just make it worse
Written by Neha Lodha
The job market is expanding for persons equipped with technical and scientific expertise and skills, particularly in areas such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and other emerging technologies. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology claims, in a recent report, that there will be a market for approximately one million AI professionals in India by next year.
This increase in demand for skilled employment is, however, being outpaced by the increase in automation by AI in entry-level positions and continuously evolving job profiles, leading to an employment crisis. Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei recently warned that AI may eliminate 50 per cent of entry-level white collar jobs in the next five years. The adverse effects are likely to be unevenly distributed across demographic groups, affecting those already facing systemic barriers to workforce participation, such as women.
Automation and structured unemployment
Back in 2013, an Oxford study had indicated that nearly 47 per cent of US jobs were highly susceptible to being eliminated due to automation. As one of the earliest such studies on the future of employment, this report highlighted that there is an 'inverse relationship' between the advancement of technologies and the creation of employment. Since the breakthrough of generative AI in 2023, these projections are slowly becoming reality. The World Economic Forum, in its Report on the Future of AI in 2025, predicts that about 22 per cent of jobs will be disrupted by as early as 2030, and about 40 per cent of the existing jobs will require an entirely new set of skills.
From this data, it is evident that while AI and innovation will enable the creation of new employment opportunities, they may also leave some people unequipped to take up the new jobs or continue in the existing jobs, making them prone to being unemployed cyclically. The consequence is the creation of a scenario of 'structurally lower employment'. The situation is aggravated for women in the workforce, who have traditionally faced a high degree of exclusion from participation in the economic sphere.
Gendered exclusion in employment
International Labour Organisation projections indicate that there has been a consistent 30 per cent gap in labour force participation between men and women since the 1990s. Further, a high proportion of women continue to be employed at administrative or clerical levels across sectors, whereas the higher managerial level jobs are dominated by men. Further, a UNESCO study has revealed that women make up only 35 per cent of STEM graduates, with only 26 per cent working as AI or data science professionals. These numbers indicate a systematic exclusion of women from the workforce and technical education.
Historically, women were excluded from workforce participation due to the gendered division of labour. Under such division, the role of women is primarily relegated to the 'private sphere', involving tasks concentrated around domestic work, which kept them out of the economic sphere. Over time, while women's participation in the public sphere has increased, the impact of initial structural disadvantages, coupled with persistent practices of division of work, has continued to hinder their professional advancement. As a result, a significant proportion of women remain concentrated in administrative and support roles, with limited representation in leadership or managerial positions. Women are also more prone to being forced outside of the workforce because of familial and societal pressures to prioritise child care and household responsibilities over gainful employment. A 2024 study of the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation reveals that women in India spent 201 more minutes a day in unpaid domestic services for household members than their male counterparts.
In addition to the problem of gendered division of labour, women face exclusions from the job market due to deeply entrenched biases. These biases are often perpetuated through politics of essentialisation, which suggest that women are inherently weaker in areas such as science and mathematics. This is then used as a tool to justify their exclusion from STEM fields, to the extent that women are actively discouraged from taking up such jobs.
With the increase in automation and AI-driven job markets, this systematic exclusion of women creates three critical policy problems. First, the changing nature of jobs and job profiles increases the barrier to entry and re-entry of women in the workforce, leading to further exclusion from the workforce. The limited new jobs that are created through automation and innovation largely focus on fields such as AI, computer sciences and software engineering, where women already face a structural disadvantage.
Second, the concentration of women in low-skilled jobs and administrative positions makes them highly susceptible to facing full or partial automation and leads to a downward pressure on their wages. Third, the underrepresentation of women in science and technical fields increases the perpetuation of biases against their scientific skills.
The way forward
In order to address the threats posed by the female workforce, because of the accelerated shift to an AI-driven economy, there is a need for urgent legal and policy interventions. Targeted reskilling and education programmes are required to orient women towards the transitions to new jobs or new job profiles, given the existing disadvantages faced by them. As the government plans new curricula for scientific education, which is oriented towards promoting AI, it should ensure that the gendered stereotypes that are present in the current technological discourse are reduced and greater representation of women in science is promoted. Furthermore, policies on the development of AI and automation should be designed with an inclusive perspective. They should promote advancements not only in capital-intensive sectors but also in products and services that reduce the burden of unpaid domestic work. This approach will help support women's participation in the paid labour market.
Additionally, to provide a safety net for women who may face temporary job losses or require time to acquire new skills, it is essential to consider measures that support income continuity and economic resilience. This may include basic income support for displaced workers and conditional cash transfers linked to undertaking upskilling programmes. Complementary to these efforts, financial instruments designed to promote long-term savings and asset accumulation for women, such as subsidised pension and savings plans, can enhance economic security and reduce dependency.
