Bitcoin to $1 Million by 2028? Arthur Hayes Says It's Inevitable.
Arthur Hayes, the outspoken co-founder and former CEO of BitMEX, is no stranger to volatility, be it in markets or in politics. But when he predicts that Bitcoin will hit $1 million by 2028, it is a macroeconomic thesis grounded in decades of monetary policy missteps, geopolitical recalibration, and the slow-motion collapse of the fiat system born in 1971.
A System Built On Sand
Hayes sees Bitcoin's price action as a structural response to the erosion of financial sovereignty. When the U.S. decoupled the dollar from gold in 1971, it created a global financial system reliant on credit issuance, massive debt accumulation, and central bank intervention.
'The people who benefited the most are those who issue credit – commercial banks,' Hayes explains. 'And anyone who challenges their dominance tends to fall afoul of regulators.'
From his perspective, Bitcoin's rise is not a random fluke, it's a very clear reaction. A decentralized, scarce, programmable asset stands in stark contrast to the highly centralized, inflationary fiat model.
The Trump Factor And The Strategic Reserve Illusion
Hayes is less impressed by politicians claiming to embrace Bitcoin, especially when it is there to serve a populist narrative. Take President Trump's Executive order on the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve, while the move grabbed headlines and delighted many in the Bitcoin and crypto community, Hayes remains sceptical.
'Governments buy assets for political reasons and sell them for political reasons,' he warns. 'Why tether your financial future to the whim of politics?'
He doesn't see this as actual adoption, but only as a tactical appeal to voters disillusioned by deindustrialization, wage stagnation, and the rise of big finance. Still, the political interest in Bitcoin, no matter how superficial, signals a shift in how governments perceive the role of digital assets in a post-dollar world.
Stablecoins Will Lead, But Bitcoin Will Reclaim The Narrative
In the short term, Hayes argues that stablecoins, particularly USD-backed ones like USDT, will see greater real-world adoption, especially in regions with limited banking access.
'People want dollars, not volatility,' he notes, citing the Middle East, as a major growth market for stablecoins. Afterall, the Arab region's population is only approximately 40% banked according to the ESCWA Annual SDG Review 2025.
But that doesn't mean Bitcoin loses its edge in the stablecoin game. Quite the opposite. Hayes predicts Bitcoin dominance will rise to 70% just before we will see unprecedented price action to $1 million.
Why $1 Million Bitcoin Isn't As Wild As It Sounds
At the heart of Hayes' forecast is one simple principle: the fiat system must inflate or collapse. Either path fuels Bitcoin's rise.
'The amount of money that will need to be printed just to maintain the current economic structure is staggering,' he explains. 'That's what's going to propel Bitcoin.'
Whether or not governments buy Bitcoin is secondary. Their policies of debt expansion, currency debasement, and geopolitical fragmentation will drive more capital into decentralized stores of value.
In other words, Bitcoin doesn't need the Government's buy-in or permission to win. We just let governments do their thing, and this leads to Bitcoin winning.
Beyond Price: A New Financial Era
Hayes' prediction of $1 million isn't rooted in hype. It's based on deep scepticism about the longevity of the current financial order and belief that a decentralized alternative is not only possible but necessary.
'This isn't just about crypto,' Hayes concludes. 'It's about dismantling a system that no longer works and building something better.'
Whether Bitcoin reaches $1 million by 2028 remains to be seen. But the conditions that could make it happen are already here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
5 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Gulf faces nuclear catastrophe if Bushehr is hit, says IAEA
TDT | agencies A military strike on Iran's Bushehr nuclear reactor could unleash a nuclear catastrophe across the Gulf, the UN's nuclear watchdog chief warned, calling for urgent restraint amid spiralling tensions. Even targeting the power lines that supply the facility could trigger a meltdown, said Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 'This would cause a very high release of radioactivity,' Grossi told the UN Security Council, noting that Bushehr contains thousands of kilograms of nuclear material. 'Countries of the region have reached out directly to me in recent hours to express concern,' he added. Grossi warned that the fallout would not stop at Iran's borders. In a worst-case scenario, areas within several hundred kilometres of the site — including major population centres in Gulf Arab states — would face emergency evacuation orders, food restrictions, and the need for iodine distribution to counter radiation exposure. While the IAEA has not detected any radiation leak so far during Israel's ongoing military campaign against Iran, Grossi stressed that Bushehr — the Middle East's first civilian nuclear reactor — remains a high-risk target. He confirmed that, as of now, the site appears to have been spared. Bushehr's construction began in the 1970s under the Western-backed Shah of Iran. German engineers initially led the project, which was later completed and maintained by Russia after the 1990s. Grossi urged all sides to pursue diplomatic solutions, reiterating the IAEA's role in verifying Iran's compliance with non-proliferation commitments. 'We can guarantee, through a watertight inspection system, that nuclear weapons are not being developed in Iran,' he said, offering once again to personally mediate a resolution.
