'I am watching': Trump issues new warning after US strikes on Iran; asks 'everyone' to keep oil prices down

US President Donald Trump
In a fiery post, US President
Donald Trump
on Monday warned "everyone" to keep the prices down or they would play "into the hands of the enemy."
Taking to Truth Social, he wrote, "EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!"
While the US president did not name specific targets of his ire, the message appeared directed at US oil companies and possibly OPEC+ nations, amid renewed global energy jitters. Trump followed up with a pointed demand to the federal government: "To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!"
The post drew raised eyebrows across the energy sector, not least because the department of energy does not directly drill for oil.
US production decisions are made by private companies responding to market forces, not presidential directives.
Markets waver as traders await Iran's response to US strikes
Oil prices and global stock markets seesawed on Monday as traders held their breath for Iran's next move following US airstrikes on its nuclear facilities over the weekend, a strike that has raised fears of a larger regional conflict and potential disruption to global oil supplies.
International crude benchmarks Brent and WTI both surged more than 4 per cent at open, hitting their highest levels since January.
But by midday, gains had pared, and both contracts wobbled near a 0.3 per cent increase as Wall Street opened.
"The big question," Bjarne Schieldrop, chief commodities analyst at SEB Bank, told AFP, "is whether Iran will choose to choke off the Strait of Hormuz or not." He added, however, that current price movement suggests the market sees that risk as "low, for now."
Still, with the Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 20% of global oil supply flows, in potential jeopardy, investor nerves remained raw. Iran, the world's ninth-largest oil producer, exports nearly half of its 3.3 million barrels per day.
Meanwhile, Wall Street stocks edged down, with the S&P 500 slipping 0.1% in early trading. Asian markets closed mixed, while European indices dipped slightly.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

18 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Did he casually use 'N' word? Trump slams Medvedev over Iran nuke comments

US President Donald Trump has hit out at former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for suggesting that some countries may be ready to supply nuclear warheads to Iran in response to recent American airstrikes. In a strongly worded post on Truth Social, Trump said: "Did I hear Former President Medvedev, from Russia, casually throwing around the 'N word' (Nuclear!), and saying that he and other Countries would supply Nuclear Warheads to Iran? Did he really say that or, is it just a figment of my imagination? If he did say that, and, if confirmed, please let me know, IMMEDIATELY," he wrote. "I guess that's why Putin's 'THE BOSS,' he added. Trump also highlighted the technological edge of the United States in nuclear weaponry. He said US nuclear submarines are '20 years advanced over the pack' and expressed gratitude to the submarine crews involved in the recent strikes on Iranian nuclear targets. 'Russia has no intention of supplying nuclear weapons to Iran' Responding to Trump's concern, Medmedev, in a post on X, said, "Regarding President Trump's concerns: I condemn the US strike on Iran – it failed to achieve its objectives. However, Russia has no intention of supplying nuclear weapons to Iran because, unlike Israel, we are parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty." — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) June 23, 2025 He added, "I know quite well what this would entail, having overseen our nuclear forces as president. But other countries might – and that's what was said. And we definitely shouldn't be arguing over who has more nukes. All the more so because the New START treaty, which I once signed with a US president, is still in force — for now. The question is: what comes next?" Strikes failed to damage Iran's nuclear programme: Medvedev The Trump-Medvedev comes after a series of posts by Dmitry Medvedev on X (formerly Twitter), where he claimed that the US-led strikes failed to cause serious harm to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. He argued that the attacks might have strengthened Iran's position and escalated tensions in the Middle East. 'Critical infrastructure of the nuclear fuel cycle appears to have been unaffected or sustained only minor damage. The enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads,' Medvedev wrote. 'US now entangled in new conflict' Medvedev painted a grim picture of the situation in the region: 'Israel is under attack, explosions are rocking the country, and people are panicking. The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon.' In his posts, Medvedev blamed Trump for pushing the US into yet another war and mocked any chances the American president might have had of receiving international recognition for peace efforts. 'Iran's political regime has survived — and in all likelihood, has come out even stronger. The people are rallying around the country's spiritual leadership, including those who were previously indifferent or opposed to it. Donald Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war,' he stated. 'The vast majority of countries around the world oppose the actions of Israel and the United States. At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become. What a way to kick things off, Mr. President. Congratulations!' Medvedev added.

Time of India

24 minutes ago

• Time of India

In meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, NSA Ajit Doval calls for countering terrorism