Furthermore, publicly funded childcare support, flexible work arrangements, and legal safeguards against discriminatory layoffs should be integrated into labour market policies to ensure that women are not disproportionately affected by technological disruption. These measures would not only address immediate vulnerabilities but also contribute to building a more inclusive and resilient future of work for women.
The writer is Senior Resident Fellow, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy. Views expressed are personal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Mondays are for hustle, Fridays for AI: Study reveals why Gen Z wants bots to do the boring stuff
iStock A new Grammarly and Talker Research study reveals that American workers are losing over three hours a week to repetitive tasks, with productivity peaking on Monday mornings and crashing by Friday noon. (Image: iStock) In a revealing new survey by Grammarly, conducted in collaboration with Talker Research, American knowledge workers have offered a striking glimpse into their daily grind—and what they desperately want to leave behind. With productivity peaking at exactly 11 a.m. on Mondays and plunging into a nosedive by Friday at 12:06 p.m., the data shows that the modern office worker may be more reliant on caffeine and coping mechanisms than ever before. But as frustration brews, one thing is becoming crystal clear: artificial intelligence might just be the escape route everyone is hoping for. The survey, which polled 2,000 American employees working in knowledge-based roles, revealed that the average worker faces a barrage of 53 tasks a week that derail their productivity. This task overload adds up to over three and a half hours of 'lost productivity' every single week—a steep cost in time and efficiency. And what are the culprits behind this loss? Repetition and monotony. A staggering 44% of respondents admitted to 'hating' the repetitive aspects of their jobs. The discontent is especially strong among Gen Z employees, with 57% reporting deep dissatisfaction with mundane tasks, compared to just 42% of Gen X workers. Enter AI, not as the job-snatching villain of workplace anxiety, but as the hero workers are actually rooting for. Sixty-two percent of participants said they're eager to use AI for certain tasks, and the enthusiasm is highest among younger employees. What do they want AI to do? The wish list is pragmatic and insightful. Nearly half the respondents (49%) said they want AI tools that are easy to use. Over a third (35%) want help drafting emails, while another third said they'd love AI support for data sorting and meeting note-taking. Simplicity, autonomy, and integration with existing workflows are top priorities—indicating a growing demand for AI solutions that fit seamlessly into daily routines. Heather Breslow, Head of UX and Marketing Research at Grammarly, summed it up: 'By minimizing the tedious tasks that get in the way of true productivity, AI users have time to focus on more meaningful work that requires their judgment, creativity and care.' Despite widespread willingness to embrace AI, the corporate world appears sluggish in response. Only 38% of the surveyed workers said their companies have a clear AI usage policy. Yet half of all respondents—and a whopping 67% of Gen Z workers—wish their workplaces were more proactive in integrating AI tools. This enthusiasm stems from hope, not fear. Sixty-four percent view AI as a career growth opportunity rather than a threat. An overwhelming 76% believe AI will become essential in corporate roles—and they expect that transformation to become reality in just three and a half years. Grammarly's report sounds a clear alarm for employers dragging their feet on digital transformation. As Breslow notes, 'For organizations to stay competitive in a landscape where everyone is harnessing AI, they must actively invest in helping their people use it well.' That means structured upskilling, thoughtful tool integration, and a cultural shift toward creating AI super users—teams empowered not just to adapt, but to thrive in an AI-powered future. Whether it's sorting spreadsheets, drafting meeting notes, or simply eliminating the dread of repetitive clicks, the message from the workforce is unmistakable: Let the bots take the boring stuff. We've got better things to do.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Mondays are for hustle, Fridays for AI: Study reveals why Gen Z wants bots to do the boring stuff
In a revealing new survey by Grammarly, conducted in collaboration with Talker Research, American knowledge workers have offered a striking glimpse into their daily grind—and what they desperately want to leave behind. With productivity peaking at exactly 11 a.m. on Mondays and plunging into a nosedive by Friday at 12:06 p.m., the data shows that the modern office worker may be more reliant on caffeine and coping mechanisms than ever before. But as frustration brews, one thing is becoming crystal clear: artificial intelligence might just be the escape route everyone is hoping for. Too Many Tasks, Too Little Time The survey, which polled 2,000 American employees working in knowledge-based roles, revealed that the average worker faces a barrage of 53 tasks a week that derail their productivity. This task overload adds up to over three and a half hours of 'lost productivity' every single week—a steep cost in time and efficiency. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo And what are the culprits behind this loss? Repetition and monotony. A staggering 44% of respondents admitted to 'hating' the repetitive aspects of their jobs. The discontent is especially strong among Gen Z employees, with 57% reporting deep dissatisfaction with mundane tasks, compared to just 42% of Gen X workers. AI: Not the Enemy, but the Ally Enter AI, not as the job-snatching villain of workplace anxiety, but as the hero workers are actually rooting for. Sixty-two percent of participants said they're eager to use AI for certain tasks, and the enthusiasm is highest among younger employees. You Might Also Like: 'I earned my graduation degree before AI': This one-line reply got the candidate into next interview round What do they want AI to do? The wish list is pragmatic and insightful. Nearly half the respondents (49%) said they want AI tools that are easy to use. Over a third (35%) want help drafting emails, while another third said they'd love AI support for data sorting and meeting note-taking. Simplicity, autonomy, and integration with existing workflows are top priorities—indicating a growing demand for AI solutions that fit seamlessly into daily routines. Heather Breslow, Head of UX and Marketing Research at Grammarly, summed it up: 'By minimizing the tedious tasks that get in the way of true productivity, AI users have time to focus on more meaningful work that requires their judgment, creativity and care.' Policy Lag or Opportunity Lost? Despite widespread willingness to embrace AI, the corporate world appears sluggish in response. Only 38% of the surveyed workers said their companies have a clear AI usage policy. Yet half of all respondents—and a whopping 67% of Gen Z workers—wish their workplaces were more proactive in integrating AI tools. This enthusiasm stems from hope, not fear. Sixty-four percent view AI as a career growth opportunity rather than a threat. An overwhelming 76% believe AI will become essential in corporate roles—and they expect that transformation to become reality in just three and a half years. You Might Also Like: 'They copy-pasted from AI': Tech company offers Rs 20 lakh, can't find a single techie who understands code The Workplace Wake-Up Call Grammarly's report sounds a clear alarm for employers dragging their feet on digital transformation . As Breslow notes, 'For organizations to stay competitive in a landscape where everyone is harnessing AI, they must actively invest in helping their people use it well.' That means structured upskilling, thoughtful tool integration, and a cultural shift toward creating AI super users—teams empowered not just to adapt, but to thrive in an AI-powered future. Whether it's sorting spreadsheets, drafting meeting notes, or simply eliminating the dread of repetitive clicks, the message from the workforce is unmistakable: Let the bots take the boring stuff. We've got better things to do. You Might Also Like: Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Income Tax Return: Are capital gains from MFs taxed differently under new & old regime? What taxpayers should know about new LTCG, STCG rules
Capital gains from sale of mutual funds (MFs) are taxable In India, under both the old and new income tax regimes. (AI image) Income Tax Return Filing AY 2025-26: One important aspect of income tax return filing, apart from reporting income from salary, is also filling in details of any capital gains - short-term or long-term - that you have made during the financial year. If you are wondering whether taxation of capital gains made from mutual funds differs between the new and the old income tax regime, we have you covered. Capital Gains From MFs: How Does Taxation Work? Capital gains from sale of mutual funds (MFs) are taxable In India, under both the old and new income tax regimes. The categorization of the MF, method of computation of capital gains, is not impacted by the choice of the income tax regime by an individual. 'All the deductions available while computing the capital gains, including towards reinvestment in the specified new asset, continue to be equally available under both the new and old income tax regimes,' says Parizad Sirwalla, Partner and Head, Global Mobility Services, Tax, KPMG in India. Also Read | ITR e-filing FY 2024-25: What is the benefit of pre-filled ITR forms on the income tax portal? Top points In general, from a taxability perspective, MFs are broadly categorized into equity MFs and non-equity MFs. There is also a special category of specified MFs within the non-equity MFs. Parizad Sirwalla tells TOI, 'Effective 23 July 2024, gains from sale of equity MFs, if held for more than 12 months, are classified as Long-term (LTCG) and gains (exceeding Rs 1.25 lakh) are taxable at 12.50%. Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) from sale of equity MFs are taxable at 20%.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Gains from sale of non - equity MFs, held for more than 24 months, are considered LTCG and taxable at 12.50%. STCG from sale of non-equity MFs are taxable as per the income tax slab rates. Further, gains from specified MFs are deemed to be STCG irrespective of the holding period and taxable as per the tax slab rates. Applicable surcharge and cess apply on the above tax rates 'The tax slab rates, surcharge rates and applicable rebates, will apply qua the tax regime chosen. The maximum surcharge under the old tax regime is 37% (triggers beyond income of Rs 5 crore) while under the new regime it is restricted to 25% (triggers beyond income of Rs 2 crore). It may be noted that under both tax regimes, surcharge is restricted to 15% on all LTCG and STCG on equity MF,' Parizad Sirwalla adds. Also Read | ITR e-filing AY 2025-25: What is Annual Information Statement (AIS) and how is it different from Form 26AS? Top points for taxpayers Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
