Top special forces general Gwyn Jenkins named head of the Royal Navy
Royal Marine Sir Gwyn replaces Admiral Sir Benjamin Key as First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff.
He is the first Royal Marine to be appointed to the role, and he has also been made an aide-de-camp to the King.
The Defence Secretary has confirmed that His Majesty The King has approved the new appointment of General Sir Gwyn Jenkins as First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff.
🔗: https://t.co/kBUcgOekeU pic.twitter.com/GfP9hD0t84
— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) May 15, 2025
In a statement, Sir Gwyn said: 'It is an honour to be selected as the next First Sea Lord.
'I feel extremely privileged to lead the exceptional sailors and marines of the Royal Navy at this pivotal time for UK Defence.
'Throughout my career, I have always been motivated by the vital role the Royal Navy has in keeping our nation safe.
'To do that now, we need to accelerate our return to a war fighting force that is ready for conflict, expand our modernisation efforts and deliver the Royal Navy our nation needs.'
The general had been in line to become the UK's national security adviser until Sir Keir Starmer cancelled the appointment by his predecessor as prime minister, Rishi Sunak.
On Tuesday, BBC Panorama reported claims Sir Gwyn had overseen the rejection of resettlement claims of Afghan commandos who served with UK special forces amid allegations of extra-judicial killings which were subject to a public inquiry.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) told the BBC it was 'fully committed' to supporting the ongoing inquiry and urged anyone with relevant information to come forward.
The department said it was 'not appropriate for the MoD to comment' on allegations explored by the inquiry.
Defence Secretary John Healey said the incoming First Sea Lord was a 'proven leader' as he welcomed him to the role.
'I know he will deliver in this pivotal role, making Britain secure at home and strong abroad,' Mr Healey added.
Chief of the Defence Staff Admiral Sir Tony Radakin said: 'As one of the outstanding Royal Marines of his generation, he brings with him a wealth of operational and organisational expertise.
'His appointment reflects a corps which is bound even more tightly to the way the Royal Navy thinks, operates and fights.'
It is not yet clear when General Sir Gwyn will take up duties as the head of the Royal Navy.
His predecessor, Admiral Sir Ben, stood down earlier than expected, amid an investigation which is understood to be related to a relationship with a female subordinate.
An MoD spokesperson said it would 'inappropriate to comment at this time' due to the ongoing investigation.
The Second Sea Lord, Vice Admiral Sir Martin Connell, is currently in command of the Royal Navy on an interim basis.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
MoD staff lose record number of security passes
Officials at the Ministry of Defence (MoD) have admitted losing a record number of security passes. More than 15,000 passes have been lost over the past five years by MoD employees, while another 1,000 were logged as stolen. It means the passes, which give access to buildings within the nation's defence institutions, are vanishing at the rate of almost 80 every week. Security experts fear the number of AWOL passes could pose a security or terror risk to the nation if they fell into the wrong hands. The revelation comes after pro-Palestinian protesters broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged two military planes on Friday morning. Palestine Action said two of its activists had broken into the Oxfordshire base and sprayed red paint into the engines of two Airbus Voyager aircraft. Friday's incident has led to calls for Palestine Action to become a proscribed terror group in Britain, from high-profile politicians such as Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick, the shadow home secretary. The numbers on missing MoD security passes, obtained under Freedom of Information requests, show the number of passes lost has almost doubled in the space of four years, rising from 2,043 in 2020 to more than 3,830 last year. The number of stolen passes trebled from 82 to 278 over the same period. The figures show there was a dip in reports of missing passes during the pandemic, but the number increased as workers returned to the office. A security industry expert said many organisations have opted for a pass system called 'exchange badging', where the employee only leaves their HQ with a blank plastic card that has no markings to reveal either the staff member or their employer. This unmarked card gains the employee access to their company building, where it is then exchanged for their named access card. The security source said: 'This system is used more frequently now and it has the advantage that if a card is lost outside it is just a blank piece of plastic and the security ramifications are much less.' 'Worrying lack of responsibility' Admiral Lord West of Spithead, the former navy chief, said in 2023 that lost passes were 'not something that should be taken lightly'. He added: 'It is a security risk, but also a terrorist risk.' In June 2021, the MoD suffered an embarrassing security breach when a senior official mistakenly left a stack of sensitive documents at a bus stop in Kent. John O'Connell, the chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'It's ludicrous that thousands of security passes have been lost or stolen by those in the very department meant to keep Britain safe.' Col Philip Ingram, the former army intelligence officer, said: 'What the numbers highlight is a worrying lack of responsibility by employees so there should be consequences if passes are lost – as one has to ask what else is being misplaced. 'However, the loss of passes provides a small risk – to access sensitive areas there are always other checks, whether they be signing into guard rooms or security offices, using digital PIN codes or other means.' A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: 'We treat all breaches of security very seriously and we require all suspected breaches to be reported. All incidents are subjected to an initial security risk assessment, with further action taken on a proportionate basis.'
