Test-Driving The 2025 Dacia Duster Hybrid

2025 Dacia Duster tackling rough terrain
Dacia sold more than 100,000 first and second-generation Dusters in Britain, but the latest third-generation car is even more of a hit. It looks good, has a hybrid powertrain and is affordable, but what's the Dacia Duster like to live with? I spend a week with it to find out.
Almost everything. The new Duster sports chunkier off-road-like bodywork with its plastic trim (made from 20 percent recycled material) and boxy nose.
Like older Dusters, the new car, alongside the Dacia Jogger and Sandero, sits on a Renault-Nissan platform known as the CMF-B LS. Put simply, this means more space, better noise insulation and crash protection.
Dusters of old had spartan interiors, but these were affordable cars after all. This carries across to the new entry-level Duster; it's basic but usable. Mod cons are added from the 'Expression' trim onwards and buyers get 17-inch alloy wheels, a reverse camera, a 7-inch instrument cluster and an infotainment touchscreen.
Similarly, two or four-wheel drive becomes available and buyers can choose from a 130 bhp petrol or a 140 bhp hybrid, the latter is only available with two-wheel drive.
I spent a week with the old TCe 90 car, and while I wanted to enjoy it I just couldn't. It was glacial. The gearbox felt cumbrous and at the end of a trip, the economy meter would show three stars out of three for driving efficiency. A maddening thing, as planting the throttle was the only way it moved.
Luckily, this isn't the case with the latest car. The hybrid, paired to the four-speed automatic gearbox, is a delight. The electric motor provides enough shove at low revs for town driving although this depletes whenever the battery is low.
2025 Dacia Duster over rough terrain
0-to-62mph arrives in a smidge under 10 seconds and although the Duster hybrid doesn't feel particularly quick in gear, there's enough oomph to overtake slower traffic. Likewise, the gearbox swaps cogs smoothly and there's a neat brake regen function which can be enabled or disabled via the gear selector.
The Duster has an SUV-like seating position with plenty of driver seat and steering wheel adjustments. There's also a built-in distance meter, which measures the gap in seconds between you and the car ahead, and information is displayed on the instrument cluster. It comes with heaps of safety tech such as lane-keep assist, traffic sign recognition and speed limit alert. The lane-keep assist and speed warning can be annoying, but this is easily turned off via a button.
At a steady 60mph cruise, the Duster hybrid showed a relatively hush 67db on my sound meter, but wind noise is apparent above 60mph.
Throughout the week, the Duster hybrid returned a 45mpg average through towns, on motorways and backroads with single trip data occasionally showing 54mpg. Dacia claims an official 55.3mpg figure and I believe that's more than achievable.
The shapes used throughout the cabin solidify the Duster's rugged character, but a quick knuckle tap on the various plastics quickly reminds you of its affordability factor. Quality isn't its strong suit and most of its rivals like the Renault Captur and Skoda Kamiq have plusher interiors.
The infotainment screen is easy to use and contains Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, but it can be slow at times.
2025 Dacia Duster interior
Dacia has given the Duster lots of cubby storage: the front and rear door bins are large, and lifting the armrest reveals a deep area ideal for storing a flask. Passengers have generous room too. I'm just under 6ft, and a similarly tall passenger could sit comfortably behind me without any seat adjustment.
Pop the boot, and you'll find a large 430-litre area, complete with a false floor.
Opt for the two-wheel drive non-hybrid car and this increases to 517 litres. Fold the 60/40 seats flat and this rises to a mighty 1,696 litres.
It's good. Really good, and if you're not fussed about mod cons or hybrid tech, one can be sat on your driveway for just £18,850 ($24,388). There are four trims: Essential, Expression, Journey and Extreme. My Journey press car had everything I needed and more while tipping the scales at just £26,700.
Would I buy one? Yes, I would. It's a dog mobile, a people mover and an economy wagon rolled into one. It's the best Duster to date, and you can't get much for £18,850 nowadays, so what's not to love?
Although not direct Dacia Duster competitors, the Nissan Qashqai and Mazda CX-80 PHEV are great family alternatives.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

4 hours ago

• Yahoo

EV tax credits are out in budget bill, but House and Senate clash on how fast to kill key incentive