Gulf Insider
9 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
Alarming Fox Report Says Tactical Nukes 'Not Off The Table' For Trump's Iran Response
The Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) has reportedly informed American officials that destroying Iran's heavily fortified Fordow nuclear facility might require the use of a nuclear weapon, based on The Guardian . Officials, briefed on the limitations of the GBU-57 — a 30,000-pound conventional bunker-buster bomb — are worried that even if President Trump give the order it may not be powerful enough to reach and destroy the deeply buried site. The report described that conventional bombs might have to be used to soften the terrain, followed by the dropping of a tactical nuclear weapon from a B-2 stealth bomber. The latest reporting has sought to clarify that President Trump is not considering the nuclear option, nor has it yet to be formally presented to him by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. From fresh 'anonymous' White House statement present contradictory information. So very quickly, here we are … there's prominent public discourse about the 'possibility' or eventual 'necessity' of a nuclear bomb. As the Quincy Institute's Eli Clifton observes: It's disturbing but not surprising how the entire Executive Branch communications apparatus can be activated into total war-hysteria mode seemingly overnight. Israel is urging the US under Trump to target Fordow with whatever it takes, given it lacks the capability to carry out such a strike. But at least it's 'comforting' that a tactical nuke is off the table, for now… or wait: 'none of the options are off the table' – a fresh FOX report claims, citing a senior White House official. Heinrich on Iran: An article stated that Trump was not considering a tactical nuke— that it was not one of the options that was presented to him. I was just told by a top official here that none of that report is true— that none of the options are off the table — Acyn (@Acyn) June 19, 2025 All this is premised on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claim that Iran is in fact pursuing a nuclear weapon. Dangerously the White House seems to be siding with Israeli intelligence over the assessment of the US intelligence community, as presented by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, who may have already been sidelined in White House Situation Room discussions. * * * The Publication Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists are meanwhile warning that it's possible that the Fordow enrichment facility could be destroyed and yet still it won't make the Iranian nuclear threat go away … If the Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear program, started on June 13, is to prove successful in preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons, then a necessary—but not sufficient—step will involve the elimination of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant. At the Fordow plant, located near the city of Qom, the Iranians have enough centrifuges (including IR-6s, their more advanced type) and uranium hexafluoride gas to produce several nuclear weapons. They could probably produce enough weapon-grade (90 percent) enriched uranium for one nuclear weapon within five to six days. Perhaps more important, Fordow itself is a hardened facility, built within a mountain and protected from many forms of attack. It could—in theory—continue to operate even after other nuclear facilities in the country have been destroyed, with its material then fueling nuclear weapons to be produced clandestinely. If Israel decides to continue down the military path against Iran's nuclear program, it has no choice but to ensure that the Fordow enrichment plant no longer poses a threat.
Gulf Insider
10 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group Will Arrive In Mideast Waters This Weekend
The USS Nimitz carrier strike group is en route to Middle East waters and is expected to arrive this weekend, a US official tells Fox news on Friday, after the carrier departed the South China Sea on Monday. This is the latest confirmation that the US Navy will now have two aircraft carriers in the Middle East at the same time. While reports previewed this movement earlier this week, making it no surprise, this is the first revelation of a more precise timeline. As for the prior reporting via military sources, Stars & Stripes stated, 'The aircraft carrier and its strike group left Bremerton, Wash., in March for the Indo-Pacific region for what is expected to be the ship's final deployment. Now, the Nimitz and the warships sailing with it will join the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson in the Middle East, the defense official said. Currently, the USSCarl Vinson is already positioned in the Arabian Sea, while the Navy has also lately confirmed deployment of the carrier USS Gerald R. Ford to the Mediterranean, presumably as 'back-up' – though that mission had long been shechuled. As for the Nimitz, itsis currently underway westbound from the Strait of Malacca. So this will place in total three carriers within reach of the Middle East theatre of operations. Stars & Stripes has recently offered the following background on the last week of the Iran-Israel aerial war: Each carrier strike group typically brings with it one attack submarine, one cruiser and two or more destroyers, in addition to an air wing of F/A-18 Super Hornets and (on some carriers) F-35 Lightning strike fighters. The overall package delivers a powerful land-attack punch, but also enhances regional air defense with a combination of anti-aircraft, anti-drone and anti-ballistic-missile capabilities. Two destroyers operating in Central Command have already been involved in defeating Iranian ballistic missile attacks on Israel over the past week, a Navy official told Norfolk's WAVY. USS The Sullivans and USS Arleigh Burke both expended interceptors over the weekend to shoot down Iranian attacks, the official confirmed. President Trump conveyed via the White House Press Secretary on Thursday afternoon that he will make a decision on striking Iran within the next two weeks. Trump words and 'warning' to Tehran were as follows: 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.'
