Retail NZ wants 'urgent meeting' with police minister over police shoplifting change
Police Minister Mark Mitchell at a media stand-up after the crime statistics were released on 15 April 2025.
Photo:
RNZ / Marika Khabazi
Retail NZ is seeking an "urgent meeting" with the Police Minister after
RNZ revealed
a police directive to staff said they would no longer be investigating allegations of shoplifting below $500 regardless of lines of inquiry as part of a new nationwide directive.
The directive, sent to staff in March, has sparked confusion about the reality of the situation, with police conceding on Friday that while the wording of the directive "could have been clearer" police would continue to investigate reports if there are avenues of inquiry to explore.
RNZ has seen a directive that was recently sent to staff relating to police's File Management Centre (FMC) titled 'Assignment Changes - Theft and Fraud'.
The directive said that from 26 March the FMC was applying "nationally standardised value thresholds" when assessing theft and fraud files.
The value thresholds are - general theft $200, petrol drive off $150, shoplifting $500, fraud (paywave, online, scam etc) $1000, and all other fraud $500.
"When assessing files with these offences, you will apply the relevant value threshold and file any file under that threshold regardless of any lines of enquiry or IFA score."
Do you know more? Email
sam.sherwood@rnz.co.nz.
The police instructions relating to Case Management define an IFA score as "a numeric value derived from a series of weighted factors which gives an indication of the solvability of the case, based on the presence or absence of certain key lines of enquiry".
Retail NZ advocacy manager Ann-Marie Johnson told RNZ on Monday the organisation was seeking an "urgent meeting" with Police Minister Mark Mitchell to discuss the directive further "and to understand if anything has changed in the police's approach to retail crime".
"In an ideal world, police would have the resources to attend and investigate every report of crime. Unfortunately retailers know this is not the case. Retail NZ has consistently advocated for police to have more resourcing.
"We have also formed a working group comprising a number of large retailers which is developing agreed approaches to crime prevention measures including legislative change and technology like Facial Recognition Technology."
Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young is a member of the Ministerial Advisory Group for the victims of retail crime.
Johnson said Retail NZ recently published a report which identified that 99 percent of respondents, representing more than 1500 stores across New Zealand and online, experienced some form of retail crime or anti-social behaviour. There were more than 140,000 incidents through 2023-24.
"The incidents ranged from credit card fraud and shoplifting through to threatening behaviour, criminal damage and physical assault."
Johnson said about 40 percent of the retail crimes were not reported to police.
"There were a range of reasons why respondents did not report incidents to police, such as low value items not being worth the effort; the retailer discovered the offence too late or dealt with it directly. Some also raised concerns that Police would not do anything."
Retail NZ continued to encourage members to report all crime incidents to the police, regardless of the scale of the offending, Johnson said.
"Our understanding is that all reports of retail crime are sent to the National Retail Investigative Support Unit so that they can track the full extent of retail crime, supporting Police to assign appropriate resources and keep track of repeat offenders."
She said the cost of retail crime was about $2.6 billion a year in New Zealand.
"This cost flows through from retailers to customers to the New Zealand economy, and so is a major brake on the retail sector's contribution to economic growth.
"Every day, retailers are dealing with threatening, violent or simply unpleasant customers, who are trying to steal or damage their property. Almost every retail worker has been affected by crime and aggression which is traumatic for those directly involved and their colleagues. This is a serious health and safety issue for retail employers."
Mitchell declined to comment when approached on Friday. RNZ has requested further comment in response to Retail NZ's statement.
On Friday, police's National Retail Investigation Support Manager Matt Tierney confirmed police was "standardising" its approach to reports of lower-level crime, "ensuring more consistency nationwide" and freeing up frontline staff to focus on "the most significant incidents and prolific offenders."
He said there was no change to the way police assessed and responded to reports of "lower-level crime".
Tierney said that if a 111 call was placed regarding an incident such as shoplifting which had just occurred, and the offender was still there or had only just left, this had always been - and would continue to be prioritised for dispatch by police.