President Donald Trump is moving forward on his promise to end the $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids, but it's up to Republicans in Congress to decide whether the cutoff date comes at the end of 2026 or much earlier that year. Competing versions of the incentive rollback in the House and Senate are now up for negotiation, with the House version offering to continue the credit for smaller EV and PHEV makers through the end of 2026 while cutting off bigger ones at the end of this year. The provisions are part of proposals for Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill. The Senate version, released from the Finance Committee on June 16, treats all automakers the same by ending the EV tax credit within 180 days of the bill's passage. That proposal would also cut the EV leasing credit immediately for vehicles that don't meet local content rules and in 180 days for those that do. A $7,500 incentive would end this year for automakers that reach a quota of 200,000 electric vehicles or plug-in hybrids sold since 2010 under a House Republican proposal for the Trump administration's budget bill. Those under the cap remain eligible through 2026. S&P Global Mobility registration data from January 2015 to April 2025 gives a rough idea of where automakers stand. Manufacturers are listed as they appear on the IRS page. American Honda(Honda, Acura) 99,347 BMW of North America(BMW, Mini) 343,402 Ford Motor Co.(Ford, Lincoln) 406,786 General Motors(Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, GMC) 468,952 Hyundai Motor America(Hyundai, Genesis) 241,605 JLR(Jaguar, Land Rover) 19,749 Kia America 212,667 Lucid USA 19,991 Maserati North America 21 Mazda Motor America 33,969 McLaren Automotive 946 Mercedes-Benz USA(Mercedes, Smart) 140,194 Mitsubishi Motors North America 27,512 Nissan North America(Nissan, Infiniti) 166,303 Polestar Automotive USA 29,866 Porsche Cars North America 63,766 Rivian Automotive 126,322 Rolls-Royce Motor Cars N.A. 688 Stellantis 457,955 Subaru of America 36,638 Tesla 2,897,522 Toyota Motor Sales(Toyota, Lexus) 361,692 VinFast 5,174 Volvo Car North America 158,068 Volkswagen of America(VW, Audi, Bentley) 259,086 The Senate text suggests that the chamber is taking an even harder line than the House bill passed May 22 in eliminating Biden-era incentives for EVs. The Senate proposal would also end a $4,000 used-vehicle EV tax credit after 90 days. 'I think the Senate version is worse, totally cold turkey, and the lease thing is so important,' said Mike Murphy, a Republican political consultant and CEO of the American EV Jobs Alliance, a pro-EV lobbying group. 'Bottom line is the Senate is really trying to put a stake in the heart of EV subsidies.' While both rollback plans will likely reduce consumer demand and automaker investments by also phasing out credits for battery production, the House version gives some automakers more time to build on their modest EV sales, analysts say. Sign up for the weekly Automotive News Mobility Report newsletter for the latest developments at the intersection of transportation and technology. The House proposal does that by returning to the quota-based program from 2010 to 2022 that phased out the credits once an automaker reached sales of 200,000 electric models, including battery-electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids. With the proposed revival of that mechanism, automakers exceeding that threshold would lose access to the credit Dec. 31 while those still under the cap would have until the end of 2026. The result could be a short-term rush by consumers to take advantage of the tax break, followed by a decline in demand. 'Although some brands may have a longer runway with the House's proposal for discontinuing the EV credits, the cap would eliminate EVs from many of the industry's most popular brands,' said Brent Gruber, executive director at J.D. Power's EV practice. 'The Senate's version may spur EV sales in the short term, but it, like the House's version, ultimately may jeopardize EV adoption.' The current tax credit, signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022 as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, doesn't use quotas. It does impose North American content rules and battery-material requirements, but leased EVs get the credit without having to comply with those rules. EV makers already exceeding 200,000 in U.S. registrations include Tesla, General Motors, Ford Motor Co., Hyundai, Volkswagen, BMW and Stellantis, according to data from S&P Global Mobility that covers the period from January 2015 to April 2025. EV makers who are safely under the quota include startups Rivian Automotive and Lucid Motors, electric vehicle latecomers Honda