Government capital is not just 'silly money'
Silicon Valley-minded venture capitalists (VCs) around the world tend to blindly criticize government capital for innovation as 'silly money.'
For sure, there has been a global trend to replicate concepts from Silicon Valley with regards to the 'power law' of venture capital, 'move fast, break things' disruption, avoidance of government and the 'fake it until you make it' confidence, among others.
Nothing could be more wrong — especially when Silicon Valley is fundamentally a sui generis culture and ecosystem.
Unlike Silicon Valley's predominantly private-sector-driven ecosystem, many Asian societies exhibit greater risk aversion, necessitating proactive government involvement to stimulate entrepreneurial activity.
Historically, government funding and industrial policy have played a pivotal role in fostering innovation and supporting startups across Asia, starting with Japan, followed by other countries like South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan, among others. And we must not forget that, even in the establishment of the Silicon Valley ecosystem, the U.S. government and military played a big role in the postwar years and the military even laid the foundation for the invention of the internet and the semiconductor chip.
In particular, the commercialization of cutting-edge fundamental research at universities carries high risks and very long gestation periods that could be unpalatable to private-sector players. Further, deep-tech and life-science research from universities are often of strategic interest to governments, particularly from the angles of national security and economic development, which typical investors may not be attracted to.
Indeed, government-backed VCs, including public university VCs are more inclined to invest in early-stage companies, particularly those emerging from academic or research institutions. On the other hand, independent VCs tend to focus on later-stage investments where the risk is lower and the potential for returns is clearer.
This approach often leads to underinvestment in nascent technologies and startups that require more time and support to mature. A study by Iqbal Muhammad and Stephanie Serve analyzing 3,817 firms across nine Asian developing countries from 1991 to 2017 found that government-backed startups were more likely to receive early-stage financing compared to those backed by independent VC firms.
And while government-backed VCs may have a lower likelihood of successful exits compared with independent VCs, which tend to follow more rigorous due diligence processes and market-driven strategies, government-backed startups perform better in the expansion and later stages thanks to early investments aimed at unlocking exponential innovation.
As examples across Asia, Singapore's government actively supports startups through initiatives like the Startup SG Equity program. Last year, an additional $338 million was allocated to this program, increasing the investment cap per startup from $6 million to $9 million. Taiwan's government has invested approximately $211.6 million over five years to support local equipment and materials suppliers in building research and development capabilities.
Meanwhile, mainland China exemplifies a robust government-led approach to innovation. In 2022, tax rebates for corporate R&D reached 1.3 trillion Chinese yuan (approximately $180 billion), marking a 28.8% annual growth rate since 2018. Additionally, in 2025, China launched a 1 trillion yuan ($138 billion) government-backed venture fund targeting emerging technologies like quantum computing and artificial intelligence.
With this context, a key platform to commercialize fundamental research — especially from universities and research institutions — are government-backed university VCs and incubation programs. In the early stage deep-tech space, incubators turn basic research into commercializable ideas and found companies, while university VCs would invest when startups at the seed stage are ready to create products based on their intellectual property and beyond.
In 2022, the Japanese government launched the University Fund of Japan, a ¥10 trillion ($68.5 billion) endowment aimed at revitalizing the nation's research capabilities and fostering innovation. This initiative addresses concerns over declining research performance and aims to position Japanese universities as global leaders in scientific research.
Profits from the investments are distributed to selected universities, with a maximum annual allocation of ¥300 billion ($2 billion). The duration is suitably long for early stage deep-tech investments — the support is structured to continue for up to 25 years, providing long-term financial stability to recipient institutions. Universities are chosen based on their strategies for research excellence and organizational reform. Tohoku University was the first institution selected under this program.
Public university VCs like Kyoto-iCAP (Kyoto University Innovation Capital), where the author works, are also designed to take high risks to commercialize fundamental university research through government funding alongside private-sector limited partners. Its funds, with a capital size of more than $220 million, have a duration of 12 to 15 years to reflect the high risks and long gestation periods. Indeed, according to Global University Venturing, Japan has one of the most advanced university VC ecosystems in Asia — 85% of its top universities have an investment vehicle to support its startups.
Other notable Japanese university VCs are University of Tokyo Edge Capital Partners (UTEC) — which leads the pack with an approximate capital size of $594 million, University of Tokyo Innovation Platform, Osaka University Venture Capital and Tohoku University Venture Partners.
More than 40% of European institutions and more than half of Australian campuses have funds too. In contrast, only about a third of U.S. universities maintain such investment vehicles, which goes back to the U.S. and Silicon Valley having a unique private-sector-dominated ecosystem that is backed by a highly entrepreneurial and risk-taking culture. Some of the successful exits that have emerged from the university VC ecosystem are Kyoto iCAP-funded Cuorips and Chordia Therapeutics, UTEC-funded PeptiDream and Spiber, National University of Singapore-incubated and Temasek-backed VC fund Vertex-funded PatSnap and Oxford Science Enterprises-backed Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Immunocore.