"This means that, pending availability, officers will typically be immediately dispatched. This is regardless of the value of goods taken.
"However, the reality is that police cannot attend every such report right away - but we need people to keep reporting incidents to us, so we continue to have a picture of when and where offending is occurring."
He said the public could be "rest assured" that each report had always been, and would continue to be, assessed on its individual merits.
"Reports through 105, or Auror, where there is clear accompanying evidence to support a potential prosecution - CCTV, for example - will continue to be forwarded to Districts for further follow-up.
"However, if there is no provided or potential further evidence to support a report below a certain threshold, the possible lines of enquiry are limited - meaning that unless further supporting evidence comes to light, no further action can be taken."
Tierney said police knew it was "likely to be frustrating for victims" if police cannot progress their report.
"We would continue to urge people to report all offending, no matter how low-level. It is this information that allows us to track patterns, and link offences together - potentially leading to significant prosecutions.
"Police's focus is on holding the most harmful retail offenders to account, meaning those who are undertaking brazen and dangerous retail offending, such as aggravated robbery."
Further pressed on the directive by RNZ's Checkpoint, Tierney said the value of the crime did not change the way that police investigate.
Asked what police would do if the offender had left the scene after stealing $450 worth of goods and police were called, Tierney said it depended on the level of evidence available.
He said the examples given in the directive would be "investigated as part of a wider investigation" into offenders when police are "looking at the offender as a whole".
Tierney said the document seen by RNZ was not his document and that it was an internal email sent out by another senior police officer.
Asked if police's position had changed since the directive was sent out, he said it had not.
"But it needs to be read and understood in its entirety. You're focusing on the value that's not the whole entirety of the email."
Asked what the purpose of supplying the dollar values was, he said Checkpoint would have to ask the author of the report.
Tierney said police would be seeking prosecutions on files below the financial levels.
He said the directive had been "taken out of context and possibly misunderstood".
"Police will 100 percent investigate crimes, irrespective of value."
"I can assure the New Zealand public that that person will be prosecuted and put before the courts. There's no change in that at all. Whether they're arrested on site or arrested later after the fact, and it could be, you know, up to a year after the fact, they'll still be held to account for whatever that value is."
He said he had only been made aware of the email after RNZ made inquiries.
"There's multiple 1000s of emails that go through police every day. I'm not privy to all of them, so it's not unusual, but it's good that it has come through, and we can seek clarification and we can explain how we can explain our point."
In response to further questions a police spokesperson said while the wording of the directive RNZ had seen "could have been clearer", it must not be considered in isolation.
"There have been a number of conversations and discussions around getting this to a nationally-consistent place.
"This is more of a back-channel streamlining of initial report assessment - practically speaking, the public can be reassured that if there is something for police to follow-up with, we will do so."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Meth worth $8 million seized after drug smuggling operation
The methamphetamine had a street value of more than $8 million. Photo: Supplied / NZ Police Police have arrested four men accused of being in a Wellington-based drug syndicate, seizing 23 kilograms of methamphetamine with a street value of more than $8 million. Police said over the past month a joint operation with Customs - Operation Armani - identified a group they said were smuggling significant amounts of drugs into New Zealand over a number of months. More than 1000 MDMA pills, with a street value of $50,000, was also seized. Police also located a loaded pistol and ammunition. Last week the National Organised Crime Group, Customs, district investigators and specialist support groups carried out a number of search warrants across the Wellington district. Four men, aged 26 to 30 faced charges for the import and supply of methamphetamine, and possession for supply of cocaine, MDMA and cannabis. More than 1000 MDMA pills were seized. Photo: Supplied / NZ Police They have appeared in the Lower Hutt and Wellington District Courts. "This is an enormous amount of serious harm being peddled into our communities - with these suppliers giving no conscious thought to the impact on those they are supplying to," Detective Inspector Darrin Thomson said. "This investigation demonstrates how the excellent work of frontline Customs officers combined with the collaborative efforts of our Police partners is protecting our communities from the scourge of illicit drugs,"Acting Customs investigations manager Matt Green said. The investigation is ongoing.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Teens arrested after aggravated robbery, fleeing in stolen car in Auckland
Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER A 14-year-old and a 16-year-old have been arrested following an aggravated robbery in Auckland's suburb of New Lynn on Monday morning. The police said one of them was armed with a knife when they entered a convenience store on Parker Avenue about 8.30am. They reportedly stole the till before fleeing in a stolen car. The pair were arrested after police found the stolen vehicle nearby. They will be appearing in the Waitākere Youth Court. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Crown alleges woman killed mother after buying ballet tickets
By Kate Green of RNZ A Crown prosecutor has told a court Wellington woman Julia DeLuney violently attacked her mother, leaving her dead or dying, in January last year. A post-mortem found Khandallah resident Helen Gregory, aged 79, died from complications of blunt force trauma, with 12 lacerations to her head and three skull fractures. Her daughter DeLuney is charged with murder, to which she has pleaded not guilty, with her trial opening Monday morning in the High Court in Wellington. Crown prosecutor Nicole Jamieson told the court that on the evening of 24 January, DeLuney visited her mother to book tickets to the ballet. But sometime between 8.16pm - when DeLuney's email address received confirmation of the ticket purchase - and 9.45pm when she left the address, the Crown said she violently attacked her mother and then staged the scene to make it look like she had suffered a fall. But DeLuney's defence lawyers said the police investigation had suffered from tunnel vision, and failed to consider that someone else killed Gregory. The Crown's case Jamieson laid out the case for the jurors. Allegedly, DeLuney organised a visit with her mother via email, with the purpose of booking tickets to the ballet. She arrived a little after 6pm. Jamieson said phone records showed DeLuney messaged her husband on Facebook around 7.20pm, to say they were looking through her mother's clothes, and sent a photo of them together in the wardrobe. DeLuney's email account received a Ticketmaster confirmation of purchase for tickets to the ballet, and then at 8.16pm, DeLuney messaged her husband to say they were having dinner. She left at 9.45pm. It is in this window that the Crown alleged DeLuney attacked her mother, leaving her fatally injured. She said it was the Crown's understanding that DeLuney was experiencing financial difficulty, involved in trading cryptocurrency, and had recently received $15,000 from her mother to invest, which the Crown said it appeared she used instead to pay off her own debt. Jamieson said later evidence would show the possibility that Gregory was attacked using a vase which normally stood on the bedside table. DeLuney then drove home, stopped at a Mobil station, and then picked up her husband before returning to the Baroda St address. Her husband began performing CPR and an ambulance was called, but first responders were not successful, and Gregory was pronounced dead at 11.45pm. Jamieson said the case would be "an issue of identity". "Who killed Ms Gregory? And that is because Ms DeLuney denies it was her." She said in DeLuney's version of events, her mother went to put toilet roll in the attic and fell. At that stage, her injuries were not "significant". DeLuney put her in a bedroom and left her to go and pick up her husband to help, and when they returned, they found blood and significant injuries. According to Jamieson: "The Crown says that what Ms DeLuney told the police is not the truth." The case in defence Defence lawyer Quentin Duff told the jury the police investigation had failed to consider that someone else might have killed Gregory. He said from the very beginning, the "rot of tunnel vision" had excluded DeLuney's "honest, if not perfect explanation" of the evening, and the case had "developed a contagious case of tunnel vision", which excluded the most obvious explanation - that someone else had killed her. He said later evidence would show Gregory's phone ascending one floor into the attic at 9.30pm. He asserted that between 9.30pm and 10pm, a neighbour told police someone had knocked on their door, and when they went to investigate, nobody was there, introducing the possibility of a third person to the evening. The Crown began calling witnesses on Monday afternoon. The trial is expected to go for up to five weeks, and there are set to be more than 80 witnesses called in total.