and Subaru, low-volume brands such as Mazda and Mitsubishi, and sports car manufacturers including Porsche, McLaren and Maserati. The registration data from S&P Global Mobility does not include the years 2010 to 2014 when EV and plug-in hybrid sales were still relatively modest. Ultimately, it would be up to the IRS to determine which automakers would get cut off at the end of this year and which would still be eligible in 2026, analysts said. Also, the House and Senate could negotiate a different set of rules from their original proposals for the EV credit phaseout. In response to questions from Automotive News, Mercedes-Benz said its cumulative EV and PHEV sales in the U.S. were approaching 150,000 as of mid-June. Mercedes said interest in 'sustainable mobility' remains strong, and it will offer a variety of powertrains to meet consumer needs. 'The pace of transformation is determined by market conditions and the needs of our customers,' Mercedes said. 'Into the 2030s, we can flexibly offer vehicles with both fully electric drivetrains and electrified high-tech combustion engines.' Mercedes said it supports 'a more orderly phase out of the existing federal EV incentives,' a stance shared by the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents most automakers selling vehicles in the U.S. According to J.D. Power survey data, a majority of EV buyers cited tax credits and incentives as a key reason for purchasing a new electric vehicle in 2024 and this year. 'For customers of Honda and Volkswagen, on average, the tax credit was the No. 1 purchase reason. For brands like Tesla, Cadillac and Chevrolet, among others, tax credits were amid the top three most influential purchase reasons,' Gruber said. Nissan, an EV pioneer with the Leaf hatchback in 2010, said EV adoption will continue to grow despite the loss of the federal tax credit. 'We anticipate continued growth in the EV market, driven by strong demand and the many benefits that EVs provide,' Nissan said. 'However, we acknowledge that the pace of growth may slow compared to earlier projections.' In addition to targeting the consumer EV tax credit, the Trump administration has taken steps to roll back federal emissions standards and withhold funding for a nationwide charging network. 'If tax credits are abolished, the price competitiveness of BEVs and PHEVs relative to internal combustion engine vehicles is generally expected to decline,' Mazda said. BMW said that a change in the tax credits wouldn't affect its strategy of offering different powertrains for different consumer needs. 'From the start, BMW's strategic approach has been one of 'technology openness,' where we offer our customers the ability to choose the vehicle that best suits their lifestyle — whether that be a highly efficient internal combustion vehicle, plug-in hybrid electric vehicle, or battery electric vehicle," the automaker said. Toyota, which has focused on hybrids over fully electric vehicles, said the loss of the EV and PHEV tax credits would not have a significant impact on its business. 'While there may be a small impact on leases in the short term, the impact to our business will not be substantial,' Toyota said. 'We feel a strong, competitive product with a more robust national charging infrastructure will drive sales when consumers are ready to purchase a BEV.' Some EV fans expect sales to suffer without the tax credit but mostly on lower-cost electric vehicles where the credit allows monthly payments similar to gasoline vehicles and hybrids. Some buyers will still prefer EVs even at a higher price. 'I don't want to say the tax credit had no impact. Clearly it did,' said Loren McDonald, chief analyst at EV consultancy Paren. 'But I've always believed that it was 10 percent, 20 percent maximum of the market where it actually converted people to EVs.' Some EV skeptics welcome the return to a more level playing field where consumers, not government regulations, drive the auto business. 'Once the smoke clears and the incentives clear, I think you'll see a pullback from how much the automakers are investing in this technology and the number of consumers who are buying EVs,' said Karl Brauer, executive analyst at iSeeCars. He said EVs have advantages in refinement, but range and charging limit their appeal. 'I believe that financial viability is supposed to be a cornerstone of capitalism, which is supposed to be the cornerstone of the U.S. economy,' Brauer said. 'You shouldn't have cars that are drastically losing money with no real long-term horizon on when they're going to be profitable.' Hans Greimel, Urvaksh Karkaria, Carly Schaffner and Larry P. Vellequette contributed to this report. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald

8 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Auto review: Massive Nissan Armada trades fire with Detroit mega-utes

FARMINGTON HILLS, Michigan - Where Titan failed, the Armada might break through. Nissan has sent big truck-based warriors with fierce names into battle against Detroit's formidable armies of full-size pickups and mega-utes. The Titan pickup finally waved the red flag after bashing its brains in against endless waves of Detroit 1500, 2500, 3500 and even bigger dually pickups with more technology than a NASA launch site and enough towing power to tow, well, a Titan ballistic missile. Doing battle against the Ford Expedition and Expedition XL looks more feasible. Based on the same truck chassis as the expired Titan, the 2025 Armada has been remade into a state-of-the-art mega-ute matching Ford, Chevy Tahoe and Jeep Wagoneer weapon-for-weapon. Heading onto I-696, I stomped the gas and the new twin-turbo V-6 awoke with a roar. WHAAAUUGGRH! I miss the V-8s Nanny State rules have suffocated, but turbo sixes like Titan, Toyota Sequoia and Wagoneer have character and make the ocean liners fun to drive. More compelling is the tech. Mega-ute land yachts must endure long hours on the road. Nissan has always prioritized comparable seating with its "zero-gravity seats," and Armada's no different with its plush thrones. But Nissan has also stepped up with state-of-the-art, hands-free autopilot like Chevy (Super Cruise) and Ford (Blue Cruse) peers. Nissan calls it Pro Pilot Assist 2.1. Self-driving tech is freaky at first - especially in such a big ocean liner - and Ford and Tesla, for example, smartly offer subscription packages for their systems so you can try 'em out. Try it, you'll like it. Unfortunately, Nissan (like Chevy) requires an expensive, $3,375 leap-of-faith purchase. I toggled the left steering button (nice, raised tabs like a Chevy) and I was hands-free, cruising I-75 with hands on my knees. Tug the left turn signal and Armada switched automatically into the left passing lane. Tug the right signal, and it moved back. Nissan calls such goo-gaws "super powers," and it will impress the kiddies sitting waaaay back in the third row. The roomy third row (I could sit behind myself sitting behind myself) benefits from independent rear suspension technology that allowed for more legroom than the traditional, truck-based solid rear axle that Toyota Sequoia employs and that proved cramped on a trip north a couple of summers back. Nothing makes a trip more tiresome than knees in your chest. Unfortunately, Nissan doesn't offer a panoramic roof - or split roof like the Expedition - to give third row travelers more light. Not does it attempt to compete with the Detroit utes with an extended-cab XL model like Ford and Jeep (or Suburban, in Chevy's case). Such long cabs make up 40% of Chevy's business and came in handy when, for example, I towed a sailboat with the Wagoneer L last summer and fit the entire boom through the middle of the cabin so it didn't rattle around in the boat. Extended cabs are also useful for lots of baggage on, say, ski trips. What Armada does offer is fold-flat seats so you can store big items (think TV screens or stacks of boxed books) when you aren't using all three seat rows. Nissan also keeps up with the Joneses - er, Detroiters - with big, hoodless digital displays that are choked with content and ergonomically sound. While you can outfit Armada with premium trims like the Detroiters, I would recommend starting with the SL model, which offers tech goodies like Pro Pilot and standard Google Built-in. Google Built-in is General Motors Co.'s new secret sauce - an operating system on par with your phone - and Nissan has embraced it as well. "Google, tell me a joke," I barked and Armada chose from a library of dumb one-liners to lighten the trip. More practical is the SL's standard surround-view that coordinates eight cameras so you can dock the big ship with precision. I turned into a cramped Walled Lake gas station and put the cameras to good use. Most impressive is the hood view, which allows you to look right through the hood to place the front wheels where you want them. It helped me miss tall curbs as well as potholes opened up by Michigan's' long winter. 7Pro Pilot Assist package with a head-up display offers further ease of use on the highway. Ring it all up and Armada comes in at 73 grand, a healthy $4,000 cheaper than a comparable Tahoe LT. And with 70 more horsepower on tap from Armada's 425-horse turbo-6, you may not miss the Chevy's throaty 355-horse V-8. But the Ford's flexible subscription price for Blue Cruise is much more affordable (especially if you only use it during, say, summer trips) and Ford's Activ model clocks in at a more affordable $71,900. Oh. Conservatively styled, the Nissan should age well, though it doesn't have the swagger of Motown's hunks - or even the nicely styled Toyota Sequioa. Nissan does offer a tough, armored off-road model called the Pro 4X. Armada has come with big guns blazing so it can trade blows with the Detroit armada. It's a better battleship than the Titan and offers a legitimate alternative to the Detroit Three. 2025 Nissan Armada Vehicle type: Front-engine, rear- and-four-wheel-drive, six- to-seven passenger mega-ute Price: $59,530, including $2,010 destination fee ($81,900 Platinum Reserve as tested) Powerplant: 3.5-liter, twin-turbocharged V-6 Power: 425 horsepower, 516 pound-feet of torque Transmission: Nine-speed automatic Performance: 0-60 mph, 6.1 seconds (Car and Driver); towing, 8,500 pounds Weight: 5,886 pounds (as tested) Fuel economy: EPA est., 16 mpg city/20 highway/18 combined (RWD); 16 mpg city/19 highway/17 combined (AWD); 472-mile range Report card Highs: Roomy in all three rows; tech-tastic features Lows: Meh styling; lacks extended wheelbase model Overall: 4 stars ____ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Yahoo

11 hours ago

• Yahoo

Geely to hold 26.4% stake in Brazilian JV majority-owned by Renault

BEIJING (Reuters) -China's Geely said on Friday it and its parent Geely Holding would take a combined 26.4% stake in a joint venture controlled by its French partner Renault as the two seek to produce and sell cars jointly in Brazil. The two automakers have entered an agreement that would see Renault take 73.57% in the venture that would focus on producing and distributing cars in Brazil under the Renault and Geely brands. It is also due to make and distribute light commercial vehicles under the Renault brand to "attract new customers", according to a filing by Geely Auto. The deal is subject to regulatory approvals, the company said. Geely and Renault first announced their partnership to produce and sell zero- and low-emission vehicles in Brazil in February. The Brazilian partnership builds on the two companies' thermal engine joint venture headquartered in London and their jointly owned manufacturing plant in South Korea.