Telegraph
15 hours ago
- Telegraph
An unarmed Royal Navy warship has just quietly struck a blow for freedom
Freedom of Navigation (FON) is a cornerstone of the international order – and it's one that must be exercised or it can disappear. It's not just a legal principle under the UN Convention on the Law Of the Sea (UNCLOS), but a live issue. Today, nearly every global choke point is under stress. The Red Sea has had Freedom of Navigation (FON) challenged successfully by the Houthis since December 2023. The current uneasy ceasefire there has not restored sufficient confidence for the larger merchant ships to consider routing through there again. The Black Sea was nearly closed after Russia's invasion, until Ukraine's naval ingenuity restored free passage for its grain exports. The Strait of Hormuz is in the telescope today as commentators try and guess if the US is about to get involved in the Iran campaign and what that could mean for FON in the Strait of Hormuz. The Danish Straits and the Northern Sea Route are also now contested in different ways. Meanwhile, in the part of the world many deem the most important, HMS Spey has just conducted a Freedom of Navigation patrol in the Taiwan Strait, the first by the Royal Navy since the 2021 carrier strike group deployment dispatched HMS Richmond through there. HMS Spey, alone, unafraid, and basically unarmed, did the same on Wednesday. This raises a few interesting points. As the British office in Taipei noted after the 2021 patrol: 'Wherever the Royal Navy operates, it does so in full compliance with international law and exercises its right to freedom of navigation and overflight provided by UNCLOS.' Yet China tries to claim that the Taiwan Strait is its own and it has the right to deny passage through it. China also tries to claim that nearly all of the South China Sea belongs to it too. So who is right? From a UK and general international perspective this is an easy one. China's claims have no legal basis whatsoever – as found by the Hague's ruling against them in 2016 invalidating their claim to the 'nine-dash line'. China described the Hague ruling as 'null and void'. As importantly, their actions in the China Sea are repeatedly in breach of normal, professional and disciplined maritime behaviours. Close passes, ramming, fire hoses, lasers and so on are behaviours that you would wish to avoid whether you think you are in your own waters or not. It's all part of a broader attempt to 'normalise illegal' until the international community becomes deaf to it, and then you advance one more step. FONOPs, as conducted by Spey, are part of the counter to this. That she is unarmed is also interesting because it made the inevitable outrage from Chinese state run media look pretty silly. Screaming and yelling at an unarmed patrol boat is not a good look. It doesn't seem like she was shadowed through the transit in the way we do when Russian warships pass the UK. Again this is indicative of Spey not being an actual threat, perhaps. It's also of note that were it not for Taiwan's Foreign Ministry publicly praising the operation, we might not have found out about it at all. 'Do it but don't shout about it' appears to have been our Ministry of Defence's – reasonable – communications posture for this one. What does this mean as our Carrier Strike Group closes on the region? Without the Spey dash, one would have assumed that they would have detached a frigate to do it later this year as per the 2021 playbook. Was this FONOP done to set the conditions and judge the reaction before doing it again with a larger, better armed ship, or is that it for now? The final point is the worth of these unarmed patrol ships. With two in the Indo-Pacific, one in the Mediterranean, one in the Caribbean and one in the Falklands, they have more than paid back the paltry sum it cost to buy them. They are also one of the few remaining bastions of faraway fun left in an overstretched fleet and a good command opportunity for those aspiring to higher rank. In other words, it would be madness to either bring them back to the UK or dispense with them altogether. But it's a sad reflection on the state of Defence, and Defence thinking, that both these options are now likely. In an increasingly unstable world, and with missiles in the air every night, there is a temptation to assume that every naval interaction will result in high-intensity combat. In fact the opposite is true. The vast majority of naval interactions are like this one. Benign, challenging, occasionally threatening (both ways) but ultimately designed to set the conditions to avoid conflict. Spey's contribution, whilst small, is part of this wider picture and her captain and ship's company should be commended for doing it. Without such operations Chinese legal perceptions will become international reality – at which point Freedom of Navigation in this critical part of the world is forever compromised.
The Sun
15 hours ago
- The Sun
Palestine Action ‘to be BANNED' like terror group after they broke into RAF Brize Norton & vandalised 2 planes
PALESTINE Action is set to be "proscribed" and "branded a terror group" by the home secretary in the coming weeks, according to the BBC. Activists from the pro-Palestinian group broke into RAF Brize Norton overnight in a video shared online by members. Now, Yvette Cooper is preparing a written statement before Parliament on Monday - which if passed will make becoming a member of the group illegal, reports the BBC. It will then need to be enacted through new legislation. Proscription is used to ban terror groups in the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the attack as "disgraceful" today. The MoD earlier slammed the "vandalism of Royal Air Force assets" in a scathing statement. Brize Norton is the RAF's largest airbase and home to more than 6,000 military and civilian personnel as well as the UK's largest military aircraft. The MoD has slammed the "vandalism of Royal Air Force assets" in a scathing statement. A spokeswoman for the ministry said: "Our armed forces represent the very best of Britain. "They put their lives on the line for us, and their display of duty, dedication and selfless personal sacrifice are an inspiration to us all. "It is our responsibility to support those who defend us." 1