In an oblique reference to Pakistan's support to cross-border terrorist activities, NSA Ajit Doval on Monday emphasised the need to counter terrorism in all its forms for regional peace and stability during a meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing. Doval's call for countering terrorism comes nearly a month-and-a-half after India carried out precision strikes on nine terror infrastructures in Pakistani territories early on May 7 in response to the horrific Pahalgam terrorist attack that killed 26 civilians. NSA Doval is visiting China to attend a conclave of top national security officials of the member nations of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), an influential regional grouping focused on security related issues. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Upgrade to Lifetime Office 365 (Discover Now) prime software Upgrade Undo Doval and Wang also deliberated on various aspects of India-China relations amid efforts by the two sides to rebuild the ties that came under severe strain following the eastern Ladakh border standoff . Both sides reviewed recent developments in India-China relations and underscored the need to promote the overall development of the ties, including by fostering greater people to people engagement, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said Live Events "The NSA also emphasized the need to counter terrorism in all its forms and manifestations to maintain overall peace and stability in the region," it said. The remarks are also seen as an indirect message to China to put pressure on its all-weather ally Pakistan to take action against terror outfits operating from its soil. Wang noted that China-India relations have made some positive progress and it is essential that both sides further enhance communication, build mutual trust, and work toward resolving practical issues, according to Chinese envoy to India Xu Feihong. "Only when the dragon and elephant dance together can there be a win-win outcome. China and India should properly handle sensitive issues and maintain peace and tranquillity in the border regions," Xu said in a social media post. "Doval said that India is willing to strengthen collaboration with China in multilateral fields and fully supports China's role as the rotating presidency of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in hosting a successful summit," the envoy said. "As two major Asian nations, India and China can make even greater contributions to the international community," he added. The MEA said Doval and Wang also exchanged views on other bilateral, regional and global issues of mutual interest. "The NSA noted that he looked forward to meeting with Wang Yi in India at a mutually convenient date for the 24th round of the Special Representative (SR) talks," it said. China is hosting the SCO conclave in its capacity as the current chair of the grouping. The military standoff in eastern Ladakh began in May 2020 and a deadly clash at the Galwan Valley in June that year resulted in a severe downturn in ties between the two neighbours. The face-off effectively ended following completion of the disengagement process from the last two friction points of Demchok and Depsang under an agreement finalised on October 21 last year. In December, NSA Doval visited Beijing and held talks with Wang under the framework of Special Representatives (SR) dialogue on the boundary dispute. The decision to revive the SR mechanism and other such dialogue formats was taken at a meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Kazan on October 23. The Modi-Xi meeting came two days after India and China firmed up a disengagement pact for Depsang and Demchok.

India Gazette

29 minutes ago

• India Gazette

India-US trade deal to increase US' exports to India: Crisil

New Delhi [India], June 23 (ANI): Given that India has much higher tariffs than those imposed by the US, the impending bilateral trade agreement (BTA) -- that would reduce tariffs-- is set to increase the US's exports to India more than vice versa, according to an analysis by Crisil. India would be able to import more energy products, certain agricultural products, and defence equipment, among others, from the US, Crisil said in a 'Quickonomics' report. India, according to Crisil, should be prepared to see more imports from the US under the bilateral trade agreement (BTA). A lowering of tariffs under the BTA would make US goods more competitive in India, it argued. 'This is because India's tariffs are much higher than those of the US, and bringing these down would be advantageous to exporters in the US,' Crisil said. India's exports, however, are unlikely to see a major spike because the focus of the President Donald Trump administration is to reduce its trade deficit with India, and most of India's top exports to the US are already duty-free (before the application of baseline 10 per cent, which is applicable since April 10). Besides, the export potential would also depend eventually on the amount of tariff India faces when compared with other competing nations, Crisil noted. The US has categorically said that it wants to reduce its trade deficit with India (among other nations) and has complained that India's high tariffs and non-tariff barriers have been a hindrance for American companies looking to increase their exports. Even as India had shown its discomfort in allowing US agriculture products to be exported to India, imports of certain agriculture products such as walnuts, pistachios and cranberries could get a fillip as India's share in US exports of these items was relatively low -- at 19.4 per cent, 5.0 per cent and 3.1 per cent, respectively -- in 2024. This contrasts with almonds, where India's share was a hefty 70.5 per cent in 2024 -- one of the US's top agricultural export items to India. Further, with India's aviation sector growing, there is scope to increase imports of civilian aircraft, engines, and parts. According to Crisil, there also seems to be good complementarity in the energy space as the US is a large exporter and India is a large importer of energy commodities. Even though India has a huge opportunity to import crude oil from the US, Crisil said the prospects of increasing crude oil imports from the US would have to be viewed against challenging factors -- such as higher cost of transportation, including the longer transit time. 'The US is a large exporter and India a large importer of LNG, providing a mutually beneficial ground. Here, the synergy seems to be much better than that in crude petroleum as the US is already among the top three suppliers of LNG to India,' Crisil said. 'With favourable factors such as US natural gas prices being more stable than those in the Middle East (India's largest LNG import partner) and long-term contracts being signed between Indian entities and US suppliers, there has been an increase in the import of this commodity from the US,' it added. Defence imports into India could see a rise under the bilateral trade agreement. 'Even as India is trying to increase its defence production and export capabilities, it remains one of the largest arms importers. At the same time, the US is the world's largest arms exporter. While Russia has been India's largest arms supplier traditionally, its share in India's arms imports has come down in recent years. This has created space for western suppliers, led by the US, to step up their sales,' the report said. In fact, in 2023, the US and India launched a bilateral Defence Acceleration Ecosystem (called INDUS-X) to facilitate defence collaboration between the countries. Combining all these opportunities, India's trade surplus with the US is expected to come down -- a major ask of the US, as it has implemented reciprocal tariffs on countries in proportion to the trade surplus. On the contrary, India may see some gains in exports of smartphones, certain pharmaceuticals and labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and gems and jewellery. The US announced reciprocal tariffs on India and a host of other nations on April 2, and then paused the increase for 90 days from April 10 to negotiate trade deals with these countries (for India, the reciprocal tariff was 26 per cent, lower than the tariff on many other Asian peers). During the pause period, a 10 per cent base tariff remains applicable (over and above the existing tariffs) on all countries, including India. India is negotiating a trade deal with the US, called the bilateral trade agreement (BTA) -- the first tranche of which is targeted to be completed by the fall of 2025. (ANI)