Going forward, especially when deep-tech fields like semiconductors, materials, clean energy, AI and life sciences become more strategically important for Asian societies, further funding from governments and universities are crucial. This can eventually scale the early stage of a deep-tech startup ecosystem and encourage risk-sharing that could attract more private-sector players.
Raymond Woo is the Singapore Office Representative of Kyoto-iCAP (Kyoto University Innovation Capital), Kyoto University's venture capital firm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
22 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Japanese companies offer gifts to boost their ranks of loyal retail investors
More Japanese companies are giving gifts at annual general meetings (AGMs) in a practice that could increase the ranks of loyal retail investors as pressure from activist investors grows. The pickup in gifts, from collectibles to food, has been steady. A survey by Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank showed 11% of firms offered them at AGMs in 2024, up from 4% in 2021. Companies that gave cash vouchers to vote totaled more than 120 last year, five times the level in 2019, an industry group estimated. Companies are seeking to build shareholder support as activists inundate them with an unprecedented number of proposals. Meanwhile, the Tokyo Stock Exchange and the government have called for an improvement of valuations and cuts to close ties with other firms in the form of cross-shareholdings. "The underlying idea is to increase the number of 'fan' shareholders who will hold shares over the long term and vote favorably for management,' said Mizuki Suma, head of the legal & governance team at Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank in Tokyo. "When thinking of who to attract after cross shareholders go, it would be the retail investors, the fans." Dan Castellano, a 51-year-old tech worker who has lived in Tokyo for most of his life, was disappointed when he didn't see any gifts at last month's AGM of Hub, an operator of a British style pub chain. A free T-shirt or other collectible would have been nice, he said. But Castellano said he still has ¥25,000 ($171) worth of Hub gift points that give him a strong incentive to hold its stock. The company offers the points based on the number of shares an investor holds. "I get a Hub card for free drinks, which I basically use to treat my friends and to kind of show off my shareholder status,' said Castellano, a follower of Warren Buffett's strategy of investing in understandable businesses. "I like attaching myself to the company, and being a shareholder is a way to do that.' Retail investors tend to vote in favor of the management, said Kunio Marutani, a researcher Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corporation. Some firms hope that through exercising voting rights, individual shareholders will develop a sense of participation in management and hold shares for the long term, he said. While some analysts point out that focusing on shareholder loyalty could distract management from improving corporate governance, the practice may get first-time equity holders more interested in the company's business. Takahiro Shinozaki, a 30-something construction professional who has attended dozens of AGMs in the past, said the meetings give him a chance to learn more about the companies. Shinozaki said he votes for management 90% of the time. "It's important to promote the right to participate in management decisions through the gift vouchers they provide,' said Shinozaki, who often takes a half-day off to attend AGMs. "The proportion of individual shareholders will increase more and more in the future, and retail investors will have a lot more impact.'
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Japan aims to double number of military aid recipients this year
Thailand, Sri Lanka, Tonga, East Timor and Papua New Guinea are expected to become the newest recipients of Japanese military aid as Tokyo looks to double the number of countries involved in its official security assistance (OSA) program this fiscal year to eight. The Foreign Ministry is currently in discussions with these countries, as well as with earlier recipients Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, a government source told The Japan Times on Monday. The move, the official added, is part of an incremental push to gradually include more countries in the program 'to help maintain stability in the Indo-Pacific region.' It also comes after parliament approved a 60%, or ¥3 billion, year-on-year increase in OSA funding, raising the budget to ¥8 billion ($54.6 million) for fiscal 2025, as Japan seeks to strengthen the security capabilities of 'like-minded' countries amid growing concerns over the regional security environment. The hike in OSA spending was the third straight since the program was launched in 2023 with an initial ¥2 billion budget. The program marked a break with Tokyo's previous policy of avoiding the use of development aid for military purposes. As OSA funds increase, so too will Japan's efforts to boost the number of countries it assists, with those already part of the program expected to receive larger grants going forward, the official added. Asked which types of equipment will be provided this year, the official said this is still being worked out with candidate countries. 'What I can say at this point though is that overall there are growing requests for drones, larger vessels for rescue missions and heavy construction machinery for use in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations,' the official added, without specifying countries. The OSA expansion comes after Fiji recently became the first-ever recipient of equipment provided through the military aid framework. The South Pacific island nation received on May 26 the first of three batches of equipment requested in fiscal 2023, including an underwater camera unit, a rescue boat and a water-rescue training doll. The second batch, which includes a rescue boat, is slated for delivery later this year, as are surveillance drones requested by Malaysia and coastal surveillance radars sought by the Philippines the same year. Next year will see Japan provide the third batch of equipment to Fiji, comprising one rescue and three patrol boats, while Bangladesh is due to receive patrol boats. First announced in December 2022's revised National Security Strategy, OSA has been promoted as an expansion of Japan's foreign aid frameworks, but it is separate from the Foreign Ministry's official development assistance program. It is designed to cover projects 'for the benefit of armed forces and other related organizations.' That said, OSA cannot be used to provide just any military equipment, as the program must also abide by Japan's strict arms export controls. Contracts for OSA projects have so far all gone to Japanese companies, and this is likely to remain the case unless they are unable to provide specific equipment or parts. While the program provides grants for equipment, infrastructure and initial training, maintenance or repair costs must be covered by the partner country. Although not OSA's top priority, there are also hopes that the program could inspire partner nations to eventually purchase Japanese defense products.
Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Japan and South Korea mark 60 years of ties despite lingering tension and political uncertainty
A statue symbolizing a wartime sex slave is displayed near the Japanese Embassy in Seoul, South Korea, on Jan. 8, 2021. (AP Photo) Japan and South Korea are marking the 60th anniversary of the normalization of their diplomatic relations Sunday. The two Asian powers, rivals and neighbors, have often had little to celebrate, much of their rancor linked to Japan's brutal colonial rule of Korea in the early 20th century. Things have gotten better in recent years, but both nations — each a strong ally of the United States — now face political uncertainty and a growing unease about the future of their ties. Here's a look at one of Northeast Asia's most crucial relationships, from both capitals, by two correspondents from The Associated Press. South Korea's new liberal president, Lee Jae Myung, is determined to break sharply from the policies of his disgraced predecessor, Yoon Suk Yeol, who now faces a trial on charges of leading an insurrection over his imposition of martial law in December. Relations with Japan, however, are one area where Lee, who describes himself as a pragmatist in foreign policy, may find himself cautiously building on Yoon's approach. Before his removal from office in April, the conservative former president tried to repair relations with Japan. Yoon wanted to also tighten the countries' three-way security cooperation with Washington to counter North Korean nuclear threats. In 2023, Yoon announced a South Korea-funded compensation plan for colonial-era forced laborers. That decision caused a strong backlash from victims and their supporters, who had demanded direct payments from Japanese companies and a fresh apology from Tokyo. Yoon's outreach boosted tourism and business ties, but there's still lingering resentment in South Korea that Japan failed to reciprocate Seoul's diplomatic concession by addressing historical grievances more sincerely. While advocating for pragmatism and problem-solving in foreign policy, Lee has also long criticized Japan for allegedly clinging to its imperialist past and blamed that for hurting cooperation between the countries. Some experts say the stability of the countries' improved ties could soon be tested, possibly around the Aug. 15 anniversary of Korea's liberation from Japanese colonial rule at the end of World War II, when Lee is expected to publicly address the nation's painful history with Japan. Some in Seoul want Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba to mark the anniversary with a stronger statement of remorse over Japan's wartime past to put bilateral ties on firmer ground. While wartime history will always linger in the background of Seoul-Tokyo relations, Lee and Ishiba may face a more immediate concern: U.S. President Donald Trump's rising tariffs and other America-first trade policies. South Korea's Hankyoreh newspaper in an editorial this week called for South Korea and Japan to 'collaborate immediately' on a joint response to Trump's policies, arguing that the proposed U.S. tariffs on automobiles pose similar threats to both countries' trade-dependent economies. Ishiba, eager to improve ties with Seoul, has acknowledged Japan's wartime aggression and has shown more empathy to Asian victims than his recent predecessors. His first encounter with Lee seemed positive, despite worries in Japan about South Korea's stance under a liberal leader known for attacks on Japan's wartime past. Lee, in that meeting with Ishiba at the G7, likened the two countries to 'neighbors sharing the same front yard' and called for building a future-oriented relationship that moves beyond their 'small differences and disagreements.' Ishiba and Lee agreed to closely communicate and to cooperate on a range of issues, including North Korea's nuclear and missile development. Under a 1965 normalization treaty, Japan provided $500 million in economic assistance to South Korea, saying all wartime compensation issues were settled. However, historical issues including forced labor and sexual abuse of Korean women during the war have disrupted ties over the decades, while South Korea has become an Asian power and a rival to Japan, and while Tokyo, especially during the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe 's rule, has promoted revisionist views. Japan has since offered atonement money twice for the so-called 'comfort women,' an earlier semi-private fund and a second one unilaterally dissolved by former South Korean President Moon Jae-in's liberal government. Things have improved in recent years, and Japan is watching to see whether Lee sticks with his conservative predecessor's more conciliatory diplomacy or returns to the confrontation that marked previous liberal governments. Cooperation between the two sides is 'more essential than ever' to overcome their shared problems such as worsening regional security and Trump's tariffs that have shaken free trade systems, Japan's largest-circulation newspaper Yomiuri said in a recent editorial. At a 60th anniversary reception in Tokyo, Ishiba said that he sees 'a bright future' in the relationship. He expressed hope also for cooperation in 'common challenges' such as low birth rates and declining populations.
